Skip to main content
Log in

Presence of veterinary antibiotics in livestock manure in two Southeastern Europe countries, Albania and Kosovo

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, veterinary drug application has become an integral practice in livestock farming. Veterinary antibiotics (VAs) are administered onto animals for therapeutic use; meanwhile, in some countries, they are used for growth promotion. To indicate the level of VAs use in livestock breeding in two countries, Albania and Kosovo, their presence was studied in the animal manure. In total, 38 manure samples, 22 from Kosovo and 16 samples from Albania, belonging to cattle, pig, and poultry, were collected and investigated for the presence of VAs. Seven VAs and 2 metabolites, from the groups of sulfonamides and tetracyclines, were identified by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The detected antibiotics were sulfadiazine (SDZ), sulfathiazole (STZ), sulfamethazine (SMZ), oxytetracycline (OTC), tetracycline (TC), chlortetracycline (TC), and doxycycline (DOY). VAs were detected in 27% and 31.2% of the manure samples, from Kosovo and Albania, respectively, and the levels ranged from 0.04 to 10.1 mg kg−1. VAs were widely detected (100%) in poultry manure from Kosovo, as well as poultry manure from Albania. The contamination rate ranged from pig manure (25%) to cow manure (66.6%). Sulfonamides were the most commonly detected VAs with maximum concentration of sulfadiazine (10.1 mg kg−1) in poultry manure. Tetracyclines were most widely detected in poultry manure, as well as other animal manures. When it comes to the comparison between the two countries, VAs residues are more frequent per analyzed sample and higher in concentrations in the manure samples from Albania. Therefore, an environmental impact of VAs on both countries may be expected. These results indicate that VAs may enter the local ecosystem through manure application to agriculture and potentially may bring ecological risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baguer AJ, Jensen J, Krogh PH (2000) Effects of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin on soil fauna. Chemosphere 40:751–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baynes RE, Dedonder K, Kissell L, Mzyk D, Marmulak T, Smith G, Tell L, Gehring R, Davis J, Riviere JE (2016) Health concerns and management of select veterinary drug residues. Food Chem Toxicol 88:112–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berendsen BA, Wegh RS, Memelink J et al (2015) The analysis of animal faeces as a tool to monitor antibiotic usage. Talanta 132:258–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall AB, Fogg LA, Blackwell PA et al (2004) Veterinary medicines in the environment. Rev Environ Contam T 180:1–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chee-Sanford JC, Mackie RI, Koike S, Krapac IG, Lin YF, Yannarell AC, Maxwell S, Aminov RI (2009) Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J Environ Qual 38:1086–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ESVAC (European Medicines Agency, European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption) (2018) 'Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 30 European countries in 2016′ (EMA/275982/2018)

  • EU (2002) Commission Decision 2002/657/EC Implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Official Journal of the European Communities L 221/20:29

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005) Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect. Press Release Database, IP/05/1687. Brussels. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-05-1687_en.html (Accessed February 28th 2019)

  • European Parliament and the Council (2003) Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Off J Eur Union L 268:29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • FVA (Food and Veterinary Agency) (2019) Data on Veterinary antibiotics used during 2018 in husbandry. (http://www.auv-ks.net/). (Accessed on February 10th, 2019)

