Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteoporotic mandibular changes caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparative study by cone beam computed tomography imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Studies on bone mineral density and fracture risk in diabetic patients have attracted interest in the last few years. This study was aimed at comparing mandibular osteoporotic changes assessed by qualitative and quantitative radiographic methods in the mandibles of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with those of non-diabetic subjects using cone beam computed tomographic images.

Methods

This quantitative and qualitative study of mandibular bone in diabetic patients included 23 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and an equal number of healthy subjects. Radiomorphometric measurements were performed for each subject using cone beam computed tomography images. Changes in cortical bone thickness were determined by measuring bone area. Fractal dimension analysis was applied to evaluate the trabecular structure of the bone.

Results

No statistically significant difference could be established between the type 2 diabetes mellitus group and the control group in regard to either radiomorphometric measurements or fractal dimension analysis. Quantitative assessment of mandibular bone indicated a thinning of the cortical bone, with a statistically significant difference between the type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and the healthy controls.

Conclusions

Bone condition related to diabetes involves complex pathophysiological mechanisms; thus, radiographic imaging parameters may be useful as an adjunct to clinical parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdulameer SA, Sulaiman SA, Hassali MA, Subramaniam K, Sahib MN. Osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus: what do we know, and what we can do? Patient Prefer Adher. 2012;6:435–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leidig-Bruckner G, Grobholz S, Bruckner T, Scheidt-Nave C, Nawroth P, Schneider JG. Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014;11:14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang D, Wang J, Yang H. Prevalence and predictors of osteopenia and osteoporosis in postmenopausal Chinese women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma L, Oei L, Jiang L, Estrada K, Chen H, Wang Z, et al. Association between bone mineral density and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:319–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ay S, Gursoy UK, Erselcan T, Marakoglu İ. Assessment of mandibular bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:327–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onoyama K, Kawatama R, Kozai Y, Sakurai T, Kashima I. Comparison of mandibular trabecular structures between normal and diabetic rats: evaluation of spontaneous type 2 diabetes in a rat model. Oral Radiol. 2011;27:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M. Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996;25:263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dagistan S, Bilge OM. Comparison of antegonial index, mental index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular cortical index values in the panoramic radiographs of normal males and male patients with osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:290–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Link TM. Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging. Radiology. 2012;263:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahin B, Acer N, Sonmez OF, Emirzeoglu M, Basaloglu H, Uzun A, et al. Comparison of four methods for the estimation of intracranial volume: a gold standard study. Clin Anat. 2007;20:766–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Küçük M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1812–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koh KJ, Kim KA. Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41:101–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88:628–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:68–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahin B, Ergur H. Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: a stereological gold standard study. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:96–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaalaas L, Henn L, Gaillard PR, Ahmad M, Islam MS. Analysis of trabecular bone using site-specific fractal values calculated from cone beam CT images. Oral Radiol. 2014;30:179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anaforoglu I, Nar-Demirer A, Bascil-Tutuncu N, Ertorer ME. Prevalence of osteoporosis and factors affecting bone mineral density among postmenopausal Turkish women with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2009;23:12–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sosa M, Dominguez M, Navarro MC, Segarra MC, Hernández D, de Pablos P, et al. Bone mineral metabolism is normal in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complicat. 1996;10:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hofbauer LC, Brueck CC, Singh SK, Dobnig H. Osteoporosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1317–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Tsuda M, Nakamoto T, Kodama I, Inagaki K, et al. Risk of vertebral osteoporosis in post-menopausal women with alterations of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gulsahi A, Paksoy CS, Ozden S, Kucuk NO, Cebeci AR, Genc Y. Assessment of bone mineral density in the jaws and its relationship to radiomorphometric indices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:284–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Sanada M, Ohtsuka M, Nakamoto T, Sumida H, et al. Validation of dental panoramic radiography measures for identifying postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1755–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostenson CG, Fière V, Ahmed M, Lindström P, Brismar K, Brismar T, et al. Decreased cortical bone thickness in spontaneously non-insulin-dependent diabetic GK rats. J Diabetes Complicat. 1997;11:319–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mishima T, Motoyama K, Imanishi Y, Hamamoto K, Nagata Y, Yamada S, et al. Decreased cortical thickness, as estimated by a newly developed ultrasound device, as a risk for vertebral fracture in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with eGFR of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:229–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Naitoh M, Kurosu Y, Inagaki K, Katsumata A, Noguchi T, Ariji E. Assessment of mandibular buccal and lingual cortical bones in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Saricaoglu ST, Bas O, Sahin B, Küçük M. The estimation of the volume of sheep mandibular defects using cone-beam computed tomography images and a stereological method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:165–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Paccou J, Ward KA, Jameson KA, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Edwards MH. Bone microarchitecture in men and women with diabetes: the importance of cortical porosity. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;98(5):465–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patsch JM, Burghardt AJ, Yap SP, Baum T, Schwartz AV, Joseph GB, et al. Increased cortical porosity in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:313–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Oliveira ML, Pedrosa EF, Cruz AD, Haiter-Neto F, Paula FJ, Watanabe PC. Relationship between bone mineral density and trabecular bone pattern in postmenopausal osteoporotic Brazilian women. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1847–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yaşar F, Akgünlü F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberts M, Yuan J, Graham J, Jacobs R, Devlin H. Changes in mandibular cortical width measurements with age in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1915–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, Worthington H. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ling H, Yang X, Li P, Megalooikonomou V, Xu Y, Yang J. Cross gender–age trabecular texture analysis in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20130324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saadettin Kayipmaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Saadettin Kayıpmaz, Saliha Akçay and Ömer Said Sezgin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayipmaz, S., Akçay, S. & Sezgin, Ö.S. Osteoporotic mandibular changes caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparative study by cone beam computed tomography imaging. Oral Radiol 33, 108–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0252-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0252-x

Keywords

Navigation