Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficiency assessment of coal energy and non-coal energy under bound dynamic DDF DEA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The demand for energy has continued to increase because of global economic development, which has led to rising fuel prices and continued pollution problems. China is currently the largest coal consumer and is also the largest emitter of coal-fired CO2 emissions. However, past efficiency studies have been mostly limited to static analyses and have not considered undesirable outputs. Therefore, this study developed a bound dynamic directional distance function (DDF) data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to explore the energy and environmental efficiencies in 30 Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2015, from which it was found that (1) the overall efficiency was the best in the eastern region, but relatively low in the western region; (2) Beijing, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, Shanghai, Tianjin, Jiangxi, Jilin, and some other regions had efficiencies of 1; (3) the revenue and non-coal indicator efficiencies were reasonably good, but the expenditure and emissions efficiencies were generally poor; and (4) the key direction for primary improvements was found to be the emissions index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the China National Bureau of Statistics (www.stats.gov.cn).

References

  • BP (2019) Statistical review of world energy. LNG Global, 1730 E. Holly Avenue El Segundo, CA, USA.

  • Chen J, Dong X (2018) Carbon efficiency and carbon abatement costs of coal-fired power enterprises: a case of Shanghai, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 206:452–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Lv K, Wang J, Xu H (2019) Energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emission efficiency, and related abatement costs in regional China: a synthesis of input–output analysis and DEA. Energy Efficiency 12:863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management 51:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Huang G, Yin Z (2015) Estimating regional coal resource efficiency in China using three-stage DEA and bootstrap DEA models. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 25:861–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Mao J (2015) Estimating the environmental efficiency and marginal CO2 abatement cost of coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Policy 85:347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Hanley A, Zhang N (2016) Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fuelled power plants in China: a parametric meta-frontier analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 43:14–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2010) Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 200:320–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Li N, Mu H, Li L, Duan Y (2017a) Regional total-factor coal consumption efficiency in China: a meta-frontier SBM-undesirable approach. Energy Procedia 142:2423–2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Liu W, Tian J, He R, Chen L (2017b) Eco-efficiency assessment of coal-fired combined heat and power plants in Chinese eco-industrial parks. Journal of Cleaner Production 168:963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Lu CC, Lee JH, Chiu YH (2017c) Applying the dynamic DEA model to evaluate the energy efficiency of OECD countries and China. Energy 134:392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Qi X, Zhou X, Li W (2018) Total-factor energy efficiency of coal consumption: an empirical analysis of China’s energy intensive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 172:2618–2624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Zhu X, Han Y, Geng Z, Liu L (2020) Economy and carbon dioxide emissions effects of energy structures in the world: evidence based on SBM-DEA model. Science of the Total Environment 138947.

  • Liu J, Liu H, Yao X, Liu Y (2016) Evaluating the sustainability impact of consolidation policy in China’s coal mining industry: a data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:2969–2979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Chu J, Yin P, Sun J (2017) DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 142:877–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long R, Wang H, Chen H (2016) Regional differences and pattern classifications in the efficiency of coal consumption in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:3684–3691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger D (1992) Benefit functions and duality. Journal of Mathematical Economics 21:461–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Su B, Thomson E, Zhou D, Zhou P (2016) Measuring China’s regional energy and carbon emission efficiency with DEA models: a survey. Applied Energy 183:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren F R, Tian Z, Chen H S, Shen Y T (2020a) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and agricultural disaster efficiency evaluation of China based on the two-stage dynamic DEA method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–18.

  • Ren J, Gao B, Zhang J, Chen C (2020b) Measuring the energy and carbon emission efficiency of regional transportation systems in China: chance-constrained DEA models. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020.

  • Shephard R (1970) The theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Li M, Zhang F, He Y, Tao W (2014) Analysis of energy efficiency for coal-fired power units based on data envelopment analysis model. Energy Procedia 61:904–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LW, Le KD, Nguyen TD (2019) Assessment of the energy efficiency improvement of twenty-five countries: a DEA approach. Energies 12:1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Ke Y, Xu C, Xiao X, Hu Y (2018) Eco-efficiency measurement of coal-fired power plants in China using super efficiency data envelopment analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society 36:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Li M, Ji X, Wu J, Dong Y (2019) Revealing potential of energy-saving behind emission reduction. Manag Environ Qual

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.L. conceived and designed the topic; Y.N.L. and Y.L. performed the model; H.C., Y.-h.C., and T.-Y.L. analyzed the data; Y.-h.C. contributed the reagents/materials/analysis tools; Y.L. and T.-Y.L. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tai-Yu Lin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Lin, TY., Chiu, Yh. et al. Efficiency assessment of coal energy and non-coal energy under bound dynamic DDF DEA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 20093–20110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12037-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12037-8

Keywords

Navigation