  • Grave K, Torren-Edo J, Muller A, Greko C, Moulin G, Mackay D, on behalf of the ESVAC Group, Fuchs K, Laurier L, Iliev D, Pokludova L, Genakritis M, Jacobsen E, Kurvits K, Kivilahti-Mantyla K, Wallmann J, Kovacs J, Lenharthsson JM, Beechinor JG, Perrella A, Mi ule G, Zymantaite U, Meijering A, Prokopiak D, Ponte MH, Svetlin A, Hederova J, Madero CM, Girma K, Eckford S (2014) Variations in the sales and sales patterns of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 24 European countries. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(8):2284–2291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg E, Cao S, Berg OG, Ilbäck C, Sandegren L, Hughes D, Andersson DI (2011) Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathog 7(7):e1002158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamscher G, Bachour G (2018) Veterinary drugs in the environment: current knowledge and challenges for the future. J Agr Food Chem 66:751–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jechalke S, Heuer H, Siemens J, Amelung W, Smalla K (2014) Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol 22:536–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Shen Q, Liu F et al (2012) Antibiotic resistance gene abundances associated with antibiotics and heavy metals in animal manures and agricultural soils adjacent to feedlots in Shanghai. China J Hazard Mater 235–236:178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KR, Owens G, Kwon SI, So KH, Lee DB, Ok YS (2011) Occurrence and environmental fate of veterinary antibiotics in the terrestrial environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 214:163–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivits T, Broers HP, Beeltje H, van Vliet M, Griffioen J (2018) Presence and fate of veterinary antibiotics in age-dated groundwater in areas with intensive livestock farming. Environ Pollut 241:988–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kools SAE, Moltmann JF, Knacker T (2008) Estimating the use of veterinary medicines in the European Union. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 50:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Gupta SC, Baidoo SK, Chander Y, Rosen CJ (2005) Antibiotic uptake by plants from soil fertilized with animal manure. J Environ Qual 34:2082–2085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppusamy S, Kakarla D, Venkaterswarlu K et al (2018) Veterinary antibiotics (VAs) contamination as a global agro-ecological issue: a critical view. Agric Ecosyst Environ 257:47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D (2012) Occurrence, fate, and ecotoxicity of antibiotics in agro-ecosystems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 32:309–327

  • MARD (2018) Statistical annual of livestock breeding. http://www.instat.gov.al/media/4412/vjetari-statistikor-i-bujq%C3%ABsis%C3%AB-2017-blegtoria_final.xlsx. (Accessed January 14th, 2019)

  • Marshall BM, Levy SB (2011) Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:718–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Beegle D (2009) Manure sampling for nutrient management planning. https://extension.psu.edu/programs/nutrient-management/educational/manure-storage-and-handling/manure-sampling-for-nutrient-management-planning/extension_publication_file. (Accessed on October 2nd, 2018)

  • Martínez-Carballo E, González-Barreiro C, Scharf S, Gans O (2007) Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 148:570–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massé D, Saady N, Gilbert Y (2014) Potential of biological processes to eliminate antibiotics in livestock manure: an overview. Animals 4(2):146–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OIE (World Organization for Animal Health) (2019) The Third OIE Annual report on the use of antimicrobial agents in animals

  • Pan M, Cu LM (2017) Leaching behavior of veterinary antibiotics in animal manure-applied soils. Sci Total Environ 579:466–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmah K, Meyer MT, Boxall ABA (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate, and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmeyer A (2018) Occurrence and fate of antibiotics in manure during manure treatments: a short review. Sustain Chem Pharmacy 9:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmeyer A, Ahlborn J, Hamscher G (2014) Simultaneous determination of 14 sulfonamides and tetracyclines in biogas plants by liquid-liquid-extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2513–2524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmeyer A, Breier B, Groißmeier K, Hamscher G (2015) Elimination patterns of worldwide used sulfonamides and tetracyclines during anaerobic fermentation. Bioresour Technol 193:307–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tasho RP, Cho JG (2016) Veterinary antibiotics in animal waste, its distribution in soil and uptake by plants: a review. Sci Total Environ 563–564:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, Laxminarayan R (2015) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5649–5654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Meersche T, Van Pamel E, Van Poucke C, Herman L, Heyndrickx M, Rasschaert G, Daeseleire E (2016) Development, validation, and application of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous detection and quantification of five different classes of veterinary antibiotics in swine manure. J Chromatogr A 1429:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2014) Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance 2014, WHO

  • Widyasari-Mehta A, Hartung S, Kreuzig R (2016) From the application of antibiotics to antibiotic residues in liquid manure and digestates: a screening study in one European Centre of conventional pig husbandry. J Environ Manag 177:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohde M, Berkner S, Junker T, Konradi S, Schwarz L, Düring RA (2016) Occurrence and transformation of veterinary pharmaceuticals and biocides in manure: a literature review. Environ Sci Eur 28:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0091-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Dong YH, Wang H (2010) Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci Total Environ 408:1069–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Gerd Hamscher and Dr. Astrid Spielmeyer from Justus Liebig University Gießen (Germany) for their support on performing analysis and fruitful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeton Spahiu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ester Heath

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Topi, D., Spahiu, J. Presence of veterinary antibiotics in livestock manure in two Southeastern Europe countries, Albania and Kosovo. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 44552–44560 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10341-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10341-x

Keywords

Navigation