Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy

Methods

A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy

Results

Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy

Conclusions

Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Only 20 drivers receiving the experimental intervention could not recall receiving the leaflet.

  2. Although in QCET, too, a lower response rate was achieved from the experimental group (Mazerolle et al. 2011, 2012).

  3. Coefficients 1, 2 and 4 were taken directly from each model. Coefficient 3, along with its standard error and significance level, was calculated using the lincom function in Stata.

References

  • Antrobus, E., Elffers, H., White, G., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Non-response bias in randomized control experiments: Putting the Queensland community engagement trial (QCET) under a microscope’. Evaluation Review, 37(3-4), 197–212.

  • Ariel, B., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Randomised block designs. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), The handbook of quantitative criminology. New York: Springer.

  • Boruch, R., Weisburd, D., & Berk, R. (2010). Place randomised trials. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), The handbook of quantitative criminology. New York: Springer.

  • Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. A. (2009). ‘Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the Police’. Policing and Society, 19(1), 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014a). ‘What price fairness when security is at stake?Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation and Governance, 8(2), 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., Murphy, K. and Jackson, J. (2014b) ‘Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity’ in British Journal of Criminology Advance Access.

  • Brandl, S., Frank, J., Worden, R., & Bynum, T. (1994). Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship’. Justice Quarterly, 11(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: using procedural justice to improve police Legitimacy’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, K., Bradford, B., & Stanko, E. A. (2010). Influencing trust and confidence in the London metropolitan police: results from an experiment testing the effect of leaflet-drops on public opinion. British Journal of Criminology, 50(3), 491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013). The governance of criminal justice, legitimacy and trust’. In S. Body-Gendrot, R. Lévy, M. Hough, S. Snacken, & K. Kerezsi (Eds.), The routledge handbook of european criminology. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). ‘Why do people comply with the Law?: legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2013). Just authority? trust in the police in England and wales. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Eggins, E., Antrobus, E., White, G., & Davis, J. (2011). Testing police legitimacy…one breath at a time: the Queensland community engagement trial technical report. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of the police: main findings from the Queensland community engagement trial (QCET)’. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013a). ‘Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the evidence’ in. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. (2013b). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice’. Criminology, 51(1), 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Bates, L., Bennett, S., White, G., Ferris, J., & Antrobus, E. (2014a). Optimising the length of random breath tests: Results from the Queensland community engagement Trial’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/0004865814532661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Sargeant, E., Cherney, A., Bennett, S., Murphy, K., Antrobus, E., & Martin, P. (2014b). Procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging cooperation and public support for Police’. Policing and Society, 18, 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., Mazerolle, L., & Bennett, S. (2014). ‘Promoting trust in police: findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing’ in. Policing and Society, 24(4), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, A., & Bradford, B. (2012). ‘Can police enhance public confidence by improving quality of service? results from two surveys in England and wales. Policing and Society, 22(4), 397–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2012). ‘Why do criminals obey the Law? the influence of legitimacy and social networks on active Gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 397–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multi-level modelling using stata (2nd edition). College Station, TX: Stata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government (2014) Scottish Crime and Justice Survey 2012-13: Main Findings, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

  • Scottish Government. (2012). The strategy for justice in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (2006). ‘Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 16(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003). ‘The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tankebe, J. (2008). Police effectiveness and police trustworthiness in Ghana: an empirical appraisal. Criminology and Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 8, 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., & Gill, C. (2014). ‘Block randomised trials at places rethinking the limitations of small N experiments. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wünsch, D., & Hohl, K. (2009). Evidencing a "good practice model" of police communication: The impact of local policing newsletters on public confidence’. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 3(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, University of Edinburgh Law School, 15 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9LN, UK

    Sarah MacQueen

  2. Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Ben Bradford

Authors
  1. Sarah MacQueen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben Bradford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah MacQueen.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 23 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacQueen, S., Bradford, B. Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland. J Exp Criminol 11, 419–443 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation