Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional analysis of temporomandibular joint in Chinese adults with normal occlusion and harmonious skeleton

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the detailed three-dimensional measurements of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in Chinese adults with normal occlusion and harmonious skeleton.

Methodology

In 51 subjects 102 joints were analyzed using Anatomage Invivo dental 5.4. The measurements include: joints’ parameters, position, angulation, and inclination of the condyle and articular fossa as well as 3D volumetric of the joint-spaces. All measurements were statistically analyzed by paired Student’s t test to find out the differences between the left- and right sides. Pearson correlation coefficient test was done to figure out the relationship of the TMJ parts in the normal situation.

Results

The inter-condyle distances medially, geometrically, and laterally were 90.2 ± 5.2,107 ± 6.1, and 125 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. However, the 102 condyles were angulated on three planes 54.9º ± 11.2, 71.8º ± 7.3, and 12.5º ± 6.3 at vertical-, horizontal-, and midsagittal planes, respectively. The joint spaces measurements were 2.6 ± 0.7 mm, 2.5 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.7 mm, and 3.3 ± 0.7 mm for anterior-, medial-, posterior-, and superior joints, respectively. The total volume of the whole joint-space was 404.3 ± 71mm3. The left condyle position was on the centric position whereas the right condyle was eccentric (slightly anterior).

Conclusion

Chinese subjects are characterized by wide inter-fossa distance and inter-condyle distance; however, no significant correlations with joint spaces in normal occlusion were found. The asymmetries between right- and left mandibular condyle were distinguished in angular and linear-vertical measurements. Finally, this study could be considered as reference data for upcoming research in the Chinese population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

There is no any restricted available data.

References

  1. Bordoni B, Varacallo M. Anatomy, head and neck, temporomandibular joint. StatPearls Publishing; 2019.

  2. Pileicikiene G, et al. A three-dimensional model of the human masticatory system, including the mandible, the dentition and the temporomandibular joints. Stomatologija. 2007;9(1):27–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. List T, Axelsson S. Management of TMD: evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(6):430–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhammadi MS, Fayed MS, Labib A. Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joints in skeletal class I, class II, and class III malocclusions: cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Federation Orthodontists. 2016;5(3):80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorucu-Coskuner H, Ciger S. Computed tomography assessment of temporomandibular joint position and dimensions in patients with class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e417.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma Q, et al. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary–mandibular skeletal patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. J Am Dental Assoc. 2018;149(7):589–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitral RWF, et al. Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: Is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140(1):18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alhammadi MS, et al. Temporomandibular joint measurements in normal occlusion: a three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Federation Orthodontists. 2014;3(4):155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christiansen EL, et al. Computed tomography of condylar and articular disk positions within the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;64(6):757–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koppe T, et al. Factors affecting the variation in the adult temporomandibular joint of archaeological human populations. Ann Anat Anatomischer Anz. 2007;189(4):320–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-koshab M, Nambiar P, John J. Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in South-East Asians. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0121682.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Silva MAG et al. (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthodontics Dentofac Orthop 133(5): 640. e1–640. e5.

  13. Suomalainen A, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2008;37(1):10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zain-Alabdeen E, Alsadhan R. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012;41(3):185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pullinger A. Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion I: TM joint anatomic relationships. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(4):296–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith HF, Terhune CE, Lockwood CA. Genetic, geographic, and environmental correlates of human temporal bone variation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;134(3):312–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hongxing L, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder pain in Chinese adolescents compared to an age-matched Swedish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(4):241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lei J, et al. Sleep disturbance and psychologic distress: prevalence and risk indicators for temporomandibular disorders in a Chinese population. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2015;29(1):24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu N, Hirsch C. Temporomandibular disorders in German and Chinese adolescents. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop. 2010;71(3):187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. García-Sanz V, et al. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for linear and volumetric mandibular condyle measurements. A human cadaver study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazić B, et al. Intercondylar distances of the human temporomandibular joints. Coll Antropol. 2006;30(1):37–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RWF. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in class II division 1 and class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136(2):199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhee S. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24(1):73–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tecco S, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Čimić S, et al. Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: intraindividual variations. CRANIO®. 2014;32(2):104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galeković NH, et al. Influence of the hinge axis transfer modality on the three-dimensional condylar shift between the centric relation and the maximum intercuspation positions. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49(1):36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Widman DJ. Functional and morphologic considerations of the articular eminence. Angle Orthod. 1988;58(3):221–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corbett NE, et al. The relation of the condylar path to the articular eminence in mandibular protrusion. Angle Orthod. 1971;41(4):286–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fraga MR, et al. Anteroposterior condylar position: a comparative study between subjects with normal occlusion and patients with class I, class II division 1, and class III malocclusions. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liling Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulqader, A.A., Ren, L., Alhammadi, M. et al. Three-dimensional analysis of temporomandibular joint in Chinese adults with normal occlusion and harmonious skeleton. Oral Radiol 36, 371–382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00415-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00415-z

Keywords

Navigation