Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling urban air pollution with optimized hierarchical fuzzy inference system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental exposure assessments (EEA) and epidemiological studies require urban air pollution models with appropriate spatial and temporal resolutions. Uncertain available data and inflexible models can limit air pollution modeling techniques, particularly in under developing countries. This paper develops a hierarchical fuzzy inference system (HFIS) to model air pollution under different land use, transportation, and meteorological conditions. To improve performance, the system treats the issue as a large-scale and high-dimensional problem and develops the proposed model using a three-step approach. In the first step, a geospatial information system (GIS) and probabilistic methods are used to preprocess the data. In the second step, a hierarchical structure is generated based on the problem. In the third step, the accuracy and complexity of the model are simultaneously optimized with a multiple objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm. We examine the capabilities of the proposed model for predicting daily and annual mean PM2.5 and NO2 and compare the accuracy of the results with representative models from existing literature. The benefits provided by the model features, including probabilistic preprocessing, multi-objective optimization, and hierarchical structure, are precisely evaluated by comparing five different consecutive models in terms of accuracy and complexity criteria. Fivefold cross validation is used to assess the performance of the generated models. The respective average RMSEs and coefficients of determination (R 2) for the test datasets using proposed model are as follows: daily PM2.5 = (8.13, 0.78), annual mean PM2.5 = (4.96, 0.80), daily NO2 = (5.63, 0.79), and annual mean NO2 = (2.89, 0.83). The obtained results demonstrate that the developed hierarchical fuzzy inference system can be utilized for modeling air pollution in EEA and epidemiological studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera I et al. (2015) Land use regression models for crustal and traffic-related PM2.5 constituents in four areas of the SAPALDIA study. Environ Res 140:377–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalá R, Alcalá-Fdez J, Herrera F (2007a) A proposal for the genetic lateral tuning of linguistic fuzzy systems and its interaction with rule selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:616–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalá R, Gacto MJ, Herrera F (2011) A fast and scalable multiobjective genetic fuzzy system for linguistic fuzzy modeling in high-dimensional regression problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19:666–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalá R, Gacto MJ, Herrera F, Alcalá-Fdez J (2007b) A multi-objective genetic algorithm for tuning and rule selection to obtain accurate and compact linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowledge-Based Syst 15:539–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arfaeinia H, Kermani M, Aghaei M, Bahrami Asl F, Karimzadeh S (2014) Comparative investigation of health quality of air in Tehran, Isfahan and Shiraz metropolises in 2011-2012. J Health Field 1:37–44 In Persian

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunraj N, Mandal S, Maiti J (2013) Modeling uncertainty in risk assessment: an integrated approach with fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Accid Anal Prev 55:242–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez AD, Casillas J (2013) Multi-objective genetic learning of serial hierarchical fuzzy systems for large-scale problems. Soft Comput 17:165–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs DJ, Sabel CE, Lee K (2008) Uncertainty in epidemiology and health risk and impact assessment. Environ Geochem Health 31:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camastra F et al. (2014) TERA: a tool for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. Ecol Inform 24:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camastra F et al. (2015) A fuzzy decision system for genetically modified plant environmental risk assessment using Mamdani inference. Expert Syst Appl 42:1710–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chart-asa C, Gibson JM (2015) Health impact assessment of traffic-related air pollution at the urban project scale: influence of variability and uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 506:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Dong J, Yang B (2004) Automatic design of hierarchical TS-FS model using ant programming and PSO algorithm. In: Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. Springer, pp 285–294

  • Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8:256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordón O, Herrera F, Zwir I (2002) Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules. Fuzzy Syst IEEE Trans 10:2–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordón O, Herrera F, Zwir I (2003) A hierarchical knowledge-based environment for linguistic modeling: models and iterative methodology. Fuzzy Sets Syst 138:307–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Heaton SK, Feldman JD, Rutt CD (2008) Use of health impact assessment in the US: 27 case studies, 1999–2007. Am J Prev Med 34:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Hoogh K et al. (2014) Comparing land use regression and dispersion modelling to assess residential exposure to ambient air pollution for epidemiological studies. Environ Int 73:382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery DW et al. (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA U (2001) Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume3—process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment chapter l, part A. Washington, IX

  • Gacto MJ, Alcalá R, Herrera F (2011) Interpretability of linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems: an overview of interpretability measures. Inf Sci 181:4340–4360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dubois D, Fargier H, Côme B, Chilès J-P (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 129:68–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81:23–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F (2008) Genetic fuzzy systems: taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evol Intel 1:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8:746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek G, Beelen R, de Hoogh K, Vienneau D, Gulliver J, Fischer P, Briggs D (2008) A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmos Environ 42:7561–7578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseiniebalam F, Ghaffarpasand O (2015) The effects of emission sources and meteorological factors on sulphur dioxide concentration of great Isfahan, Iran. Atmos Environ 100:94–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Davenport JM, Zeigler DK (1980) Latin hypercube sampling (program user’s guide).[LHC, in FORTRAN]. Sandia Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)

  • Ishibuchi H, Nozaki K, Yamamoto N, Tanaka H (1995) Selecting fuzzy if-then rules for classification problems using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi A, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Yakhchali SH, Khaleghi S (2013) Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind 26:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelleli TM, Alimi AM (2010) Automatic design of a least complicated hierarchical fuzzy system. In: Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), IEEE International Conference on, 2010. IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Jin Y (2000) Fuzzy modeling of high-dimensional systems: complexity reduction and interpretability improvement. Fuzzy Syst IEEE Trans 8:212–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral M (2005) 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stoch Env Res Risk A 19:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H, Clark S (2014) Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Clean Prod 73:183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-L, Chung H-Y, Yu F-M (2003) Modeling of hierarchical fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 138:343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung W, Noble B, Gunn J, Jaeger JA (2015) A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 50:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López V, Fernández A, Del Jesus MJ, Herrera F (2013) A hierarchical genetic fuzzy system based on genetic programming for addressing classification with highly imbalanced and borderline data-sets. Knowl-Based Syst 38:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Feng M, He L, Ren L (2015) Optimization-based multicriteria decision analysis for identification of desired petroleum-contaminated groundwater remediation strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9505–9514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowska A (2011) A fuzzy inference-based approach for building damage risk assessment on mining terrains. Eng Struct 33:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchini A, Facchinetti T, Mistri M (2009) F-IND: a framework to design fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecol Indic 9:485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JD, Nethery E, Brauer M (2008) Within-urban variability in ambient air pollution: comparison of estimation methods. Atmos Environ 42:1359–1369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Frias M, Chalabi Z, Foss AM (2014) Quantifying uncertainty in health impact assessment: a case-study example on indoor housing ventilation. Environ Int 62:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Rahimi S (2013) The impacts of landuse on spatial variation of air pollutant in Tehran (In Persian). Res Urban Plan 14:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Mölter A, Lindley S, de Vocht F, Simpson A, Agius R (2010) Modelling air pollution for epidemiologic research—part I: a novel approach combining land use regression and air dispersion. Sci Total Environ 408:5862–5869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RK (2012) Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 30:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo-Duque W, Osorio C, Piamba C, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2013) Water quality analysis in rivers with non-parametric probability distributions and fuzzy inference systems: application to the Cauca River, Colombia. Environ Int 52:17–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C (2006) Preventing disease through healthy environments. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju G, Zhou J, Kisner RA (1991) Hierarchical fuzzy control. Int J Control 54:1201–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnayake RC (2014) Application of a fuzzy inference system for functional failure risk rank estimation: RBM of rotating equipment and instrumentation. J Loss Prev Process Ind 29:216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowangould GM (2015) A new approach for evaluating regional exposure to particulate matter emissions from motor vehicles. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 34:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schram-Bijkerk D, van Kempen E, Knol A, Kruize H, Staatsen B, van Kamp I (2009) Quantitative health impact assessment of transport policies: two simulations related to speed limit reduction and traffic re-allocation in the Netherlands. Occup Environ Med 66:691–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton-Baldrey L (2012) The impacts of health impact assessment: a review of 54 health impact assessments, 2007–2012. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeglehner G (2010) Enhancing SEA effectiveness: lessons learnt from Austrian experiences in spatial planning. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 28:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainio M, Tuomisto JT, Hänninen O, Ruuskanen J, MJ J, Pekkanen J (2007) Parameter and model uncertainty in a life-table model for fine particles (PM2.5): a statistical modeling study. Environ Health 6:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenailleau QM, Mauny F, Joly D, François S, Bernard N (2015) Air pollution in moderately polluted urban areas: how does the definition of “neighborhood” impact exposure assessment? Environ Pollut 206:437–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2001) Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume III. Part A: process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Washington^ eDC DC,

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung S, Rajesh R, Lee S, Ramkumar T, Prasanna M (2015) Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:11209–11223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachokostas C et al. (2009) Decision support system for the evaluation of urban air pollution control options: application for particulate pollution in Thessaloniki, Greece. Sci Total Environ 407:5937–5948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MB, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess 4:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L-X, Mendel JM (1992) Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22:1414–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White L, Noble BF (2013) Strategic environmental assessment for sustainability: a review of a decade of academic research. Environ Impact Assess Rev 42:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2013) Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution—REVIHAAP project: final technical report. The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajaczkowski J, Verma B (2012) Selection and impact of different topologies in multi-layered hierarchical fuzzy systems. Appl Intell 36:564–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarrabi A, Mohammadi J, Abdollahi A (2010) Evaluation of mobile and stationary sources of Isfahan air pollution. Geography 26:151–164 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Onieva E, Perallos A, Osaba E, Lee VC (2014) Hierarchical fuzzy rule-based system optimized with genetic algorithms for short term traffic congestion prediction. Trans Res C Emerg Technol 43:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonouz SA, Miremadi SG (2006) A fuzzy-Monte Carlo simulation approach for fault tree analysis. In: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. RAMS'06. Annual, 2006. IEEE, pp 428–433

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Vali-Asr Street, Mirdamad Cross, Tehran, Iran

    Behnam Tashayo & Abbas Alimohammadi

  2. Center of Excellence in Geospatial Information Technology, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Alimohammadi

Authors
  1. Behnam Tashayo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Alimohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Tashayo.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerhard Lammel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tashayo, B., Alimohammadi, A. Modeling urban air pollution with optimized hierarchical fuzzy inference system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 19417–19431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7059-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7059-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation