Abstract
The effects of slag, fly ash (formed in boiler above 1500 °C), and experimental ash (formed in muffle furnace at 815 °C) on the formation of sulfur trioxide (SO3) were studied in a fixed bed rector. The results showed that the slag had the best catalytic effect on SO3 formation, the effect of fly ash was second, and the effect of experimental ash was the worst. The reason may be that the forms of iron in different samples were different. Iron in the experimental ash all existed in the form of Fe2O3. Iron in the fly ash mainly existed in the form of composite iron oxides, such as Fe0.3Mg0.7SiO3, Ca3Fe2(SiO4)3, and MgFe2O4. Iron in the slag also mainly existed in the form of composite iron oxides, such as CaFe2O4, MgFe2O4, and CaMgO0.88Fe0.12SiO4. The different forms of iron had different effects on SO3 formation. Composite iron oxides could produce more oxygen vacancies owing to lattice defects. This likely promoted the migration and regeneration of lattice oxygen and thus better promoted the formation of SO3 than Fe2O3. Moreover, MgFe2O4 and Ca3Fe2(SiO4)3 could better promote SO3 formation than CaMgO0.88Fe0.12SiO4 and Fe0.3Mg0.7SiO3. In addition, increasing the SO2 concentration and O2 concentration increased the SO3 concentration but increasing the SO2 concentration decreased the SO3 formation ratio.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-019-05424-3/MediaObjects/11356_2019_5424_Fig8_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams B, Senior C (2006) Curbing the blue plume: SO3 formation and mitigation. Power 150:39–42
Ahn JY, Okerlund R, Fry A et al (2011) Sulfur trioxide formation during oxy-coal combustion. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5:127–135
Alzueta MU, Bilbao R, Glaborg P (2001) Inhibition and sensitization of fuel oxidation by SO2. Combust Flame 127:2234–2251
Belo LP, Elliott LK, Stanger RJ (2014) High-temperature conversion of SO2 to SO3: homogeneous experiments and catalytic effect of fly ash from air and oxy-fuel firing. Energy Fuel 28:7243–7251
Choudhury NN, Padak B (2016) A comprehensive experimental and modeling study of sulfur trioxide formation in oxy-fuel combustion. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 51:165–175
Duan LB, Duan YQ, Sarbassov Y, Li Y, Anthony EJ (2015) SO3 formation under oxy-CFB combustion conditions. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 43:172–178
Durie RA, Matthews CJ, Smith MY (1970) The catalytic formation of sulfur trioxide in fuel-rich propane-air flames. Combust Flame 15:157–165
Fleig D, Andersson K, Normann F, Johnsson F (2011) SO3 formation under oxyfuel combustion conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:8505–8514
Fleig D, Alzueta MU, Normann F, Abián M, Andersson K, Johnsson F (2013) Measurement and modeling of sulfur trioxide formation in a flow reactor under post-flame conditions. Combust Flame 160:1142–1151
Galloway BD, Sasmaz E, Padak B (2015) Binding of SO3 to fly ash components: CaO, MgO, Na2O and K2O. Fuel 145:79–83
Gao ZM, Wu TH, Wang GJ, Peng SY (1994) Catalytic behavior of magnesium ferrate and zinc ferrite ultrafine powder in oxidative dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene. Mol Catal 04:293–298
Guo JZ, Liu XW, Wang H, Zhang P, Xu Y, Chen Z, Xu M (2018) Effect of HCl and CO on sulfur trioxide formation mechanisms during oxy-fuel combustion. Fuel Process Technol 174:95–103
Hindiyarti L, Glarborg P, Marshall P (2007) Reactions of SO3 with the O/H radical pool under combustion conditions. J Phys Chem A 111:3984–3991
Jørgensen TL, Livbjerg H, Glarborg P (2007) Homogeneous and heterogeneously catalyzed oxidation of SO2. Chem Eng Sci 62:4496–4499
Kim KH, Choi JH (1981) Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of sulfur dioxide on α-Fe2O3. J Phys Chem 85:2447–2450
Li JF, Zhang CH, Cheng XF (2013) Effects of alkaline-earth metals on the structure, adsorption and catalytic behavior of iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 464–465:10–19
Marier P, Dibbs HP (1974) The catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3 by fly ash and the capture of SO2 and SO3 by CaO and MgO. Thermochim Acta 8:155–165
Miller BG (2017) Formation and control of sulfur oxides. Clean Coal Eng Technol 3:467–506
Murciano LT, White V, Petrocelli F, Chadwick D (2011) Sour compression process for the removal of SOx and NOx from oxyfuel-derived CO2. Energy Procedia 4:908–916
Sarbassov Y, Duan LB, Jeremias M, Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2017) SO3 formation and the effect of fly ash in a bubbling fluidised bed under oxy-fuel combustion condition. Fuel Process Technol 167:314–321
Srivastava R, Miller C, Erickson CR (2004) Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 54:750–762
Suo HY, Zhang CH, Wu BS, Xu J, Yang Y, Xiang H, Li Y (2012) A comparative study of Fe/SiO2 Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts using tetraethoxysilane and acidic silica sol as silica sources. Catal Today 183:88–95
Tseng HH, Wey MY, Fu CH (2003) Carbon materials as catalyst supports for SO2 oxidation: catalytic activity of CuO-AC. Carbon 41:139–149
Wang ZQ, Hu YJ, Cheng XX, Ma CY (2018) Study of adsorption characteristics of calcium-based sorbents with SO3. Energy Procedia 144:43–49
Xiang BX, Shen WF, Zhang M, Yang H, Lu J (2017) Effects of different factors on sulfur trioxide formations in a coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler. Chem Eng Sci 172:262–277
Xiao HP, Ru Y, Cheng QY, Zhai G, Dou C, Qi C, Chen Y (2018) Effect of sodium sulfate in ash on sulfur trioxide formation in the postflame region. Energy Fuel 32:8668–8675
Xu YS, Liu XW, Zhang PH, Guo J, Han J, Zhou Z, Xu M (2016a) Role of chlorine in ultrafine particulate matter formation during the combustion of a blend of high-Cl coal and low-Cl coal. Fuel 184:185–191
Xu YS, Liu XW, Cui J, Chen D, Xu M, Pan S, Zhang K, Gao X (2016b) Field measurements on the emission and removal of PM2.5 from coal-fired power stations: 4. PM removal performance of wet electrostatic precipitators. Energy Fuel 30:7465–7473
Xu YS, Liu XW, Qang H et al (2019) Investigation of simultaneously reducing the emission of ultrafine particulate matter and heavy metals by adding modified Attapulgite during coal combustion. Energy Fuel 33:1518–1526
Yang M (2007) Research on wet catalytic oxidation reaction and its catalyst. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics) (in Chinese)
Zhang YW, Jin J, Liu W et al (2015) Effect of fly ash on oxidation characteristics of SO2 in wet desulfurization system. Coal Convers 38:75–78 (in Chinese)
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51206047).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, H., Cheng, Q., Li, J. et al. Enhanced effects of ash and slag on SO3 formation in the post-flame region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 20920–20928 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05424-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05424-3