Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of LEACH Network Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

WSN having not a fixed architecture randomly deploys numerous sensing nodes over any measuring area and the collected information are sent to the head nodes through wireless media. In the area of lifetime of sensing elements as it is placed in uncertain areas or inaccessible zones with limited energy sources where the replacement or recharging of these sensor battery is just tends to impossible researches are working. Hence, researchers are trying to design a routing protocol that can effectively use the resources of sensor nodes. Low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH) have come up with several successors from distributed clustering to centralized clustering, single- hoping to multi-hoping, normal power source to renewable energy based etc. This survey paper is based on the LEACH and its successors. Primary focus of our examination is the manner by which these all-inclusive conventions operate in the request to increase the survival period and in what way quality steering conventions are developed for wireless sensor networks. Moreover, this paper features a portion of the issues considered by LEACH and furthermore clarifies how problems are controlled by the expanded variants of LEACH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anand, G., & Balakrishna, K.N. (2013). Leach-ex protocol-a comparative performance study and analysis with leach variants of wireless sensor networks. In National Conf. Frontiers Adv. Inf. Sci. Technology FAIST.

  2. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless microsensor networks. In Proc. 33rd Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), Maui, HI.

  3. Salim, A., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. M. (2014). IBLEACH: Intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Network, 20(6), 1515–1525.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HeinzelmanW, B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application specific protocol architecture for wireless micro sensor networks. IEEE Trans on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, X. H., & Wang, S. (2010). Performance comparison of LEACH and LEACHC protocols by NS2. In Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications to Business, Engineering and Science. Hong Kong, China, (pp. 254–258).

  6. Tao, L., Zhu, Q.X., & Zhang, L. (2010). An improvement for LEACH algorithm in wireless sensor network. In Proc. 5th IEEE Conf. Industrial Electronics. Applied.

  7. Singh, S. K., Singh, M. P., & Singh, D. K. (2010). A survey of energy-efficient hierarchical cluster-based routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Application (IJANA), 2(02), 570–580.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Verma, A., Kumar, S., Gautam, P. R., Rashid, T., & Kumar, A. (2020). Fuzzy logic based effective clustering of homogeneous wireless sensor networks for mobile sink. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(10), 5615–5623.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naregal, K., & Gudnavar, A. (2012). Improved cluster routing protocol for wireless sensor network through simplification. In 18th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications (ADCOM) (pp. 1–3). India.

  10. Aslam, M., Javaid, N., Rahim, A., Nazir, U., Bibi, A., & Khan, Z.A. (2012). Survey of Extended LEACH-based clustering routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE 14th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communication, 2012 & IEEE 9th International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (pp. 1232–1238) Liverpool, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC.2012.181.

  11. Xinhua, Wu., & Li, H. (2011). Research and Improvement of the LEACH protocol to reduce the marginalization of cluster head. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 35(1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1006-2823.2011.01.019. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2002). PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Aerospace conference proceedings, IEEE, 3, 3–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, D., Li, X., Sawhney, R., & Wang, X. (2009). Geographic and energy-aware routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Computing, 4(2), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kulik, J., Heinzelman, W., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). Negotiation-based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 8, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., Xin, Z., Junyuan, X., & Zhengkun, M. (2011). A Distance-based Clustering Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks. Important national science technology specific projects.

  16. Voigt, T., Ritter, H., Schiller, J., Dunkels, A., & Alonso, J. (2004). Solar-aware Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications.

  17. Islam, M.J., Islam, M.M., & Islam, M.N. (2007). A-sLEACH : An advanced solar aware leach protocol for energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Networking (ICN’07) 0-7695-2805-8/07 20.00.

  18. Xiangning, F., & Yulin, S. (2007). Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

  19. Lotf, J.J., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Alguliev, R.M. (2010). Hierarchical routing in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), 2010 2nd International Conference on, vol. 3 (pp. V3–650–V3–654).

  20. Wu, Y., Xu, D., & Gao, J. (2011). 2011 3rd international conference on environmental science and information application technology esiat 2011 comparison study to hierarchical routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aslam, M., Javaid, N., Rahim, A., Nazir, U., Bibi, A., & Khan, Z.A. (2012). Survey of extended leach-based clustering routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In High Performance Computing and Communication 2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (HPCC-ICESS), 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on (pp. 1232–1238).

