Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Study of the Performance of IR Detectors vs. High-Speed Cameras Under Dynamic Loading Conditions

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The conversion of plastic work to heat and its efficiency (the Taylor-Quinney coefficient - TQC), are traditionally measured using infrared single-detectors (named detectors from here on) which measure the temperature at a single point on the surface. Lately, fast infrared cameras (focal plane array of detectors that measures a 2-dimensional field of view on the surface) have been increasingly used for that purpose too, but no systematic study has been carried out yet to compare the respective performance of each monitoring system for impact loading conditions.

Objective

A comparison between the two techniques (infrared detector and infrared fast camera) is reported for commercial 316L stainless steel under dynamic loading in the Kolsky bar. The respective merits and limitations of each setup are compared and discussed.

Methods

Cylindrical specimens were loaded at a strain rate of about 3000 [1/s] in a split Hopkinson pressure bar (Kolsky bar) apparatus. The transient temperature change was monitored in two separate series of experiments: In the first, we used a liquid N2 cooled Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride (MCT) detector made by InfraRed Associates (USA) with a 1.5 MHz sampling rate, and in the second, a Telops FAST M2K high-speed infrared camera made by Telops (Canada) based on Indium Antimonide (InSb) array-detector and with a sampling rate of up to 90 kHz.

Results

Temperature changes under impact were successfully measured and compared using the two distinct techniques. In addition, the IR camera rendered a satisfactory thermal and visual recording of dynamic shear failure of various specimens.

Conclusions

The integral Taylor-Quinney coefficient (\({\beta }_{int}\)) can be assessed using either infrared detector or fast infrared camera alike, under dynamic loading conditions. However, the evaluation of the differential TQC (\({\beta }_{diff}\)) necessitates high sampling rates such as those enabled by infrared single detectors as compared to infrared high-speed cameras.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Tresca MH (1878) On further applications of the flow of solids. Proc Inst Mech Eng 29:301–345. https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1878_029_017_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bgi T, Taylor GI, Quinney H (1934) The latent energy remaining in a metal after cold working. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 143:307–326. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rittel D (1999) On the conversion of plastic work to heat during high strain rate deformation of glassy polymers. Mech Mater 31:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00063-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rittel D, Kidane AA, Alkhader M et al (2012) On the dynamically stored energy of cold work in pure single crystal and polycrystalline copper. Acta Mater 60:3719–3728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaera R, Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Rittel D (2013) On the Taylor-Quinney coefficient in dynamically phase transforming materials. Application to 304 stainless steel. Int J Plast 40:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rittel D, Zhang LH, Osovski S (2017) The dependence of the Taylor-Quinney coefficient on the dynamic loading mode. J Mech Phys Solids 107:96–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rittel D, Bhattacharyya A, Poon B et al (2007) Thermomechanical characterization of pure polycrystalline tantalum. Mater Sci Eng, A 447:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh D, Kingstedt OT, Ravichandran G (2017) Plastic work to heat conversion during high-strain rate deformation of Mg and Mg alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 48:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3825-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchand A, Duffy J (1988) An experimental study of the formation process of adiabatic shear bands in a structural steel. J Mech Phys Solids 36:251–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(88)90012-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartley KA, Duffy J, Hawley RH (1987) Measurement of the temperature profile during shear band formation in steels deforming at high strain rates. J Mech Phys Solids 35:283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(87)90009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolsky H (1953) Stress waves in solids. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Engineering M, Hopkinson B, Kolsky H, Kolsky H (2011) Dynamic material properties strain measurements in a split Hopkinson bar. 5–7

  14. Li Z, Zhao S, Ritchie RO, Meyers MA (2019) Mechanical properties of high-entropy alloys with emphasis on face-centered cubic alloys. Prog Mater Sci 102:296–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Y-Q, Huang F-L (2011) A microscopic model for predicting hot-spot ignition of granular energetic crystals in response to drop-weight impacts. Mech Mater 43:835–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Astakhov VP, Outeiro J, Davim JP (2019) Importance of temperature in metal cutting and its proper measurement/modeling, 1st ed. 20. Springer International Publishing, Cham

  17. Kapoor R, Nemat-Nasser S (1998) Determination of temperature rise during high strain rate deformation. Mech Mater 27:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00036-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rittel D (1998) Transient temperature measurement using embedded thermocouples. Exp Mech 38:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Regev A, Rittel D (2008) Simultaneous transient temperature sensing of impacted polymers using infrared detectors and thermocouples. Exp Mech 48:675–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9096-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rittel D (1998) Experimental investigation of transient thermoelastic effects in dynamic fracture. Int J Solids Struct 35:2959–2973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00352-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hodowany J, Ravichandran G, Rosakis AJ, Rosakis P (2000) Partition of plastic work into heat and stored energy in metals. Exp Mech 40:113–123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Macdougall DAS, Harding J (1998) The measurement of specimen surface temperature in high-speed tension and torsion tests. Int J Impact Eng 21:473–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soares GC, Vázquez-Fernández NI, Hokka M (2021) Thermomechanical behavior of steels in tension studied with synchronized full-field deformation and temperature measurements. Exp Tech 45:627–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00436-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vazquez-Fernandez NI, Soares GC, Smith JL et al (2019) Adiabatic heating of austenitic stainless steels at different strain rates. J Dyn Behav Mater 5:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-019-00204-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seidt JD, Kuokkala VT, Smith JL, Gilat A (2017) Synchronous full-field strain and temperature measurement in tensile tests at low, intermediate and high strain rates. Exp Mech 57:219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0237-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soares GC, Hokka M (2022) Synchronized full-field strain and temperature measurements

  27. Yoshida S, Lamberti L, Sciammarella C (2016) Advancement of optical methods in experimental mechanics, vol 3. Springer International Publishing

  28. Rosakis P, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G, Hodowany J (2000) A thermodynamic internal variable model for the partition of plastic work into heat and stored energy in metals. J Mech Phys Solids 48:581–607

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhouhua L, Lambros J (2001) Strain rate effects on the thermomechanical behavior of polymers. Int J Solids Struct 38:3549–3562. https://doi-org.ezlibrary.technion.ac.il/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00223-7

  30. Mason JJ, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G (1994) On the strain and strain rate dependence of the fraction of plastic work converted to heat: an experimental study using high speed infrared detectors and the Kolsky bar. Mech Mater 17:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(94)90054-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zehnder AT, Rosakis AJ (1990) Experimental measurement of the temperature rise generated during dynamic crack growth in metals. Appl Mech Rev 43:S260–S265. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3120822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zehnder AT, Rosakis AJ (1991) On the temperature distribution at the vicinity of dynamically propagating cracks in 4340 steel. J Mech Phys Solids 39:385–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(91)90019-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Potdar YK, Zehnder AT (2004) Temperature and deformation measurements in transient metal cutting. Exp Mech 44:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014485104039623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zehnder AT, Guduru PR, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G (2000) Million frames per second infrared imaging system. Rev Sci Instrum 71:3762–3768. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1310350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guduru PR, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G (2001) Dynamic shear bands: an investigation using high speed optical and infrared diagnostics. Mech Mater 33:371–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00051-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith JL, Seidt JD, Gilat A, et al (2019) Full-field determination of the Taylor-Quinney coefficient in tension tests of Ti-6Al-4V at strain rates up to 7000 s−1, 1st ed. 20. Springer International Publishing, Cham

  37. Soares GC, Hokka M (2021) The Taylor-Quinney coefficients and strain hardening of commercially pure titanium, iron, copper, and tin in high rate compression. Int J Impact Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jia B, Rusinek A, Pesci R et al (2021) Simple shear behavior and constitutive modeling of 304 stainless steel over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. Int J Impact Eng 154

  39. Zubelewicz A (2019) Century-long Taylor-Quinney interpretation of plasticity-induced heating reexamined. Sci Rep 9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45533-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Boley BA (1997) Theory of thermal stresses by Bruno A. Boley and Jerome H. Weiner. Dover, Mineola

  41. Annaratone D (2010) Engineering heat transfer by Donatello Annaratone, 1st ed. 20. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  42. TELOPS (2020) High-performance infrared cameras - TELOPS infrared cameras user’s guide, Revision 8. TELOPS

  43. Nieto-Fuentes JC, Osovski S, Rittel D (2020) High-speed infrared thermal measurements of impacted metallic solids. MethodsX 7:100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rabin Y, Rittel D (2000) Infrared temperature sensing of mechanically loaded specimens: thermal analysis. Exp Mech 40:197–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dorogoy A, Rittel D, Godinger A (2015) Modification of the shear-compression specimen for large strain testing. Exp Mech 55:1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0057-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rittel D, Lee S, Ravichandran G (2002) A shear compression specimen for large strain testing. Exp Mech 42:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02411052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Infrared Associates and Telops support with many processes and physical guidance are appreciated. Mr. I. Levin’s assistance with specimens’ supply and conducting the experiments is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, 32000, Haifa, Israel

    G.G. Goviazin, A. Shirizly & D. Rittel

  2. Rafael, POB 2250 (774), Haifa, 3102102, Israel

    G.G. Goviazin & A. Shirizly

Authors
  1. G.G. Goviazin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Shirizly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Rittel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Gleb Gil Goviazin: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Visualization. Amnon Shirizly: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization. Daniel Rittel: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.G. Goviazin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article has been updated to replace the incorrect figures 7 and 10. The errors were introduced during production and not the fault of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goviazin, G., Shirizly, A. & Rittel, D. A Comparative Study of the Performance of IR Detectors vs. High-Speed Cameras Under Dynamic Loading Conditions. Exp Mech 63, 115–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00907-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation