Skip to main content
Log in

Ozonation and ultrafiltration for the treatment of olive mill wastewaters: effect of key operating conditions and integration schemes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the objective of reaching suitable techniques for olive mill wastewater treatment, ozonation and ultrafiltration were studied individually and combined. A continuous reactor was run for the treatment of a phenolic mixture mimicking an actual olive mill wastewater (OMW) by ozonation. The effect of the main operating parameters was analysed (pH, liquid flow rate and ozone inlet concentration). The increase of pH and ozone dose improved ozonation efficiency. As expected, the highest residence time led to higher steady-state degradation (35 % of chemical oxygen demand (COD) abatement). Even if the rise on ozone inlet gas concentration was able to remove COD in a higher extent, it should be taken into consideration that with the lowest oxidant load (15 g O3/m3), the maximum steady-state biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)/COD ratio was reached which would reduce the process costs. These operating conditions (pH 9, 1 mL/min of liquid flow rate and 15 g O3/m3) were applied to an actual OMW leading to 80 % of phenolic content abatement and 12 % of COD removal at the steady state. Regarding ultrafiltration, it was concluded that the best total phenolic content (TPh) and COD abatement results (55 and 15 %) are attained for pH 9 and using a transmembrane pressure drop of 1 bar. Among the integration schemes that were tested, ultrafiltration followed by ozonation was able to reach 93 and 20 % of TPh and COD depletion, respectively. Moreover, this sequence led to an effluent with a BOD5/COD ratio of about 0.55 which means that it likely can be posteriorly refined in a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akdemir E, Ozer A (2009) Investigation of two ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of olive mil wastewater. Desalination 249:660–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cañizares P, Lobato J, Paz R, Rodrigo MA, Sáez C (2007) Advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of olive-oil mills wastewater. Chemosphere 67:832–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassano A, Conidi C, Drioli E (2011) Comparison of the performance of UF membranes in olive mill wastewaters treatment. Water Res 45:3197–3204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassano A, Conidi C, Giorno L, Drioli E (2013) Fractionation of olive mill wastewaters by membrane separation techniques. J Hazard Mater 248–249:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies LC, Novais JM, Martins-Dias S (2004) Detoxification of olive mill wastewater using superabsorbent polymers. Environ Technol 25:89–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drouiche M, Mignot V, Lounici V, Belhocine D, Grib H, Pauss A, Mameri N (2004) A compact process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater by combining OF and UV/H2O2 techniques. Desalination 169:81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Abassi A, Khayet M, Hafidi A (2011) Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater. Water Res 45:4522–4530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Abassi A, Kiai H, Raiti J, Hafidi A (2014) Application of ultrafiltration for olive processing wastewaters. J Clean Prod 65:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shafey EI, Correia PFM, Carvalho JMR (2005) An integrated process of olive mill wastewater treatment. Sep Sci Technol 40:2841–2869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg A, Clesceri L, Eaton A (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karageorgos P, Coz A, Charalabaki M, Kalogerakis N, Xekoukoulotakis N, Mantzavinos D (2006) Ozonation of weathered olive mill wastewaters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1570–1576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado MI, Malato S, Pérez-Estrada LA, Gernjak W, Oller I, Doménech X, Peral J (2006) Partial degradation of five pesticides and an industrial pollutant by ozonation in a pilot-plant scale reactor. J Hazard Mater 138:363–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantzavinos D, Psillakis E (2004) Enhancement of biodegradability of industrial wastewater by chemical oxidation pre-treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 79:431–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins R, Quinta-Ferreira R (2009) Catalytic ozonation of phenolic acids over a Mn-Ce-O catalyts. Appl Catal B 90:268–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins R, Quinta-Ferreira R (2011) Phenolic wastewaters depuration and biodegradability enhancement by ozone over active catalysts. Desalination 270:90–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins RC, Silva AMT, Castro-Silva S, Garção-Nunes P, Quinta-Ferreira RM (2010) Adopting strategies to improve the efficiency of ozonation in the treatment of olive mill wastewaters. Environ Technol 31:1459–1469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peña M, Coca M, González G (2007) Continuous ozonation of biologically pretreated molasses fermentation effluents. J Environ Sci Health A 42:777–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restivo J, Órfão JJM, Armenise S, Garcia-Bordejé E, Pereira MFR (2012) Catalytic ozonation of metolachlor under continuous operation using nanocarbon materials grown on a ceramic monolith. J Hazard Mater 239:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Muñoz I, Perdigón-Melón JA, Carbajo JB, Martínez MJ, Fernández-Alba A, García-Calvo E, Rosal R (2012) Environmental optimization of continuous flow ozonation for urban wastewater reclamation. Sci Total Environ 437:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares OS, Órfão JJM, Portela D, Vieira A, Pereira MFR (2006) Ozonation of textile effluents and dye solutions under continuous operation: influence of operating parameters. J Hazard Mater 137:1664–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares OS, Faria P, Órfão JJM, Pereira MFR (2007) Ozonation of textile effluents and dye solutions in the presence of activated carbon under continuous operation. Sep Sci Technol 42:1477–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller M, Bravi M (2010) Critical flux analyses on differently pretreated olive vegetation waste water streams: some case studies. Desalination 250:578–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turano E, Curcio S, De Paola M, Calabrò V, Iorio G (2002) An integrated centrifugation-Ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater. J Membr Sci 209:519–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yahiaoiu O, Lounici H, Abdi N, Drouiche N, Ghaffour N, Pauss A, Mamer N (2011) Treatment of olive mill wastewater by the combination of ultrafiltration and bipolar electrochemical reactor processes. Chem Eng Process 50:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia by the financial support under the contract (PTDC/EQU-ERQ/113308/2009). Rui C. Martins gratefully acknowledges Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia for the IFCT contract (IF/00215/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui C. Martins.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Bingcai Pan

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martins, R.C., Ferreira, A.M., Gando-Ferreira, L.M. et al. Ozonation and ultrafiltration for the treatment of olive mill wastewaters: effect of key operating conditions and integration schemes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 15587–15597 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4766-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4766-2

Keywords

Navigation