Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of fiscal decentralisation on the environment: new evidence from China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the environmental effects of fiscal decentralisation from theoretical and empirical perspectives. We first analyse the dynamic relationship between fiscal decentralisation and the environment using an endogenous growth model. Our findings demonstrate that fiscal decentralisation and environmental pollution display an inverted U-shaped relationship. We then use provincial panel data from 1998 to 2015 in the empirical investigation of CO2 emissions in China. Our findings show that empirical results verify the correctness of the theoretical results. The results obtained are robust using different methods. The findings of this work may help China’s central government and local governments in addressing the problem of CO2 emissions by using a reasonable degree of fiscal decentralisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These used data in this study are not afflicted with a high degree of multicollinearity because the maximum variance inflation factor is 1.623.

  2. The 30 provinces and municipalities are Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, Hainan, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang.

References

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran T (2010) On the link between fiscal decentralization and public debt in OECD countries. Public Choice 145(3-4):351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):634–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Shleifer A (2001) Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. IMF Staff Pap 48:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoodi H, Zou H (1998) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: a cross-country study. J Urban Econ 43(2):244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2005) A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 53(3):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Fang H, Jin X (2014) The “growth-first strategy” and the imbalance between consumption and investment in China. China Econ Rev 31:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faguet JP (2004) Does decentralization increase responsiveness to local needs? evidence from Bolivia. J Public Econ 88:867–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? sorting out the causality. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzarelli G (2004) The theory of fiscal federalism as a theory of economic organization: assessment and prospectus. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Università Degli Studi di Roma, “La Sapienza”, Roman, Italy

  • Guan D, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM (2008) The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob Environ Chang 18(4):626–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Q (2015) Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from Chinese panel data. China Econ Rev 36:86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Pan F, Yan Y (2012) Is economic transition harmful to China’s urban environment? evidence from industrial air pollution in Chinese cities. Urban Stud 49(8):1767–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia J, Guo Q, Zhang J (2014) Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Econ Rev 28:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuai P, Yang S, Tao A, Zhang S, Khan ZD (2019) Environmental effects of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization and the sustainability implications. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zhou L (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ 89(9-10):1743–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Gerking S (2000) Regulatory federalism and environmental protection in the United States. J Reg Sci 40:453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen X, Wei R (2017) Socioeconomic drivers of environmental pollution in China: a spatial econometric analysis. Discret Dyn Nat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4673262

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen JB (2007) Technology spill over through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD countries. J Int Econ 72(2):464–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E, Qian Y, Xu C (2000) Incentives, scale economies, and organization forms. Rev Econ Stud 67(2):359–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi Z, Zhang Y, Guan D, Shan Y, Liu Z, Cong R, Yuan XC, Wei YM (2016) Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities. Appl Energy 184:1073–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL (2003) Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism. J Reg Sci 43:711–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave R (1959) Public finance. McGraw–Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates WE (2005) Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. Int Tax Public Financ 12(4):349–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, June.

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Weingast BR (1997) Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. J Econ Perspect 11(4):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Xu C (1993) Why China’s economic reforms differ: the M-form hierarchy and entry/expansion of the non-state sector. Econ Transit 1(2):135–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Que W, Zhang Y, Liu S, Yang C (2018) The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and factor market segmentation on environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 184:402–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2006) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 103

  • Rubinfeld D (1987) Economics of the local public sector. In: Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of Public Economics, vol II. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2013) Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries? Energy Econ 37:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Gow J (2019) Effects of energy consumption and economic growth on environmental quality: evidence from Qatar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18124–18142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Shao S, Wang P, Guan D (2016) New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors. Appl Energy 184:742–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Zhang Q (2018) China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Sci Data 5:170201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman H (2007) Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution. National Bureau of Economic Research No.13098

  • Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? Int Econ Rev 39(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Heerink N (2016) Foreign direct investment, fiscal decentralization and land conflicts in China. China Econ Rev 38:92–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2016) Tax reform, fiscal decentralization, and regional economic growth: new evidence from China. Econ Model 59:520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our genuine appreciation to the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20190792) for supporting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangliang Liu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Li, L. Effects of fiscal decentralisation on the environment: new evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 36878–36886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06818-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06818-z

Keywords

Navigation