Skip to main content
Log in

Heavy metal speciation with prediction model for heavy metal mobility and risk assessment in mine-affected soils

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heavy metals from mines affect the soil and groundwater, and cause and severely impact on the health of local residents. The soil samples were characterized for the distribution and by the chemical speciation method, and then estimated the human health risks of the two mineaffected soils after stabilization process.. Two extraction techniques (Tessier and Wenzel methods) were applied to fractionate metals, such as arsenic (As) and zinc (Zn), to quantify the chemical status of metals in the soils. The mobility of As and Zn was predicted using the ASTM test and sequential extraction (Tessier and Wenzel) method results. The correlation coefficients of As and Zn mobility prediction using Tessier and Wenzel Fraction 1 were 0.920 and 0.815, respectively. The sum of fractions F1 + F2 + F3 showed the highest correlation coefficients value and F value for mobility prediction of both As and Zn. The hazardous indices (HI) for non-carcinogenic risk and carcinogenic risk (CR) to humans were evaluated according to the pseudo-total concentrations of metal in soils. The CR values of carcinogenic for As were within the ranges from 1.38 × 10−4 to 1.25 × 10−3 and 3.71 × 10−4 to 3.35 × 10−3 for both Young Dong (YD) and Dea San (DS), respectively. The HI for non-carcinogenic risk was the highest for As in the YD (2.77) and DS (7.46) soils, which covered approximately 96 and 84% of HI, respectively. In summary, the contribution of As to risk from heavy metals was dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An J, Jeong B, Nam K (2019) Evaluation of the effectiveness of in situ stabilization in the field aged arsenic-contaminated soil: chemical extractability and biological response. J Hazard Mater 367:137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bade R, Oh S, Shin WS, Hwang I (2013) Human health risk assessment of soils contaminated with metal(loid)s by using DGT uptake: a case study of a former Korean metal refinery site. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 19:767–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastami KD, Neyestani MR, Esmaeilzadeh M, Haghparast S, Alavi C, Fathi S, Nourbakhsh S, Shirzadi EA, Parhizgar R (2017) Geochemical speciation, bioavailability and source identification of selected metals in surface sediments of the Southern Caspian Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 114:1014–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastami KD, Neyestani MR, Molamohyedin N, Shafeian E, Haghparast S, Shirzadi IA, Baniamam M (2018) Bioavailability, mobility, and origination of metals in sediments from Anzali Wetland, Caspian Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 136:22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonten LTC, Groenenberg JE, Weng L, van Riemsdijk WH (2008) Use of speciation and complexation models to estimate heavy metal sorption in soils. Geoderma 146:303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Cabrera JC, Georgiadis M, Jayachandran K (2002) Assessment of arsenic mobility in the soils of some golf courses in South Florida. Sci Total Environ 291:123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Zhang H, Yuan G, Li F (2017) Sources, speciation and transformation of arsenic in the gold mining impacted Jiehe River, China. Applied Geochemistry 84, 254–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demková L. JT, Bobuľská L. (2017) Assessment of soil heavy metal pollution in a former mining area – before and after the end of mining activities. Soil & Water Research 12, 229–236

  • EPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume I: human health evaluation manual (part a), EPA/540/1-89/002

  • EPA (1998) Guideline for ecological risk assessment

  • EPA U (2004) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Volume I: Human health evaluation manual. Part E. Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment

  • EPA (2007) Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report

  • EPA UJPRD, OSWER (2001) Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. 9355, 4–24

  • Gibbs RJ (1977) Transport phases of transition metals in the Amazon and Yukon Rivers. GSA Bull 88:829–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritse RG, van Driel W (1984) The Relationship Between Adsorption of Trace Metals, Organic Matter, and pH in Temperate Soils1. Journal of Environmental Quality 13, 197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groenenberg JE, Römkens PFAM, Comans RNJ, Luster J, Pampura T, Shotbolt L, Tipping E, De Vries W (2010) Transfer functions for solid-solution partitioning of cadmium, copper, nickel, lead and zinc in soils: derivation of relationships for free metal ion activities and validation with independent data. European Journal of Soil Science 61, 58–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach. Water Research 14, 975–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International A (2001) Standard Test Method for Laboratory Weathering of Solid Materials Using a Humidity Cell. West Conshohocken, PA

