Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the nonlinear relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and the ecological footprint (EF), trying to confirm the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). We use a panel data model for MINT (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey) countries in the period 1990–2013 and an empirical framework based on the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH). Using the fully modified least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) econometric methodologies, the empirical results confirm an inverted-U relationship between FDI and the ecological footprint. To reinforce our analysis, we check the connection between economic growth and the ecological footprint, validating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis for MINT countries. Finally, we also confirm a negative connection between renewable energy use, the urbanization process, and the changes in the ecological footprint. These findings offer a series of useful recommendations for policymakers, where the promotion of clean industries and energy-efficiency actions are essential for reducing environmental damage in MINT countries. We highlight the viability of the ecological footprint as a first-order environmental indicator whose evolution is determined by demographic fluctuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Kim and Adilov (2012) simultaneously studied the pollution halo hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis and concluded that the two hypotheses are not contradictory.

References

  • Abdouli M, Hammami S (2017) Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: an empirical study for the MENA countries. Qual Quant 51:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya J (2009) FDI, growth and the environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. J Econ Dev 341:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu MA (2005) Foreign direct investment and the environment: pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany pp 9–11

  • Al-Mulali U (2012) Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy 441:564–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA Middle East and North African region. Energy 84:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Tang CF (2013) Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council GCC countries. Energy Policy 60:813–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin A (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: the role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Herranz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 378:3282–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE, Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69:2255–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asici AA, Acar S (2016) Does income growth relocate ecological footprint? Ecol Indic 61:707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atici C (2012) Carbon emissions, trade liberalization, and the Japan–ASEAN interaction: a group-wise examination. J Int Econ 26(1):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek J, Kim HS (2011) Trade liberalization, economic growth, energy consumption and the environment: time series evidence from G-20 countries. J East Asian Econ Integr 15:3–32

  • Bakirtas I, Cetin M (2017) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18273–18283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre D, Alvarez A (2016) Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:16478–16494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre D, Alvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4881–4892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera SR, Dash DP (2017) The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA South and Southeast Asian region. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:96–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bento JPC, Moutinho VMF (2016) CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renew Sust Energy Rev 55:142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinelli L, Black D (2004) Urbanization and growth. J Urban Econ 56:80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bildirici ME (2013) Economic growth and electricity consumption: MS-VAR and MS-granger causality analysis. OPEC Energy Rev 37(4):447–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energy Rev 54:838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco L, Gonzalez F, Ruiz I (2013) The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxf Dev Stud 41(1):104–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokpin GA (2017) Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of institutions and governance. Res Int Bus Financ 39:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs greenhouse gases and economic growth: evidence from a panel of EU European Union countries. Energy 74:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sust Energy Rev 76:138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Al-Malk AY, Al Korbi K (2018) Is it possible to improve environmental quality without reducing economic growth: evidence from the Qatar economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikaraishi M, Fujiwara A, Shinji Kaneko S, Phetkeo Poumanyvong P, Komatsu S, Kalugin A (2015) The moderating effects of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions: a latent class modeling approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 2015.90(A):302–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20:249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung S (2014) Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. J Dev Econ 108:222–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Co CY, List JA (2004) Is foreign direct investment attracted to ‘knowledge creators’? Appl Econ 36(11):1143–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Elliott R (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Dev Econ 9:530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Neumayer E (2004) Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Popul Dev Rev 26(1):5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliot R, Strobl E (2008) The environmental performance of firms: the role of foreign ownership, training and experience. Ecol Econ 65:538–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North–South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109:755–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S (2009) Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy 37(11):4208–4219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer I, Rosen M (2002) Thermal energy storage: systems and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Peng J (2018) Impacts of urbanization of mountainous areas on resources and environment: based on ecological footprint model. Sustainability 10:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D (2009) Blaming cities for climate change: an analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ Urban 21(1):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2, emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Crenshaw EM, Craig Jenkins J (2002) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Soc Sci Q 83(1):226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ 70:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Lui L-C, Wu G, Wie Y-M (2006) Analysing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel J, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev 89:379–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii T (1996) Industrialization, urbanization and economic growth. Econ Rev 17:368–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2010) The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J Urban Econ 67(3):404–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2018) https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/data/

