Skip to main content
Log in

An Equilibrium Model Estimated on Pharmaceutical Data

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to estimate patients’ and doctors’ responses to prices when making a choice between brand name products and generics. We account for the response of pharmacies to government regulation and to prices set by brand name producers. The data from the Norwegian Prescription Database are unique in the sense that we observe prices set by pharmacies as well as by producers. Our results confirm that estimating only the demand side yields biased estimates of consumers’ price responses. We find much stronger price responses when demand and supply are jointly estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Brekke et al. (2012) for details of market structure and regulation in Nordic countries, and Vogler (2012) for an overview of pharmaceutical pricing and market regulation in 29 European countries, including Norway.

  2. We provide a description of the variables and summary statistics including market shares in http://folk.uio.no/steinast/supplements/An%20Equilibrium%20Model-Sum.stat.pdf

References

  • Anderson, S. P., Palma, A. D., & Thisse, J. F. (1992). Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aricidiacono, P., Elickson, P. B., Landry, P., & Ridley, D. B. (2013). Pharmaceutical followers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5), 538–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. T. (1994). Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. T., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica, 63(4), 841–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, K. R., Dalen, D. M., & Strøm, S. (2012). Should pharmaceuticals costs be curbed? Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coscelli, A. (2000). The importance of doctors’ and patients’ preferences in the prescription decision. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalen, D. M., Locatelli, M., Sorisio, E., & Strøm, S. (2014). Does the identity of the third-part payer matters for the prescribing doctors. Applied Economics and Finance, 1(1), 9–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folksholseinstitutiet (2017). Norwegian Prescription Data Base.

  • Granlund, D. (2010). Price and welfare effects of a pharmaceutical substitution reform. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 856–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo, T. (1943). The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 11(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo, T. (1944). The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica, 12(iii-vi), 1–115 (Supplementary Issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, J. (1998). The importance of physician in the generic versus trade-name prescription decision. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 108–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, G., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series model. Biometrika, 66, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, D. (2000). Moral hazard in physician prescription behaviour. Journal of Health Economics, 19(5, 2000), 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, S. O., & Lu, Z. J. (2018). Pharmaceuticals economics and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, N., & Vejlin, R. (2015). Determinants of generic vs brand drug choice: evidence from population-wide Danish data. Social Science & Medicine, 130, 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, S. (2012). The impact of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies on generics uptake: Implementation of policy options on generics in 29 European countries–an overview. 1, 2, pp. 93–100. Available at: http://gabi-journal.net/the-impact-of-pharmaceutical-pricing-and-reimbursement-policies-on-generics-uptake-implementation-of-policy-options-on-generics-in-29-european-countries%E2%94%80an-overview.html.

  • Yeung, K., Basu, A., Hansen, R.N., & Sullivan, S.D. (2016). Price elasticities of pharmaceuticals in a value-based- formulary setting. NBER, Working paper no 22308, http://www.nber.org/papers/w22308.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by The Ragnar Frisch Centre of Economic Research, Oslo, Norway and by Small Research Grants from the Department of Economics, University of Oslo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steinar Strøm.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Norwegian Research Council. We thank John K. Dagsvik and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions and comments. Financial support from The Frisch Centre is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalen, D.M., Locatelli, M. & Strøm, S. An Equilibrium Model Estimated on Pharmaceutical Data. Atl Econ J 46, 281–296 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-018-9592-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-018-9592-8

Keywords

JEL

Navigation