Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative nutrient leaching capability of cattle dung biogas digestate and inorganic fertilizer under spinach cropping condition

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A field experiment was used to determine leaching capability of biogas digestate used as soil amendment in comparison to inorganic fertilizer under spinach cropping condition. The biogas digestate used in this experiment was obtained from a biogas production plant that used cattle dung as feedstock. Spinach was cultivated under three treatments, namely, biogas digestate (BD), inorganic fertilizer (IN) and control (no fertilizer or biogas digestate). All the treatments were replicated three times. Irrometer soil solution access tubes were inserted in the middle of each plot for the collection of the nutrient leachates. The leaf area of spinach was significantly higher in IN treatment than BD and control at the harvest stage; BD produced higher fresh mass (479 g/plant) than IN (468 g/plant) and control (201 g/plant). The leachates of inorganic fertilizer showed higher nutrient concentration compared to biogas digestate and control treatments. Twenty-eight days after transplanting, the leachate consisted of 3670.7, 12.12 and 8.5 mg/l of ammonium and 408, 83 and 39 mg/l of phosphate at IN, BD and control treatments, respectively. The study demonstrates that cattle dung biogas digestate can be applied on soil as fertilizer for crops with little or no environmental consequences to water resources and still have the same product quality as inorganic fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARC-VOPI (Agricultural Research Council-Institute for vegetables and ornamental plants institute). (2007). www.arc.agric.za/arc.vopi

  • Aghoghovwia M (2018) Effect of different biochars on inorganic nitrogen availability. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch

  • Barbosa DBP, Nabel M, Jablonowski ND (2014) Biogas-digestate as nutrient source for biomass production of Sida hermaphrodita, Zea mays L. and Medicago sativa L. Energy procedia 59:120–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Hu K, Nie Y, Wang K (2017) Analysis of soil water movement inside a footslope and a depression in a karst catchment, Southwest China. J Sci Rep 7(2544):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Crusciol CAC, Garcia RA, Castro GSA, Rosolem CA (2011) Nitrate role in basic cation leaching under no-till. Braz J Soil Soc 35(6):1975–1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (2010) Spinach production manual. Pretoria: Republic of South Africa. Available from www.nda.agric.za/docs/Brochures/brochureSpinach.pdf [Accessed on 20 July 2017]

  • Demirel B, Gol NP, Onay TT (2013) Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 12(2):242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diacono M, Montemurro F (2011) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. J Sustain Agric 2:761–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades DC (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Journal of nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 66(2):165–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg GR (1987) The impacts of agricultural chemicals on ground water quality. J Geol 15(3):283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Han SH, An YJ, Hwang J, Kim SB, Park B (2016) The effects of organic manure and chemical fertiliser concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin) in a nursery system. Journal of forest science and technology 12(3):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Follett RF (eds) (2008) Nitrogen in the environment, 2nd edn. Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A (2017) Nutrient leaching from compost: implications for bioretention and other green storm water infrastructure. Journal of sustainable water in the built environment 3(3):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam M, Hossain N, Alamgir M, Kibria MG (2014) Comparative effects of biogas plant residues, poultry manure and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of ladies finger. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimeneze RR, Lidha JK (1993) Automated element analysis: a rapid and reliable but expensive measurements of total carbon and nitrogen in plant and soil sample. Journal of soil science and plant analogy 24:1897–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laegreid M, Bockman OC, Kaarstad O (1999) Agriculture, fertilizer and the environments. CAB International, Wallingford

  • Lehmann J, Schroth G (2003) Nutrient leaching. Trees, crops, and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CAB publishing, Wallingford, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon DS (2017) Nutrient leaching when soil is part of the plant growth. J Water 9:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna Oxisol. J Plant Soil 333(1–2):117–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miri SM, Roughani A (2019) Allium species growing in Iran: botany and distribution. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on medicinal plants, organic farming, natural and pharmaceutical ingredients, Iran-Mashhad: Iranian medicinal plant society

  • Moss B (2008) Water pollution by agriculture. Philosophical transactions of the royal society journal of biological sciences 363(1491):659–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Engineering in Life Sciences 12(3):242–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Msibi BM, Mukabwe WO, Manyatsi AM, Mhazo N, Masarirambi MT (2014) Effects of liquid manure on growth and yield of spinach (beta vulgaris var. cicla) in a sub-tropical environment in Swaziland. Asian Journal of Agricultural Science 6(2):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir A, Khalid MU, Anwar S, Arslan C, Akhtar MJ, Suitan M (2012) Evaluation of bio-fertilizer application to ameliorate the environment and crop production. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 49(4):527–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndolwana NG (2015) The use of winery waste compost to establish cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris subsp. cycla) on sandy soil at Bien Donné experimental farm near Paarl in the Western Cape region. MSc thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town

  • Nest TV, Ruysschaert G, Vandecasteele B, Cougnon M, Merckx R, Reheul D (2015) P availability and P leaching after reducing the mineral P fertilization and the use of digestate products as new organic fertilizers in a 4-year field trial with high P status. Agric Ecosyst Environ 20:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse D (1994) Multiple threats to food production: environment, economy and population? Food security policy 19(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odlare M, Arthurson V, Pell M, Svensson K, Nehrenheim E, Abubaker J (2011) Land application of organic waste–effects on the soil ecosystem. Journal of applied energy 88(6):2210–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ololade OO, Esterhuyse S, Levine AD (2017) The water-energy-food nexus from a South African perspective, in: water-energy-food nexus: theories and practices. Salam, PA; Shrestha S, anal AK, Pandey VP eds. USA: AGU-Wiley 350pp; ISBN: 978-1-119-24313-7

  • Parris K (2011) Impact of agriculture on water pollution in OECD countries: recent trends and future prospects. International journal of water resources development 27(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud M, Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Palma P, Sousa JP, Natal-da-Luz T (2017) Organic wastes as soil amendments–effects assessment towards soil invertebrates. J Hazard Mater 3:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saini RK, Ko EY, Keum YS (2017) Minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables: production, processing, storage, microbial safety, and nutritional potential. Food Reviews International 33(6):644–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaible GD, Aillery MP (2017) Challenges for US irrigated agriculture in the face of emerging demands and climate change. In: Competition for water resources, 44-79. Economic research service. Elsevier, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon K, Wu S, Kurui KS, Lei M, Lu Q, Bah H, Dong R (2015) Evaluation of slow pyrolysed wood and rice husk biochar for adsorption of ammonium nitrogen from piggery manure anaerobic digestate slurry. Science of total Environment 505:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Classification Working Group (1991) Soil classification - a taxonomic system for South Africa. Department of Agricultural Development, Pretoria

  • Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, Kluß C, Kage H, Herrmann A (2013) Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Tillage Res 130:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir S, Marschner P (2017) Clay addition to sandy soil - influence of clay type and size on nutrient availability in sandy soils amended with residues differing in C/N ratio. Pedosphere 27(2):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Dwivedi AK, Dikshit PR (2002) Long term influence of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil fertility and productivity of soybean-wheat system in a vertisol. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 50:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reeuwijk LP (2002) Procedures for soil analysis, 6th edition, 9. Netherlands. International soil reference and information centre

  • Van Rensburg WJ, Van Averbeke W, Slabbert R, Faber M, Van Jaarsveld P, Van Heerden I, Wenhold F, Oelofse A (2007) African leafy vegetables in South Africa. Water SA 33(3):317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananthan K (2014) Spatial structure of soil texture and its influence on spatial variability of nitrate leaching. MSc thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba

  • Walsh JJ, Jones DL, Edwards-Jones G, Williams AP (2012) Replacing inorganic fertiliser with anaerobic digestate may maintain agricultural productivity at less environmental cost. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175(6):840–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zasoski RJ, Burau RG (1977) A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multielement tissue analysis. Journal of communications in soil science and plant analysis 8(5):425–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Professor Mofokeng for allowing us to use the biogas digestate from his biogas plant. The Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Central Research Fund, University of the Free State, is also acknowledged for providing funds to carry out this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olusola O. Ololade.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tshikalange, B., Bello, Z.A. & Ololade, O.O. Comparative nutrient leaching capability of cattle dung biogas digestate and inorganic fertilizer under spinach cropping condition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 3237–3246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07104-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07104-8

Keywords

Navigation