  • Gokmenoglu K, Taspinar N (2016) The relationship between Co2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev 25(5):706–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement, NBER working papers 3914, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Grossman GM, Krueger A (1992) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Soc Sci Electron Publ 8:223–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger A (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halicioğlu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanif I (2017) Economics-energy-environment nexus in Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy 141:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna R (2010) US environmental regulation and FDI: evidence from a panel of US-based multinational firms. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(3):158–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassaballa H (2014) Testing for Granger causality between energy use and foreign direct investment inflows in developing countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Zhong Z, Fang Yin F, Wang D (2018) Impact of energy consumption on air quality in Jiangsu Province of China. Sustainability 10(1):94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubler M, Keller A (2010) Energy savings via FDI? Empirical evidence from developing countries. Environ Dev Econ 151:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irandoust M (2016) The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: evidence from the Nordic countries. Ecol Indic 69:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulations and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us. J Econ Lit 33:132–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik BS, Wei SJ (2004) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth?. Contributions in economic analysis and policy, 32

  • Jóhannesson SE, Davíðsdóttir B, Heinonen JT (2018) Standard ecological footprint method for small, highly specialized economies. Ecol Econ 146:370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis-testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59(6):1551–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90(1):1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade, and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley A, Riddel M (2010) A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 69(4):905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Khan MZ, Zaman K, Irfan D, Khatab H (2014) RETRACTED: Questing the three key growth determinants: energy consumption, foreign direct investment and financial development in South Asia. Renew Energy 68:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MH, Adilov N (2012) The lesser of two evils: an empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff. Appl Econ 44:2597–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Beak J (2012) The environmental consequence of economic growth revisited. Econ Bull 31:1198–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsten S (2014) Renewable energy sources act and trading of emission certificates: a national and a supranational tool direct energy turnover to renewable electricity-supply in Germany. Energy Policy 64:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2015) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft J, Kraft A (1978) On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Dev:401–403

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2005) Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revised: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Econ 27:857–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root test in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang FH (2008) Does foreign direct investment harm the host country’s environment? Evidence from China. Available at SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1479864

  • Liddle B (2014) Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analysis. Popul Environ 35:286–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B, Lung S (2010) Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption related environmental impacts. Popul Environ 31:317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Kim H (2018) Ecological footprint, foreign direct investment, and gross domestic production: evidence of Belt & Road Initiative countries. Sustainability 10(10):3527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu TY, Su CW, Jiang XZ (2015) Is economic growth improving urbanisation? A cross-regional study of China. Urban Stud 52:1883–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Huang J, Zikhali P (2016) The bittersweet fruits of industrialization in rural China: the cost of environment and the benefit from off-farm employment. China Econ Rev 38:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Zhan D, Li J (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613–614:521–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JG, Haug AA, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. J Appl Econ 14:563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Roy J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. J Appl Econ 31(4):652–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2005) Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework. Econ Model 22(3):423–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neequaye NA, Oladi R (2015) Environment, growth, and FDI revisited. Int Rev Econ Financ 39:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD 1997. Foreign direct investment and the environment: an overview of the literature. Paris; 1997

  • Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Lin B (2017) CO2 emissions during urbanization: a comparative study between China and Japan. J Clean Prod 143:356–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özbugday FC, Erbas BC (2015) How effective are energy efficiency and renewable energy in curbing CO2, emissions in the long run? A heterogeneous panel data analysis. Energy 82:734–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk Z, Yildirim E (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve in the MINT countries: evidence of long-run panel causality test. Int J Econ Soc Res 11(1):175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao HT, Li YY, Fu HC (2014) Clean energy, non-clean energy, and economic growth in the MIST countries. Energy Policy 67:932–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2001a) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Revised working paper, Indiana University

