Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in South Africa: an Empirical Investigation

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the dynamic causal relationship between government expenditure and economic growth is examined using data from South Africa, the most advanced economy in Africa. The study uses the recently developed auto-regressive distributed lag model (ARDL)-bounds testing approach to examine this linkage. In order to address the omission of variable bias, the study incorporates unemployment as an intermittent variable between economic growth and government spending, thereby creating a simple multivariate model. The empirical findings of this study show that, although both government expenditure and economic growth Granger-cause each other in the short run, in the long run, it is economic growth that Granger-causes government expenditure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Bader, S., & Abu-Qarn, A. S. (2003). Government expenditures, military spending and economic growth: causality evidence from Egypt, Israel, and Syria. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akitoby, B., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Inchauste, G. (2006). Public spending, voracity, and Wagner’s law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 908–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. M. (1971). Wagner’s law of expanding state activity. Public Finance, 26, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenau, W. F. (2005). Public schooling, college subsidies and growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29(3), 487–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenau, F. B., Simpson, N. B., & Tomljanovich, M. (2007). Public education expenditure, taxation, and growth: Linking data to theory. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 97(2), 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohl, M. T. (1996). Some international evidence on Wagner’s law. Public Finance, 51, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, N., Haque, M. E., & Osborn, D. R. (2007). Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries. The Manchester School, 75, 533–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. S., & Lai, W. T. (1997). Government expenditures and economic growth in South Korea: a VAR approach. Journal of Economic Development, 22(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA World Factbook (2014). Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2014. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.

  • Dogan, E., & Tang, T. C. (2006). Government expenditure and national income: causality tests for five South East Asian countries. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 5, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dritsakis, N. (2004). Defence spending and economic growth: an empirical investigation for Greece and Turkey. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. J. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghali, K. H. (1998). Government size and economic growth: evidence from a multivariate cointegration analysis. Applied Economics, 31, 975–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Gregoriou, A. (2008). The composition of government spending and growth: Is current or capital spending better? Oxford Economic Papers, 60, 484–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, I. J. (1968). On the empirical testing of Wagner’s law: a technical note. Public Finance, 23, 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, J. J., & Mahar, D. J. (1971). The Growth of public expenditures in selected developing nations: six Caribbean nations. Public Finance, 26, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. P. (1967). Public expenditure and economic growth: a time series analysis. Public Finance, 22, 423–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Clements, B., Baldacci, E., Mulas-Granados, C. (2002). Expenditure composition, fiscal adjustment and growth in low-income countries. IMF Working Paper 02/77. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  • Huang, C. J. (2006). Government expenditures in China and Taiwan: do they follow Wagner’s law? Journal of Economic Development, 31(2), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Financial Statistics Yearbook (2014). IMF, Washington DC.

  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum-likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Webber, D. J., & Fargher, S. (2012). Wagners law revisited: cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand. Applied Economics, 44(5), 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamartina, S., & Zaghini, A. (2011). Increasing public expenditure: Wagner’s law in OECD countries. German Economic Review, 12(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizides, J., & Vamvoukas, G. (2005). Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from trivariate causality testing. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(1), 125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. J. (1980). Wagner’s law: an econometric test for Mexico 1926–1976. National Tax Journal, 33, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, H., Cak, M., & Cak, D. (2008). Wagner’s hypothesis: new evidence from turkey using the bounds testing approach. Journal of Economics Studies, 35(1), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, B. (2006). Causality between economic growth and migration: an ARDL bounds testing approach. Economics Letters, 90, 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Fiscal systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). Electricity consumption, employment and real income in Australia: evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Energy Policy, 33, 1109–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2006). Higher education, real income and real investment in China: evidence from Granger causality tests. Education Economics, 14, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: new evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30, 2331–2341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I., & Smyth, R. (2008). Panel data, cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: empirical evidence from Chinese provinces. China Economic Review, 19, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, N. M. (2010). Energy consumption, prices and economic growth in three SSA countries: a comparative study. Energy Policy, 38, 2463–2469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, N. M. (2011). Growth, employment and poverty in South Africa: in search of a trickle-down effect. Journal of Income Distribution, 20(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. T., & Wiseman, J. (1961). The growth of public expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F. L. (1969). Public expenditures in communist and capitalist nations. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samudram, M., Nair, M., & Vaithilingam, S. (2009). Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: the case of a developing economy. Empirical Economics, 36, 697–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideris, D. (2007). Wagner’s law in 19th century Greece: A cointegration and causality analysis. Bank of Greece Working Papers No. 64.

  • Statistics South Africa (2014). Quarterly labour force survey (QLFS)—Quarter 1. Pretoria.

  • Tang, C. F. (2009). An examination of the government spending and economic growth nexus for Malaysia using the leveraged bootstrap simulation approach. Global Economic Review, 38(2), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. (1883[1958]). Three extracts on public finance. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 119–36). London: MacMillan.

  • Wagner, A. H. (1912). Les fondements de l’économie politique. Paris: Girard and Brière, vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). World development indicators. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Tang, J., & Lin, E. S. (2010). The impact of government expenditure on economic growth: how sensitive to the level of development? Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 804–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas M Odhiambo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Odhiambo, N.M. Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in South Africa: an Empirical Investigation. Atl Econ J 43, 393–406 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-015-9466-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-015-9466-2

Keywords

JEL

Navigation