Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A scientometric analysis and visualization of global research on brownfields

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brownfields have attracted increasing attentions from both researchers and practitioners. However, few studies have attempted to make a comprehensive and quantitative review on this topic. This study conducted a scientometric review on the brownfield research from 1995 to 2017 using CiteSpace. The knowledge structure, hot topics, research trends, and gaps were analyzed based on the co-author, co-word, co-citation, and clusters analysis. Six hundred thirty articles from the Web of Science core collection database were selected as the research samples. Results revealed that the research focus has changed from soil remediation technologies to sustainable regeneration methods. The most vital development in brownfield research occurred in the USA, England, Canada, Germany, and China. “Brownfield,” “heavy metal,” “remediation,” “redevelopment,” and “sustainability” were the most frequently used keywords. Whereas “management” and “biodiversity” received citation bursts in recent years. Existing researches mainly concentrated on subject categories of environmental sciences ecology, environmental sciences, engineering, environmental studies, engineering environmental, and urban studies. Sustainable regeneration, urban brownfields’ regeneration, mental distribution, coal-mine brownfield, and ecosystem service were the identified co-citation clusters and represented the hot topics and emerging trends. The research gaps can serve as a motivation to research on the next generation of brownfields to support the sustainable development. This study provides researchers and practitioners an extensive and intensive understanding of the salient research themes and trends of brownfields’ research worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams D, De SC, Tiesdell S (2010) Brownfield development: a comparison of north American and British approaches. Urban Stud 47:75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R (2015) Policy instruments and the remediation and redevelopment of contaminated properties. Environmental Politics 24:75–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrescu FM, Rizzo E, Pizzol L et al (2016) The social embeddedness of brownfield regeneration actors: insights from social network analysis. J Clean Prod 139:1539–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrescu F, Klusacek P, Bartke S et al (2017) Actor networks and the construction of applicable knowledge: the case of the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19:1323–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alker S, Joy V, Roberts P et al (2000) The definition of brownfield. J Environ Plan Manag 43:49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ana P (2013) The review of planning practice in brownfield regeneration: some European experience. Istrazivanja I Projektovanja Za Privredu 11:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson-Skold Y, Bardos P, Chalot M et al (2014) Developing and validating a practical decision support tool (DST) for biomass selection on marginal land. J Environ Manag 145:113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO et al (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360(1–3):196–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arienzo M, Donadio C, Mangoni O et al (2017) Characterization and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pahs) in the sediments of gulf of Pozzuoli (Campania, Italy). Mar Pollut Bull 24:480–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardos P (2003) A review of the contaminated land rehabilitation network for environmental technologies in Europe (CLARINET). Land Contamination and Reclamation 11:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardos RP, Bone BD, Boyle R et al (2016a) The rationale for simple approaches for sustainability assessment and management in contaminated land practice. Sci Total Environ 563:755–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardos RP, Jones S, Stephenson I et al (2016b) Optimizing value from the soft re-use of brownfield sites. Sci Total Environ 563:769–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartke S, Schwarze R (2015) No perfect tools: trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields. J Environ Manag 153:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartke S, Martinat S, Klusacek P et al (2016) Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: user experiences from five cases testing the timbre brownfield prioritization tool. J Environ Manag 184:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM et al (2013) Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341:45–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beames A, Broekx S, Lookman R et al (2014) Sustainability appraisal tools for soil and groundwater remediation: how is the choice of remediation alternative influenced by different sets of sustainability indicators and tool structures. Sci Total Environ 470:954–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley L, Dickinson N (2011) Carbon and trace element fluxes in the pore water of an urban soil following greenwaste compost, woody and biochar amendments, inoculated with the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Soil Biol Biochem 43(1):188–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis E, Schaefer WF, Han Q (2012) Conflicts and cooperation in brownfield redevelopment projects: application of conjoint analysis and game theory to model strategic decision making. J Urban Plann Dev 138:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boente C, Sierra C, Rodriguez-Valdes E et al (2017) Soil washing optimization by means of attributive analysis: case study for the removal of potentially toxic elements from soil contaminated with pyrite ash. J Clean Prod 142:2693–2699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cahantimur AI, Ozturk RB, Ozturk AC (2010) Securing land for urban transformation through sustainable brownfield regeneration-the case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Environ Urban 22:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Guan H (2007) Brownfield redevelopment toward sustainable urban land use in China. Chin Geogr Sci 17:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CABERNET (n.d.) (Concerted Action on Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network). www.cabernet.org.uk

  • CLARINET, 2002. Contaminated land rehabilitation network for environmental technologies. In: Brownfields and redevelopment of urban areas. Federal Environment Agency, Austria

