Abstract
VANETs are wireless sensor networks that suffer from the drawback of highly mobile nodes. The main objective of any type of network is to achieve efficient transmission goals. The vehicles act as the transmitting nodes. Cognitive radio technology helps in sensing the spectrum in order to ensure the efficient usage of the reserved channels by all the nodes. Our proposed system incorporates a routing protocol with the cognitive radio technology for efficient channel assignment. The routing protocol applies a tree based structure for efficient routing within and between networks. The tree routing protocol is further altered by the inclusion of an efficient optimized scheme. The proposed technique involves a Genetic Whale Optimization Algorithm which helps in choosing a root channel for transmission. When the selected root channel becomes active, the other channels are disabled. The proposed tree routing protocol is called the modified cognitive tree routing protocol (MCTRP).Apart from routing this protocol also caters to the need of effective channel utilization by allocating the spectrum fairly. This scheme results in ranking the channels based on their transmission efficiency and also aims to reduce the inherent delay usually associated with VANETs. The protocol also handles link breakages efficiently. The proposed scenario is simulated in NS2 and is evaluated based on the major network metrics. Our protocol shows a sharp decline in the associated delay and guarantees effective channel utilization. The proposed MCTRP method is effective over other protocols, such as, CTRP and OLSR. The analytical results show that MCTRP promises minimum overheads with effective channel utilization than the existing protocols.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jalil Piran, M., Cho, Y., Yun, J., Ali, A., & Suh, D. Y. (2014). Cognitive radio-based vehicular ad hoc and sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks,10(8), 1–11.
Nassef, L., & Alhebshi, R. (2016). Secure spectrum sensing in cognitive radio sensor networks: A survey. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER),6(3), 1–7.
Patel, J., & Thakkar, M. (2014). A survey on cognitive radio wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 1(3), 146–148.
Abolarinwa, J. A., Salawu. N., & Achonu. (2013). Cognitive radio-based wireless sensor networks as next generation sensor network: Concept, problems and prospects. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences,4(8), 146–148.
Qu, Y., Dong, C., Tang, S., Chen, C., Dai, H., Wang, H., et al. (2017). Opportunistic network coding for secondary users in cognitive radio networks. Ad Hoc Networks,56, 186–201.
Rao, K. L., Kalyana Chakravarthy, C., & Chilukuri, S. (2015). Energy efficient routing in cognitive radio networks: Challenges and existing solutions. Journal on Communication Technology: Special Issue,6, 1039–1052.
Mishra, P., & Dewangan, N. (2015). Survey on optimization methods for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. International Journal of New Technology and Research,1(6), 23–28.
Wang, J., Chen, R., Tsai, J. J. P., & Wang, D.-C. (2018). Trust-based mechanism design for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Computer Communications,116, 90–100.
Singh, J. S. P., & Rai, M. K. (2017). CROP: Cognitive radio routing protocol for link quality channel diverse cognitive networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications,104, 48–60.
Rathika, P. D., & Sophia, S. (2017). A distributed scheduling approach for QoS improvement in cognitive radio networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering,57, 186–198.
Ramzan, M. R., Nawaz, N., Ahmed, A., Naeem, M., Iqbal, M., & Anpalagan, A. (2017). Multi-objective optimization for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: A review. Pervasive and Mobile Computing,41, 106–131.
Bouabdellah, M., Kaabouch, N., El Bouanani, F., & Ben-Azza, H. (2018). Network layer attacks and countermeasures in cognitive radio networks: A survey. Journal of Information Security and Applications,38, 40–49.
Ozger, M., & Akan. O.B. (2013). Event-driven spectrum-aware clustering in cognitive radio sensor networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM (pp. 1483–1491).
Bicen, A. O., Cagri Gungor, V., & Akan, O. B. (2012). Delay-sensitive and multimedia communication in cognitive radio sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks,10(5), 816–830.
Esmaeelzadeh, V., Hosseini, E. S., Berangi, R., & Akan, O. B. (2016). Modeling of rate-based congestion control schemes in cognitive radio sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks,36, 177–188.
Kumbhar, S. V., & Durafe, A. (2015). Cognitive radio sensor network future of wireless sensor network. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering,4(2), 492–495.
Houaidia, C., Idoudi, H., Van Den Bossche, A., Saidane, L. A., & Val, T. (2017). Inter-flow and intra-flow interference mitigation routing in wireless mesh networks. Computer Networks,120, 141–156.
Al-Turjman, F. (2017). Cognitive routing protocol for disaster-inspired internet of things. Future Generation Computer Systems,92, 2–21.
Hashem, M., Barakat, S. I., & AttaAlla, M. A. (2017). Enhanced tree routing protocols for multi-hop and multi-channel cognitive radio network (EMM-TRP). Journal of Network and computer applications,10, 1–19.
Walikar, G. A., & Biradar, R. C. (2017). A survey on hybrid routing mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications,77, 48–63.
Fadel, E., Faheem, M., Gungor, V. C., Nassef, L., Akkari, N., Malik, M. G. A., et al. (2017). Spectrum-aware bio-inspired routing in cognitive radio sensor networks for smart grid applications. Computer Communications,101, 106–120.
Sekhar, R., Raja, K., Ravi Chandra, T. S., Pooja, S., & Tapaswi, S. (2016). Light weight security protocol for communications in vehicular networks. Wireless Networks,22(4), 1343–1353.
Sathiamoorthy, J., & Ramakrishnan, B. (2016). Energy and delay efficient dynamic cluster formation using improved ant colony optimization algorithm in EAACK MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications,95, 1531–1552.
Hof, P. R., & Van Der Gucht, E. (2007). Structure of the cerebral cortex of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Balaenopteridae). The Anatomical Record,290, 1–31.
Watkins, W. A., & Schevill, W. E. (1989). Aerial observation of feeding behavior in four baleen whales: Eubalaena glacialis, Balaenoptera borealis, Megaptera novaean- gliae, and Balaenoptera physalus. Journal of Mammalogy,60, 155–163.
Goldbogen, J. A., Friedlaender, A. S., Calambokidis, J., Mckenna, M. F., Simon, M., & Nowacek, D. P. (2013). Integrative approaches to the study of baleen whale diving behavior, feeding performance, and foraging ecology. BioScience,63, 90–100.
Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016). The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software,95, 51–67.
Harikarthik, S. K., Palanisamy, V., & Ramanathan, P. (2017). Optimal test suite selection in regression testing with testcase prioritization using modified ann and whale optimization algorithm. Cluster Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1401-7.
Ying, L., Zhou, Y., & Luo, Q. (2017). Lévy flight trajectory-based whale optimization algorithm for global optimization. IEEE Access,5, 6168–6186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohanakrishnan, U., Ramakrishnan, B. MCTRP: An Energy Efficient Tree Routing Protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network Using Genetic Whale Optimization Algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun 110, 185–206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06720-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06720-4