  22. Hani, R. M., & Ijjeh, A. A. (2013). A survey on leach-based energy aware protocols for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Communications, 8(3), 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Madheswaran, M., & Shanmugasundaram, R. N. (2013). Enhancements of leach algorithm for wireless networks: A review. ICTACT Journal on Communication Technology, 4(4), 821–827.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rahayu, T.M., Lee, S.G., & Lee, H. J. (2014). Survey on leach-based security protocols. In 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (pp. 304–309).

  25. Soni, A. K., Lobiyal, D. K., Mahapatra, R. P., & Yadav, R. K. (2015). 3rd international conference on recent trends in computing 2015 (icrtc-2015) descendant of leach based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science, 57, 1005–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arora, V. K., Sharma, V., & Sachdeva, M. (2016). A survey on fLEACHg and others routing protocols in wireless sensor network. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 127(16), 6590–6600.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arjunan, S., & Pothula, S. (2019). A survey on unequal clustering protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 31(3), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Shalabi, M., Anbar, M., Wan, T.-C., & Khasawneh, A. (2018). Variants of the low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy protocol: Survey. Issues and Challenges. Electronics, 7(8), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics7080136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shahraki, A., Taherkordi, A., Haugen, Ø., & Eliassen, F. (2020). Clustering objectives in wireless sensor networks: A survey and research direction analysis. Computer Networks, 180, 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mhatre, V., & Rosenberg, C. (2004). Homogeneous vs heterogeneous clustered sensor networks: a comparative study. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577), 6 (pp. 3646–3651) Paris, France, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2004.1313223.

  31. Loscri, V., Morabito, G., & Marano, S. (2005). A two-Levels Hierarchy for low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (TL-LEACH). IEEE, (pp. 1809–1813).

  32. Xiangning, F., Yulin, S. (2007). Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. In: International conference on sensor technologies and applications (Sensor Communication-2007). IEEE. (pp. 260–4).

  33. Ding, X., Xie, F., & Wu, Q. (2009). Energy-balanced clustering with master/slave method for wireless sensor networks. In Ninth international conference on electronic measurement and instruments (ICEMI’2009). IEEE (p. 3–20).

  34. Tong, Mu., & Minghao, T. (2010). LEACH-B: An improved leach protocol for wireless sensor network. WiCom, 2010(23–25), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yulan, Z., & Chunfeng, J. (2010). Research about improvement of LEACH protocol. ICISE, 2010(4–6), 2281–2284.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khediri, S. E. L., Nasri, N., Wei, A., & Kachouri, A. (2014). A new approach for clustering in wireless sensors networks based on LEACH. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1180–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Elhoseny, M., & Hassanien, A.E. (2019). Extending homogeneous WSN lifetime in dynamic environments using the clustering model. In Dynamic Wireless Sensor Networks. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (vol 165). Cham:Springer.

  38. El Alami, H., & Najid, A. (2019). ECH: An enhanced clustering hierarchy approach to maximize lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 107142–107153.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oliveira, L. B., Ferreira, A., Vilaca, M. A., Wong, H. C., Bern, M., Dahab, R., & Loureiro, A. A. F. (2007). Sec-LEACH—On the security of clustered sensor networks. Signal Processing., 87, 2882–2895.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Duan, C., Sun, J., Zhou, D., & Zhang, J. (2009). An energy efficient regional partitioned clustering routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Second International conference on international conference on intelligent networks and intelligent systems (ICINIS- 2009) (pp. 205–8) IEEE.

  41. Yassein, M.B., Aljawarneh, S., & Al-huthaifi, R.K. (2017). Enhancements of LEACH protocol: Security and open issues. 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET) (pp. 1–8). Antalya https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308164.

  42. Alshowkan, M., Elleithy, K.,& Alhassan, H. (2013). LS-LEACH: A New Secure and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2013 IEEE/ACM 17th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications, (pp. 215–220), Delft, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1109/DS-RT.2013.31.

  43. Junping, H., Yuhui, J., & Liang, D. (2008). A time-based cluster-head selection algorithm for LEACH. In: Proceedings of the of ISCC 2008 (p. 1172–6).

  44. Allirani, A., & Suganthi, M. (2009). An energy efficient cluster formation protocol with low latency in wireless sensor networks. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 51, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Torkzaban, V., Rahmani, S., & Dehghan, M. (2009). An ID-based routing protocol for WSN. IEEE.

  46. Li, X., Xu, L., Wang, H., Song, J., & Yang, S.X. (2010). A differential evolution-based routing algorithm for environmental monitoring wireless sensor networks. Sensors.

  47. Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Zhao, T., Tie, Y., Bai, F., & Jin, M. (2019). An improved energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 19, 4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Biswas, S., & Morris, R. (2004). Opportunistic routing in multi-hop wireless networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 34(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lan, Y., Fuxiang, G., & Peng, L. (2009). An energy-balanced clustering routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Second international conference on power electronics and intelligent transportation system, (PElTS 2009) (pp. 283–286). IEEE: Lai Wei Kuang.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jiman, H., Joongjin, K., Sangjun, L., Dongseop, K., & Sangho, Yi. (2009). T-LEACH: The method of threshold-based cluster head replacement for wireless sensor networks. Information Systems Frontiers, 11, 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, W., Wang, Q., Luo, W., Sheng, M., Wu, W., & Hao, L. (2009). Leach-H: An improved routing protocol for collaborative sensing networks. Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China. (pp. 1–5) IEEE.

  52. Zhuo, C., Mark, P., Bulent, T., Wendi, H., Sameer, T., & Nuel, A.-G. (2002). Protocols for local data delivery in wireless microsensor networks., 45(1), 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar, G.S., Vinu, P.M.V., Poulose, J.K. (2009). Mobility metric based LEACH- mobile protocol, ADCOM-2008. IEEE.

  54. Hasan, A.-R., Ali, A.-A., Khaldoun, B., Amer, A. A., & Mel, R. Y. (2011). Efficient routing LEACH (ER-LEACH) enhanced on LEACH protocol in wireless sensor networks part I. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, J., Li, B., Xia, F., Kim, C.-S., & Kim, J.-U. (2014). An energy efficient distance-aware routing algorithm with multiple mobile sinks for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 14(8), 15163–15181.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, L., Liu, J., Wang, W. (2010). An improvement and simulation of leach protocol for wireless sensor network. In First international conference on pervasive computing, signal processing and applications. Proceedings of PCSPA 2010. (pp. 444–7).

  57. Yang, K., Wu, Y-M., Zhou, H.-B. (2010). Research of optimal energy consumption model in wireless sensor network. In Second international conference on computer engineering and technology (vol. 7, pp. 421–4). IEEE.

  58. Salim, A., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. M. (2014). IBLEACH: Intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 20, 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0691-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan, J., Ju-Yeon, Jo., Ling, W., Yoohwan, K., & Xiaozong, Y. (2008). ECCRA: An energy- efficient coverage and connectivity preserving routing algorithm under border effects in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 31, 2398–2407.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bian, X., Liu, X., & Cho, H. (2008). Study on a cluster-chain routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Supported in part by the NSFC (nos. 60673086, 60711140419). The Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong Province of China (no. 2006B50101003), the Science and Technology Plan of Guangzhou City (no. 2007Z3-D0071) and the Joint KOSEF Project. IEEE. (pp. 1–5).

  61. Liu, Y., Luo, Z., Xu, K., Chen, L. (2010). A reliable clustering algorithm base on LEACH protocol in wireless mobile sensor networks. In International conference on mechanical and electrical technology (ICMET 2010), (pp. 692–6) IEEE.

  62. Mehra, P. S., Doja, M., & Alam, B. (2019). Stability Enhancement in LEACH (SE-LEACH) for Homogeneous WSN. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 6(20), e5. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.156592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hung, D., Duy, T., & Trinh, D. (2019). Security-Reliability Analysis of Multi-hop LEACH Protocol with Fountain Codes and Cooperative Jamming. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems, 6(18), 157120. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-3-2019.157120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu, Q., Zhu, C., Xiao, H., Qiu, X., & Yu, L. (2019). Online scheduling for multi-hops wireless networks with security constraints. IEEE Access, 7, 21409–21419. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hung, H. D., Duy, T. T., & Voznak, M. (2020). Secrecy outage performance of multi-hop LEACH networks using power beacon aided cooperative jamming with jammer selection methods. AEU - Int. J. Electron. Commun., 124, 153357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2020.153357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lu, H., Li, J., & Guizani, M. (2014). Secure and efficient data transmission for cluster-based wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(3), 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2013.43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Vinitha, A., Rukmini, M. S. S., & Dhiraj, S. (2019). Secure and energy aware multi-hop routing protocol in WSN using Taylor-based hybrid optimization algorithm. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Antoo, A., Mohammed, A.R. (2014). EEM-LEACH: Energy efficient multi-hop LEACH routing protocol for clustered WSNs. 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT), (pp. 812–818). Kanyakumari https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICCT.2014.6993070.

  69. Prasad, D.R., Naganjaneyulu, P.V., & Prasad, K.S. (2016). St. Ann’s College of Engineering & Technology, India, MVR College of Engineering & Technology, India, and Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India, Energy Efficient Clustering in Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks Using Differential Evolutionary MOPSO. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, (vol. 59, no. spe2) https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2016161011.

  70. Al-Sodairi, S., & Ouni, R. (2018). Reliable and energy-efficient multi-hop LEACH-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst., 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Toklu, S., & Şi̇Mşek, M. (2020). Energy Efficiency with Centralized Layering Approach For Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(4), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhixin, L., Qingchao, Z., Liang, X., & Xinping, G. (2012). A distributed energy- efficient clustering algorithm with improved coverage in wireless sensor networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28, 780–790.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rhim, H., Tamine, K., Abassi, R., et al. (2018). A multi-hop graph-based approach for an energy-efficient routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci., 8, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-018-0153-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kumar Shah, I., Maity, T., & Singh Dohare, Y. (2020). Algorithm for energy consumption minimisation in wireless sensor network. IET Communications, 14(8), 1301–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Samdanis, K., Friderikos, V., & Aghvami, A. H. (2009). Autonomic hierarchical reconfiguration for wireless access networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 32(3), 630–641.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Papadopoulos, A., Navarra, A., McCann, J. A., & Pinotti, C. M. (2012). VIBE: an energy efficient routing protocol for dense and mobile sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications., 35(4), 1177–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Verma, A., Kumar, S., Gautam, P. R., Rashid, T., & Kumar, A. (2020). Fuzzy logic based effective clustering of homogeneous wireless sensor networks for mobile sink. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(10), 5615–5623. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2969697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Konstantopoulos, C., Pantziou, G., Gavalas, D., Mpitziopoulos, A., & Mamalis, B. (2012). A rendezvous-based approach enabling energy-efficient sensory data collection with mobile sinks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(5), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2011.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Qin, Z., Zhou, Z., & Zhao, X. (2012). Research on the optimal number of cluster heads of wireless sensor networks based on Multihop-LEACH. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (pp. 6391–6395) Ottawa, ON, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2012.6364752.

  80. Nam, C.-S., Bae, S.-T., Chung, J.-W., & Shin, D.-R. (2013). Multihop-based optimal cluster heads numbers considering relay node in transmission range of sensor nodes in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(5), 480981. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/480981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Saleem, K., Fisal, N., & Al-Muhtadi, J. (2014). Empirical studies of bio-inspired self-organized secure autonomous routing protocol. IEEE Sensors J., 14(7), 2232–2239.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cai, X., Duan, Y., He, Y., Yang, J., & Li, C. (2016). Bee-Sensor-C: An energy-efficient and scalable multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, (vol. 2015).

  83. Amwary, A., Maga, D., & Nahdi, T. (2016). Modified LEACH protocol for heterogeneous wireless networks. In 2016 New Trends in Signal Processing (NTSP), (pp. 1–4) Demanovska Dolina. https://doi.org/10.1109/NTSP.2016.7747774.

  84. Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2006.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhou, H., Wu, Y., Hu, Y., & Xie, G. (2010). A novel stable selection and reliable transmission protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 33(15), 1843–1849.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gaber, T., Abdelwahab, S., Elhoseny, M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2018). Trust-based Secure Clustering in WSN-based Intelligent Transportation Systems. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Palattella, M. R., Accettura, N., Vilajosana, X., Watteyne, T., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Dohler, M. (2013). Standardized protocol stack for the internet of (important) things. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1389–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rawat, P., & Chauhan, S. (2018). Energy Efficient Clustering in Heterogeneous Environment. In 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), (pp. 388–392), Coimbatore https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473296.

  89. Priyadarshi, R., Rawat, P., & Nath, V. (2018). Energy dependent cluster formation in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Microsystem Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4116-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhang, J., & Chen, J. (2019). An adaptive clustering algorithm for dynamic heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 25, 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1648-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Priyadarshi, R., Rawat, P., Nath, V., et al. (2020). Three level heterogeneous clustering protocol for wireless sensor network. Microsystem Technologies, 26, 3855–3864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04874-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Tian, J., Liang, X., & Wang, G. (2016). Deployment and reallocation in mobile survivability-heterogeneous wireless sensor networks for barrier coverage. Ad Hoc Networks, 36, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Akbar, M., Javaid, N., Imran, M., Amjad, N., Khan, M. I., & Guizani, M. (2016). Sink mobility aware energy-efficient network integrated super heterogeneous protocol for WSNs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Naranjo, P. G. V., et al. (2017). P-SEP: A prolong stable election routing algorithm for energy-limited heterogeneous fog-supported wireless sensor networks. The Journal of Supercomputing, 73(2), 733–755.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sharma, V., & Saini, D.S. (2015). Performance investigation of advanced multi-hop and single-hop energy efficient leach protocol with heterogeneous nodes in wireless sensor networks. In 2015 Second International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering, (pp. 192–197). Dehradun. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCE.2015.32.

  96. Derogarian, F., Ferreira, J.C., & Tavares, V.G.M. (2011) A routing protocol for wsn based on the implementation of source routing for minimum cost forwarding method. SENSOR COMM 2011. In Fifth international conference on sensor technologies and applications, (pp.85–90)

  97. Aslam, M., Wang, F., Hu, X., Asad, M., & Munir, E. U. (2017). Multihopping Multilevel Clustering Heterogeneity-Sensitive Optimized Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5378403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Tyagi, S., Tanwar, S., Gupta, S. K., et al. (2015). A lifetime extended multi-levels heterogeneous routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems, 59, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Kumar, D., Aseri, T. C., & Patel, R. B. (2011). Multi-hop communication routing (MCR) protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Information Technology, Communications and Convergence, 1(2), 130.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Oliveira, L.B., Wang, H.C., & Loureiro, A.A. (2005). LHA-SP: secure protocols for hierarchical wireless sensor networks. In 2005 9th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, (pp. 31–44), IM, Nice, France, https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2005.1440767

  101. Kumar, K. A., Krishna, A. V. N., & Chatrapati, K. S. (2017). New secure routing protocol with elliptic curve cryptography for military heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 38(2), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2016.1220092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Tanwar, S., Thakkar, K., Thakor, R., & Singh, P. K. (2018). M-Tesla-based security assessment in wireless sensor network. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 1154–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Oliveira, L. B., et al. (2007). SecLEACH—On the security of clustered sensor networks. Signal Processing, 87, 2882–2895.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Kumar, D., Aseri, T. C., & Patel, R. B. (2011). Multi-hop communication routing (MCR) protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Information Technology, Communication and Convergence., 1(2), 130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Atero, F.J., Vinagre, J.J., Ramiro, J., & Wilby, M. (2011). A low energy and adaptive routing architecture for efficient field monitoring in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In 2011 international conference on high performance computing & simulation, (pp. 449–455).

  106. Ossama, Y., & Sonia, F. (2004). HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–379.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Chia-Hung, L., & Ming-Jer, T. (2006). A Comment on HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(10), 1471–1472.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Mardini, W., Yassein, M. B., Khamayseh, Y., & Ghaleb, B. A. (2014). Rotated hybrid, energy-efficient and distributed (r-heed) clustering protocol in wsn. WSEAS Trans. Commun., 13, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Senouci, M. R., et al. (2012). Performance evaluation of network lifetime spatial-temporal distribution for WSN routing protocols. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(4), 1317–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Sharma, V., & Saini, D.S. (2015). Performance investigation of advanced multi-hop and single-hop energy efficient LEACH protocol with heterogeneous nodes in wireless sensor networks. In 2015 Second International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering.

  111. Verma, S., Sood, N., & Sharma, A. K. (2019). A novelistic approach for energy efficient routing using single and multiple data sinks in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., 12, 1110–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00777-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Sahoo, B. M., Amgoth, T., & Pandey, H. M. (2020). Particle swarm optimization based energy efficient clustering and sink mobility in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Muthu Krishnan, A., & Ganesh Kumar, P. (2016). An effective clustering approach with data aggregation using multiple mobile sinks for heterogeneous WSN. Wireless Personal Communications, 90(2), 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur, India for providing the research opportunity and facilities.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sweta Kumari Barnwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnwal, S.K., Prakash, A. Comparative Analysis of LEACH Network Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Wireless Pers Commun 135, 697–726 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11049-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11049-8

Keywords

Navigation