Abstract
Background
The aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of insomnia among older adults in the Philippines.
Methods
In all, 5206 cross-sectional nationally representative data from older adults (≥ 60 years) of the 2018 Longitudinal Study on Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP) was analysed. Napping frequency and duration were assessed by self-report.
Results
The prevalence of regular nappers was 35.7%, low or moderate napping (1–59 min) was 10.5% and long napping (≥ 60 min) duration was 25.2%. In the final adjusted model, older age was not significantly associated with low or moderate napping duration but older age was positively associated with long napping duration. High wealth status, physical activity and late insomnia were positively associated with low or moderate napping duration. High wealth status, urban residence, daily activity limitations, and physical activity were positively associated, and currently working status, poor self-rated health status and current alcohol use were negatively associated with long napping duration.
Conclusion
One in four older adults reported long napping duration. Sociodemographic, health status and behaviour and sleep parameters were associated with low or moderate and/or long napping duration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
For many people, daytime naps are a regular part of their lives [1]. One study among adults in 10 countries found that 23.1% engaged in regular napping, ranging from 42.4% in Brazil to 12.0% in Japan [2]. Biobank data of adults from China reported 21% daytime napping [3, 4] and among adults in rural China, the usual daytime napping was 33.7% [5]. Epidemiology study results indicate that older adults are more likely than younger adults to nap during the day [1]. In USA, in total, 15% of participants indicated they regularly took naps, with the frequency varying from 10% for individuals aged 55–64 to 25% for those aged 75–84 [6], in Japan (≥ 60 years) in men (regular or ≥ 4 times/week) 29.5% and in women 25.7%, and napping ≥ 1 h, 10.5% in men and 7.4% in women [7]. In Australia, 25% of older adults regularly nap [8]. Among middle-aged and older adults in China, 53.4% of individuals reported taking daily afternoon naps [9].
Some reviews found that compared to non-nappers daytime napping can lead to adverse health outcomes, e.g. depression [10], coronary heart disease (CHD) [11], hypertension [12] and obesity [13]. However, some research seems to suggest that short napping (< 30 min) could be beneficial and even more evidence seems to be accumulating that longer napping (≥ 30–60 min) can be detrimental to your health. For example, taking short to moderate naps improved older adults’ cognitive health more than neither not napping nor taking long or prolonged naps [14]. A longer duration of daytime naps (≥ 60 min/day) was linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in comparison to not napping [15]. Additionally, naps during the day that lasted at least one hour had a three times greater impact on the elevated risk of CHD [11] than naps that lasted less than an hour. Napping for ≥ 30 min [16] and ≥ 60 min/day compared to not napping [15] was linked to an increased risk of all-cause death. There was a 35%, 41%, and 40% higher likelihood of cognitive impairment in those who slept for more than 30, 45, and 60 min a day [17]. Prolonged diurnal naps exceeding one hour were linked to a higher chance of incident and prevalent diabetic mellitus [18, 19].
Considering the potential health effects of napping, it would be important to investigate the prevalence and associated factors among older adults, which could enhance the response of health care providers in relation to napping issues [20]. Being scarcity of information on napping in the Philippines [21], this study was trying to fill this gap. Factors associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min), in particular among older adults, may include sociodemographic factors, health status and behaviour variables and sleep parametres. Sociodemographic factors associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min) may include older age [3, 4, 7, 22], younger age (≥ 2 h napping) [7], male sex [7, 23,24,25], higher socioeconomic status (SES) [3], lower neighborhood SES [26], married [3], and residing in rural areas [4].
Variables related to health status that are associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min) may include poorer self-reported health [25], experiencing bodily pain [6], functional disability [23], and urinary incontinence [6]. Mental health factors may include depression [27], diagnosis of depression [6], higher depression scores [22], psychological distress [7], and cognitive impairment [24]. Health behaviour variables associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min) may include non-smokers [3], smoking [7, 22, 24], regular drinkers [3], no alcohol use [7], no heavy alcohol use [22], and physical inactivity [3].
Sleep parameters associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min) may include sleep-maintenance difficulty [28], excessive daytime sleepiness [7, 28], insomnia [7], long sleep [7, 29], shorter sleep duration (napping > 30 min) [30], poor sleep quality [7, 29], use of sleep medication [8], sedating medications [28] and polypharmacy [5]. This study sought to determine the prevalence and correlates of short and long napping in older adults in the Philippines in 2018 as part of a national population survey.
Methods
Sample and procedure
The current analyses were conducted using data from the 2018 Longitudinal Study on Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP) [31]. For the first panel of its implementation, 5985 respondents (60 years of age and older) provided data to the LSAHP, a nationally representative survey. Provinces and villages served as the primary and secondary sampling units, respectively, in a multistage sampling method. Sample restrictions were applied for this study, i.e., responses from proxies were not included. By using this criterion, it was ensured that the responses represented the respondents’ true health status and were provided by them. 5209 respondents made up the analytic sample that was produced. The University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board gave its approval to the LSAHP (MREB 2018-363-01), and participants provided written informed consent [31]. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Measures
Outcome measure
Napping was assessed with two questions: (1) “Do you take naps?” (response options were 1 = Yes, regularly, 2 = Yes, not regularly and 3 = No) and (2) “How long do you take naps?” (…Hrs. …minutes). Responses were grouped into (1) non-nappers or not regular nappers, (2) 1–59 min napping of regular nappers and 3) ≥ 60 min napping of regular nappers.
Exposure variables
Sociodemographic factors included age (60–69, 70–79 and 80 or more years), sex, residence status (urban-rural), marital status (never married, currently married, cohabiting, annulled/divorced/separated, widowed), work status (currently working/currently not working) and wealth status. The latter is a wealth index that combines aspects like materials used for the house, facilities present, such as a toilet, and ownership of large items like a vehicle, and grouped into low: 0 = lowest, second, or middle, and high: 1 = fourth or highest.
Health status and behaviour variables
Poor self-rated health. “In general, how would you describe your state of health?” (Coded 1=”somewhat unhealthy or very unhealthy”, and 0=”very healthy, healthier than average or of average health”).
Body pain. “Are you often troubled with pain?” (Yes/No).
Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 11-item 3-response category CES-D Scale [32], using a cut-off score of 7 or more [33] (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.74 in this study).
Loneliness (scores 6–9 = 1, and 1–5 = 0) was assessed with the three-item subscale from the revised UCLA loneliness scale [34] (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83 in this study).
Loss of bladder control. “Do you experience loss of bladder control?” (Yes/No).
Impaired cognition (scores ≥ 8) was assessed with the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-HRS-35), including orientation questions, counting backwards, object naming, serial 7s subtraction, and 10-word immediate and delayed recall (score range 0–35) [35].
Activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (defined as any one of seven ADLs due to health reasons), e.g., “dressing”, and “using the toilet” [31] (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82 in this study).
Physical activity. “How often do you engage in physical exercises such as walking, calisthenics, ballroom dancing?” (1(Low)=”never, a few times a year, or about once a month”, 2(Moderate)=”about once a week, or several times a week”, and 3(High)=”every day”).
Current smoking. “Do you currently smoke cigarettes/cigar?” (Yes/No).
Current alcohol use. “Do you currently drink alcohol?” (Yes/No) [31]. .
Sleep parameters
Initial insomnia was defined as “most of the time having trouble falling asleep.”
Intermediate insomnia was defined as “most of the time having trouble with waking up during the night.”
Late insomnia was defined as “most of the time having trouble with waking up too early and not being able to fall asleep again.”
Daytime sleepiness was defined as “never feeling really rested when you wake up in the morning.” [36].
Sleep quality was assessed with the question, “Are you satisfied with your sleep?” ) (Yes/No) A “no” response was defined as poor sleep quality.
Nocturnal sleep duration was assessed with the question, “On average, approximately how much do you sleep per night?” (…Hrs. …Mins.) and grouped into < 6 h, 6–6.9 h, 7–8.9 h and 9 or more hours.
Use of sleep medication was sourced from the item, “In the past two weeks, have you taken any medications or used other treatments to help you sleep?” (Yes/No).
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and napping categories. Chi-square statistics were used to test for differences in proportions. Using multinomial logistic regression, associations between social and health variables and napping duration categories were determined, overall and stratified by working status. Crude (unadjusted) associations are the estimated association between exposure and outcome before potential confounding variables are taken into account. Adjusted associations are multivariable models that show the relationship between multiple characteristics and the outcome while accounting for the impact of other characteristics. Based on an earlier review of the literature, covariates were added. Covariates significant (p < 0.5) in univariable analyses were subsequently included in the multivariable models. In the overall model, covariates included age, wealth status, urban residence, work status, poor self-rated health status, body pain, depressive symptoms, impaired cognition, ADL limitations, physical activity, current smoking, current alcohol use and insomnia symptoms. In the second model with the working sample, covariates included, wealth status, poor self-rated health status, depressive symptoms, impaired cognition, physical activity, current smoking, insomnia symptoms and use of sleep medication. In the third model with the non-working sample, covariates included, age, sex, wealth status, urban residence, poor self-rated health status, body pain, depressive symptoms, ADL limitations, physical activity, current alcohol use, insomnia symptoms and nocturnal sleep duration.
Weights were applied to both regression analyses and descriptive statistics to account for the intricate sampling design [31]. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) did not show any collinearity. At p < 0.05, all tests were deemed statistically significant. For all statistical procedures, STATA software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) version 15.0 was utilized.
Results
The analytic sample included 5209 participants (median age 66 years, IQR = 9), including 40.2% men. The prevalence of regular nappers was 35.7%, low or moderate napping (1–59 min) was 10.5% and long napping (≥ 60 min) duration was 25.2%. Napping status differed by age group, wealth, work, widowhood and residence status, sex, body pain, impaired cognition, depressive symptoms, loneliness, physical activity level, ADL limitations, current alcohol use, initial, intermediate, and late insomnia symptoms, poor sleep quality and nocturnal sleep duration (see Table 1).
Crude associations with low or moderate and long napping duration
Older age, high wealth status, urban residence, physical activity, and late insomnia symptoms were positively associated with low or moderate napping duration. Currently working, impaired cognition, depressive symptoms and current smoking were negatively associated with low or moderate napping duration. Older age, high wealth status, urban residence, physical activity, and ADL limitations were positively associated with long napping duration. Currently working, poor self-rated health status, body pain, depressive symptoms, and current alcohol use were negatively associated with long napping duration (see Table 2).
Adjusted associations with low or moderate and long napping duration
In the final adjusted model, older age was not significantly associated with low or moderate (short) napping duration but older age was positively associated with long napping duration. High wealth status, physical activity and late insomnia increased the likelihood of short napping duration. Having a high wealth status, urban residence, ADL limitations, and physical activity increased the risk ratio of long napping duration. Currently working status, poor self-rated health status and current alcohol use decreased the likelihood of long napping duration (see Table 3).
Crude associations with low or moderate and long napping duration among those currently working
High wealth status, physical activity and late insomnia symptoms were positively associated and poor self-rated health status, impaired cognition, and current smoking were negatively associated with low or moderate napping duration. High wealth status, and physical activity were positively associated and depressive symptoms, impaired cognition and intake of sleep medication was negatively associated with long napping duration (see Table 4).
Adjusted associations with low or moderate and long napping duration among those currently working
In the final adjusted model, among those currently working, high wealth status, physical activity and late insomnia increased the likelihood of short napping duration, while poor self-rated health status, current smoking and intake of sleep medication decreased the likelihood of short napping duration. Physical activity increased the likelihood, and depressive symptoms, and intake of sleep medication decreased the likelihood of long napping duration among those who were working (see Table 5).
Crude associations with low or moderate and long napping duration among those currently not working
Male sex, high wealth status, physical activity, and urban residence were positively associated, and depressive symptoms, current alcohol use, and 9 or more hours nocturnal sleep duration were negatively associated with low or moderate napping duration. Older age, high wealth status, urban residence, and ADL limitations were positively associated, and poor self-rated health status, body pain, depressive symptoms, late insomnia and daytime sleepiness were negatively associated with long napping duration (see Table 6).
Adjusted associations with low or moderate and long napping duration among those currently not working
In the final adjusted model, among those currently not working, male sex, high wealth status, and physical activity increased the likelihood of short napping duration, and current alcohol use decreased the likelihood of short napping duration. Older, age, male sex, high wealth status, urban residence, ADL limitations, and moderate physical activity increased the risk ratio and current alcohol use decreased risk ratio of long napping duration (see Table 7).
Discussion
According to the study, the prevalence of regular nappers (35.7%), low or moderate nappers (1–59 min) (10.5%) and long nappers (≥ 60 min) (25.2%) of older adults in the Philippines (those aged 60 and above) in a large national sample in 2018, was higher than among older adults (≥ 60 years) in Japan (regular, ≥ 4 times/week, 29.5% in women 25.7% in men) [7], napping ≥ 1 h (10.5% in men and 7.4% in women) [7], in USA (≥ 55 years, regular napping 15%) [6], Australia (older adults, regular napping 25%) [8] and lower than in China (middle-aged and older adults, daily afternoon naps 53.4%) [9]. Some of these differences may also be attributed to differences in measurement of habitual nappers.
Major results of the current study indicated that some of the same factors were linked to both short and long nap times, including high wealth status, and physical activity. Factors uniquely associated with short napping included late insomnia, and uniquely associated with long napping included older age, urban residence, not working status, ADL limitations, not poor self-rated health status, and not current alcohol use. Comparing the working population with the non-working population, older age, urban residence, and ADL limitations were uniquely associated with long napping and male sex and non-current alcohol use with short and long napping in the non-working population. Not having a poor self-rated health status, non-current smoking, and late insomnia were uniquely associated with short napping in the working population. In addition, non-sleep medication use was uniquely associated with short and long napping and not having depressive symptoms with long napping in the working population.
Regarding sociodemographic factors associated with regular and/or long napping (≥ 60 min), the study found, in agreement with some previous research [4, 7, 22, 24, 29] that long napping increased with age in the overall sample, and among those not working but not among those who were working, while the frequency of short napping did not differ by age. This could mean that when older adults stop working or retire, they engage more likely in long napping. The higher prevalence of long napping in older age groups and when older adults stop working may be included in the sleep management of older adults in the Philippines. Consistent with several research findings [3, 7, 23,24,25], male sex in the non-working sample and higher wealth status were positively associated with low or moderate and long napping duration. Understandingly, working status was negatively associated with long napping duration. Further, the study found that urban residence was positively associated with long napping, while among adults in China daytime napping habit was higher in rural areas [4]. We did not discover any significant correlation between widowhood and either long or short naps, despite a Chinese study among adults finding an association between being married [3].
Regarding health status, this study found in agreement with previous research [23, 25] that poor self-rated health and having ADL limitations increased the risk ratio of long napping. A study among adults in Japan found a positive association between psychological distress and napping [7], while in our study, among those who were working, depressive symptoms was negatively associated with long moderate napping duration. Depressed older adults may feel insecure in their social environment hindering them to engage in napping [37]. In a study among older adults in USA, experiencing bodily pain [6] was associated with napping, while this study showed in unadjusted analysis a negative association between body pain and long napping duration. Unlike several previous studies [3, 6, 22, 27], this survey did not find a significant correlation between loneliness, urinary incontinence, cognitive impairment and short or long napping.
In terms of health risk behaviour, some previous research showed mixed results in relation to smoking status, e.g., non-smokers [3] and current smoking [7, 22, 24] was associated with napping, while this study found among the working sample that current smoking was negatively associated with low or moderate napping. Similarly, mixed results having been reported on alcohol use, e.g., regular drinkers [3] and no alcohol use [7] and no heavy alcohol use [22] being associated with napping, while this study found that current alcohol use decreased the risk ratio of long napping, in particular, in the non-working sample. It is possible that as long napping increases with age, alcohol use decreases with age, and/or older adults may refrain from drinking alcohol in anticipation of its potentially negative effects on sleep [7]. Finally, a previous study in China found positive association between physical inactivity and napping [3], and another study in China found that higher physical functioning was associated with short (≤ 60 min) and not long (> 60 min) napping [38], while this study found a positive association between physical activity and both short and long napping. In a study among older adults in Brazil [39], walking regularly was found to have a significant correlation with short-duration daytime naps, while our study also found among the non-working sample that physical activity was associated with short but not long napping. A systematic review showed that day-time napping improved short-term physical performance [40].
Concerning sleep parameters, previous research found a positive association between sleep-maintenance difficulty [28], and insomnia [7] with napping, while this study found that late insomnia was positively associated with low or moderate napping duration, particularly in the working sample. This shows that nocturnal sleep deficit may translate in an increase of short daytime napping. Regarding sleep duration, previous research found a positive association between long sleep [7, 29], and shorter nocturnal sleep duration (napping > 30 min) [30] and napping, while this study found that short and long nocturnal sleep duration was not significantly associated with low or moderate napping duration, only in unadjusted analysis among the non-working sample long nocturnal sleep duration was negatively associated with short napping. It may be plausible that long nocturnal sleep duration is associated with lower short napping, having a lessor need to compensate for shorter nocturnal sleep [5]. Contrary to some previous studies [7, 28] that found a positive association between daytime sleepiness and frequent and long napping, this study found no association between daytime sleepiness and napping. This may be explained by the overall very low (2.9%) prevalence of daytime sleepiness in this study and consequently not confirming that napping can be caused by daytime sleepiness. This finding may suggest that napping in the Philippines is a cultural habit, unlike the US population, where taking naps during the day is typically a result of exhaustion and sleepiness during the day rather than a cultural habit [26]. Unlike previous studies [8, 29], this study did not find a significant association between poor sleep quality and napping. An explanation for this could be that sleep quality was only assessed with single item, in a yes/no format, instead of having Likert-scale response options. In an Australian study among older adults, those taking sleep medication were more likely to nap, and they also tend to nap longer than other subjects [8], while in our study among the working sample, the use of sleep medication was negatively associated with short and long napping. It should be mentioned here that the prevalence of past 2-weeks sleep medication use in the working sample of this study was 0.5% (n = 22) which reduces the ability to draw conclusions from this finding; in comparison in a sample of older adults in Brazil the prevalence of past 12-month sleep medication use was 20% [39]. Overall, based on a systematic review, “there is minimal evidence to indicate that napping is detrimental for older adults’ nighttime sleep.” [41].
Examine the advantages and disadvantages of the study
The study’s strength was the use of a nationally representative sample of older adults in the Philippines, combined with standardized measures that were modified from the Health and Retirement Study. Due to self-reporting, most data might have limitations. Furthermore, since the study’s data were cross-sectional, we are unable to establish a causal relationship between any of the related factors. Future research should take into account the time, frequency and period of napping and dietary habits, which were not evaluated in this survey. Furthermore, at least on a sub-sample, future studies should assess objective sleep and napping data.
Conclusion
Two in five older adults engaged regularly in napping and one in four older adults reported long napping duration. The results of the current study indicated that some of the same factors were linked to both short and long nap times, including high wealth status, and physical activity. Factors uniquely associated with short napping included late insomnia, and uniquely associated with long napping included older age, urban residence, not working status, ADL limitations, not poor self-rated health status, and not current alcohol use. Further unique factors with short napping among those who were working included not current smoking and not taking sleep medication and unique factors with long napping among those who were working included not having depressive symptoms and not taking sleep medication. Among those who were not working, male sex and without current alcohol use was associated with short and long napping, and older age, urban residence ADL limitations were uniquely associated with long napping. This seems to largely confirm that different factors contribute to short or long napping.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, https://www.drdf.org.ph/lsahp-baseline-data-request-portal/.
