Abstract
A field experiment was used to determine leaching capability of biogas digestate used as soil amendment in comparison to inorganic fertilizer under spinach cropping condition. The biogas digestate used in this experiment was obtained from a biogas production plant that used cattle dung as feedstock. Spinach was cultivated under three treatments, namely, biogas digestate (BD), inorganic fertilizer (IN) and control (no fertilizer or biogas digestate). All the treatments were replicated three times. Irrometer soil solution access tubes were inserted in the middle of each plot for the collection of the nutrient leachates. The leaf area of spinach was significantly higher in IN treatment than BD and control at the harvest stage; BD produced higher fresh mass (479 g/plant) than IN (468 g/plant) and control (201 g/plant). The leachates of inorganic fertilizer showed higher nutrient concentration compared to biogas digestate and control treatments. Twenty-eight days after transplanting, the leachate consisted of 3670.7, 12.12 and 8.5 mg/l of ammonium and 408, 83 and 39 mg/l of phosphate at IN, BD and control treatments, respectively. The study demonstrates that cattle dung biogas digestate can be applied on soil as fertilizer for crops with little or no environmental consequences to water resources and still have the same product quality as inorganic fertilizer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ARC-VOPI (Agricultural Research Council-Institute for vegetables and ornamental plants institute). (2007). www.arc.agric.za/arc.vopi
Aghoghovwia M (2018) Effect of different biochars on inorganic nitrogen availability. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stellenbosch
Barbosa DBP, Nabel M, Jablonowski ND (2014) Biogas-digestate as nutrient source for biomass production of Sida hermaphrodita, Zea mays L. and Medicago sativa L. Energy procedia 59:120–126
Chen H, Hu K, Nie Y, Wang K (2017) Analysis of soil water movement inside a footslope and a depression in a karst catchment, Southwest China. J Sci Rep 7(2544):1–13
Crusciol CAC, Garcia RA, Castro GSA, Rosolem CA (2011) Nitrate role in basic cation leaching under no-till. Braz J Soil Soc 35(6):1975–1984
DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (2010) Spinach production manual. Pretoria: Republic of South Africa. Available from www.nda.agric.za/docs/Brochures/brochureSpinach.pdf [Accessed on 20 July 2017]
Demirel B, Gol NP, Onay TT (2013) Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 12(2):242–246
Diacono M, Montemurro F (2011) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. J Sustain Agric 2:761–786
Edmeades DC (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Journal of nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 66(2):165–180
Hallberg GR (1987) The impacts of agricultural chemicals on ground water quality. J Geol 15(3):283–295
Han SH, An YJ, Hwang J, Kim SB, Park B (2016) The effects of organic manure and chemical fertiliser concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin) in a nursery system. Journal of forest science and technology 12(3):137–143
Hatfield JL, Follett RF (eds) (2008) Nitrogen in the environment, 2nd edn. Academic Press, USA
Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A (2017) Nutrient leaching from compost: implications for bioretention and other green storm water infrastructure. Journal of sustainable water in the built environment 3(3):1–8
Islam M, Hossain N, Alamgir M, Kibria MG (2014) Comparative effects of biogas plant residues, poultry manure and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of ladies finger. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7:29–33
Jimeneze RR, Lidha JK (1993) Automated element analysis: a rapid and reliable but expensive measurements of total carbon and nitrogen in plant and soil sample. Journal of soil science and plant analogy 24:1897–1924
Laegreid M, Bockman OC, Kaarstad O (1999) Agriculture, fertilizer and the environments. CAB International, Wallingford
Lehmann J, Schroth G (2003) Nutrient leaching. Trees, crops, and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CAB publishing, Wallingford, pp 151–166
Logsdon DS (2017) Nutrient leaching when soil is part of the plant growth. J Water 9:1–7
Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna Oxisol. J Plant Soil 333(1–2):117–128
Miri SM, Roughani A (2019) Allium species growing in Iran: botany and distribution. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on medicinal plants, organic farming, natural and pharmaceutical ingredients, Iran-Mashhad: Iranian medicinal plant society
Moss B (2008) Water pollution by agriculture. Philosophical transactions of the royal society journal of biological sciences 363(1491):659–666
Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Engineering in Life Sciences 12(3):242–257
Msibi BM, Mukabwe WO, Manyatsi AM, Mhazo N, Masarirambi MT (2014) Effects of liquid manure on growth and yield of spinach (beta vulgaris var. cicla) in a sub-tropical environment in Swaziland. Asian Journal of Agricultural Science 6(2):40–47
Nasir A, Khalid MU, Anwar S, Arslan C, Akhtar MJ, Suitan M (2012) Evaluation of bio-fertilizer application to ameliorate the environment and crop production. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 49(4):527–531
Ndolwana NG (2015) The use of winery waste compost to establish cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris subsp. cycla) on sandy soil at Bien Donné experimental farm near Paarl in the Western Cape region. MSc thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town
Nest TV, Ruysschaert G, Vandecasteele B, Cougnon M, Merckx R, Reheul D (2015) P availability and P leaching after reducing the mineral P fertilization and the use of digestate products as new organic fertilizers in a 4-year field trial with high P status. Agric Ecosyst Environ 20:56–67
Norse D (1994) Multiple threats to food production: environment, economy and population? Food security policy 19(2):133–148
Odlare M, Arthurson V, Pell M, Svensson K, Nehrenheim E, Abubaker J (2011) Land application of organic waste–effects on the soil ecosystem. Journal of applied energy 88(6):2210–2218
Ololade OO, Esterhuyse S, Levine AD (2017) The water-energy-food nexus from a South African perspective, in: water-energy-food nexus: theories and practices. Salam, PA; Shrestha S, anal AK, Pandey VP eds. USA: AGU-Wiley 350pp; ISBN: 978-1-119-24313-7
Parris K (2011) Impact of agriculture on water pollution in OECD countries: recent trends and future prospects. International journal of water resources development 27(1):33–52
Renaud M, Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Palma P, Sousa JP, Natal-da-Luz T (2017) Organic wastes as soil amendments–effects assessment towards soil invertebrates. J Hazard Mater 3:149–156
Saini RK, Ko EY, Keum YS (2017) Minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables: production, processing, storage, microbial safety, and nutritional potential. Food Reviews International 33(6):644–663
Schaible GD, Aillery MP (2017) Challenges for US irrigated agriculture in the face of emerging demands and climate change. In: Competition for water resources, 44-79. Economic research service. Elsevier, Washington
Simon K, Wu S, Kurui KS, Lei M, Lu Q, Bah H, Dong R (2015) Evaluation of slow pyrolysed wood and rice husk biochar for adsorption of ammonium nitrogen from piggery manure anaerobic digestate slurry. Science of total Environment 505:102–112
Soil Classification Working Group (1991) Soil classification - a taxonomic system for South Africa. Department of Agricultural Development, Pretoria
Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science Publication, London
Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, Kluß C, Kage H, Herrmann A (2013) Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Tillage Res 130:69–80
Tahir S, Marschner P (2017) Clay addition to sandy soil - influence of clay type and size on nutrient availability in sandy soils amended with residues differing in C/N ratio. Pedosphere 27(2):293–305
Tiwari A, Dwivedi AK, Dikshit PR (2002) Long term influence of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil fertility and productivity of soybean-wheat system in a vertisol. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 50:472–475
Van Reeuwijk LP (2002) Procedures for soil analysis, 6th edition, 9. Netherlands. International soil reference and information centre
Van Rensburg WJ, Van Averbeke W, Slabbert R, Faber M, Van Jaarsveld P, Van Heerden I, Wenhold F, Oelofse A (2007) African leafy vegetables in South Africa. Water SA 33(3):317–326
Vivekananthan K (2014) Spatial structure of soil texture and its influence on spatial variability of nitrate leaching. MSc thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Walsh JJ, Jones DL, Edwards-Jones G, Williams AP (2012) Replacing inorganic fertiliser with anaerobic digestate may maintain agricultural productivity at less environmental cost. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175(6):840–845
Zasoski RJ, Burau RG (1977) A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multielement tissue analysis. Journal of communications in soil science and plant analysis 8(5):425–436
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Professor Mofokeng for allowing us to use the biogas digestate from his biogas plant. The Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Central Research Fund, University of the Free State, is also acknowledged for providing funds to carry out this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tshikalange, B., Bello, Z.A. & Ololade, O.O. Comparative nutrient leaching capability of cattle dung biogas digestate and inorganic fertilizer under spinach cropping condition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 3237–3246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07104-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07104-8