  • Chambers J, Ogilvy RD, Kuras O et al (2002) 3D electrical imaging of known targets at a controlled environmental test site. Environ Geol 41(6):690–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2005a) CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57:359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2005b) CiteSpace: Quick Guide 1.2

  • Chen C (2014) The CiteSpace manual, College of Computing and Informatics. Drexel University, Philadelphia

  • Chen C (2017) Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science 2(2):1–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Morris S (2003) Visualizing evolving networks: minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, October 19–24:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen IC, Tsai YC, Ma HW (2016) Toward sustainable brownfield redevelopment using life-cycle thinking. Sustainability 8:994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng FF, Geertman S, Kuffer M et al (2011) An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: a case study of Futian, Shenzhen. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(5):388–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente R, Hartley W, Riby P et al (2010) Trace element mobility in a contaminated soil two years after field-amendment with a greenwaste compost mulch. Environ Pollut 158(5):1644–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo MJ, Lopez-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E et al (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(7):1382–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundy AB, Bardos RP, Puschenreiter M et al (2016) Brownfields to green fields: realising wider benefits from practical contaminant phytomanagement strategies. J Environ Manag 184(1):67–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai H, Sun T, Guo W (2016) Brownfield redevelopment evaluation based on fuzzy real options. Sustainability 8(2):170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison G, Legacy C (2014) Positive Planning and Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: The Role and Potential of Government Land Development Agencies. Int Plan Stud 19(2):154–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermont G, Bergeron M, Richer-Lafleche M et al (2010) Remediation of metal-contaminated urban soil using flotation technique. Sci Total Environ 408(5):1199–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De SCA (2003) Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto. Landsc Urban Plan 62(4):181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa C, Ghoshal S (2012) Redevelopment of brownfield sites. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096463.2.99

  • Dickinson NM (2000) Strategies for sustainable woodland on contaminated soils. Chemosphere 41(1-2):259–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding K, Wu Q, Wei H et al (2018) Ecosystem services provided by heavy metal-contaminated soils in China. J Soils Sediments 18(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon T, Pocock Y, Waters M (2006) An analysis of the UK development industry’s role in brownfield regeneration. J Prop Invest Financ 24(6):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon T, Otsuka N, Abe H (2011) Critical success factors in urban brownfield regeneration: an analysis of ‘hardcore’ sites in Manchester and Osaka during the economic recession. Metall Mater Trans B 21(1):4140–4142

