Abstract
In this study, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed under the air environment for four different heating rates (10, 20, 30, and 40 °C min−1) in order to find out thermal degradation and mechanisms of the chicken manure, a Turkish lignite, and their blends (25 lignite + 75 manure, 50 lignite + 50 manure, and 75 lignite + 25 manure). To calculate thermal kinetics and responsible solid-state mechanisms of the samples, the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Coats-Redfern methods were applied. Significant differences between Turkish lignite and chicken manure samples were observed in terms of thermal kinetics and mechanisms. D1 and D4 mechanisms were found to be the responsible mechanisms for the main oxidation region of the lignite and chicken manure/blends, respectively. A similar decreasing trend for the calculated activation energies and pre-exponential constants was observed with increasing biomass content in the manure blends from 25 to 75% by both Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Coats-Redfern methods. Furthermore, biomass content has an effect on the mechanisms of chicken manure blends during the combustion. D3 was found to be the responsible solid-state mechanism for the third regions (pre-combustion of the manure) of the chicken manure samples. However, D1 and D2 mechanisms were found to be responsible mechanisms for the blends.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from TÜBİTAK but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of TÜBİTAK.
References
Aboulkas A, El Harfi K (2008) Study of the kinetics and mechanisms of thermal decomposition of Moroccan Tarfaya oil shale and its kerogen. Oil Shale 25(4):426–443
Aich S, Nandi BK, Bhattacharya S (2019) Utilization of sal leaves and sal leaves char to improve the combustion performance of reject coal. Energy Sour Part A Recover Util Environ Effects 41:2299–2312
Aich S, Behera D, Nandi BK, Bhattacharya S (2020) Relationship between proximate analysis parameters and combustion behaviour of high ash Indian coal. I J Coal Sci Technol 7(4):766–777
Alvarez VA, Vázquez A (2004) Thermal degradation of cellulose derivatives/starch blends and sisal fibre biocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 84(1):13–21
Asensio MO, Yildirim M, Senberber FT, Kipcak AS, Derun E (2016) Thermal dehydration kinetics and characterization of synthesized potassium borates. Res Chem Intermed 42(5):4859–4878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2326-5
Barbieri CCT, Osório E, Vilela ACF (2016) Combustibility and reactivity of coal blends and charcoal fines aiming use in ironmaking. Mater Res 19(3):594–601
Bioenergy (2020) Biomass co-firing, an efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, European Networks, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2003_cofiring_eu_bionet.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2020
Çetinkaya S, Yürüm Y (2000) Oxidative pyrolysis of Turkish lignites in air up to 500 C. Fuel Process Technol 67(3):177–189
Cimò G, Kucerik J, Berns AE, Schaumann GE, Alonzo G, Conte P (2014) Effect of heating time and temperature on the chemical characteristics of biochar from poultry manure. J Agric Food Chem 62(8):1912–1918
Cong K, Zhang Y, Han F, Li Q (2019) Influence of particle sizes on combustion characteristics of coal particles in oxygen-deficient atmosphere. Energy 170:840–848
Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi R, Abbasi MH (2008) Evaluation of reliability of Coats-Redfern method for kinetic analysis of non-isothermal TGA. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 18(1):217–221
Enweremadu CC, Ojediran O (2004) Evaluation of energy potential in husks from soy-bean and cowpea. Sci Focus 8:18–23
Fernandez-Lopez M, Pedrosa-Castro GJ, Valverde JL, Sanchez-Silva L (2016) Kinetic analysis of manure pyrolysis and combustion processes. Waste Manag 58:230–240
Flores JJA, Quiñones JGR, Rodríguez MLÁ, Vera JVA, Valencia JE, Martínez SJG, Montesino FM, Rosas AA (2020) Thermal degradation kinetics and FT-IR analysis on the pyrolysis of Pinus pseudostrobus. Pinus leiophylla and Pinus montezumae as forest waste in Western Mexico. Energies 13(4):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040969
