Skip to main content
Log in

Design parameters and treatment efficiency of a retrofit bioretention system on runoff nitrogen removal

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixed media design is key factor that affects the operation of bioretention systems. In this study, four types of modifiers, namely, water treatment residual (WTR), green zeolite, fly ash, and coconut bran, were mixed with traditional bioretention soil (65% sand + 30% soil + 5% sawdust, by mass). Consequently, four kinds of modified media were obtained. Ten pilot-scale bioretention basins were constructed by setting different configurations. The steady infiltration rates of the modified packing bioretention systems were 3.25~62.78 times that of plant soil, which was 2.88~55.75 m/day. Results showed that the average concentration removal (ACR) of both mixed and layered fly ash and WTR were better than those of the other media, and the effects could reach over 61.92%. In the bioretention basins with WTR as the modifier, the treatment efficiency of nitrogen under the submerged zone height of 150 mm was relatively optimal, and ACR could reach 65.46%. Outflow total nitrogen (TN) load was most influenced by inflow load, and the correlation coefficient was above 0.765. Relative to the change of inflow concentration (IC), the change of recurrence interval (RI) and discharge ratio (DR) was more sensitive to TN load reduction. The reduction rate of TN load decreased by approximately 15% when the recurrence interval increased from 0.5 to 3 years. It decreased by approximately 12% when the discharge ratio increased from 10 to 20. This study will provide additional insights into the treatment performance of retrofit bioretention systems, and thus, can guide media and configuration design, effect evaluation, and related processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cen GP, Shen J, Fan RS (1998) Research on rainfall pattern of urban design storm. Adv Water Sci 9(1):41–47 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Che W, Li JQ (2006) Urban rainwater utilization technology and management. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coustumer SL, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Lewis JF (2009) Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation. J Hydrol 376(1/2):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coustumer SL, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Poelsma P (2012) The influence of design parameters on clogging of stormwater biofilters: a large-scale column study. Water Res 46:6743–6752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP (2007) Field performance of bioretention: water quality. Environ Eng Sci 24(8):1048–1064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP (2008) Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impact. J Hydrol Eng 13(2):90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckart K, McPhee Z, Bolisetti T (2017) Performance and implementation of low impact development - a review. Sci Total Environ 607–608:413–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao XL (2014) Study on filter media road runoff bioretention systems. Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2009) Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J Hydrol 365(3–4):310–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH, Davis AP (2005) Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban stormwater runoff. J Environ Eng 131:1521–1531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH, Davis AP, Needelman BA (2007) Nitrogen removal from urban stormwater runoff through layered bioretention columns. Water Environ Res 79(12):2404–2411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre GH, Paus KH, Natarajan P, Gulliver JS, Novak PJ, Hozalski RM (2015) Review of dissolved pollutants in urban storm water and their removal and fate in bioretention cells. J Environ Eng 141:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Davis AP (2014) Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems. Environ Sci Technol 48:3403–3410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JK, Jiang CB, Lei TT, Li YJ (2016) Experimental study and simulation of water quality purification of urban surface runoff using non-vegetated bioswales. Ecol Eng 95:706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW (2015) The design and operation of the bioretention with submerged area zone. Southeast university, Nanjing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Engel BA, Flanagan DC, Gitau MW, McMillan SK, Chaubey I (2017) A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: needs and opportunities. Sci Total Environ 601–602:580–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke T, Peter WB (2015) The pollution removal and stormwater reduction performance of street-side bioretention basins after ten years in operation. Sci Total Environ 536:784–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mangangka IR, Liu A, Egodawatta P, Goonetilleke A (2015) Performance characterisation of a stormwater treatment bioretention basin. J Environ Manag 150:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill SW, Davis AP (2012) Water treatment residual as a bioretention amendment for phosphorus. I: evaluation studies. J Environ Eng 138(3):318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumo D, Arnone E, Francipane A, Caracciolo D, Noto LV (2017) Potential implications of climate change and urbanization on watershed hydrology. J Hydrol 554:80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun YW, Wei XM, Pomeroy CA (2011) Global analysis of sensitivity of bioretention cell design elements to hydrologic performance. Water Sci Eng 4(3):246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowsdale SA, Simcock R (2011) Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J Hydrol 397:167–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan ZX, Li T, Shi ZB (2017) A layered bioretention system for inhibiting nitrate and organic matters leaching. Ecol Eng 107:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wu QJ, Wu L, Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Feyen J (2000) Effects of soil water repellency on infiltration rate and flow instability. J Hydrol 231:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ding LQ, Cheng XT, Li N (2015a) Hydrologic control criteria framework in the United States and its referential significance to China. Shuili Xuebao 46(11):1261–1271 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SM, He Q, Xu Q, Song L (2015b) Summary of nitrogen removal in surface runoff by bioretention system. Adv Water Sci 26(1):140–150 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SM, Lin XY, Yu H, Wang ZD, Xia HX, An J, Fan GD (2017) Nitrogen removal from urban stormwater runoff by stepped bioretention systems. Ecol Eng 106:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Dick WA, McCoy EL, Phelan PL, Grewal PS (2013) Field evaluation of a new biphasic rain garden for stormwater flow management and pollutant removal. Ecol Eng 54:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Wang YT, Hu QF, He RM (2016) Discussion and views on some issues of the sponge city construction in China. Adv Water Sci 27(6):793–799 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JM (2015) Study on the changes in rainfall patterns in Xi’an. Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879215), the key research and development project of Shaanxi Province (2017ZDXM-SF-073), and the open foundation of Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering of Xi’an University of Technology (2016ZZKTZ-30).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia-ke Li.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Cb., Li, Jk., Zhang, Bh. et al. Design parameters and treatment efficiency of a retrofit bioretention system on runoff nitrogen removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 33298–33308 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3267-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3267-5

Keywords

Navigation