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Zhang W, Qian Y et al (2016) Synchrotron X-ray microfluorescence measurement of metal distributions in Phragmites australis, root system in the Yangtze River intertidal zone. J Synchrotron Radiat 23(4):937–946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frantal B, Kunc J, Novakova E et al (2013) Location matters! Exploring brownfields regeneration in a spatial context (a case study of the South Moravian Region, Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports 21(2):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantal B, Greer-Wootten B, Klusacek P et al (2015a) Exploring spatial patterns of urban brownfields regeneration: the case of Brno, Czech Republic. Cities 44:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantal B, Kunc J, Klusacek P et al (2015b) Assessing success factors of brownfields regeneration: international and inter-stakeholder perspective. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 11(44):91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1997) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French CJ, Dickinson NM, Putwain PD (2006) Woody biomass phytoremediation of contaminated brownfield land. Environ Pollut 141(3):387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault Y, Durand MJ, Tack K et al (2013) Use of ecotoxicity test and ecoscores to improve the management of polluted soils: case of a secondary lead smelter plant. J Hazard Mater 246:291–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher FJ, Pechmann I, Bogden JD et al (2008) Soil metal concentrations and vegetative assemblage structure in an urban brownfield. Environ Pollut 153(2):351–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardi C, Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M et al (2015) Land take and food security: assessment of land take on the agricultural production in Europe. J Environ Plan Manag 58(5):898–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan M, Newman ME (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7821–7826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glumac B, Han Q, Schaefer WF (2014) Actors’ preferences in the redevelopment of brownfield: latent class model. J Urban Plann Dev 141(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Glumac B, Han Q, Schaefer W et al (2015) Negotiation issues in forming public-private partnerships for brownfield redevelopment: applying a game theoretical experiment. Land Use Policy 47:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan G, Cristina Negri M, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW, LaFreniere L (2009) Biofuels, Land, and Water: A Systems Approach to Sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):6094–6100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Haase A, Rink D (2014) Conceptualizing the nexus between urban shrinkage and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 132:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison C, Davies G (2002) Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. J Environ Manag 65(1):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley W, Dickinson NM, Riby P et al (2009) Arsenic mobility in brownfield soils amended with green waste compost or biochar and planted with Miscanthus. Environ Pollut 157(10):2654–2662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Zhang J, Wang X et al (2018) A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in agricultural ecological compensation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(17):16522–16532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess DJ (1997) Science studies: an advanced introduction. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwijnen RV, Laverye T, Poole J et al (2007) The effect of organic materials on the mobility and toxicity of metals in contaminated soils. Appl Geochem 22(11):2422–2434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hipel KW, Hegazy T, Yousefi S (2010) Combined strategic and tactical negotiation methodology for resolving complex brownfield conflicts. Pesquisa Operacional 30(2):281–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D, Al-Tabbaa A (2014) Sustainability: a new imperative in contaminated land remediation. Environ Sci Pol 39(5):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabisch N, Haase D (2013) Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landsc Urban Plan 110:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D, Song Y, Zhang J et al (2017) Climate change mitigation potential of contaminated land redevelopment: a city-level assessment method. J Clean Prod 171:1396–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konur O (2012) The evaluation of the global research on the education: a scientometric approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 47:1363–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs H, Szemmelveisz K (2017) Disposal options for polluted plants grown on heavy metal contaminated brownfield lands-a review. Chemosphere 166:8–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments-a review. Waste Manag 28(1):215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krejci T, Dostal I, Havlicek M et al (2016) Exploring the hidden potential of sugar beet industry brownfields (case study of the Czech Republic). Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 46:284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange D, Mcneil S (2004) Clean it and they will come? Defining successful brownfield development. J Urban Plann Dev 130(2):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange D, Wang D, Zhuang Z et al (2013) Brownfield development selection using multi attribute decision making. J Urban Plann Dev 140(2):04013009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laprise M, Lufkin S, Rey E (2015) An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. Build Environ 86(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Ji H (2017) Chemical speciation, vertical profile and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils from coal-mine brownfield, Beijing, China. J Geochem Explor 183:22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Ji H, Shi C et al (2017a) Distribution of heavy metals and metalloids in bulk and particle size fractions of soils from coal-mine brownfield and implications on human health. Chemosphere 172:505–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Wu K, Wu J (2017b) A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000–2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LA, ISEBRANDS et al (2005) Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy 28(2):203–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Limasset E, Bartke S, Merly C et al (2017) Prioritisation strategies for regional brownfield redevelopment: perspectives and feedback on existing tools and approaches. Aqua Consoil Lyon

  • Limasset E, Pizzol L, Merly C et al (2018) Points of attention in designing tools for regional brownfield prioritization. Sci Total Environ 622:997–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, David BK (2016) Residents’ perceptions and attitudes toward waste treatment facility sites and their possible conversion: a literature review. Urban For Urban Green 20:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loures L, Vaz E (2018) Exploring expert perception towards brownfield redevelopment benefits according to their typology. Habitat Int 72:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loures L, Panagopoulos T, Burley J (2015) Assessing user preferences on postindustrial redevelopment. Environ Plann B Plann Des 43(5):871–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo XSYS, Zhu YG et al (2012) Trace metal contamination in urban soils of China. Sci Total Environ 421(3):17–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz-Patkowska J, Hursthouse A, Przybyla-Kij H (2005) The interaction of heavy metals with urban soils: sorption behaviour of Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb and Zn with a typical mixed brownfield deposit. Environ Int 31(4):513–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsilio M, Cappellaro G, Cuccurullo C et al (2011) The intellectual structure of research into PPPs: a bibliometric analysis. Public Manag Rev 13:763–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinat S, Dvorak P, Frantal B et al (2016) Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. J Clean Prod 118:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateus RJG, Costa JCBE, Matos PV (2017) Supporting multicriteria group decisions with MACBETH tools: selection of sustainable brownfield redevelopment actions. Group Decis Negot 26(3):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathey J, Rossler S, Banse J (2015) Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into urban areas. J Urban Plann Dev 141(3):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J (2016) Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas—results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban For Urban Green 29:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megharaj M, Naidu R (2017) Soil and brownfield bioremediation. Microb Biotechnol 10(5):1244–1249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mench M, Lepp N, Bert V et al (2010) Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST Action 859. J Soils Sediments 10(6):1039–1070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ (2012) What is ecological engineering? Ecol Eng 45(8):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa T, Otsuka N, Abe H (2016) Lessons from the international comparison of contaminated land policies with risk governance in Japan. International Journal of Geomate Geotechnique Construction Materials & Environment 10:–1905

