Skip to main content
Log in

High-Speed, Full-Field Deformation Measurements Near Inertial Microcavitation Bubbles Inside Viscoelastic Hydrogels

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inertial microcavitation is a well-known phenomenon that generates large stresses and deformations at extremely high loading rates in various soft materials, ranging from commercial polymer coatings to biological tissues. Recent advances in soft material characterization have taken advantage of inertial cavitation as a means towards a high-rate, minimally invasive soft material rheology approach. Yet, most of these studies rely on idealizations to infer the full deformation fields around the bubble based only on the experimentally measured temporal evolution of the bubble radius (akin to relying on crosshead strain data in a traditional materials test).

Objective

Here, we develop an experimental method to quantitatively measure full-field deformation and associated strains due to laser-induced inertial cavitation (LIC) in gelatin hydrogels, where the surrounding material is subjected to ultra-high strain rates (\(10^3\) \(\sim\) \(10^6\) s\(^{-1}\)).

Methods

Our method combines two broad experimental techniques: the embedded speckle plane patterning (ESP) method and spatiotemporally adaptive quadtree mesh digital image correlation (STAQ-DIC).

Results

We illustrate the powerful capability of our approach by testing three concentrations of gelatin hydrogels 6%, 10%, and 14% as benchmark cases and quantitatively capture their kinematics during LIC.

Conclusions

These full-field, quantitative investigations are of significant interest in many cavitation-related applications including high strain-rate material characterization, guided advanced laser & ultrasound therapies, tissue engineering, and advanced manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The melting temperature of gelatin has been found to vary depending on its type, concentration, pH, and bloom strength. The melting point of most common gelatin hydrogels is in the range of 20 \(\sim\) 35 \(^{\circ }\)C [44].

  2. The maximum hoop stretches for 6% \(\sim\) 14% gelatin hydrogels are between 2.40 and 3.65, which are smaller than previous studies for LIC in polyacrylamide [23, 30] or agarose [13] hydrogels. The strain-rates reported here are estimated numerically following the theoretical framework in Estrada et al. [30] and Yang, et al. [23] to match our LIC experimental observations.

  3. For each cavitation event, there were 5 \(\sim\) 6 frames taken by the camera before the laser pulse, which are discarded in the DIC post-processing routine.

References

  1. Silberrad D (1912) Propeller erosion. Proc Est Acad Sci 33:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtman JZ, Kallas DH, Chatten CK, Cochran EP Jr (1958) Study of corrosion and Cavitation-Erosion damage. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 80(6):1325–1339

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brennen CE (2013) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Versluis M, Schmitz B, Von der Heydt A, Lohse D (2000) How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles. Science 289(5487):2114–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang Y, Qin S, Di C, Qin J, Wu D, Zhao J (2020) Research on claw motion characteristics and cavitation bubbles of snapping shrimp. Appl Bionics Biomech 2020(65857290)

  6. Barney CW, Dougan CE, McLeod KR, Kazemi-Moridani A, Zheng Y, Ye Z, Tiwari S, Sacligil I, Riggleman RA, Cai SQ, Lee JH, Peyton SR, Tew GN, Crosby AJ (2020) Cavitation in soft matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:9157–9165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Estrada JB, Cramer HC, Scimone MT, Buyukozturk S, Franck C (2021) Neural cell injury pathology due to high-rate mechanical loading. Brain Multiphysics 2:100034

  8. Maxwell AD, Cain CA, Duryea AP, Yuan LQ, Gurm HS, Xu Z (2009) Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy - histotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(12):1982–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maxwell AD, Wang TY, Yuan L, Duryea AP, Xu Z, Cain CA (2010) A tissue phantom for visualization and measurement of ultrasound-induced cavitation damage. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:2132–2143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Požar T, Petkovšek R (2020) Cavitation induced by shock wave focusing in eye-like experimental configurations. Biomed Opt Express 11(1):432–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murakami K, Gaudron R, Johnsen E (2020) Shape stability of a gas bubble in a soft solid. Ultrason Sonochem 67:105170

  12. Murakami K, Yamakawa Y, Zhao J, Johnsen E, Ando K (2021) Ultrasound-induced nonlinear oscillations of a spherical bubble in a gelatin gel. J Fluid Mech 924:A38

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Cramer HC, Bremer EC, Buyukozturk S, Yin Y, Franck C (2022) Mechanical characterization of agarose hydrogels and their inherent dynamic instabilities at ballistic to ultra-high strain-rates via inertial microcavitation. Extreme Mech Lett 51:101572

  14. Diab M, Zhang T, Zhao R, Gao H, Kim K-S (2013) Ruga mechanics of creasing: from instantaneous to setback creases. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 469(2157):20120753

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao R, Zhang T, Diab M, Gao H, Kim K-S (2015) The primary bilayer Ruga-phase diagram I: localizations in Ruga evolution. Extreme Mech Lett 4:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang J, Tzoumaka A, Murakami K, Johnsen E, Henann DL, Franck C (2021) Predicting complex nonspherical instability shapes of inertial cavitation bubbles in viscoelastic soft matter. Phys Rev E 104:045108

  17. Hosoya N, Kajiwara I, Umenai K (2016) Dynamic characterizations of underwater structures using non-contact vibration test based on nanosecond laser ablation in water: investigation of cavitation bubbles by visualizing shockwaves using the schlieren method. J Vib Control 22(17):3649–3658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujisawa N, Fujita Y, Yanagisawa K, Fujisawa K, Yamagata T (2018) Simultaneous observation of cavitation collapse and shock wave formation in cavitating jet. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 94:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Supponen O, Obreschkow D, Farhat M (2019) High-speed imaging of high pressures produced by cavitation bubbles. In: 32nd International Congress on High-Speed Imaging and Photonics, vol 11051. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 1105103

  20. Yamamoto S, Tagawa Y, Kameda M (2015) Application of background-oriented schlieren (BOS) technique to a laser-induced underwater shock wave. Exp Fluids 56(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ward B, Emmony DC (1991) Interferometric studies of the pressures developed in a liquid during infrared-laser-induced cavitation-bubble oscillation. Infrared Phys 32:489–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Veysset D, Maznev AA, Pezeril T, Kooi S, Nelson KA (2016) Interferometric analysis of laser-driven cylindrically focusing shock waves in a thin liquid layer. Sci Rep 6(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang J, Cramer HC, Franck C (2020) Extracting non-linear viscoelastic material properties from violently-collapsing cavitation bubbles. Extreme Mech Lett 39:100839

  24. Yang J, Yin Y, Landauer AK, Buyukozturk S, Zhang J, Summey L, McGhee A, Fu MK, Dabiri JO, Franck C (2022) SerialTrack: ScalE and Rotation Invariant Augmented Lagrangian particle tracking. SoftwareX

  25. Vogel A, Lauterborn W, Timm R (1989) Optical and acoustic investigations of the dynamics of laser-produced cavitation bubbles near a solid boundary. J Fluid Mech 206:299–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pennings PC, Westerweel J, Van Terwisga TJC (2015) Flow field measurement around vortex cavitation. Exp Fluids 56(11):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayasaka K, Tagawa Y, Liu TS, Kameda M (2016) Optical-flow-based background-oriented schlieren technique for measuring a laser-induced underwater shock wave. Exp Fluids 57(12):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan F, Yang C, Zhong P (2015) Cell membrane deformation and bioeffects produced by tandem bubble-induced jetting flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(51):E7039–E7047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiwari S, Kazemi-Moridani A, Zheng Y, Barney CW, McLeod KR, Dougan CE, Crosby AJ, Tew GN, Peyton SR, Cai SQ et al (2020) Seeded laser-induced cavitation for studying high-strain-rate irreversible deformation of soft materials. Soft Matter 16(39):9006–9013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Estrada JB, Barajas C, Henann DL, Johnsen E, Franck C (2018) High strain-rate soft material characterization via inertial cavitation. J Mech Phys Solids 112:291–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gregorčič P, Petkovšek R, Možina J (2007) Investigation of a cavitation bubble between a rigid boundary and a free surface. J Appl Phys 102(9):094904

  32. Li T, Zhang AM, Wang SP, Li S, Liu WT (2019) Bubble interactions and bursting behaviors near a free surface. Phys Fluids 31(4):042104

  33. Yang J, Yin Y, Cramer HC, Franck C (2022) The penetration dynamics of a violent cavitation bubble through a hydrogel-water interface. In: Amirkhizi Alireza, Notbohm Jacob, Karanjgaokar Nikhil, DelRio Frank W (eds) Challenges in Mechanics of Time Dependent Materials. Mechanics of Biological Systems and Materials & Micro-and Nanomechanics, vol 2. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 65–71

  34. Brujan EA, Nahen K, Schmidt P, Vogel A (2001) Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near elastic boundaries: influence of the elastic modulus. J Fluid Mech 433:283–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Brujan EA, Keen GS, Vogel A, Blake JR (2002) The final stage of the collapse of a cavitation bubble close to a rigid boundary. Phys Fluids 14(1):85–92

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Buljac Ante, Jailin Clément, Mendoza Arturo, Neggers Jan, Taillandier-Thomas Thibault, Bouterf Amine, Smaniotto Benjamin, Hild François, Roux Stéphane (2018) Digital volume correlation: review of progress and challenges. Exp Mech 58(5):661–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang J, Hazlett L, Landauer AK, Franck C (2020) Augmented Lagrangian Digital Volume Correlation (ALDVC). Exp Mech 60(9):1205–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang J, Rubino V, Ma Z, Tao JL, Yin Y, McGhee A, Pan WX, Franck C (2022) SpatioTemporally Adaptive Quadtree mesh (STAQ) Digital Image Correlation for resolving large deformations around complex geometries and discontinuities. Exp Mech 62:1191–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Poissant J, Barthelat F (2010) A novel “subset splitting” procedure for digital image correlation on discontinuous displacement fields. Exp Mech 50(3):353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubino V, Lapusta N, Rosakis AJ, Leprince S, Avouac JP (2015) Static laboratory earthquake measurements with the digital image correlation method. Exp Mech 55(1):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rubino V, Rosakis AJ, Lapusta N (2019) Full-field ultrahigh-speed quantification of dynamic shear ruptures using digital image correlation. Exp Mech 59(5):551–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McGhee A, Bennett A, Ifju P, Sawyer GW, Angelini TE (2018) Full-field deformation measurements in liquid-like-solid granular microgel using digital image correlation. Exp Mech 58:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McGhee AJ, McGhee EO, Famiglietti JE, Schulze KD (2021) Dynamic subsurface deformation and strain of soft hydrogel interfaces using an embedded speckle pattern with 2d digital image correlation. Exp Mech 61(6):1017–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ninan G, Joseph J, Aliyamveettil ZA (2014) A comparative study on the physical, chemical and functional properties of carp skin and mammalian gelatins. J Food Sci Technol 51(9):2085–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Funken SA, Schmidt A (2020) Adaptive mesh refinement in 2D-An efficient implementation in matlab. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics 20(3):459–479

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang J, Bhattacharya K (2021) Fast Adaptive Mesh Augmented Lagrangian Digital Image Correlation. Exp Mech 61(4):719–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media

  48. Taubin G (1991) Estimation of planar curves, surfaces, and nonplanar space curves defined by implicit equations with applications to edge and range image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(11):1115–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bailey M, Alunni-Cardinali M, Correa N, Caponi S, Holsgrove T, Barr H, Stone N, Winlove CP, Fioretto D, Palombo F (2020) Viscoelastic properties of biopolymer hydrogels determined by Brillouin spectroscopy: a probe of tissue micromechanics. Sci Adv 6(44):eabc1937

  50. Ohl CD (2002) Probing luminescence from nonspherical bubble collapse. Phys Fluids 14(8):2700–2708

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Spratt JS, Rodriguez M, Schmidmayer K, Bryngelson SH, Yang J, Franck C, Colonius T (2020) Characterizing viscoelastic materials via ensemble-based data assimilation of bubble collapse observations. J Mech Phys Solids 152:104455

  52. Kang W, Raphael M (2018) Acceleration-induced pressure gradients and cavitation in soft biomaterials. Sci Rep 8(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kang W, Adnan A, O’Shaughnessy T, Bagchi A (2018) Cavitation nucleation in gelatin: experiment and mechanism. Acta Biomater 67:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Milner MP, Hutchens SB (2021) Multi-crack formation in soft solids during high rate cavity expansion. Mech Mater 154:103741

  55. Chockalingam S, Roth C, Henzel T, Cohen T (2021) Probing local nonlinear viscoelastic properties in soft materials. J Mech Phys Solids 146:104172

  56. Mancia L, Yang J, Spratt J-S, Sukovich JR, Xu Z, Colonius T, Franck C, Johnsen E (2021) Acoustic cavitation rheometry. Soft Matter 17(10):2931-2941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yang J, Cramer HC, Franck C (2021) Dynamic Rugae strain localizations and instabilities in soft viscoelastic materials during inertial microcavitation. In: Lamberson L, Mates S, Eliasson V (eds) Dynamic Behavior of Materials, vol 1. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 45–49

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yang J, Cramer HC, Buyukozturk S, Franck C (2022) Probing inertial cavitation damage in viscoelastic hydrogels using dynamic bubble pairs. In: Mates S, Eliasson V (eds) Dynamic Behavior of Materials, vol 1. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 47–52

  59. Sugita N, Ando K, Sugiura T (2017) Experiment and modeling of translational dynamics of an oscillating bubble cluster in a stationary sound field. Ultrasonics 77:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yamashita T, Ando K (2019) Low-intensity ultrasound induced cavitation and streaming in oxygen-supersaturated water: Role of cavitation bubbles as physical cleaning agents. Ultrason Sonochem 52:268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rodriguez M (2018) Numerical simulations of bubble dynamics near viscoelastic media. PhD thesis, University of Michigan

  62. Liu YL, Zhang AM, Tian ZL, Wang SP (2019) Dynamical behavior of an oscillating bubble initially between two liquids. Phys Fluids 31(9):092111

  63. Brennen CE (2015) Cavitation in medicine. Interface Focus 5:20150022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Luo JC, Ching H, Wilson BG, Mohraz A, Botvinick EL, Venugopalan V (2020) Laser cavitation rheology for measurement of elastic moduli and failure strain within hydrogels. Sci Rep 10:13144

  65. Flaschel M, Kumar S, De Lorenzis L (2021) Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 381:113852

  66. Liu B, Kovachki N, Li Z, Azizzadenesheli K, Anandkumar A, Stuart AM, Bhattacharya K (2022) A learning-based multiscale method and its application to inelastic impact problems. J Mech Phys Solids 158:104668

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from the US Office of Naval Research under PANTHER award number N000142112044 through Dr. Timothy Bentley.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Franck.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Theoretical Kinematic Fields in LIC

Consider a spherical bubble (see Fig. 12) with reference undeformed configuration \(\mathcal {B}_0(r_0,\varphi _0,\theta _0)\), \(\lbrace R_{0} \leqslant r_0 < \infty , \ 0 \leqslant \varphi _0 \leqslant \pi , \ 0 \leqslant \theta _0 \leqslant 2 \pi \rbrace\), and current deformed configuration \(\mathcal {B}(r,\varphi ,\theta )\), \(\lbrace R \leqslant r < \infty , \ 0 \leqslant \varphi \leqslant \pi , \ 0 \leqslant \theta \leqslant 2 \pi \rbrace\), where \(\lbrace r_0, r \rbrace\) represent referential and current radial coordinates, \(\lbrace \varphi _0, \varphi \rbrace\) are referential and current azimuthal angular coordinates, and \(\lbrace \theta _0, \theta \rbrace\) are referential and current polar angular coordinates. The time-dependent bubble radius is R(t), and \(R_0\) denotes the undeformed bubble radius. We assume a spherically symmetric motion, in which \(r = r(r_0,t)\), \(\varphi =\varphi _0\), and \(\theta =\theta _0\), and the components of the deformation gradient tensor \(\mathbf {F}\) in the spherical coordinate system are

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {F} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial r}{\partial r_0} &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} \frac{r}{r_0} &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} \frac{r}{r_0} \end{bmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$
(4)
Fig. 12
figure 12

Spherical coordinate system \(\lbrace r, \varphi , \theta \rbrace\)

We assume that the surrounding material is incompressible, so that det(\(\mathbf {F}\)) = 1, and the spherically symmetric motion is described by

$$\begin{aligned} r = \left( r_0^3 + R(t)^3 - R_0^3 \right) ^{1/3}. \end{aligned}$$
(5)

Equation (5) may be inverted to obtain the reference map \(r_0 = (r^3 + R_0^3 - R(t)^3)^{1/3}\). For a spherically symmetric, incompressible motion, the only non-zero components of the displacement and the velocity vectors are the radial components, and their spatial descriptions are given by

$$\begin{aligned} u_r(r,t) = r - r_0(r,t), \end{aligned}$$
(6)

and

$$\begin{aligned} v_r(r,t) = \frac{R^2 \dot{R}}{r^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(7)

where the superposed dot denotes the derivative with respect to time t. The spatial description of the radial component of the acceleration vector is

$$\begin{aligned} a_r(r,t) = \frac{R^2 \ddot{R} + 2 R \dot{R}^2 }{r^2} - \frac{2 R^4 \dot{R}^2 }{r^5}. \end{aligned}$$
(8)

Finally, the Hencky (logarithmic) strain tensor is defined as \(\mathbf {E} = (1/2) \text {ln} (\mathbf {F}^{{\scriptscriptstyle \mathsf {T}}} \mathbf {F})\). For a spherically symmetric, incompressible motion, the components of the logarithmic strain tensor in the spherical coordinate system are

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {E} = \begin{bmatrix} E_{rr} &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} E_{\varphi \varphi } &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} E_{\theta \theta } \end{bmatrix}, \end{aligned}$$
(9)

where \(E_{\varphi \varphi } = E_{\theta \theta }\), and the spatial descriptions of the radial and circumferential logarithmic strain components are

$$\begin{aligned} E_{rr} = -2\ln \left( \dfrac{r}{r_0(r,t)}\right) \quad \text {and}\quad E_{\theta \theta } = \ln \left( \dfrac{r}{r_0(r,t)}\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(10)

Appendix 2

Other DIC Measured Displacement and Strain Results

Fig. 13
figure 13

Kymographs of kinematic fields in three concentrations, (a) 6%, (b) 10%, and (c) 14%, of gelatin due to a single laser-induced cavitation bubble. The kymographs are created by taking a 10 pixel-wide vertical slice of the full-field data symmetric about the center of the cavitation bubble for each frame over 250 frames at a camera frame rate of 2 million frames/sec. The resulting (i) circumferential displacement field \(u_{\theta }\) and (ii) shear logarithmic strain \(E_{r\theta }\) are plotted against time for all three gelatin concentrations

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGhee, A., Yang, J., Bremer, E. et al. High-Speed, Full-Field Deformation Measurements Near Inertial Microcavitation Bubbles Inside Viscoelastic Hydrogels. Exp Mech 63, 63–78 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00893-z

Keywords

Navigation