Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging the Classroom Gap between Asset Pricing and Business Cycle Theory

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tools presented in the standard undergraduate economics and finance curricula are insufficient for explaining the complex dynamics of the modern U.S. economy. For instance, students of macroeconomics are not provided with a satisfactory framework for assessing how a financial shock may reverberate through the real economy, as it did during the Great Recession of 2008-2009. Similarly, students of finance are left with little guidance as to the origins of two key inputs into asset pricing models, namely cash flows and discount rates. In this article we present a unified macro-financial model to bridge the gap between the typical undergraduate treatments of asset pricing and business cycle theory. The Dynamic Empirical Macroeconomic (DyEM) model we introduce here offers several innovations, the most important of which is expanding the role of the interest rate to include term and default risk premia. We combine these elements to construct a series of discount rates that are critical for a range of present discounted value calculations. Moreover, we link economic activity to earnings growth in order to facilitate macro-based equity pricing. The paper concludes with an illustration of how the DyEM model may be used in the classroom via a cooperative learning exercise centered on the Great Recession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mishkin (2011) is a notable, recent exception. Mankiw (2013) briefly mentions calibration without much detail.

  2. Alpanda et al. (2013) augment the standard adaptive expectations to allow for expectations of next period’s inflation to be a weighted average of last period’s inflation and the Federal Reserve’s target rate.

  3. See de Araujo et al. (2013) for an overview of the various models offered by different textbooks.

  4. This innovation is similar to that of Alpanda et al. (2013), which incorporates a zero lower bound within a dynamic AS/AD framework.

  5. Note that although well chosen calibrations can reflect various schools of economic thought, those schools may not necessarily advocate the dynamic modeling strategy of the DyEM.

  6. The Excel template can be found at the corresponding author’s website: www.unc.edu/~maguilar.

References

  • Aguilar, M., & Soques, D. (2015). Open DyEM: A cohesive open-economy macro-financial model for the undergraduate level. Working Paper.

  • Alpanda, S., Honig, A., & Woglom, G. (2013). Extending the textbook dynamic AD-AS framework with flexible inflation expectations, optimal policy response to demand changes, and the zero-bound on the nominal interest rate. Modern Economy, 4(3), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth and business fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79(1), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. (2012). Macroeconomics, 6th ed. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (2015). What did we learn from the financial crisis, the great recession, and the pathetic recovery? Journal of Economic Education, 6(2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661–1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Araujo, P., O’Sullivan, R., & Simpson, N.B. (2013). What should be taught in intermediate macroeconomics? Journal of Economic Education, 41(4), 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F.S. (1996). The yield curve as a predictor of U.S. recessions. In Current Issues in Economics and Finance, (Vol. 2 pp. 1–7): Federal Reserve Bank of New York . (Jun), 1996,

  • Froyen, R. (2012). Macroeconomics: Theories and Policies, 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2011). Macroeconomics, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1994). The structural approach: Six keys to cooperative learning . In Sharan, S. (Ed.) Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods (pp. 115–136). Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.T. (2005). Integrative learning and interdisciplinary studies. Peer Review, 7(4), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. (2013). Macroeconomics, 8th ed. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. (2011). Macroeconomics: Policy and Practice, 1st ed. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Aguilar.

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Ben Horlick for research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilar, M., Soques, D. Bridging the Classroom Gap between Asset Pricing and Business Cycle Theory. Int Adv Econ Res 21, 433–452 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-015-9546-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-015-9546-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation