Abstract
The study revisits the position of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India by incorporating the role of energy consumption and democratic regime in the environmental degradation function for the period 1971–2014. Employing Zivot–Andrews nonstationarity test, Bayer–Hanck cointegration test, autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, and vector autoregressive model (VECM) Granger causality test, the results found the integration order of I(1) and a stable cointegration among the series. The result validates the EKC hypothesis for India and further divulges that while energy consumption increases environmental degradation both in the long run and short run; the effect of democracy in reducing environmental degradation is weak (statistically insignificant) in the long run but strong (statistically significant) in the short run. The finding from the VECM Granger causality test indicates a long-run causality between the fundamental variables and environmental degradation. Furthermore, the results of the short run show a unidirectional Granger causality running from energy consumption to environmental degradation, energy consumption to real income, and energy consumption to square of real income. Therefore, our findings suggest that energy conservation policy should be prioritized towards harnessing energy from clean sources to mitigate environmental degradation and spur economic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To void the negative sign of value, rescaling approach is usually applied to convert the measure of democracy to values ranging from zero and above in order to provide nonspurious results. However, in the case of India, all the values are positives; hence, we used the variable directly without rescaling.
References
Alam MJ, Begum IA, Buysse J, Rahman S, Van Huylenbroeck G (2011) Dynamic modeling of causal relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3243–3251
Alhassan A, Alade AS (2017) Income and democracy in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 8(18):67–73
Alola AA (2019) The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: accounting for environmental sustainability. Sci Total Environ 658:260–267
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908
Apergis N, Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2018) Does renewable energy consumption and health expenditures decrease carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Renew Energy 127:1011–1016
Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2402–2408
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283
Barrett S, Graddy K (2000) Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 5(4):433–456
Bayer C, Hanck C (2013) Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal 34(1):83–95
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029
Bhattacharyya R, Ghoshal T (2010) Economic growth and CO2. Environ Dev Sustain 12(2):159–177
Boswijk HP (1994) Testing for an unstable root in conditional and unconditional error correction models. J Econ 63:37–60
Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41
Dedeoglu D, Kaya H (2013) Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: new evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy 57:469–476
Dietzenbacher E, Mukhopadhyay K (2007) An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green Leontief paradox? Environ Resour Econ 36(4):427–449
Emir F, Bekun FV (2018) Energy intensity, carbon emissions, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: new insights from Romania. Energy Environ 0958305X1879310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18793108
Energy Information Association (EIA) (2018) Short-term energy outlook, May 2018
Engle RF, Granger C (1987) Cointegration and error correction representation: estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276
Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81(1):213–235
Fisher R (1932) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, London
Ghosh S (2010) Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38:3008–3014
Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N (2018) Testing the agriculture-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2330-6
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research
Heilbronner RL (1974) An inquiry into the human prospect. Norton, New York
Johansen S (1995) A statistical analysis of cointegration for I(2) variables. Economet Theor 11:25–59
Kanjilal K, Ghosh S (2013) Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56:509–515
Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S (2018) Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):5616–5630
Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S, Kilinc CC (2018) Investigating the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the globe. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(15):15029–15035
Khanna M, Zilberman D (2001) Adoption of energy efficient technologies and carbon abatement: the electricity generating sector in India. Energy Econ 23(6):637–658
Lv Z (2017) The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: does the level of income matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:900–906
Mesagan E, Isola W, Ajide K (2018) The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: evidence from BRICS. Environ Dev Sustain 24:1–22
Midlarsky MI (1998) Democracy and the environment: an empirical assessment. J Peace Res 35(3):341–361
Mukhopadhyay K (2008) Air pollution and income distribution in India. J Asia Pac 15(1):35–64
Mukhopadhyay K, Chakraborty D (2005a) Environmental impacts of trade in India. Int Trade J 19(2):135–163
Mukhopadhyay K, Chakraborty D (2005b) Is liberalisation of trade good for the environment? Evidence from India. J Asia Pac 12(1):109–135
Ozatac N, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N (2017) Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(20):16690–16701
Payne RA (1995) Freedom and the environment. J Democr 6(3):41–55
Perkins R (2007) Globalizing corporate environmentalism? Convergence and heterogeneity in Indian industry. Comparative International Development 42(3/4):279–309
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Rafindadi AA (2016) Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: empirical evidence from Japan. Energy Policy 94:274–284
Rafindadi AA, Yusof Z, Zaman K, Kyophilavong P, Akmat G (2014) The relationship between air pollution, fossil fuel energy consumption, and water resources in the panel of selected Asia-Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:11395–11400
Roberts JT, Parks BC (2007) A climate of injustice: global inequality, north-south politics, and climate policy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110
Shahbaz M, Mutascu M, Azim P (2013a) EKC in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:165–173
Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013b) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:494–502
Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Muzaffar AT, Ahmed K, Jabran MA (2016) How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:83–93
Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev 62(04):929–957
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stern DI, Van Dijk J (2017) Economic growth and global particulate pollution concentrations. Clim Chang 142:391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1955-7
Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25(2):147–160
Zivot E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Usman, O., Iorember, P.T. & Olanipekun, I.O. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 13390–13400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z