References
Li J, Vitiello MV, Gooneratne NS (2022) Sleep in normal aging. Sleep Med Clin 17(2):161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsmc.2022.02.007
Soldatos CR, Allaert FA, Ohta T, Dikeos DG (2005) How do individuals sleep around the world? Results from a single-day survey in ten countries. Sleep Med 6(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2004.10.006
Chen Y, Kartsonaki C, Clarke R, Guo Y, Yu C, Bian Z, Jiang Q, Li S, Chen J, Li L, Chen Z (2018) China Kadoorie Biobank Study (members listed at end of report). Characteristics and correlates of sleep duration, daytime napping, snoring and insomnia symptoms among 0.5 million Chinese men and women. Sleep Med 44:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2017.11.1131
Wen QR, Zhu YQ, Lyu J, Guo Y, Pei P, Yang L, Du HD, Chen YP, Chen JS, Yu CQ, Chen LM, Li L (2022) [Characteristics of daytime napping and its correlation with chronic diseases in Chinese adults]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. ;43(12):1869–1874. Chinese. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220108-00016
Zhang X, Li G, Shi C, Sun Y (2023) Associations of sleep duration, daytime napping, and snoring with depression in rural China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 23(1):1530. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16479-w
Foley DJ, Vitiello MV, Bliwise DL, Ancoli-Israel S, Monjan AA, Walsh JK (2007) Frequent napping is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness, depression, pain, and nocturia in older adults: findings from the National Sleep Foundation ‘2003 Sleep in America’ Poll. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(4):344–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000249385.50101.67
Furihata R, Kaneita Y, Jike M, Ohida T, Uchiyama M (2016) Napping and associated factors: a Japanese nationwide general population survey. Sleep Med 20:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2015.12.006
Beh HC (1994) A survey of daytime napping in an elderly Australian population. Aust J Psychol 46(2):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539408259480
Yin X, Liu Q, Wei J, Meng X, Jia C (2018) Association of daytime napping with prediabetes and diabetes in a Chinese population: results from the baseline survey of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Diabetes 10(4):302–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12605
Li L, Zhang Q, Zhu L, Zeng G, Huang H, Zhuge J, Kuang X, Yang S, Yang D, Chen Z, Gan Y, Lu Z, Wu C (2022) Daytime naps and depression risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Front Psychol 13:1051128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051128
Salari N, Moradi S, Bagheri R, Talebi S, Wong A, Babavaisi B, Kermani MAH, Hemati N (2023) Daytime napping and coronary heart disease risk in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Sleep Breath 27(4):1255–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-022-02759-z
Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Srivali N, Vijayvargiya P, Andersen CA, Kittanamongkolchai W, Sathick IJ, Caples SM, Erickson SB (2016) The effects of napping on the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 9(4):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12211
Cai Z, Yang Y, Zhang J, Liu Y (2023) The relationship between daytime napping and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 13(1):12124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37883-7
Li J, McPhillips MV, Deng Z, Fan F, Spira A (2023) Daytime napping and Cognitive Health in older adults: a systematic review. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci 78(10):1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac239
Yamada T, Hara K, Shojima N, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T (2015) Daytime napping and the risk of Cardiovascular Disease and all-cause mortality: a prospective study and dose-response Meta-analysis. Sleep 38(12):1945–1953. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.5246
da Silva AA, de Mello RG, Schaan CW, Fuchs FD, Redline S, Fuchs SC (2016) Sleep duration and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6(2):e008119. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008119
Fang W, Le S, Han W, Peng-Jiao X, Shuai Y, Rui-Ling Z, Lin L, Ya-Hui X (2023) Association between napping and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med 111:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2023.09.022
Guo VY, Cao B, Wong CKH, Yu EYT (2017) The association between daytime napping and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Sleep Med 37:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.018
Liu M, Liu M, Wang S, Sun Y, Zhou F, Sun H (2023) Relationship between daytime napping with the occurrence and development of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 13(9):e068554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068554
dos Santos AA, de Oliveira SC, Freitas DC, Ceolim MF, Pavarini SC, da Rocha MC (2013) Perfil Dos Idosos que cochilam [Profile of the elderly who naps]. Rev Esc Enferm USP 47(6):1345–1351. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420130000600014. Portuguese
Tse LA, Wang C, Rangarajan S, Liu Z, Teo K, Yusufali A, Avezum Á, Wielgosz A, Rosengren A, Kruger IM, Chifamba J, Calik KBT, Yeates K, Zatonska K, AlHabib KF, Yusoff K, Kaur M, Ismail N, Seron P, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Poirier P, Gupta R, Khatib R, Kelishadi R, Lear SA, Choudhury T, Mohan V, Li W, Yusuf S (2021) Timing and Length of Nocturnal Sleep and Daytime Napping and Associations With Obesity Types in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries. JAMA Netw Open. ;4(6):e2113775. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13775. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2124602
