Skip to main content
Log in

Association between muscle mass quantity and quality and muscle strength in adults with obesity

  • Research
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This cross-sectional study aimed to verify the association between muscle quantity and quality and muscle strength in obese adults.

Methods

Lean mass (LM) and intracellular water (ICW) were obtained using bioelectrical impedance. Muscle quantity was expressed in kg for LM, while muscle quality was determined by ICW and the ratio of ICW/LM. Maximum strength was measured by the one-repetition maximum test (1RM) in bench press and leg press exercises at 45º. The score for total strength (Z-score) was given by the average of scores for each test. The statistical analysis included Spearman's correlation, whose results were expressed as correlation coefficients (r); crude and adjusted linear regression, expressed as adjusted coefficients of determination (R2); Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC); and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).

Results

Sixty-nine adults of both sexes with a mean age of 34 (± 7.1) years participated in the study. A strong positive correlation was found between the amount of LM and muscle strength (r = 0.83; p < 0.001). There was also a positive correlation between ICW and the ratio of ICW/LM, indicators of muscle quality, and muscle strength, resulting in strong (r = 0.83; p < 0.001) and moderate (r = 0.40; p < 0.001) magnitudes, respectively. Additionally, ICW had better predictive power for muscle strength (R2 adjusted = 0.98; AIC: 161.8483; BIC: 175.253).

Conclusion

Muscle quantity and quality presented good predictive capacity for muscle strength. Assessing muscle quality can provide further clarification on how the muscle is able to produce strength in adults with obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [ARS], upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Slentz CA, Houmard JA, Kraus WE (2009) Exercise, abdominal obesity, skeletal muscle, and metabolic risk: evidence for a dose response. Obesity 17(Suppl 3):S27-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Washburn RA, Donnelly JE, Smith BK et al (2012) Resistance training volume, energy balance and weight management: rationale and design of a 9 month trial. Contemp Clin Trials 33:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennison EM, Sayer AA, Cooper C (2017) Epidemiology of sarcopenia and insight into possible therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Argilés JM, Campos N, Lopez-Pedrosa JM et al (2016) Skeletal muscle regulates metabolism via interorgan crosstalk: roles in health and disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morton JM, Brethauer SA, DeMaria EJ, Kahan S, Hutter MM (2019) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Marzolini S, Oh PI, Brooks D (2012) Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in individuals with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 19:81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826710393197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin YZ, Yan S, Yuan WX (2017) Effect of isometric handgrip training on resting blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 57:154–160. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.16.05887-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen L, Nelson DR, Zhao Y et al (2013) Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength, and the impact of comorbidities: a population-based, cross-sectional study of older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatr 13:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-74

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ, Evans WJ (1991) A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 71:644–650. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1991.71.2.644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serra-Prat M, Lorenzo I, Palomera E et al (2019) Intracellular water content in lean mass is associated with muscle strength, functional capacity, and frailty in community-dwelling elderly individuals. A Cross-Sectional Study Nutrients 11:661. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Serra-Prat M, Lorenzo I, Papiol M et al (2020) Intracellular water content in lean mass as an indicator of muscle quality in an older obese population. J Clin Med 9:E1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiles Shaffer N, Fabbri E, Ferrucci L et al (2017) Muscle quality, strength, and lower extremity physical performance in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Frailty Aging 6:183–187. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Streb AR, da Silva RP, dos Leonel L, S, et al (2019) Comparison of linear periodized and non-periodized combined training in health markers and physical fitness of adults with obesity: Clinical trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 15:100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD et al (2004) Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 23:1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2004.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amarante do Nascimento M, Januário RSB, Gerage AM, et al (2013) Familiarization and reliability of one repetition maximum strength testing in older women. J Strength Cond Res 27:1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182717318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Moshfegh AJ (2004) Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 104:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisberg RM, Villar BS (2002) Manual de receitas e medidas caseiras para cálculo de inquéritos alimentares: manual elaborado para auxiliar o processamento de dados de inquéritos alimentares‬. São Paulo: Signus.67–67.

  18. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the computer science and applications. Inc accel Med Sci Sport Exerc 30:777–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sasaki J, Coutinho A, Santos C et al (2017) Orientações para utilização de acelerômetros no Brasil. Rev Bras de Ativ Fís Saúde. 22:110–126. https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.22n2p110-126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Manini TM, Clark BC (2012) Dynapenia and aging: an update. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McGregor RA, Cameron-Smith D, Poppitt SD (2014) It is not just muscle mass: a review of muscle quality, composition and metabolism during ageing as determinants of muscle function and mobility in later life. Longev Healthspan 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2395-3-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomlinson DJ, Erskine RM, Morse CI et al (2016) The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age. Biogerontology 17:467–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9626-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuchnia AJ, Yamada Y, Teigen L et al (2018) Combination of DXA and BIS body composition measurements is highly correlated with physical function-an approach to improve muscle mass assessment. Arch Osteoporos 13:97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0508-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshida T, Yamada Y, Tanaka F et al (2018) Intracellular-to-total water ratio explains the variability of muscle strength dependence on the size of the lower leg in the elderly. Exp Gerontol 113:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman AB, Haggerty CL, Goodpaster B et al (2003) Strength and muscle quality in a well-functioning cohort of older adults: the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51105.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prado CMM, Wells JCK, Smith SR et al (2012) Sarcopenic obesity: a Critical appraisal of the current evidence. Clin Nutr 31:583–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mastrocola R, Collino M, Nigro D et al (2015) Accumulation of advanced glycation end-products and activation of the scap/srebp lipogenetic pathway occur in diet-induced obese mouse skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE 10:e0119587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Correa-de-Araujo R, Harris-Love MO, Miljkovic I et al (2017) The Need for standardized assessment of muscle quality in skeletal muscle function deficit and other aging-related muscle dysfunctions: a symposium report. Front Physiol 8:87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Barbat-Artigas S, Rolland Y, Vellas B, Aubertin-Leheudre M (2013) Muscle quantity is not synonymous with muscle quality. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:852.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maffiuletti NA, Ratel S, Sartorio A, Martin V (2013) The Impact of Obesity on In vivo human skeletal muscle function. Curr Obes Rep 2:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-013-0066-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valenzuela PL, Maffiuletti NA, Tringali G et al (2020) Obesity-associated poor muscle quality: prevalence and association with age, sex, and body mass index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03228-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cumberledge EA, Myers C, Venditti JJ, Dixon CB, Andreacci JL (2018) The effect of the menstrual cycle on body composition determined by contact-electrode bioelectrical impedance analyzers. Int J Exerc Sci 11(4):625–632 (PMID: 29541335)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Stachenfeld NS (2008) Sex hormone effects on body fluid regulation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 36(3):152–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e31817be928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pereira ML, Conterato Gomes I, Ribeiro VS, Lima LS, Castoldi RC, Freitas J (2012) Limite de concordância por meio da impedância Bioelétrica na posição horizontal e vertical. R bras Ci e Mov 20(2):76–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ARS was responsible for designing and writing the protocol, conducting the research, analyzing data, interpreting results, and creating tables and writing the manuscript. JB was responsible for designing and writing the protocol, conducting the research, interpreting results, and creating tables and writing the manuscript. FR and GTB interpreted results, creating tables and writing the manuscript. AMG and GFDD designing and writing the protocol and provided feedback on the report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Ribeiro Streb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Committee for Ethics in Research on Human Beings of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (protocol 2448,674). All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards set out in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent amendments. In addition, all subjects gave their informed consent before being included in the study, with anonymity being guaranteed at all stages.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Streb, A.R., Benedet, J., Rosa, F. et al. Association between muscle mass quantity and quality and muscle strength in adults with obesity. Sport Sci Health 19, 211–217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-01021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-01021-z

Keywords

Navigation