Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managers of Molecular Imaging Laboratories (MOMIL) Interest Group

  • Special Topic
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Managers of Molecular Imaging Laboratories (MOMIL) interest group in the World Molecular Imaging Society provides a forum for exchanging information between researchers who manage molecular imaging laboratories and institutional core facilities. This information exchange includes operational procedures for acquiring and analyzing imaging results, including considerations for quality assurance and quality control, and animal handling and care for imaging studies. MOMIL also exchanges administrative policies, interactions with collaborators and clients, and industry relations. In addition to this comprehensive review of MOMIL, more information is available at http://www.wmis.org/.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Notice NOT-OD-10-138.

  2. Farber GK, Weiss L (2011) Core facilities: maximizing the return on investment. Sci Transl Med 3:95cm21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moses H, Braunwald E, Martin JB, Their SO (2002) Collaborating with industry—choices for the academic medical center. New England J Med 347:1371–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckler AJ, Bresolin L, Reed DN, Sullivan DC (2011) A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. Radiology 258:906–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurland BF, Gerstner ER, Mountz JM et al (2012) Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology trials. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1301–1312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abramson RG, Burton KR, Yu JPJ et al (2015) Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development. Acad Radiol 22:25–32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt H, Schwenzer NF, Bezrukov I et al (2014) On the quantification accuracy, homogeneity, and stability of simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging systems. Investigative Radiol 49:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38:8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace CT, St. Croix CM, Watkins SC (2015) Data management and archiving in a large microscopy-and-imaging, multi-user facility: problems and solutions. Molec Reprod Dev 82:630–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. McConville P (2011) Small animal preparation and handling in MRI. Methods Molec Biol 771:89–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I et al (2006) Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice. Jf Nucl Med 47(6):999–1006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanhove C, Vandenberghe S, Bankstahl JP et al (2015) Accurate molecular imaging of small animals taking into account animal models, handling, anaesthesia, quality control and imaging system performance. EJNMMI physics 2:31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals: Eighth Edition, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011.

  14. Tremoleda JL, Kerton A, Gsell W (2012) Anaesthesia and physiological monitoring during in vivo imaging of laboratory rodents: considerations on experimental outcomes and animal welfare. EJNMMI Res 2:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lukasik VM, Gillies RJ (2003) Animal anaesthesia for in vivo magnetic resonance. NMR Biomed:459–467

  16. Hildebrandt IJ, Su H, Weber WA (2008) Anesthesia and other considerations for in vivo imaging of small animals. ILAR J 49:17–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurst K, Litwak KN (2012) Accelerative forces associated with routine inhouse transportation of rodent cages. J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci 51:544–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meder D, Morales M, Pepperkok R et al (2016) Institutional core facilities: prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences. EMBO J 17:1088–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao R, Lecomte R, Crawford ES (2012) Small-animal PET: what is it, and why do we need it? J Nucl Med Technol 40:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leblond F, Davis SC, Valdes PA, Pogue BW (2010) Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: review of instruments, methods and applications. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 98:77–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Chris Contag and Raymond Gibson for helpful advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Pagel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nickels, M.L., Pagel, M.D. Managers of Molecular Imaging Laboratories (MOMIL) Interest Group. Mol Imaging Biol 19, 332–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1075-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1075-9

Key words

Navigation