Abstract
This study analyzes Kazakhstan’s influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions in different stages, and the study period (1992–2014) was divided into four stages by using the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) method. In the low efficiency and high output stage, Kazakhstan had the most energy-related carbon emissions. The total energy-related carbon emissions might be positive or negative in the high efficiency and high output stage and the low efficiency and low output stage, and this was mainly determined by the energy intensity effect or the economic output effect. Different influencing factors had different effects in the different stages from 1992 to 2014. The economic output effect was the first contributor for promoting energy-related carbon emissions, and the energy intensity factor was the first contributor for suppressing energy-related carbon emissions from 1992 to 2014. Finally, policy recommendations in terms of the main influencing factors are put forward, including the low-carbon economic development mode transformation, technological innovation, and renewable energy development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policy making in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32:1131–1139
Ang BW (2015) LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86:233–238
Chang M, Zheng J, Inoue Y, Tian X, Chen Q, Gan T (2018) Comparative analysis on the socioeconomic drivers of industrial air pollutant emissions between Japan and China: insights for the further abatement period based on the LMDI method. J Clean Prod 189:240–250
Chong H, Liu P, Ma L, Li Z, Ni W, Li X, Song S (2017) LMDI decomposition of energy consumption in Guangdong Province, China, based on an energy allocation diagram. Energy 133:525–544
EIA (2018) International Energy Statistics. https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/. [Accessed 28 September 2018].
Government of Kazakhstan (2016) National Inventory Report. GoK, Kazakhstan, Astana, p 300
Guan DB, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM (2008) The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob Environ Chang 18:626–634
Iskin I, Daim T, Kayakutlu G, Altuntas M (2012) Exploring renewable energy pricing with analytic network process - comparing a developed and a developing economy. Energy Econ 34(4):882–891
Jotzo F, Burke PJ, Wood PJ, Macintosh A, Stern DI (2012) Decomposing the 2010 global carbon dioxide emissions rebound. Nat Clim Chang 2:213–214
Jung S, An KJ, Dodbiba G, Fujita T (2012) Regional energy-related carbon emission characteristics and potential mitigation in eco-industrial parks in South Korea: logarithmic mean Divisia index analysis based on the Kaya identity. Energy 46(1):231–241
Kang JD, Zhao T, Liu N, Zhang X, Xu XS, Liu T (2014) A multi-sectoral decomposition analysis of city-level greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China. Energy 68:562–571
Karatayev M, Hall S, Kalyuzhnova Y, Clarke ML (2016) Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 66:120–136
Li J, Chen Y, Li Z, Liu Z (2018) Quantitative analysis of the impact factors of conventional energy carbon emissions in Kazakhstan based on LMDI decomposition and STIRPAT model. J Geogr Sci 28(7):1001–1019
Li W, Sun W, Li GM, Cui PF, Wu W, Jin BH (2017) Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of carbon intensity in China’s construction industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:162–173
MacGregor J (2017) Determining an optimal strategy for energy investment in Kazakhstan. Energy Policy 107:210–224
Mahony TO (2013) Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: an extended Kaya identity. Energy Policy 59:573–581
Ma MD, Cai WG (2018) What drives the carbon mitigation in Chinese commercial building sector? Evidence from decomposing an extended Kaya identity. Sci Total Environ 634:884–899
Mao Z (2014) Cosmopolitanism and global risk: news framing of the Asian financial crisis and the European debt crisis. Int J Commun 8(1):1029–1048
Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2014) Statistical Yearbook of Kazakhstan. www.stat.gov.kz. [Accessed 18 August 2014].
Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622
NRGI Kazakhstan report (2014) Natural Resource Governance Institute. Available at (www.resourcegovernance.org).
Peters GP, Weber CL, Guan DB, Hubacek K (2007) China’s growing CO2 emissions: a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environ Sci Technol 41:5939–5944
Raupach MR, Marland G, Ciais P, Le QC, Canadell JG, Klepper G, Field CB (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(24):10288–10293
Rowland RH (2001) Regional population change in Kazakhstan during the 1990s and the impact of nationality population patterns: results from the recent census of Kazakhstan. Post-Soviet Geogr Econ 42(8):571–614
Ruziev K, Majidov T (2013) Differing effects of the global financial crisis on the Central Asian countries: Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan. Europe-Asia Studies 65(4):682–716
Shao S, Yang L, Gan C, Cao J, Geng Y, Guan D (2016) Using an extended LMDI model to explore techno-economic drivers of energy-related industrial CO2 emission changes: a case study for Shanghai (China). Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:516–536
Su B, Ang BW (2012) Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ 34:177–188
Sun D, Zhang Y, Xue R, Zhang Y (2017) Modeling carbon emissions from urban traffic system using mobile monitoring. Sci Total Environ 599:944–951
Wang C, Wang F (2017) China can lead on climate change. Science 357:764
Wang C, Zhang X, Du H, Wang F et al (2013) Variations and influence factors of carbon emission of primary energy consumption in Kazakhstan. Arid Land Geogr 36(4):757–763 (In Chinese)
Wang C, Zhang X, Wang F, Lei J, Zhang L (2015) Decomposition of energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang and relative mitigation policy recommendations. Front Earth Sci 9(1):65–76
Wang M, Feng C (2017) Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data of three sectors. Appl Energy 190:772–787
World Bank (2018a) World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE?locations=KZ&view=chart. [Accessed 28 September 2018]
World Bank (2018b) World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator. [Accessed 28 September 2018].
Xiong C, Chen S, Huang R (2019) Extended STIRPAT model-based driving factor analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Kazakhstan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:15920–15930
Xiong C, Yang D, Huo J, Zhao Y (2015) The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth and the development strategy of a low-carbon economy in Kazakhstan. J Arid Land 7(5):706–715
Xiong C, Yang D, Huo J (2016a) Spatial-temporal characteristics and LMDI-based impact factor decomposition of agricultural carbon emissions in Hotan Prefecture, China. Sustainability 8(3):262
Xiong C, Yang D, Xia F, Huo J (2016b) Changes in agricultural carbon emissions and factors that influence agricultural carbon emissions based on different stages in Xinjiang, China. Sci Rep 6:36912
Xu SC, He ZX, Long RY, Chen H (2016) Factors that influence carbon emissions due to energy consumption based on different stages and sectors in China. J Clean Prod 115:139–148
Xu XY, Ang BW (2013) Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies. Ecol Econ 93:313–329
Zhang N, Liu Z, Zheng X, Xue J (2017) Carbon footprint of China’s Belt and Road. Science 357:1107
Zhang W, Li K, Zhou D, Zhang W, Gao H (2016) Decomposition of intensity of energy-related CO2 emission in Chinese provinces using the LMDI method. Energy Policy 92:369–381
Funding
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20010301), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (BK20181105), Jiangsu province “One Belt and One Road” technical cooperation project (BZ2018057), the Construction Plan for Overseas Scientific Education Base of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (SAJC201609), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFE0105900, 2018YFD1100101), and National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41771140).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiong, C., Chen, S., Gao, Q. et al. Analysis of the influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions in Kazakhstan at different stages. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 36630–36638 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09750-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09750-9