Florin NH, Maddocks AR, Wood S, Harris AT (2009) High-temperature thermal destruction of poultry derived wastes for energy recovery in Australia. Waste Manag 29:1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.10.002
Font-Palma C (2012) Characterisation, kinetics and modelling of gasification of poultry manure and litter: an overview. Energy Convers Manage 53(1):92–98
Ge J, Wang RQ, Liu L (2016) Study on the thermal degradation kinetics of the common wooden boards. Procedia Eng 135:72–82
Giuntoli J, De Jong W, Arvelakis S, Spliethoff H, Verkooijen AHM (2009) Quantitative and kinetic TG-FTIR study of biomass residue pyrolysis: dry distiller’s grains with solubles (DDGS) and chicken manure. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85(1-2):301–312
Hadroug S, Jellali S, Leahy JJ, Kwapinska M, Jeguirim M, Hamdi H, Kwapinski W (2019) Pyrolysis process as a sustainable management option of poultry manure: characterization of the derived biochars and assessment of their nutrient release capacities. Water 11(11):2271
Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S (2008) Effect of co-combustion on the burnout of lignite/biomass blends: a Turkish case study. Waste Manag 28:2077–2084
Hussein MH (2016) Experimental investigation of chicken manure pyrolysis and gasification. Theses and Dissertations. 1376, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
İnaner H, Nakoman E (1997) Turkish lignite deposits. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 125(1):77–99
Kebelmann K, Hornung A, Karsten U, Griffiths G (2013) Intermediate pyrolysis and product identification by TGA and Py-GC/MS of green microalgae and their extracted protein and lipid components. Biomass Bioenergy 49:38–48
Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan AM, O’dwyer TF, Sutton D, Leahy MJ (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology—a review. Bioresor Technol 83:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X
Kim SS, Agblevor FA (2007) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of chicken litter. Waste Manag 27(1):135–140
Kirubakaran V, Sivaramakrishnan V, Premalatha M, Subramanian P (2007) Kinetics of auto-gasification of poultry litter. Int J Green Energy 4(5):519–534
Koppejan J, Van Loo S (2012) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Routledge, Abingdon, UK
Li J, Paul MC, Czajka KM (2016) Studies of ignition behavior of biomass particles in a down-fire reactor for improving co-firing performance. Energy Fuel 30(7):5870–5877
Liu X, Chen M, Wei Y (2015) Kinetics based on two-stage scheme for co-combustion of herbaceous biomass and bituminous coal. Fuel 143:577–585
Loison R, Foch P, Boyer A (1989) Coke quality and production. Butterworths, Paris
Magalhaes D, Kazanç F, Riaza J, Erensoy S, Kabaklı Ö, Chalmers H (2017) Combustion of Turkish lignites and olive residue: experiments and kinetic modelling. Fuel 203:868–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.050
Mansor AM, Lim JS, Ani FN, Hashim H, Ho WS (2018) Ultimate and proximate analysis of Malaysia pineapple biomass from MD2 cultivar for biofuel application. Chem Eng Trans 63:127–132. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863022
Mante NOD (2008) Influence of wood on the pyrolysis of poultry litter, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech
Miller B (2013) Fuel considerations and burner design for ultra-supercritical power plants. In: Zhang D (ed) Ultra-supercritical coal power plants. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. Woodhead Publishing, pp 57–80
Özdemir S, Sezer B (2013) Utilization of poultry wastes as organic fertilizers and biofuels. Poultry Res J 10:20–24 (in Turkish)
Pitta CSR, Adami PF, Pelissari A, Assmann TS, Franchin MF, Cassol LC, Sartor LR (2012) Year-round poultry litter decomposition and N, P, K and Ca release. Rev Bra Cienc Solo 36(3):1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000300034
Qiao Y, Wang B, Ji Y, Xu ZP, Zhang J, Tian Y (2019) Thermal decomposition of castor oil, corn starch, soy protein, lignin, xylan, and cellulose during fast pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 278:287–295
Sahu SG, Sarkar P, Chakrabort N, Adak AK (2010) Thermogravimetric assessment of combustion characteristics of blends of a coal with different biomass chars. Fuel Process Technol 91(3):369–378