  • Morio M, Schaedler S, Finkel M (2013) Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences. J Environ Manag 130:331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Rodenburg CA, Wagtendonk AJ (2002) Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: a comparative case study approach to polluted sites. Ecol Econ 40(2):235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrman J, Volchko Y, Hooimeijer F et al (2016) Integration of the subsurface and the surface sectors for a more holistic approach for sustainable redevelopment of urban brownfields. Sci Total Environ 563:879–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olawumi TO, Chan DWM, Wong JKW (2017) Evolution in the intellectual structure of BIM research: a bibliometric analysis. J Civ Eng Manag 23:1060–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olawumi TO, Chan DWM (2018) A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. J Clean Prod 183:231–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver L et al (2005) The scale and nature of European brownfields. Available online: www.cabernet.org.uk/resourcefs/ 417.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 13

  • Osman R, Frantal B, Klusacek P (2015) Factors affecting brownfield regeneration in post-socialist space: the case of the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 48:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payá Pérez A et al (2017) European achievements in soil remediation and brownfield redevelopment. Publications Office of the European Union

  • Pearsall H (2010) From brown to green? Assessing social vulnerability to environmental gentrification in New York city. Eviron Plann C Gov Policy 28:872–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pediaditi K, Wehrmeyer W, Burningham K (2006) Evaluating brownfield redevelopment projects: a review of existing sustainability indicator tools and their adoption by the UK development industry. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 94:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perovic S, Folic NK (2012) Brownfield regeneration-imperative for sustainable urban development. Gradevinar 64(5):67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzol L, Zabeo A, Klusacek P et al (2016) Timbre brownfield prioritization tool to support effective brownfield regeneration. J Environ Manage 166:178–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris A, Pouris A (2011) Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the world. Scientometrics 86(2):541–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Gallagher FJ, Feng H et al (2014) Vanadium uptake and translocation in dominant plant species on an urban coastal brownfield site. Sci Total Environ 476:696–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radulescu CM, Stefan O, Radulescu GMT et al (2016) Management of stakeholders in urban regeneration projects, case study: Baia-Mare, Transylvania. Sustainability 8(3):238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rall EL, Haase D (2011) Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 100(3):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren WX (2014) Inventorying heavy metal pollution in redeveloped brownfield and its policy contribution: case study from Tiexi District, Shenyang, China. Land Use Policy 38:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo E, Bardos P, Pizzol L et al (2016) Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation. J Environ Manag 184(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardinha ID, Craveiro D, Milheiras S (2013) A sustainability framework for redevelopment of rural brownfields: stakeholder participation at SAO DOMINGOS mine, Portugal. J Clean Prod 57:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaedler S, Morio M, Bartke S et al (2011) Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. J Environ Manag 92(3):827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano SD, James K, Zhang G et al (2009) Adhesion and Enrichment of Metals on Human Hands from Contaminated Soil at an Arctic Urban Brownfield. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6385–6390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 24:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Zhang H, Dong W (2016) A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization. Scientometrics 107(3):1111–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess T, De Sousa C (2016) Barriers to renewable energy development on brownfields. J Environ Policy Plan 4:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stezar IC, Ozunu A, Barry DL (2014) The role of stakeholder attitudes in managing contaminated sites: survey of Romanian stakeholder awareness. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(1):787–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton G, Franz M, Edwards D et al (2007) The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 10(2):116–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifuoggi M, Donadio C, Mangoni O et al (2017) Distribution and enrichment of trace metals in surface marine sediments in the Gulf of Pozzuoli and off the coast of the brownfield metallurgical site of Ilva of Bagnoli (Campania, Italy). Mar Pollut Bull 124:502–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2015) Facilitating risky project negotiation: an integrated approach using fuzzy real options, multicriteria analysis, and conflict analysis. Inf Sci 295:544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wcisło E, Ioven D, Kucharski R et al (2002) Human health risk assessment case study: an abandoned metal smelter site in Poland. Chemosphere 47(5):507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedding GC, Crawford-Brown D (2011) Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. J Environ Manag 85:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo A, Lee S (2016) Illuminating the impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing prices: case of Cuyahoga county, Ohio in the U.S. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48(6):1107–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yozzo DJ, Wilber P, Will RJ (2004) Beneficial use of dredged material for habitat creation, enhancement, and restoration in New York-New Jersey Harbor. J Environ Manag 73(1):39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X (2017) A scientometric review of global BIM research: analysis and visualization. Autom Constr 80:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Hipel KW, Ke GY et al (2015) Establishment and optimization of an evaluation index system for brownfield redevelopment projects: an empirical study. Environ Model Softw 74(C):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2017JM7002)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710100, Shannxi, China

    Hongli Lin, Yuming Zhu, Naveed Ahmad & Qingye Han

Authors
  1. Hongli Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuming Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naveed Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingye Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuming Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, H., Zhu, Y., Ahmad, N. et al. A scientometric analysis and visualization of global research on brownfields. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 17666–17684 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05149-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05149-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation