Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on thermal degradation kinetics and mechanisms of chicken manure, lignite, and their blends by TGA

  • Research in Environmental Planning and Management
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed under the air environment for four different heating rates (10, 20, 30, and 40 °C min−1) in order to find out thermal degradation and mechanisms of the chicken manure, a Turkish lignite, and their blends (25 lignite + 75 manure, 50 lignite + 50 manure, and 75 lignite + 25 manure). To calculate thermal kinetics and responsible solid-state mechanisms of the samples, the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Coats-Redfern methods were applied. Significant differences between Turkish lignite and chicken manure samples were observed in terms of thermal kinetics and mechanisms. D1 and D4 mechanisms were found to be the responsible mechanisms for the main oxidation region of the lignite and chicken manure/blends, respectively. A similar decreasing trend for the calculated activation energies and pre-exponential constants was observed with increasing biomass content in the manure blends from 25 to 75% by both Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Coats-Redfern methods. Furthermore, biomass content has an effect on the mechanisms of chicken manure blends during the combustion. D3 was found to be the responsible solid-state mechanism for the third regions (pre-combustion of the manure) of the chicken manure samples. However, D1 and D2 mechanisms were found to be responsible mechanisms for the blends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from TÜBİTAK but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of TÜBİTAK.

References

  • Aboulkas A, El Harfi K (2008) Study of the kinetics and mechanisms of thermal decomposition of Moroccan Tarfaya oil shale and its kerogen. Oil Shale 25(4):426–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aich S, Nandi BK, Bhattacharya S (2019) Utilization of sal leaves and sal leaves char to improve the combustion performance of reject coal. Energy Sour Part A Recover Util Environ Effects 41:2299–2312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aich S, Behera D, Nandi BK, Bhattacharya S (2020) Relationship between proximate analysis parameters and combustion behaviour of high ash Indian coal. I J Coal Sci Technol 7(4):766–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez VA, Vázquez A (2004) Thermal degradation of cellulose derivatives/starch blends and sisal fibre biocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 84(1):13–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asensio MO, Yildirim M, Senberber FT, Kipcak AS, Derun E (2016) Thermal dehydration kinetics and characterization of synthesized potassium borates. Res Chem Intermed 42(5):4859–4878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2326-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri CCT, Osório E, Vilela ACF (2016) Combustibility and reactivity of coal blends and charcoal fines aiming use in ironmaking. Mater Res 19(3):594–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bioenergy (2020) Biomass co-firing, an efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, European Networks, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2003_cofiring_eu_bionet.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2020

  • Çetinkaya S, Yürüm Y (2000) Oxidative pyrolysis of Turkish lignites in air up to 500 C. Fuel Process Technol 67(3):177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimò G, Kucerik J, Berns AE, Schaumann GE, Alonzo G, Conte P (2014) Effect of heating time and temperature on the chemical characteristics of biochar from poultry manure. J Agric Food Chem 62(8):1912–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cong K, Zhang Y, Han F, Li Q (2019) Influence of particle sizes on combustion characteristics of coal particles in oxygen-deficient atmosphere. Energy 170:840–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi R, Abbasi MH (2008) Evaluation of reliability of Coats-Redfern method for kinetic analysis of non-isothermal TGA. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 18(1):217–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enweremadu CC, Ojediran O (2004) Evaluation of energy potential in husks from soy-bean and cowpea. Sci Focus 8:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Lopez M, Pedrosa-Castro GJ, Valverde JL, Sanchez-Silva L (2016) Kinetic analysis of manure pyrolysis and combustion processes. Waste Manag 58:230–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flores JJA, Quiñones JGR, Rodríguez MLÁ, Vera JVA, Valencia JE, Martínez SJG, Montesino FM, Rosas AA (2020) Thermal degradation kinetics and FT-IR analysis on the pyrolysis of Pinus pseudostrobus. Pinus leiophylla and Pinus montezumae as forest waste in Western Mexico. Energies 13(4):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florin NH, Maddocks AR, Wood S, Harris AT (2009) High-temperature thermal destruction of poultry derived wastes for energy recovery in Australia. Waste Manag 29:1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.10.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Font-Palma C (2012) Characterisation, kinetics and modelling of gasification of poultry manure and litter: an overview. Energy Convers Manage 53(1):92–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge J, Wang RQ, Liu L (2016) Study on the thermal degradation kinetics of the common wooden boards. Procedia Eng 135:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuntoli J, De Jong W, Arvelakis S, Spliethoff H, Verkooijen AHM (2009) Quantitative and kinetic TG-FTIR study of biomass residue pyrolysis: dry distiller’s grains with solubles (DDGS) and chicken manure. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85(1-2):301–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadroug S, Jellali S, Leahy JJ, Kwapinska M, Jeguirim M, Hamdi H, Kwapinski W (2019) Pyrolysis process as a sustainable management option of poultry manure: characterization of the derived biochars and assessment of their nutrient release capacities. Water 11(11):2271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S (2008) Effect of co-combustion on the burnout of lignite/biomass blends: a Turkish case study. Waste Manag 28:2077–2084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein MH (2016) Experimental investigation of chicken manure pyrolysis and gasification. Theses and Dissertations. 1376, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

  • İnaner H, Nakoman E (1997) Turkish lignite deposits. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 125(1):77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebelmann K, Hornung A, Karsten U, Griffiths G (2013) Intermediate pyrolysis and product identification by TGA and Py-GC/MS of green microalgae and their extracted protein and lipid components. Biomass Bioenergy 49:38–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan AM, O’dwyer TF, Sutton D, Leahy MJ (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology—a review. Bioresor Technol 83:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SS, Agblevor FA (2007) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of chicken litter. Waste Manag 27(1):135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirubakaran V, Sivaramakrishnan V, Premalatha M, Subramanian P (2007) Kinetics of auto-gasification of poultry litter. Int J Green Energy 4(5):519–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koppejan J, Van Loo S (2012) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Routledge, Abingdon, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Paul MC, Czajka KM (2016) Studies of ignition behavior of biomass particles in a down-fire reactor for improving co-firing performance. Energy Fuel 30(7):5870–5877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Chen M, Wei Y (2015) Kinetics based on two-stage scheme for co-combustion of herbaceous biomass and bituminous coal. Fuel 143:577–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loison R, Foch P, Boyer A (1989) Coke quality and production. Butterworths, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes D, Kazanç F, Riaza J, Erensoy S, Kabaklı Ö, Chalmers H (2017) Combustion of Turkish lignites and olive residue: experiments and kinetic modelling. Fuel 203:868–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansor AM, Lim JS, Ani FN, Hashim H, Ho WS (2018) Ultimate and proximate analysis of Malaysia pineapple biomass from MD2 cultivar for biofuel application. Chem Eng Trans 63:127–132. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mante NOD (2008) Influence of wood on the pyrolysis of poultry litter, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech

  • Miller B (2013) Fuel considerations and burner design for ultra-supercritical power plants. In: Zhang D (ed) Ultra-supercritical coal power plants. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. Woodhead Publishing, pp 57–80

  • Özdemir S, Sezer B (2013) Utilization of poultry wastes as organic fertilizers and biofuels. Poultry Res J 10:20–24 (in Turkish)

  • Pitta CSR, Adami PF, Pelissari A, Assmann TS, Franchin MF, Cassol LC, Sartor LR (2012) Year-round poultry litter decomposition and N, P, K and Ca release. Rev Bra Cienc Solo 36(3):1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000300034

  • Qiao Y, Wang B, Ji Y, Xu ZP, Zhang J, Tian Y (2019) Thermal decomposition of castor oil, corn starch, soy protein, lignin, xylan, and cellulose during fast pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 278:287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SG, Sarkar P, Chakrabort N, Adak AK (2010) Thermogravimetric assessment of combustion characteristics of blends of a coal with different biomass chars. Fuel Process Technol 91(3):369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SGB (2019) Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2018 Annual Report, Ankara, Turkey. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/Bakanl%C4%B1k_Faaliyet_Raporlar%C4%B1/2018%20FAAL%C4%B0YET%20RAPORU.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2020

  • Shao Y, Wang J, Preto F, Zhu J, Xu C (2012) Ash deposition in biomass combustion or co-firing for power/heat generation. Energies 5(12):5171–5189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharara MA (2015) Transformation of swine manure and algal consortia to value-added products, Theses and Dissertations, 1034, University of Arkansas

  • Singh G, Shamsuddin MR, Lim SW (2018) Characterization of chicken manure from manjung region. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 458(1):012084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/458/1/012084

  • Sommer SG, Olesen JE, Petersen SO, Weisbjerg MR, Valli L, Rodhe L, Béline F (2009) Region-specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones. Glob Chang Biol 15(12):2825–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibola FL, de Oliveira TJ, Cerqueira D, Ataíde CH, Cardoso CR (2020) Kinetic parameters study for the slow pyrolysis of coffee residues based on thermogravimetric analysis. Quím Nova 43(4):426–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toptas A, Yildirim Y, Duman G, Yanik J (2015) Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour Technol 177:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tu D, Dong H, Shang B (2009) Pyrolysis behavior of selected manures using TG-FTIR techniques. In: Livestock Environment VIII, 31 August–4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, Brazil. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, p 30. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25501

  • Uzun H, Yildiz Z, Ceylan S (2019) Fast pyrolysis of biomass mixtures in a fixed bed reactor: Characterization of bio-oil product. Environ Res Technol 2(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvuka D, Sfakiotakis S, Panopoulos KD (2013) An experimental study on the thermal valorization of municipal and animal wastes. Int J Energy Environ 4(2):191–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vries T (2017) Pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading of poultry litter to produce chemicals. Dissertation, Wageningen UR

  • Wang HY, Zhang JL, Wang GW, Xu RS, Zhang PC, Liu SY (2016) Characteristics and kinetic analysis of co-combustion of brown coal and anthracite. J Therm Anal Calorim 126(2):447–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waters CL, Janupala RR, Mallinson RG, Lobban LL (2017) Staged thermal fractionation for segregation of lignin and cellulose pyrolysis products: an experimental study of residence time and temperature effects. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 126:380–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely N, Ozao R, Cao Y, Pan WP (2006) Multi-utilization of chicken litter as a biomass source. Part II. Pyrolysis. Energy Fuel 20:2666–2671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H (2013) Biomass gasification: an alternative solution to animal waste management. Biological Systems Engineering-Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research. 34

  • Xu Y, Chen B (2013) Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol 146:485–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefzad Farrokhi F, Kazanç F (2018) Combustion behavior and kinetics of Turkish lignite blended with biomass/magnesite dust. J Energy Eng 144(6):04018064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Chen M, Wei Y, Niu S, Xue F (2016) An assessment on co-combustion characteristics of Chinese lignite and eucalyptus bark with TG-MS technique. Powder Technol 294:463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yurdakul S (2016) Determination of co-combustion properties and thermal kinetics of poultry litter/coal blends using thermogravimetry. Renew Energy 89:215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zevenhoven-Onderwater M (2001) Ash-forming matter in biomass fuels. Dissertation, Åbo Akademi University

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TÜBİTAK) with a project number 218M440. The thermogravimetric analysis was carried out with this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SY analyzed and interpreted the TG data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. BG supplied the chicken manure and lignite samples and also analyzed the data. MV and HG helped interpretation of the data. KK contributed in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sema Yurdakul.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurdakul, S., Gürel, B., Varol, M. et al. Investigation on thermal degradation kinetics and mechanisms of chicken manure, lignite, and their blends by TGA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 63894–63904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12732-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12732-0

Keywords

Navigation