SGB (2019) Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2018 Annual Report, Ankara, Turkey. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/Bakanl%C4%B1k_Faaliyet_Raporlar%C4%B1/2018%20FAAL%C4%B0YET%20RAPORU.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2020
Shao Y, Wang J, Preto F, Zhu J, Xu C (2012) Ash deposition in biomass combustion or co-firing for power/heat generation. Energies 5(12):5171–5189
Sharara MA (2015) Transformation of swine manure and algal consortia to value-added products, Theses and Dissertations, 1034, University of Arkansas
Singh G, Shamsuddin MR, Lim SW (2018) Characterization of chicken manure from manjung region. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 458(1):012084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/458/1/012084
Sommer SG, Olesen JE, Petersen SO, Weisbjerg MR, Valli L, Rodhe L, Béline F (2009) Region-specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones. Glob Chang Biol 15(12):2825–2837
Tibola FL, de Oliveira TJ, Cerqueira D, Ataíde CH, Cardoso CR (2020) Kinetic parameters study for the slow pyrolysis of coffee residues based on thermogravimetric analysis. Quím Nova 43(4):426–434
Toptas A, Yildirim Y, Duman G, Yanik J (2015) Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour Technol 177:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.072
Tu D, Dong H, Shang B (2009) Pyrolysis behavior of selected manures using TG-FTIR techniques. In: Livestock Environment VIII, 31 August–4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, Brazil. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, p 30. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25501
Uzun H, Yildiz Z, Ceylan S (2019) Fast pyrolysis of biomass mixtures in a fixed bed reactor: Characterization of bio-oil product. Environ Res Technol 2(1):1–5
Vamvuka D, Sfakiotakis S, Panopoulos KD (2013) An experimental study on the thermal valorization of municipal and animal wastes. Int J Energy Environ 4(2):191–198
Vries T (2017) Pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading of poultry litter to produce chemicals. Dissertation, Wageningen UR
Wang HY, Zhang JL, Wang GW, Xu RS, Zhang PC, Liu SY (2016) Characteristics and kinetic analysis of co-combustion of brown coal and anthracite. J Therm Anal Calorim 126(2):447–454
Waters CL, Janupala RR, Mallinson RG, Lobban LL (2017) Staged thermal fractionation for segregation of lignin and cellulose pyrolysis products: an experimental study of residence time and temperature effects. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 126:380–389
Whitely N, Ozao R, Cao Y, Pan WP (2006) Multi-utilization of chicken litter as a biomass source. Part II. Pyrolysis. Energy Fuel 20:2666–2671
Wu H (2013) Biomass gasification: an alternative solution to animal waste management. Biological Systems Engineering-Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research. 34
Xu Y, Chen B (2013) Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol 146:485–493
Yousefzad Farrokhi F, Kazanç F (2018) Combustion behavior and kinetics of Turkish lignite blended with biomass/magnesite dust. J Energy Eng 144(6):04018064
Yu D, Chen M, Wei Y, Niu S, Xue F (2016) An assessment on co-combustion characteristics of Chinese lignite and eucalyptus bark with TG-MS technique. Powder Technol 294:463–471
Yurdakul S (2016) Determination of co-combustion properties and thermal kinetics of poultry litter/coal blends using thermogravimetry. Renew Energy 89:215–223
Zevenhoven-Onderwater M (2001) Ash-forming matter in biomass fuels. Dissertation, Åbo Akademi University
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TÜBİTAK) with a project number 218M440. The thermogravimetric analysis was carried out with this support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SY analyzed and interpreted the TG data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. BG supplied the chicken manure and lignite samples and also analyzed the data. MV and HG helped interpretation of the data. KK contributed in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yurdakul, S., Gürel, B., Varol, M. et al. Investigation on thermal degradation kinetics and mechanisms of chicken manure, lignite, and their blends by TGA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 63894–63904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12732-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12732-0