Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing geotechnical centrifuge modelling in addressing variably saturated flow in soil and fractured rock

  • Young Scholars in Earth & Environmental Sciences
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vadose zone typically comprises soil underlain by fractured rock. Often, surface water and groundwater parameters are readily available, but variably saturated flow through soil and rock are oversimplified or estimated as input for hydrological models. In this paper, a series of geotechnical centrifuge experiments are conducted to contribute to the knowledge gaps in: (i) variably saturated flow and dispersion in soil and (ii) variably saturated flow in discrete vertical and horizontal fractures. Findings from the research show that the hydraulic gradient, and not the hydraulic conductivity, is scaled for seepage flow in the geotechnical centrifuge. Furthermore, geotechnical centrifuge modelling has been proven as a viable experimental tool for the modelling of hydrodynamic dispersion as well as the replication of similar flow mechanisms for unsaturated fracture flow, as previously observed in literature. Despite the imminent challenges of modelling variable saturation in the vadose zone, the geotechnical centrifuge offers a powerful experimental tool to physically model and observe variably saturated flow. This can be used to give valuable insight into mechanisms associated with solid–fluid interaction problems under these conditions. Findings from future research can be used to validate current numerical modelling techniques and address the subsequent influence on aquifer recharge and vulnerability, contaminant transport, waste disposal, dam construction, slope stability and seepage into subsurface excavations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aouad W, Landel JR, Dalziel SB, Davidson JF, Wilson DI (2016) Particle image velocimetry and modelling of horizontal coherent liquid jets impinging on and draining down a vertical wall. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 74:429–443. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer A (2014) Using small-strain stiffness to predict the settlement of shallow foundations. Unpublished MEng dissertation, Pretoria: University of Pretoria.[Links]

  • Aydin A (2001) Fracture void structure: implications for flow, transport and deformation environmental geology. Int J Geosci 40:672–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz C, Newell C, Gonzales J, Haas P, Clement T, Sun Y (2000) BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System. User’s Manual Version 1.0 US Environmental Protection Agency

  • Barry D, Lisle I, Li L, Prommer H, Parlange JY, Sander GC, Griffioen J (2001) Similitude applied to centrifugal scaling of unsaturated flow. Water Resour Res 37:2471–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basha H, Mina N (1999) Estimation of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from the pressure distribution in a centrifugal field. Water Resour Res 35:469–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media American. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25:861–884. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00042-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield R (2000) Scale-modelling of fluid flow in geotechnical centrifuges. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society: Soils and Foundation 40:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecconi M, Croce P, Viggiani G 2006 Physical modelling of block toppling. In: Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Two Volume Set: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 6th ICPMG'06, Hong Kong, 4–6 August 2006, CRC Press, p 325

  • Chen ZY, Zhang JH, Wang WX, Xing YC (2006) Centrifuge modelling of rock slopes. In: Ng CW, Wang Y-H, Zhang L (eds) Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Two Volume Set: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 6th ICPMG'06, Hong Kong, 4–6 August 2006, vol 1. CRC Press, pp 19–28

  • Chikatamarla R, Laue J, Springman S 2006 Modelling of rockfall on protection galleries. In: 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, pp 331–336

  • Cook N (1992) Natural joints in rock: mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 29:198–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culligan P, Barry D (1998) Similitude requirements for modelling NAPL movement with a geotechnical centrifuge. Proc Instn Civ Engrs Geotech Engng 131:180–186

  • Culligan-Hensley PJ, Savvidou C (1995) Environmental geomechanics and transport processes. In: Taylor R (ed) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 201–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Morra M, Siboni S (2002) The determination of a ‘stable-equilibrium’contact angle on heterogeneous and rough surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:47–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delleur JW (2006) Elementary groundwater flow and transport processes. In: Delleur JW (ed) The handbook of groundwater engineering, vol 3. CRC press, Boca Raton, pp 1–3.45

    Google Scholar 

  • Dippenaar MA (2012) How we lose ground when earth scientists become territorial: defining “soil”. Nat Resour Res 21:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dippenaar MA (2014) Porosity reviewed: quantitative multi-disciplinary understanding, recent advances and applications in vadose zone hydrology. Geotech Geol Eng 32:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dippenaar MA, Van Rooy JL (2016) On the cubic law and variably saturated flow through discrete open rough-walled discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 89:200–211. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.09.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Dippenaar MA, van Rooy JL, Breedt N, Huisamen A, Muravha SE, Mahlangu S, Mulders JA (2014) Vadose zone hydrology: concepts and techniques. Water Research Commision (WRC), Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Doe TW (2001) What do drops do? Surface wetting and network geometry effects on vadose-zone fracture flow Conceptual models of flow and transport in the fractured vadose zone: 243–270

  • Dragila MI, Hay KM, Wheatcraft SW (2016) 9. Initial pipe development within epikarst microfractures. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 516:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragila MI, Weisbrod N (2003) Parameters affecting maximum fluid transport in large aperture fractures. Adv Water Resour 26:1219–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HH, Li V, Whitman RV, Veneziano D, Reyes O, Iglesia G, Lee J-S (1990) Stochastic and centrifuge modelling of jointed rock. DTIC Document

  • Fetter C (2001) Applied hydrogeology, Fourth edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J et al (2007) Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 7:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzehei TA (2004) Constraints for flow regimes on smooth fracture surfaces. Water Resour Res 40:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2004WR003164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzehei TA, Or D (2005) Liquid fragmentation and intermittent flow regimes in unsaturated fractured media. Water Resour Res:41

  • Gudmundsson A, Gjesdal O, Brenner SL, Fjeldskaar I (2003) Effects of linking up of discontinuities on fracture growth and groundwater transport. Hydrogeol J 11:84–99. doi:10.1007/s10040-002-0238-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günzel F, Davies M 2006 Influence of warming permafrost on the stability of ice filled rock joints. In: Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, pp 343–348

  • Hakami E, Larsson E 1996 Aperture measurements and flow experiments on a single natural fracture. In: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 395–404

  • Hensley P, Randolph M 1994 Modelling contaminant dispersion in saturated sand. In: Proceedings of the international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering-international society for soil mechanics and foundation engineering. AA Balkema, pp 1557–1557

  • Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering. Rev. 3rd ed. edn. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

  • Indraratna B, Ranjith P (2001) Hydromechanical aspects and unsaturated flow in jointed rock. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Toyosawa Y, Kusakabe O, Ng C, Zhang L, Wang Y 2006 Centrifugal modelling of rockfalls. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics–ICPMG, Hong Kong (Ng CWW, Zhang LM and Wang YH (eds). Taylor & Francis, London, UK, pp 349–354

  • Jacobsz S, Kearsley E, Kock J 2014 The geotechnical centrifuge facility at the University of Pretoria. In: ICPMG2014–Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (ICPMG2014), Perth, Australia, 14–17 January 2014, 2014. CRC Press, p 169

  • Jones BR, Brouwers LB, Van Tonder WD, Dippenaar MA n.d.(under review) Assessing geotechnical centrifuge modelling in addressing variably saturated flow in soil and fractured rock Environmental Science and Pollution Research Manuscript Number: ESPR-D-16-01828R1

  • Joseph P, Einstein H (1988) Rock modeling using the centrifuge. DTIC Document

  • Knappett J, Craig RF (2012) Craig's soil mechanics. Spon Press

  • Kordilla J, Tartakovsky AM, Geyer T (2013) A smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for droplet and film flow on smooth and rough fracture surfaces. Adv Water Resour 59:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P (2007) Scaling laws and experimental modelling of contaminant transport mechanism through soils in a geotechnical centrifuge. Geotech Geol Eng 25:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-H, Farmer IW (1993) Fluid flow in discontinuous rocks, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy LC, Culligan PJ, Germaine JT (2002) Use of the geotechnical centrifuge as a tool to model dense nonaqueous phase liquid migration in fractures. Water Resour Res:38

  • Levy LC, Culligan PJ, Germaine JT (2003) Modelling of DNAPL behavior in vertical fractures. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 3:01–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wartman J, Tang H, Yan J, Luo H, Hu W (2014) Dynamic centrifuge modelling tests for sliding rock slopes. In: Landslide science for a safer Geoenvironment. Springer, Switzerland, pp 75–79

  • Liu H-H, Wei M-Y, Rutqvist J (2013) Normal-stress dependence of fracture hydraulic properties including two-phase flow properties. Hydrogeology Journal : Official Journal of the International Association of Hydrogeologists 21:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson ED, Palmer C, Smith RW, Flury M (2010) Centrifuge techniques and apparatus for transport experiments in porous media vol 1. Taylor and Francis Group, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (2005) Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J 13:124–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo JR (1990) Experimental testing of transient unsaturated flow theory at low water content in. Water Resour Res 26:1951–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo JR (2006) Unsaturated zone flow processes Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences

  • Nimmo JR, Akstin KC, Mello KA (1992) Improved apparatus for measuring hydraulic conductivity at low water content. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1758–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo JR, Mello KA (1991) Centrifugal techniques for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Water Resour Res 27:1263–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo JR, Rubin J, Hammermeister D (1987) Unsaturated flow in a centrifugal field: measurement of hydraulic conductivity and testing of Darcy’s law. Water Resour Res 23:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Or D, Ghezzehei TA (2007) Traveling liquid bridges in unsaturated fractured porous media. Transp Porous Media 68:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Or D, Tuller M (2000) Flow in unsaturated fractured porous media: hydraulic conductivity of rough surfaces. Water Resour Res 36:1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R (1995) Centrifuge modelling: practical considerations Geotechnical centrifuge technology:34–60

