Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer learning in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis using panoramic radiography and conventional radiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To clarify the performance of transfer learning with a small number of Waters’ images at institution B in diagnosing maxillary sinusitis, based on a source model trained with a large number of panoramic radiographs at institution A.

Methods

The source model was created by a 200-epoch training process with 800 training and 60 validation datasets of panoramic radiographs at institution A using VGG-16. One hundred and eighty Waters’ and 180 panoramic image patches with or without maxillary sinusitis at institution B were enrolled in this study, and were arbitrarily assigned to 120 training, 20 validation, and 40 test datasets, respectively. Transfer learning of 200 epochs was performed using the training and validation datasets of Waters’ images based on the source model, and the target model was obtained. The test Waters’ images were applied to the source and target models, and the performance of each model was evaluated. Transfer learning with panoramic radiographs and evaluation by two radiologists were undertaken and compared. The evaluation was based on the area of receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC).

Results

When using Waters' images as the test dataset, the AUCs of the source model, target model, and radiologists were 0.780, 0.830, and 0.806, respectively. There were no significant differences between these models and the radiologists, whereas the target model performed better than the source model. For panoramic radiographs, AUCs were 0.863, 0.863, and 0.808, respectively, with no significant differences.

Conclusions

This study performed transfer learning using a small number of Waters’ images, based on a source model created solely from panoramic radiographs, resulting in a performance improvement to 0.830 in diagnosing maxillary sinusitis, which was equivalent to that of radiologists. Transfer learning is considered a useful method to improve diagnostic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshiura K, Ban S, Hijiya T, Yuasa K, Miwa K, Ariji E, et al. Analysis of maxillary sinusitis using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22(2):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.22.2.8375560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nascimento EH, Pontual ML, Pontual AA, Freitas DQ, Perez DE, Ramos-Perez FM. Association between odontogenic conditions and maxillary sinus disease: a study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2016;42(10):1509–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Timmenga NSB, Raghoebar G, van Hoogstraten J, van Weissenbruch R, Vissink A. The value of waters’ projection for assessing maxillary sinus inflammatory disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(1):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.120056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simuntis R, Kubilius R, Padervinskis E, Ryskiene S, Tusas P, Vaitkus S. Clinical efficacy of main radiological diagnostic methods for odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(10):3651–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4678-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Constantine S, Clark B, Kiermeier A, Anderson PP. Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(3):237–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aalokken TM, Hagtvedt T, Dalen I, Kolbenstvedt A. Conventional sinus radiography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32(1):60–2. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/65139094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke TFGA, Timmons JH. Comparison of sinus x-rays with computed tomography scans in acute sinusitis. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;3(1):235–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02437.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Konen E, Faibel M, Kleinbaum Y, Wolf M, Lusky A, Hoffman C, et al. The value of the occipitomental (waters’) view in diagnosis of sinusitis: a comparative study with computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(11):856–60. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuwada C, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, Fujita H, Katsumata A, et al. Deep learning systems for detecting and classifying the presence of impacted supernumerary teeth in the maxillary incisor region on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;130(4):464–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.04.813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuwana R, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kise Y, Nozawa M, Kuwada C, et al. Performance of deep learning object detection technology in the detection and diagnosis of maxillary sinus lesions on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(1):20200171. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mori M, Ariji Y, Katsumata A, Kawai T, Araki K, Kobayashi K, et al. A deep transfer learning approach for the detection and diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis on panoramic radiographs. Odontology. 2021;109(4):941–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00615-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muramatsu C, Morishita T, Takahashi R, Hayashi T, Nishiyama W, Ariji Y, et al. Tooth detection and classification on panoramic radiographs for automatic dental chart filing: improved classification by multi-sized input data. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(1):13–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00418-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karen Simonyan AZ. (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. The 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2015)

  14. Wuest W, May M, Saake M, Brand M, Uder M, Lell M. Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses: minimizing X-ray exposure with spectral shaping. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(11):4155–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4263-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Almashraqi AA, Ahmed EA, Mohamed NS, Barngkgei IH, Elsherbini NA, Halboub ES. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(6):20160323. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotaki S, Gamoh S, Tsuji K, Akiyama H, Ikeda C, Yoshida A. The combination of panoramic imaging and waters’ projection contributes to the diagnosis of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Kobe J Med Sci. 2021;66(5):E180–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen MC, Ball RL, Yang L, Moradzadeh N, Chapman BE, Larson DB, et al. Deep learning to classify radiology free-text reports. Radiology. 2018;286(3):845–52. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Daugaard Jorgensen M, Antulov R, Hess S, Lysdahlgaard S. Convolutional neural network performance compared to radiologists in detecting intracranial hemorrhage from brain computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2022;146: 110073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murata M, Ariji Y, Ohashi Y, Kawai T, Fukuda M, Funakoshi T, et al. Deep-learning classification using convolutional neural network for evaluation of maxillary sinusitis on panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol. 2019;35(3):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0363-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe H, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kuwada C, Kise Y, Nozawa M, et al. Deep learning object detection of maxillary cyst-like lesions on panoramic radiographs: preliminary study. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(3):487–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00485-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori M, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kitano T, Funakoshi T, Nishiyama W, et al. Performance of deep learning technology for evaluation of positioning quality in periapical radiography of the maxillary canine. Oral Radiol. 2022;38(1):147–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00538-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuzoff DV, Tuzova LN, Bornstein MM, Krasnov AS, Kharchenko MA, Nikolenko SI, et al. Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(4):20180051. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kilic MC, Bayrakdar IS, Celik O, Bilgir E, Orhan K, Aydin OB, et al. Artificial intelligence system for automatic deciduous tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(6):20200172. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim Y, Lee KJ, Sunwoo L, Choi D, Nam CM, Cho J, et al. Deep learning in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis using conventional radiography. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HG, Lee KM, Kim EJ, Lee JS. Improvement diagnostic accuracy of sinusitis recognition in paranasal sinus X-ray using multiple deep learning models. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(6):942–51. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.05.15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinya Kotaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with this study.

Human rights statements and informed consent

All the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for being included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotaki, S., Nishiguchi, T., Araragi, M. et al. Transfer learning in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis using panoramic radiography and conventional radiography. Oral Radiol 39, 467–474 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00658-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00658-3

Keywords

Navigation