Abstract
Pakistan has an abundant solar power potential which can be effectively utilized for the electricity generation. There are various sites across the country which have sufficient solar irradiation across the year, and thus, suitable for the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) power projects. This study, therefore, aims to undertake research on the establishment of solar power project site selection in Pakistan. In this context, 14 promising cities of Pakistan are considered as alternatives and studied in terms of economic, environmental, social, location, climate, and orography criteria and further supplemented with 20 sub-criteria. Initially, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method has been used to prioritize each of the main criteria and sub-criteria. Later, fuzzy VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (F-VIKOR) method has been employed to prioritize the 14 alternatives. The present investigation reveals that Khuzdar (C2), Badin (C3), and Mastung (C7) are the most suitable cities for the installation of solar PV power projects in Pakistan. Finally, the outcome of the sensitivity analysis revealed that obtained results are reliable and robust for the installation of solar PV power projects in Pakistan. This study shall assist government, energy planners, and policymakers in making cities sustainable by establishing solar power projects in Pakistan.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GHI :
-
global horizontal irradiation
- NASA :
-
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- NREL :
-
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- RE :
-
renewable energy
- MCDA :
-
multi-criteria decision analysis
- AHP :
-
analytical hierarchy process
- F-VIKOR :
-
Fuzzy VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje
- CI :
-
consistency index
- CR :
-
consistency ratio
- RI :
-
random index
- TFNs :
-
triangular fuzzy numbers
References
Afsordegan A, Sánchez M, Agell N, Zahedi S, Cremades LV (2016) Decision making under uncertainty using a qualitative TOPSIS method for selecting sustainable energy alternatives. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0982-7
Al Garni HZ, Awasthi A (2018) Solar PV power plants site selection: a review, in: Advances in renewable energies and power technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812959-3.00002-2
Al Garni HZ, Awasthi A (2017) Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Appl Energy 206:1225–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024
Alami Merrouni A, Elwali Elalaoui F, Ghennioui A, Mezrhab A, Mezrhab A (2018a) A GIS-AHP combination for the sites assessment of large-scale CSP plants with dry and wet cooling systems. Case study: Eastern Morocco. Sol Energy 166:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.038
Alami Merrouni A, Elwali Elalaoui F, Mezrhab A, Mezrhab A, Ghennioui A (2018b) Large scale PV sites selection by combining GIS and analytical hierarchy process. Case study: Eastern Morocco. Renew Energy 119:863–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.044
Ali M (2018) Pakistan’s quest for coal-based energy under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): implications for the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31935–31937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3326-y
Aly A, Jensen SS, Pedersen AB (2017) Solar power potential of Tanzania: identifying CSP and PV hot spots through a GIS multicriteria decision making analysis. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.077
Bhutto AW, Bazmi AA, Zahedi G (2012) Greener energy: issues and challenges for Pakistan-solar energy prospective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2762–2780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.043
Chakraborty S, Sadhu PK, Pal N (2014) New location selection criterions for solar PV power plant. Int J Renew Energy Res 4:1020–1030
Charabi Y, Gastli A (2011) PV site suitability analysis using GIS-based spatial fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation. Renew Energy 36:2554–2561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.037
Dehe B, Bamford D (2015) Development, test and comparison of two multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models: a case of healthcare infrastructure location. Expert Syst Appl 42:6717–6727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.059
Doljak D, Stanojević G (2017) Evaluation of natural conditions for site selection of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants in Serbia. Energy. 127:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.140
Effat HA (2013) Selection of potential sites for solar energy farms in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt using SRTM and multicriteria analysis. Cloud Publ Int J Adv Remote Sens GIS 2:205–220
Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0
Franek J, Kresta A (2014) Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP. Procedia Econ Financ 12:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3
Government of Pakistan (n.d.) Pakistan Bureau of Statistics | 6th Population and Housing Census [WWW Document]. URL http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/provisional-summary-results-6th-population-and-housing-census-2017-0 (accessed 7.24.18)
Harker PT (1987) Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Model 9:837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
Janke JR (2010) Multicriteria GIS modeling of wind and solar farms in Colorado. Renew Energy 35:2228–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.014
Jun D, Tian-Tian F, Yi-Sheng Y, Yu M (2014) Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II. Renew Sust Energ Rev 35:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.005
Khaliq A, Ikram A, Salman M (2015) Quaid-e-Azam Solar Power park: prospects and challenges, in: 2015 Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies. PGSRET:2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/PGSRET.2015.7312186
Kim Y, Chung ES (2013) Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea. Appl Math Model 37:9419–9430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
Klir G (2001) Foundations of fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic: a historical overview. Int J Gen Syst 30:91–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070108960701
Krejčí J, Stoklasa J (2018) Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Syst Appl 114:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.060
Lee AHI, Kang HY, Lin CY, Shen KC (2015) An integrated decision-making model for the location of a PV solar plant. Sustain. 7:13522–13541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013522
Lee AHI, Kang HY, Liou YJ (2017) A hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making approach for photovoltaic solar plant location selection. Sustain. 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020184
Liu HC, Mao LX, Zhang ZY, Li P (2013) Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection. Appl Math Model 37:6325–6338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.026
Loken E (2007) Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:1584–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005
Mateo JRSC (2012) Multi criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry, Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry. Green Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0
Mirjat NH, Uqaili MA, Harijan K, Valasai GD, Shaikh F, Waris M (2017) A review of energy and power planning and policies of Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.040
NASA-POWER Project Data Sets [WWW Document] (2018) NASA. URL https://power.larc.nasa.gov/ (accessed 10.23.18)
Noorollahi E, Fadai D, Akbarpour Shirazi M, Ghodsipour S (2016) Land suitability analysis for solar farms exploitation using GIS and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)—a case study of Iran. Energies. 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9080643
Noorollahi Y, Itoi R, Fujii H, Tanaka T (2007) GIS model for geothermal resource exploration in Akita and Iwate prefectures, northern Japan. Comput Geosci 33:1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.11.006
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Perpiña Castillo C, Batista e Silva F, Lavalle C (2016) An assessment of the regional potential for solar power generation in EU-28. Energy Policy 88:86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.004
Rauf O, Wang S, Yuan P, Tan J (2015) An overview of energy status and development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:892–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.012
Rehman SAU, Cai Y, Nafees M, Das Walasai G, Mirjat NH, Rashid W (2017) Overcoming electricity crisis in Pakistan: an overview of the renewable energy status and development in Pakistan. J Environ Account Manag. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2017.12.007
Rezaei M, Mostafaeipour A, Qolipour M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2018) Investigation of the optimal location design of a hybrid wind-solar plant: a case study. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.147
Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2013) An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making. Int J Gen Syst:121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2012.710442
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company.