  • Poehls D, Smith GJ (2011) Encyclopedic dictionary of hydrogeology. Academic Press

  • Pyrak LR, Myer LR, Cook NGW (1985) Determination of fracture void geometry and contact area at different effective stress. Eos Trans AGU 66

  • Raven KG, Gale JE (1985) Water flow in a natural rock fracture as a function of stress and sample size. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 22:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R (2002) Modelling hydraulic conductivity in a small centrifuge: discussion. Can Geotech J 39:486–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumynin VG (2011) Water movement and solute transport in unsaturated porous media. In: Subsurface solute transport models and case histories. Springer, Netherlands, pp 77–119

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silberhorn-Hemminger A, Süß M, Helmig R (2005) Natural fractured porous systems. In: Dietrich P, Helmig R, Sauter M, Hötzl H, Köngeter J, Teutsch G (eds) Flow and transport in fractured porous media. Springer, Berlin, pp 16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimůnek J, Nimmo JR (2005) Estimating soil hydraulic parameters from transient flow experiments in a centrifuge using parameter optimization technique. Water Resour Res:41

  • Singh DN, Gupta AK (2000) Modelling hydraulic conductivity in a small centrifuge. Can Geotech J 37:1150–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh DN, Gupta AK (2002) Modelling hydraulic conductivity in a small centrifuge. Reply Canadian Geotechnical Journal 39:488–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal BBS, Gupta RP (2010) Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sisavath S, Al-Yaaruby A, Pain CC, Zimmerman RW (2003) A simple model for deviations from the cubic law for a fracture undergoing dilation or closure. Pure Appl Geophys 160:1009–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone KJL, Maquin M, Richards DJ, Montouchet M (2013) Physical and numerical modeling of problems in homogeneous and fractured soft rock masses. In: ICPMG2014 Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. CRC Press, pp 413–417. doi:10.1201/b16200–53

  • Su GW, Geller JT, Pruess K, Wen F (1999) Experimental studies of water seepage and intermittent flow in unsaturated, rough-walled fractures. Water Resour Res 35:1019–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AL et al (2004) The nature of water on surfaces of laboratory systems and implications for heterogeneous chemistry in the troposphere. Phys Chem Chem Phys 6:604–613. doi:10.1039/B308125G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R (1995) Centrifuges in modelling: principles and scale effects. In: Taylor R (ed) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. CRC Press, pp 20–34

  • Tokunaga TK, Wan J (1997) Water film flow along fracture surfaces of porous rock. Water Resour Res 33:1287–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga TK, Wan J (2001) Approximate boundaries between different flow regimes in fractured rocks. Water Resour Res 37:2103–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tonder W (2016) Centrifuge modelling of permeability of a heterogeneous coal mine backfill sequence. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, University of Pretoria

  • Weiss M, Rubin Y, Adar E, Nativ R (2006) Fracture and bedding plane control on groundwater flow in a chalk aquitard. Hydrogeol J 14:1081–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemeier TH, Wilson JT, Hansen JE, Chapelle FH, Swanson MA (1996) Technical protocol for evaluating natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater. Revision 1. DTIC Document

  • Witherspoon PA (1986) Flow of groundwater in fractured rocks bulletin of the International Association of Engineering. Geology 34:103–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Bodvarsson GS (1996) Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Media 23:1–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zornberg JG, McCartney JS (2010) Centrifuge permeameter for unsaturated soils. I: theoretical basis and experimental developments. J Geotech Geoenviron 136:1051–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Water Research Commission of South Africa (www.wrc.org.za) for funding of project K5/2052 on Multidisciplinary Vadose Zone Hydrology, as well as project K5/2326 on Quantification of Unsaturated Flow in the Fractured Intermediate Vadose Zone by means of Geotechnical Centrifuge (to be published by the WRC in 2016). Furthermore, acknowledgment is extended to Prof S.W. Jacobsz and Prof J.L. Van Rooy for their guidance and input into this paper. Gratitude is also extended to the National Research Foundation (NRF) as well as Exxaro Resources Ltd. for their financial assistance to some of the authors of this paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendon R. Jones.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, B.R., Brouwers, L.B., Van Tonder, W.D. et al. Assessing geotechnical centrifuge modelling in addressing variably saturated flow in soil and fractured rock. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 13203–13223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8333-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8333-2

Keywords

Navigation