Skip to main content
Log in

An inexact mixed risk-aversion two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainties exist in the water resources system, while traditional two-stage stochastic programming is risk-neutral and compares the random variables (e.g., total benefit) to identify the best decisions. To deal with the risk issues, a risk-aversion inexact two-stage stochastic programming model is developed for water resources management under uncertainty. The model was a hybrid methodology of interval-parameter programming, conditional value-at-risk measure, and a general two-stage stochastic programming framework. The method extends on the traditional two-stage stochastic programming method by enabling uncertainties presented as probability density functions and discrete intervals to be effectively incorporated within the optimization framework. It could not only provide information on the benefits of the allocation plan to the decision makers but also measure the extreme expected loss on the second-stage penalty cost. The developed model was applied to a hypothetical case of water resources management. Results showed that that could help managers generate feasible and balanced risk-aversion allocation plans, and analyze the trade-offs between system stability and economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Claessens S, Kreuser J (2004) A framework for strategic foreign reserves risk management. In: Risk management for Central Bank foreign reserves. European Central Bank, Frankfurt, pp 47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M, Ponnambalam K, Javan M (2008) A fuzzy stochastic dynamic Nash game analysis of policies for managing water allocation in a reservoir system. Water Resour Manag 22:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haneveld WKK, vander Vlerk (2006) Integrated chance constraints: reduced forms and an algorithm. Comput Manag Sci 3:245–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Loucks DP (2000) An inexact two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Civil Eng Environ Syst 17:95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Houck MH (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation. J Am Water Resour Association 23:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer B (2012) CVaR Optimization of Real Estate Portfolios in an ALM Context. OFRC Applied Paper No. 2011–05

  • Li YP, Huang GH (2008) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic nonlinear programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 22:681–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Nie SL (2006) An interval-parameter multi-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 29:776–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Li YP, Li CH, Huang GH (2010) An inexact two-stage water management model for planning agricultural irrigation under uncertainty. Agric Water Manag 97:1905–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Li W, Huang GH (2012) Two-stage inexact-probabilistic programming model for water quality management. Environ Eng Sci 29:713–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, He L (2011) An inexact rough-interval fuzzy linear programming method for generating conjunctive water-allocation strategies to agricultural irrigation systems. Appl Math Model 35:4330–4340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Maqsood I, Yin YY, Huang GH, Cohen SJ (2003) Adaptation to climate change through water trading under uncertainty—an inexact two-stage nonlinear programming approach. J Environ Informat 2:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH (2003) A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for waste management under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 53:540–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH, Huang YF (2005) ITOM: an interval-parameter two-stage optimization model for stochastic planning of water resources systems. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 19:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özelkan EC, Galambosi Á, Fernández-Gaucherand E, Duckstein L (1997) Linear quadratic dynamic programming for water reservoir management. Appl Math Model 21:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piantadosia J, Metcalfe AV, Howlett PG (2008) Stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) with a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criterion for management of storm-water. J Hydrol 348:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Roldán J, Alcaide M, López R, Camacho E (2001) Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems: I. Description Model Agric Water Manag 48:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao LG, Luan SJ (2010) A CVaR-based nonlinear stochastic model for water resources management. Presented at the Conference on Environmental Pollution and Public Health, Wuhan, China

  • Shao LG, Qin XS, Xu Y (2011) A conditional value-at-risk based inexact water allocation model. Water Resour Manag 25:2125–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topaloglou N (2004) A stochastic programming framework for international portfolio management. Dissertation, School of Economics and Management, University of Cyprus

  • Xevi E, Khan S (2005) A multi-objective optimization approach to water management. J Environ Manag 77:269–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS (2009) Inexact two-stage stochastic robust optimization model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environ Eng Sci 26:1765–1776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JY, Li YP, Huang GH (2013) A hybrid interval–robust optimization model for water quality management. Environ Eng Sci 30:248–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng GM, Li YP, Qin XS, Huang GH, Li JB, Jiang R (2004) Optimum municipal wastewater treatment plant design with consideration of uncertainty. J Environ Sci 16:126–131

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Li.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Michael Matthies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Wang, B., Xie, Y.L. et al. An inexact mixed risk-aversion two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 2964–2975 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3547-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3547-7

Keywords

Navigation