Sabziparvar A, Shetaee H (2007) Estimation of global solar radiation in arid and semi-arid climates of East and West Iran. Energy. 32:649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.005
Sánchez-Lozano JM, García-Cascales MS, Lamata MT (2016) Comparative TOPSIS-ELECTRE TRI methods for optimal sites for photovoltaic solar farms. Case study in Spain. J Clean Prod 127:387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.005
Sánchez-Lozano JM, Teruel-Solano J, Soto-Elvira PL, Socorro García-Cascales M (2013) Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in south-eastern Spain. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:544–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019
Saracoglu BO, Ohunakin OS, Adelekan DS, Gill J, Atiba OE, Okokpujie IP, Atayero AA (2018) A framework for selecting the location of very large photovoltaic solar power plants on a global/supergrid. Energy Rep 4:586–602
Shah SAA, Solangi YA, Ikram M (2019) Analysis of barriers to the adoption of cleaner energy technologies in Pakistan using modified Delphi and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 235:1037–1050
Shahzad MK, Zahid A, Rashid T, Rehan MA, Ali M, Ahmad M (2017) Techno-economic feasibility analysis of a solar-biomass off grid system for the electrification of remote rural areas in Pakistan using HOMER software. Renew Energy 106:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.033
Sheikh MA (2009) Renewable energy resource potential in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:2696–2702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.029
Shiva Kumar B, Sudhakar K (2015) Performance evaluation of 10 MW grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy Rep 1:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.10.001
Shukla RK, Garg D, Agarwal A (2014) An integrated approach of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination. Prod Manuf Res 2:415–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.919886
Sindhu S, Nehra V, Luthra S (2017) Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: case study of India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:496–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.135
Solangi YA, Tan Q, Khan MWA, Mirjat NH, Ahmed I (2018) The selection of wind power project location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: a factor analysis, AHP, and fuzzy-TOPSIS application. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11081940
Solangi YA, Tan Q, Mirjat NH, Valasai GD, Khan MWA, Ikram M (2019) An integrated Delphi-AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach toward ranking and selection of renewable energy resources in Pakistan. Processes. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7020118
Suh J, Brownson JRS (2016) Solar farm suitability using geographic information system fuzzy sets and analytic hierarchy processes: case study of Ulleung Island, Korea. Energies 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9080648
Tahri M, Hakdaoui M, Maanan M (2015) The evaluation of solar farm locations applying geographic information system and multi-criteria decision-making methods: case study in southern Morocco. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:1354–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.054
Tian Z-P, Wang J-Q, Zhang H-Y (2018) An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Appl Soft Comput J 72:636–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.037
Uyan M (2013) GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region Konya/Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.042
Vafaeipour M, Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Morshed Varzandeh MH, Derakhti A, Keshavarz Eshkalag M (2014) Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: new application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. Energy Convers Manag 86:653–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.083
Wakeel M, Chen B, Jahangir S (2016) Overview of energy portfolio in Pakistan. Energy Procedia:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.024
Wang CN, Nguyen VT, Thai HTN, Duong DH (2018) Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Viet Nam. Energies 11:1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061504
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
Watson JJW, Hudson MD (2015) Regional scale wind farm and solar farm suitability assessment using GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation. Landsc Urban Plan 138:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.001
Wichapa N, Khokhajaikiat P (2018) Solving a multi-objective location routing problem for infectious waste disposal using hybrid goal programming and hybrid genetic algorithm. Int J Ind Eng Comput:75–98. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.4.003
World Bank (2016) The World Bank DataBank. Data Bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx
World Bank Group (2017) Global Solar Atlas [WWW Document]. Washingt, D.C.
Xu L, Wang Y, Solangi YA, Zameer H, Shah SAA (2019) Off-grid solar PV power generation system in Sindh, Pakistan: a techno-economic feasibility analysis. Processes 7:308
Yunna W, Geng S (2014) Multi-criteria decision making on selection of solar-wind hybrid power station location: a case of China. Energy Convers Manag 81:527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.056
Zafar U, Ur Rashid T, Khosa AA, Khalil MS, Rahid M (2018) An overview of implemented renewable energy policy of Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:654–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.034
Zameer H, Wang Y (2018) Energy production system optimization: evidence from Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:886–893
Zoghi M, Houshang Ehsani A, Sadat M, Javad Amiri M, Karimi S (2015) Optimization solar site selection by fuzzy logic model and weighted linear combination method in arid and semi-arid region: a case study Isfahan-IRAN. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:986–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solangi, Y.A., Shah, S.A.A., Zameer, H. et al. Assessing the solar PV power project site selection in Pakistan: based on AHP-fuzzy VIKOR approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 30286–30302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06172-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06172-0