Abstract
This work aims to obtain activated carbon (AC) from yeast residue to boost up bioeconomy. In this way, carbon was prepared from yeast biomass produced by the ethanol industry and after beta-glucan extraction. Carbon was activated with CO2, water vapor, and a combination of both using an experimental design. The best conditions to produce AC were activation with CO2 for 30 min at 850 °C and CO2 flow of 0.09 L/min, set by experimental design and desirability function to optimize the yield, surface area, and microporosity. Thus, for physical activation with water vapor employing the optimized conditions, it was possible to achieve a yield of 56.6% (m/m) for AC with 1144 m2/g of surface area and mean micropore volume of 0.53 cm3/g. The maximum AC surface area reached 1616 ± 567 m2/g with a yield of 21 ± 1%. The prepared ACs were characterized by elemental analysis, X-ray diffractometry, infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetry analysis, pHPZC, and potentiometric titration to determine the main functional groups of sorption sites. The carbon obtained from the desirability condition was used to remove dipyrone from synthetic aqueous effluent with an experimental sorption capacity of 88 ± 4 mg/g, being the phenomenon described by the Freundlich isotherm model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Activated carbon market - growth, trends, and forecast (2019-2024). https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/activated-carbon-market. Accessed 14 Nov 2019
Ahmedna M, Marshall WE, Rao RM (2000) Surface properties of granular activated carbons from agricultural by-products and their effects on raw sugar decolorization. Bioresour Technol 71:103–112
Al-Qodah Z, Shawabkah R (2009) Production and characterization of granular activated carbon from activated sludge. Braz J Chem Eng 26:1678–4383. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322009000100012
Araújo GCL, Lemos SG, Ferreira AG, Freitas H, Nogueira ARA (2007) Effect of pre-treatment and supporting media on Ni(II), Cu(II), Al(III) and Fe(III) sorption by plant root material. Chemosphere 68:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.054
Azargohar R, Dalai AK (2005) Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: experimental and modeling studies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 85:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.018
Baçaoui A, Dahbi A, Yaacoubi A, Bennouna C, Maldonado-Hódar FJ, Rivera-Utrilla J, Carrasco-Marín F, Moreno-Castilla C (2002) Experimental design to optimize preparation of activated carbons for use in water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:3844–3849. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010305t
Bergna D, Hu T, Prokkola H, Romar H, Lassi U (2020) Effect of some process parameters on the main properties of activated carbon produced from peat in a lab-scale process waste and biomass valorization. 11:2837–2848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00584-2
Carabineiro SAC, Pereira MFR, Órfão JJM, Figueiredo JL (2012) Activated carbons: classifications, properties and applications. In: Kwiatkowski FJ (ed) Activated Carbon: Classifications, Properties and Applications, 1st edn. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 125–168
Carrilho ENVM, Labuto G, Kamogawa MY (2016) Destination of vinasse, a residue from alcohol industry - resource recovery and prevention of pollution. In: Prasad MNV (ed) Environmental Materials and Waste: Resource Recovery and Pollution Prevention, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 21–40
Carus M (2017) Biobased economy and climate change– important links, pitfalls, and opportunities. Ind Biotechnol 13:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2017.29073.mca
Carus M, Dammer L, Essel R (2015) Quo vadis, cascading use of biomass? Policy paper on background information on the cascading principle provided by nova-Institute. www.bio-based. eu/policy. Accessed 14 Nov 2019
Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
Enriquez-Cabot J (1998) Genomics and the world’s economy. Science 281:925–926. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5379.925
European Commission (2012) Innovating for Sustainable Growth – A bioeconomy for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-25376-8. https://doi.org/10.2777/6462. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1f0d8515-8dc0-4435-ba53-9570e47dbd51. Accessed 14 Nov 2019
European Commission (2015) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2015:614:FIN. Accessed 14 Nov 2019
European Technology Platforms (ETP) (2011) The European bioeconomy in 2030: delivering sustainable growth by addressing the grand societal challenges. http://www.epsoweb.org/file/560. Accessed 29 May 2019
Fiol N, Villaescusa I (2009) Determination of sorbent point zero charge: usefulness in sorption studies. Environ Chem Lett 7:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-008-0139-0
Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013
Global and China Activated Carbon Industry Report (GCACIR), 2018–2023 (2018) https://www.apnews.com/2d789ed19c154c769337055468f88828. Accessed 29 May 2019
Hidayu AR, Muda N (2016) Preparation and characterization of impregnated activated carbon from palm kernel shell and coconut shell for CO2 capture. Proc Eng 148:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.463
Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
Ho YS, McKay G (2000) Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents: review. J Sep Purif Technol 29:189–232. https://doi.org/10.1081/SPM-100100009
Ho YS, Porter JF, Mckay G (2002) Equilibrium isotherm studies for the sorption of divalent metal ions onto peat: copper, nickel and lead single component systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 141:1–33
Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A (2007) Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review. Enew Sust Energ Rev 11:1966–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013
Labuto G, Carrilho ENVM (2016) Bioremediation in Brazil: challenges to improve the development and application to boost up the bioeconomy. In: Prasad MNV (ed) Bioremediation and Bioeconomy, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 569–586
Labuto G, Trama B, Castro GS, Guarnieri BS, Silva FV, Colazzo R (2015) Metals uptake by yeast alive and yeast residue modified by heating process. Rev Ambient Água 10:510–519. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.1577
Labuto G, Cardona DS, Debs KB, Imamura AR, Bezerra KCH, Carrilho ENVM, Haddad PS (2018) Low-cost agroindustrial biomasses and ferromagnetic bionanocomposites to cleanup textile effluents. Desal Wat Treat 12:80–89. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.21914
Laine J, Yunes S (1992) Effect of the preparation method on the pore size distribution of activated carbon from coconut shell. Carbon 30:601–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(92)90178-Y
MAPA (2015) Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/sanidade-animal-e-vegetal/sanidade-vegetal/arquivos-prevencao/IN35_2015Cydiapomonella.pdf/view. Accessed 29 May 2019
Marsh H, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (2006) Activated carbon, 1st edn. Elsevier, Dordrecht
Mestre AS, Machuqueiro M, Silva M, Freire R, Fonseca IM, Santos MSCS, Calhorda MJ, Carvalho AP (2014) Influence of activated carbons porous structure on iopamidol adsorption. Carbon 77:607–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.065
Minkova V, Marinova SP, Zanzi R, Björnbom E, Budinova T, Stefanova M, Lakov L (2000) Thermochemical treatment of biomass in a flow of steam or in a mixture of steam and carbon dioxide. Fuel Process Technol 62:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00065-X
Minkova V, Razvigorova M, Björnbom E, Zanzi R, Budinova T, Petrov N (2001) Effect of water vapour and biomass nature on the yield and quality of the pyrolysis products from biomass. Fuel Process Technol 70:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00153-3
Misra DN (1969) Adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces: A Dubinin-Radushkevich equation. Surf Sci 18(2):367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(69)90179-4
Molina-Sabio M, Gonzalez MT, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Sepúlveda-Escribano A (1996) Effect of steam and carbon dioxide activation in the micropore size distribution of activated carbon. Carbon 34:505–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)00006-1
Nabais JMV, Nunes P, Carrotta PJM, Carrotta MMLR, García AM, Díaz-Díez MA (2008) crbons from coffee endocarp by CO2 and steam activation. Fuel Proc Technol 89:268–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.11.030
Oliveira LS, Franca AS (2011) Conventional and non-conventional thermal processing for the production of activated carbons from agro-industrial wastes. In: Kwiatkowski FJ (ed) Activated Carbon: Classifications, Properties and Applications, 1st edn. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 205–238
Prasad MNV (2016) Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. Elsevier, Dordrecht
Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Supúlvida-Escribano A (2009) Carbon as catalyst support. In: Serp P, Figueiredo JL (eds) Carbon Materials for Catalysis, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp 131–150
Şahin Ö, Saka C (2013) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from acorn shell by physical activation with H2O–CO2 in two-step pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 136:163–168
Shahkarami S, Azargohar R, Dalaim AK, Soltan J (2015) Breakthrough CO2 adsorption in bio-based activated carbons. J Environ Sci 34:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.008
Thommes M, Katsumi K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 85:1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Wang Z (2015) Efficient adsorption of dibutyl phthalate from aqueous solution by activated carbon developed from phoenix leaves. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1923–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0554-7
Zaini MSM, Syed-Hassan SSA (2018) Comparative effects of activation by CO2, steam and their sequential combinations on the pore structure of carbon material produced from ZnCl2-treated oil palm kernel shell. Rec Innov Chem Eng 11:50–59. https://doi.org/10.2174/2405520411666180427112212
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to FAPESP (Grants 2016/06271-4 and 2017/24931-4, and Scholarship 2017/13074-3), CAPES (Finance Code 001), and CNPq (Grant 404843/2018-2 and Scholarship 105197/2018-1) for the financial support and Biorigin Company (Sao Paulo, Brazil) for providing the yeast biomass residue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 1321 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Modesto, H.R., Lemos, S.G., dos Santos, M.S. et al. Activated carbon production from industrial yeast residue to boost up circular bioeconomy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 24694–24705 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10458-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10458-z