Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Diffraction Losses and Coverage Inaccuracies in Some Mountainous Regions of Southern Nigeria

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was initiated to predict the depth of diffraction losses and coverage inaccuracies in the mountainous terrains of Ondo and Cross River State. Open Source geographical resources analysis support system and other conventional models of diffraction were used in this study. The hypothetical value for the received signal strength (RSS) level was about 65 dBµV/m for both locations. However, this was not the case, as the transmitted radio signals were received through the mechanism of diffraction. This was attributed to the mountain completely blocking the signal line-of-sight path and all the effective ellipsoids of the Fresnel Zones. Furthermore, it was apparent that there were coverage inaccuracies in all the radio cells, as this was envisioned in the maps created with ArcGIS and the output of the web-based link budget calculator. The analysis showed that there was deep under-coverage in Cross River State as the skip distance of the shadow zone cast by the mountains was 28.34 km; as opposed to Ondo with a skip distance of 0.32 km. Also, linear regression models were fitted to predict the received signal strength (RSS) level and diffraction losses, as well as to cater to the deficiency of the existing models of diffraction. The models extended the operational limits of these tools by approximately 200 km when deployed in analogous terrain. From the foregoing, it was recommended that sophisticated technologies like multiple-input multiple-output, beam-forming, etc. and repeater stations should be planted in locations with poor signal qualities to fillip the degraded signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Malila, B., Falowo, O., & Ventura, N. (2015). Analysis of diffraction loss in NLOS small cell backhaul links deployed in urban canyons. In EUROCON International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON) (pp. 1–6).

  2. Rao, T. R., & Rao, V. (1999). Single knife-edge diffraction propagation studies over hilly terrain. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 45, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacCartney Jr, G., Deng, S., Sun, S., & Rappaport, T. (2016). Millimeter-wave human blockage at 73 GHz with a simple double knife-edge diffraction model and extension for directional antennas. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00226v3.

  4. Isaac, A., Harrison, O., Edokpolor, E., & Uwakwe, C. (2017). Determination of single knife edge equivalent parameters for double knife edge diffraction loss by Deygout method. Mathematical and Software Engineering, 3, 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abhayawardhana, V. S., Wassell, I. J., Crosby, D., Sellars, M. P., & Brown, M. G. (2015). Comparison of empirical propagation path loss models for fixed wireless access systems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 1, 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akkaşlı, C. (2009). Methods for path loss prediction. Reports from MSI School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, 2, 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hum, S. V. (2016). Lecture note on radio and microwave wireless systems: Practical applications of knife-edge diffraction model. Mathematical and Software Engineering, 3, 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lazaridis, P. I., Kasampalis, S., Zaharis, Z. D., Cosmas, J. P., Paunovska, L., & Glover, I. (2015). Longley-Rice model precision in case of multiple diffracting obstacles. In URSI Atlantic Conference, Canary Islands.

  9. Prasad, M. V., Bhaskara, R. V., Rama, R., Sarkar, S. K., & Sharma, S. (2004). Double knife-edge diffraction propagation studies over irregular terrain. Indian Journal of Radio and Space Physics, 33, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Long, M. (2003). Wireless video communication: application and technology. Premier Wireless.

  11. Keller, J. B. (1962). Geometrical theory of diffraction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52, 116–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Bock, R. D. (2016). The conventionality of simultaneity and the Huygens-Fresnel-Miller model of wave propagation. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01544.

  13. Ahmad, S. A., Jabir, S. A., & Sadiq, J. A. (2017). Calculation algorithm for diffraction losses of multiple obstacles based on Epstein-Peterson approach. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 39, 199.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cadavid, A. N., Rojas, R. D., & Bernal, M. P. (2016). Digital terrestrial television measurement and coverage models comparison: Evaluation of measurements and simulations on the urban environment for DVB-T2 signals in antennas and propagation. InIEEE International Symposium (Vol. 23, pp. 1257–1258).

  15. Castel, L. (1996). Propagation characteristics of radio waves. Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bassey, D., Akpan, A., & Udoeno, E. (2016). UHF wave propagation losses beyond 40 percent Fresnel zone radii in southern Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research, 5, 470–475.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, W. C. (1988). Mobile cellular telecommunications systems. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bardwell, J. (2003). Math and physics for the 802.11 wireless LAN engineer. Retrieved 5 Feb 2020 from http://www.wildpackets.com/elements/whitepapers/math_physics.

  19. Quayle, P. R. (2001). Serving the obstructed masses- and Nlos case study, broadband wireless business. Journal of Scientific Research, 8, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christopher, H. (1999). Essential of radio wave propagation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johanna, J., Rensburg, V., & Barry, I. (2015). Wireless network visualization using radio propagation modeling. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iskander, M. F., & Yun, Z. (2021). Propagation prediction models for wireless communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 50, 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klostius, R., Wieser, A., & Brunner, F. K. (2006). Treatment of diffraction effects caused by mountain ridges. In Proceedings of 3rd IAG/12th FIG Symposium.

  24. LeNgoc, S. J., Chen, T. B, & Ye, Y. (2016). Improved diffraction loss prediction for land mobile radio communication. In Proceedings of Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (pp. 242–247).

  25. Keenan, J. M., & Motley, A. J. (1990). Radio coverage in cities. BTSJ, 8, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, J., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2020). An improved formulation of inverse square law and its applications. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Application, 34, 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fraser, W. (2003). Telecommunication. CBS Publisher and Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma, S., & Uppal, R. S. (2012). RF coverage estimation of cellular mobile system. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3, 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ITU-R. (2019). Report ITU-R M.2373-0: Principles and methods for the calculation of electromagnetic fields from broadcasting service antennas in the frequency range 0.15–100 GHz. International Telecommunication Union.

  30. Changwon, L., & Sungkwon, P. (2018). Diffraction loss prediction of multiple edges using the Bullington method with neural network in mountainous areas. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 20, 112–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

UE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Analysis, Software, Writing—original draft. ED: Methodology, Analysis, Supervision. SM: Methodology, Analysis, and Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etukakpan A. Udoeno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. In addition, the ethical issues, including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, and redundancies have been ultimately observed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Udoeno, E.A., Ekpa, I.D. & Mopta, S.E. Determination of Diffraction Losses and Coverage Inaccuracies in Some Mountainous Regions of Southern Nigeria. Wireless Pers Commun 132, 1365–1385 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10666-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10666-z

Keywords

Navigation