  • Pedroni P (2001b) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83:727–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Economet Theor 20:597–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pethig R (1976) Pollution, welfare and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. J Environ Econ Manag 2(3):160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (1995) Fully modified least squares and vector autoregression. Econometrica 59:1023–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70(2):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezza AA (2013) FDI and pollution havens: evidence from the Norwegian manufacturing sector. Ecol Econ 90:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic 81:348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Mbarek MB (2016) Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests. Prog Nucl Energy 88:364–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen P (1991) Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Economet Theor 7(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satoglu EB (2017) “Emerging” through foreign investment: investment development path estimation of “MINT” economies. Adv Econ Bus 5(5):256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebri M, Ben-Salha O (2014) On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2, emissions and trade openness: fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renew Sust Energy Rev 39:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, A Sinha A (2019) Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions Nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod 217:603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva S, Soares I, Pinho C (2012) The impact of renewable energy sources on economic growth and CO2 emissions—a SVAR approach. Eur Res Stud 15:133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018a) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018b) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2017) Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. J Clean Prod 168:1217–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska-Javorcik B, Wei S (2005) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secrect or popular myth? Contrib Econ Anal Policy 3(2):1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) Simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4):783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson KE, Kuhn RG, Xu W (2001) Environmental policy implementation in rural China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang. Environ Manag 274:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J (2015) Testing the pollution haven effect: does the type of FDI matter? Environ Resour Econ 60(4):549–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Tan EC (2015) Does tourism effectively stimulate Malaysia’s economic growth? Tour Manag 46:158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibaa S, Omri A (2017) Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilt B (2007) Perceptions of risk from industrial pollution: a comparison of occupational groups. Hum Organ 65(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK (2011) Structural VAR analysis of renewable energy consumption, real GDP and CO2 emissions: evidence from India. Econ Bull 31:1793–1806

    Google Scholar 

  • Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income inequality and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao CC, Campbell JE, Mena-Carrasco M, Spak SN, Carmichael GR, Chen Y (2012) Biofuels that cause land-use change may have much larger non-GHG air quality admissions than fossil fuels. Environ Sci Technol 46:10835–10841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Apergis N (2018) Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environ Sci Pol 80:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low-income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Lin D (2017) Persistence of policy shocks to ecological footprint of the USA. Ecol Indic 80:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldkirch A, Gopinath M (2008) Pollution control and foreign direct investment in Mexico: an industry-level analysis. Environ Resour Econ 41(3):289–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter I, Ugelow JL (1979) Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio:102–109

  • Wang QY (2005) Energy and environment: problems and solutions in China. Energy Environ 4:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Gu FF, Tse D, Kin C (2013) When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI. Int Bus Rev 22:450–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen L, Kubota J (2016) The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. J Clean Prod 112:1368–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018). World development indicators. http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu LJ, Cheng WY, Zhang L (2009) The relationship between energy consumption structure and the quality of atmospheric environment-an example in an area of Chengdu. Environ Sci Manag 34:166–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lin B (2015) How industrialization and urbanization process impact on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from nonparametric additive regression models. Energy Econ 48:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım S, Özdemir BK, Doğan B (2013) Financial development and economic growth nexus in emerging European economies: new evidence from asymmetric causality. Int J Econ Financ Issues 3(3):710–722

    Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng DZ, Zhao L (2009) Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. J Environ Econ Manag 582:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeren F (2015) Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların CO2 emisyonuna etkisi: Kirlilik hale hipotezi mi kirlilik cenneti hipotezi mi. Journal of Yaşar University 1037:6442–6448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KH (2002) What explains China’s rising urbanisation in the reform era? Urban Stud 39:2301–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Lin Y (2012) Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 49:488–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Sheng P (2017) The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the environment: market perspectives and evidence from China. Economies 51:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Gan Q, Liu Y, Yan Z (2017) The impact of foreign direct investment on SO2 emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 166:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Economy and Public Finance, Economic and Business Statistics and Economic Policy, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain

    Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & José María Cantos-Cantos

  2. Banking and Finance Department, Eastern Mediterranean University, via Mersin 10, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Turkey

    Korhan K. Gokmenoglu & Nigar Taspinar

Authors
  1. Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Korhan K. Gokmenoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nigar Taspinar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. José María Cantos-Cantos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Gokmenoglu, K.K., Taspinar, N. et al. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 23010–23026 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation