Skip to main content
Log in

A kinematic analysis to evaluate the start techniques’ efficacy in swimming

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study presents a method to evaluate the efficacy of the start techniques’ biomechanics in swimming using a kinematic reference data-set.

Methods

The biomechanics of the start techniques was derived by the performances of ten regional swimmers using a marker-based stereoscopic approach. Three start techniques were analyzed: grab start, rear track start, and front track start. The kinematic reference data-set was compiled from data available from the literature in biomechanics of the high-level swimmers. The evaluating method was based on three parameters: (1) The horizontal component of the dive speed; (2) The angle between the line joining the center of mass of the swimmer with the intersection point of the pool-water plane and the pool edge plane; (3) The distance between the block and the center of mass of the swimmer.

Results

Differences (p < 0.05) in the block position during the start were found between the national swimmers and the references in grab start, front track start, and in rear track start. Before the dive, national swimmers jump up from the block in opposition to the high-level swimmers that drop from the block such as the literature revealed.

Conclusions

This study allows: (1) To formulate a model of comparative analysis of data from the literature; (2) To obtain a three-dimensional model of the swimmers using a handy low-cost stereoscopic system; (3) To compare different multi-dimensional biomechanical models designed to describe the diving task. This approach would provide an innovative tool to evaluate the efficacy of the start technique and to assist coaches and trainers to improve their training programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guimaraes A, Hay JG (1985) A mechanical analysis of the grab starting technique in swimming. Int J Sport Biomech 1(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. FINA (2013) Swimming rules 2013–2017 3 SW 4–10

  3. Puel F, Morlier J, Avalos M, Mesnard M, Cid M, Hellard P (2012) 3D kinematic and dynamic analysis of the front crawl tumble turn in elite male swimmers. J Biomech 45(3):510–515. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costill DL, Maglischo EW, Richardson AB (1992) Handbook of sports medicine and science. Swimming. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cossor JM, Mason BR (2001) Swim start performance at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders RH (eds) XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. International Society of Biomechanics in Sport, San Francisco, pp 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cossor JM, Slawson SE, Justham LM, Conway PP, West AA (2010) The development of a component based approach for swim start analysis. In: Kjendlie PL, Stallman RK, Cabri J (eds) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming XI: XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine. Swimming Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, pp 59–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nützel W, Thoma B (1986) Measuring force-time variation in competitive racing dives. Rep Appl Meas 2(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maglischo EW (2003) Swimming fastest. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirner KE, Bock MA, Welch JH (1989) A comparison of four different start combinations. J Swim Res 5(2):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seifert L, Vantorre J, Lemaitre F, Chollet D, Toussaint HM, Vilas-Boas JP (2010) Different profiles of the aerial start phase in front crawl. J Strength Cond Res 24(2):507–516. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c06a0e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis S (1980) Comparison of five swimming starting techniques. Swim Tech 16(4):125–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welcher RL, Hinrichs RNG, Thomas R (2008) Front- or rear-weighted track start or grab start: which is the best for female swimmers? Sports Biomech 7(1):100–113. doi:10.1080/14763140701683247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blanksby B, Nicholson L, Elliott B (2002) Biomechanical analysis of the grab, track and handle swimming starts: an intervention study. Sports Biomech 1(1):11–24. doi:10.1080/14763140208522784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilas-Boas JP, Cruz MJ, Sousa F, Conceicao F, Carvalho JM (2000) Integrated kinematic and dynamic analysis of two track-start techniques. In: Hong Y, Sanders R, P. JD (eds) XVIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong, pp 113–117

  15. Vilas-Boas JP, Cruz MJ, Sousa F, Conceição F, Fernandes R, Carvalho JM (2003) Biomechanical analysis of ventral swimming starts: comparison of the grab start with two track-starts techniques. In: Chatard JC (ed) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX. Universitè de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, pp 249–254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Takeda T, Ichikawa H, Takagi H, Tsubakimoto S (2009) Do differences in initial speed persist to the stroke phase in front-crawl swimming? J Sport Sci 27(13):1449–1454. doi:10.1080/02640410903046228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Honda KE, Sinclair PJ, Mason BR, Pease DL (2010) A biomechanical comparison of elite swimmers start performance using the traditional track start and the new kick start. In: Kjendlie PL, Stallman RK, Cabri J (eds) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming XI. XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine, Oslo, Swimming Norwegian School of Sport Science, pp 94–96

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murrell D, Dragunas A (2013) A comparison of two swimming start techniques from the omega OSB11. WURJ Health Natural Sci 3(1):1–6. doi:10.5206/wurjhns.2012-13.1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Honda K, Sinclair P, Mason B, Pease D (2012) The effect of starting position on elite swim start performance using an angled kick plate. In: Bradshaw EJ, Burnett A, Hume PA (eds) 30th Annual Conference of Biomechanics in Sports. ISBS, Melbourne, pp 72–76

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nomura T, Takeda T, Takagi H (2010) Influences of the back plate on competitive swimming starting motion in particular projection skill. In: Kjendlie PL, Stallman RK, Cabri J (eds) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming XI. XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine, Swimming Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, pp 135–137

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krüger T, Wick D, Hohmann A, El-Bahrawi M, Koth A (2003) Biomechanics of the grab and track start technique. In: Chatard JC (ed) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX. University of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, pp 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller M, Allen D, Pein R (2003) A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the grab and track starts in swimming. In: Chatard JC (ed) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX. Université de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, pp 231–235

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holthe MJ, Mclean SP (2001) Kinematic comparison of grab and track starts in swimming. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders RH (eds) XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports San Francisco. International Society of Biomechanics in Sport, USA, pp 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  24. Benjanuvatra N, Edmunds K, Blanksby B (2006) Jumping Ability and Swimming Grab-Start Performance in Elite and Recreational Swimmers. Int J Aqua Res Edu 1:231–241

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bishop DC, Smith RJ, Smith MF, Rigby HE (2009) Effect of plyometric training on swimming block start performance in adolescents. J Strength Cond Res 23(7):2137–2143. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b866d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Breed RVP, Young WB (2003) The effect of a resistance training programme on the grab, track and swing starts in swimming. J Sports Sci 21(3):213–220. doi:10.1080/0264041031000071047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vantorre J, Seifert L, Fernandes R, Vilas-boas JP, Chollet D (2010) Kinematical profiling of the front crawl start. Int J Sports Med 31(1):16–21. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1241208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee C-Y, Huang C-F, Lee C-W (2012) Biomechanical analysis of the grab and track swimming starts. In: Bradshaw EJ, Burnett A, Hume PA (eds) 30th Annual Conference on Biomechanics in Sports. ISBS, Melbourn, pp 369–372

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vantorre J, Seifert L, Fernandes RJ, Vilas-Boas JP, Chollet D (2010) Biomechanical Influence of Start Technique Preference for Elite Track Starters in Front Crawl. Open Sports Sci J 3:137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang ZR (2010) Machine learning approaches to bioinformatics. World scientific

  31. Kahle W, Leonhardt H, Platzer W (1986) Color atlas and textbook of human anatomy. In: Locomotor system, 3rd edn, vol 1. Thieme, New York, pp 218–219

  32. Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Bouguet JV (2000) Camera calibration toolbox for Matlab. http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/

  34. Mariottini GL, Prattichizzo D (2005) EGT: a toolbox for multiple view geometry and visual servoing. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 3(12):26–39. doi:10.1109/MRA.2005.1577022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silaghi M-C, Plänkers R, Boulic R, Fua P, Thalmann D (1998) Local and global skeleton fitting techniques for optical motion capture. In: Magnenat-Thalmann N, Thalmann D (eds) Modelling and motion capture techniques for virtual environments. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1537. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 26–40. 10.1007/3-540-49384-0_3

  36. Härtel T, Schleichardt A (2008) Evaluation of start techniques in sports swimming by dynamics simulation (P18). In: The engineering of sport 7. Springer, Paris, pp 89–96. doi:10.1007/978-2-287-99054-0_11

  37. Fu T-c (2011) A review on time series data mining. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(1):164–181. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Esling P, Agon C (2012) Time-series data mining. ACM Comput Surv 45(1):1–34. doi:10.1145/2379776.2379788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hutter M, Zaffalon M (2005) Distribution of mutual information from complete and incomplete data. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(3):633–657. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Janušonis S (2009) Comparing two small samples with an unstable, treatment-independent baseline. J Neurosci Methods 179(2):173–178. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Arellano R, Pardillo S, de la Fuente B, Garcia F (2000) A system to improve the swimming start technique using force recording, timing and kinematic analyses. In: Hong Y, Johns DP, Sanders R (eds) XVIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong, pp 609–613

  42. Benjanuvatra N, Lyttle A, Blanksby B, Larkin D (2004) Force development profile of the lower limbs in the grab and track start in swimming. In: Lamontagne M, Robertson DGE, Sveistrup H (eds) XXII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa. Ottawa, pp 399–402

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors thank Dr. Elena Francioni for her contribution in the experimental stage of this study.

Conflict of interest

Donato Formicola and Alberto Rainoldi declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Rainoldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Formicola, D., Rainoldi, A. A kinematic analysis to evaluate the start techniques’ efficacy in swimming. Sport Sci Health 11, 57–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0207-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0207-8

Keywords

Navigation