Leng Y, Stone K, Ancoli-Israel S, Covinsky K, Yaffe K (2018) Who take naps? Self-reported and objectively measured napping in very old women. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci 73(3):374–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glx014. Erratum in: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(3):419
Guarnieri Ribeiro Bueno C, Andrechuk CRS, Guimarães Lima M, Ceretta Oliveira H, Zancanella E, Berti de Azevedo Barros M, Marchiori de Oliveira TA, Ceolim MF (2019) Napping, functional capacity and satisfaction with life in older adults: a population-based study. J Clin Nurs 28(9–10):1568–1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14768
Cheng GH, Chan A, Lo JC (2017) Factors of nocturnal sleep and daytime nap durations in community-dwelling elderly: a longitudinal population-based study. Int Psychogeriatr 29(8):1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021700062X
Leland NE, Fogelberg DJ, Mroz T, Vitiello MV (2017) Unplanned and extended napping among older adults: frequency, duration, and predictors. Innov Aging 1:261–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx004.957
Xiao Q, Hale L (2018) Neighborhood socioeconomic status, sleep duration, and napping in middle-to-old aged US men and women. Sleep 41(7):zsy076. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy076
Liu Y, Peng T, Zhang S, Tang K (2018) The relationship between depression, daytime napping, daytime dysfunction, and snoring in 0.5 million Chinese populations: exploring the effects of socio-economic status and age. BMC Public Health 18(1):759. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5629-9
Ancoli-Israel S, Martin JL (2006) Insomnia and daytime napping in older adults. J Clin Sleep Med 2(3):333–342
Sun D, Chen X, Yu R, Tang O, Xian X (2024) The influencing factors of night sleep time and nap time among older adults in China: a national study. Biol Rhythm Res 55(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2023.2287251
Georgiadi K, Tsiptsios D, Fotiadou A, Kaltsatou A, Vafeiadis I, Lialiaris S, Trypsiani I, Kitmeridou S, Karatzetzou S, Manolis A, Tsamakis K, Serdari A, Nena E, Steiropoulos P, Tripsianis G (2022) How do greeks Sleep? A cross-sectional study among Indigenous and Minority populations. Maedica (Bucur) 17(3):615–627. https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2022.17.3.615
Cruz GT, Cruz CJP, Saito Y, Jakarta (2019) Indonesia and Manila Philippines: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia and Demographic Research and Development Foundation, Inc.
Kohout FJ, Berkman LF, Evans DA, Cornoni-Huntley J (1993) Two shorter forms of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression) depression symptoms index. J Aging Health 5(2):179–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/089826439300500202
Yokoyama E, Kaneita Y, Saito Y et al (2008) Cut-off point for the 11-item shorter form of the CES-D Depression Scale. Nihon Univ. J Med 50:123–132
Russell DW (1996) UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess 66(1):20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Langa KM, Weir DR (2011) Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: the Health and Retirement Study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66(1):i162–i171. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr048
Jenkins CD, Stanton BA, Niemcryk SJ, Rose RM (1988) A scale for the estimation of sleep problems in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol 41(4):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90138-2
Kurina LM, Knutson KL, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT, Lauderdale DS, Ober C (2011) Loneliness is associated with sleep fragmentation in a communal society. Sleep 34(11):1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.1390
Xin C, Zhang B, Fang S, Zhou J (2020) Daytime napping and successful aging among older adults in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 20(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1408-4
Monteiro NT, Neri AL, Coelim MF (2014) Sintomas de insônia, cochilos diurnos e atividades físicas de lazer em idosos: estudo FIBRA Campinas [Insomnia symptoms, daytime naps and physical leisure activities in the elderly: FIBRA Study Campinas]. Rev Esc Enferm USP 48(2):242–249. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-623420140000200007
Souabni M, Hammouda O, Romdhani M, Trabelsi K, Ammar A, Driss T (2021) Benefits of daytime napping opportunity on physical and cognitive performances in physically active participants: a systematic review. Sports Med 51(10):2115–2146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01482-1
Souabni M, Souabni MJ, Hammouda O, Romdhani M, Trabelsi K, Ammar A, Driss T (2022) Benefits and risks of napping in older adults: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci 14:1000707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1000707
Acknowledgements
The 2018 LSAHP was commissioned by the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in collaboration with Demographic Research and Development Foundation, Inc. (DRDF).
Funding
The analysis received no funding.
Open access funding provided by Mahidol University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors fulfil the criteria for authorship. SP and KP conceived and designed the research, performed statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, and made critical revisions of the manuscript for key intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to the authorship and order of authorship for this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Declarations
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board gave its approval to the LSAHP (MREB 2018-363-01), and participants provided written informed consent [30].
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K. Prevalence and associated factors of napping among older adults in the Philippines. Sleep Breath 28, 2255–2267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03079-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03079-0