  • Ji H, Li H, Zhang Y, Ding H, Gao Y (2018) Distribution and risk assessment of heavy metals in overlying water, porewater, and sediments of Yongding River in a coal mine brownfield. J Soils Sediments 18:624–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji M-K, Gee E-D, Yun H-S, Lee W-R, Park Y-T, Khan MA, Jeon B-H, Choi J (2012) Inhibition of sulfide mineral oxidation by surface coating agents: batch and field studies. J Hazard Mater 229-230:298–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas G, Gasparatos D, Massas I (2018) A critical assessment on arsenic partitioning in mine-affected soils by using two sequential extraction protocols. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:1549–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-Y, Chon H-T (2001) Pollution of a water course impacted by acid mine drainage in the Imgok creek of the Gangreung coal field, Korea. Applied Geochemistry 16, 1387–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko I, Chang Y-Y, Lee C-H, Kim K-W (2005) Assessment of pilot-scale acid washing of soil contaminated with As, Zn and Ni using the BCR three-step sequential extraction. J Hazard Mater 127:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar Swain B, Goswami S, Das M (2011) Impact of Mining on Soil Quality: A Case Study from Hingula Opencast Coal Mine, Angul District, Orissa, Vistas in Geological Research, pp. 77–81

  • Lamb DT, Kader M, Wang L, Choppala G, Rahman MM, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2016) Pore-water carbonate and phosphate as predictors of arsenate toxicity in soil. Environ Sci Technol 50:13062–13069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ma Z, van der Kuijp TJ, Yuan Z, Huang L (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: Pollution and health risk assessment. Science of The Total Environment 468-469, 843–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao G-l, Liao D-x, Li Q-m (2008) Heavy metals contamination characteristics in soil of different mining activity zones. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 18, 207–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Sun J, Yang Z, Wang LJEM, Assessment (2015) Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils affected by mining activities around the Ganxi River in Chenzhou, Southern China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187, 731

  • Müller G (1969): Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River, 2, 108–118 pp

  • Oh S, Bade R, Lee H, Choi J, Shin WSJEES (2015) Risk assessment of metal(loid)-contaminated soils before and after soil washing. Environ Earth Sci 74:703–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo R, Barrado E, Lourdes P, Vega M (1990) Determination and speciation of heavy metals in sediments of the Pisuerga river. Water Res 24:373–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paria S, Yuet PK (2006) Solidification–stabilization of organic and inorganic contaminants using portland cement: a literature review. Environ Rev 14:217–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralte V (2017) Effect of coal mining on soil physico-chemical properties of Nokrek Biosphere Reserve of Meghalaya, northeastern India. Sci Vis 17:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahuquillo A, Rigol A, Rauret G (2003) Overview of the use of leaching/extraction tests for risk assessment of trace metals in contaminated soils and sediments. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 22, 152–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvé S, McBride MB, Norvell WA, Hendershot WH (1997) Copper Solubility and Speciation of In Situ Contaminated S

  • Sharma VK, Rhudy KB, Cargill JC, Tacker ME, Vazquez FG (2000) Metals and grain size distributions in soil of the middle Rio Grande basin, Texas USA. Environ Geol 39:698–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shim MJ, Choi BY, Lee G, Hwang YH, Yang J-S, O'Loughlin EJ, Kwon MJ (2015) Water quality changes in acid mine drainage streams in Gangneung, Korea, 10 years after treatment with limestone. J Geochem Explor 159:234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan PJ, Yelton JLJEG, Sciences W (1988) An evaluation of trace element release associated with acid mine drainage. Environmental Geology and Water Sciences 12, 181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhang Z, Cao H, Xu M, Xu L (2019) Concentrations, speciation, and ecological risk of heavy metals in the sediment of the Songhua River in an urban area with petrochemical industries. Chemosphere 219:538–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartjes FAJRA (1999) Risk-Based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency. Risk Analysis 19, 1235–1249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabaksblat LSJWR (2002) Specific Features in the Formation of the Mine Water Microelement Composition during Ore Mining. Water Resources 29, 333–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tansel B, Rafiuddin S (2016) Heavy metal content in relation to particle size and organic content of surficial sediments in Miami River and transport potential. Int J Sed Res 31:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC (1987) Partitioning of trace metals in sediments: relationships with bioavailability. Hydrobiologia 149:43–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtkowska M, Bogacki J, Witeska A (2016) Assessment of the hazard posed by metal forms in water and sediments. Sci Total Environ 551-552:387–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Cao L, Wang J, Liu C, Huang C, Cai W, Fang H, Peng X (2014) Speciation of metals and assessment of contamination in surface sediments from Daya Bay, South China Sea. Sustainability 6:9096–9113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M-K, Liu Z-Y, Wang H (2010) Use of Single Extraction Methods to Predict Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Polluted Soils to Rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 41, 820–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Subsurface Environmental Management (SEM) Project, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (Grant Number 2019002470001) and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (Grant 2E29670).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaeyoung Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 428 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, Y., Yun, HS., Pandi, K. et al. Heavy metal speciation with prediction model for heavy metal mobility and risk assessment in mine-affected soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 3213–3223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06922-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06922-0

Keyword

Navigation