Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficient Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Optimal Scheduling

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks generally have unique lifetime necessities. In any case, the density of the sensors may not be sufficiently substantial to fulfil the coverage requirement while meeting the lifetime constraint in the mean time. Once in a while coverage has to be traded for network lifetime. The proposed efficient pipeline based spatial temporal optimization scheduling for coverage optimization satisfies the coverage problem while meeting the lifetime constraint at the same time. In the proposed optimal scheduling, initially number of nodes in the network is clustered by using energy based one hop clustering algorithm. After the formation of clusters pipeline based spatial temporal optimization algorithm is used for the optimal scheduling. Here the optimization is improved by using trust of each sensor nodes and the area of clusters. Finally, data is aggregated through the optimally scheduled cluster nodes. The experimental results show that our proposed optimization scheduling substantially outperforms other schemes in terms of network lifetime, coverage redundancy and convergence time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patel, M., & Wang, J. (2010). Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(1), 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sobeih, A., Hou, J. C., Kung, L.-C., Li, N., Zhang, H., Chen, W.-P., et al. (2006). J-Sim: A simulation and emulation environment for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 13(4), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pedraza, J. M. (2017). Advanced nuclear technologies and its future possibilities. In Small modular reactors for electricity generation (pp. 35–122). Springer International Publishing.

  4. Akkaya, K., & Younis, M. (2005). A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patwari, N., Ash, J. N., Kyperountas, S., Hero, A. O., Moses, R. L., & Correal, N. S. (2005). Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(4), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard, A., Matarić, M. J., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2002). Mobile sensor network deployment using potential fields: A distributed, scalable solution to the area coverage problem. In Distributed autonomous robotic systems (vol. 5, pp. 299–308). Springer, Japan.

  7. Soro, S., & Heinzelman, W. B. (2009). Cluster head election techniques for coverage preservation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(5), 955–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Younis, O., Krunz, M., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2006). Node clustering in wireless sensor networks: Recent developments and deployment challenges. IEEE Network, 20(3), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardei, M., & Jie, W. (2006). Energy-efficient coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(4), 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Romer, K., & Mattern, F. (2004). The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreira, A., Krieger, G., Hajnsek, I., Papathanassiou, K., Younis, M., Lopez-Dekker, P., et al. (2015). Tandem-L: A highly innovative bistatic SAR mission for global observation of dynamic processes on the Earth’s surface. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 3(2), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, Q., He, S., Li, J., Chen, J., & Sun, Y. (2015). Energy-efficient probabilistic area coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(1), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrioli, C., Nati, M., Casari, P., Zorzi, M., & Basagni, S. (2014). ALBA-R: Load-balancing geographic routing around connectivity holes in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(3), 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Golrezaei, N., Mansourifard, P., Molisch, A. F., & Dimakis, A. G. (2014). Base-station assisted device-to-device communications for high-throughput wireless video networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(7), 3665–3676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Erol-Kantarci, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2015). Energy-efficient information and communication infrastructures in the smart grid: A survey on interactions and open issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma, K. P., & Sharma, T. P. (2016). ZBFR: Zone based failure recovery in WSNs by utilizing mobility and coverage overlapping. Wireless Networks, 23(7), 2263–2280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Younis, M., Senturk, I. F., Akkaya, K., Lee, S., & Senel, F. (2014). Topology management techniques for tolerating node failures in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 58, 254–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, M., Yan, F., Deng, S., Shen, L., Kuang, S., & Xing, S. (2016). Coverage optimization algorithms based on voronoi diagram in software-defined sensor networks. In 2016 8th international conference on wireless communications & signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  19. Govindan, R., Korre, A., Durucan, S., & Imrie, C. E. (2011). A geostatistical and probabilistic spectral image processing methodology for monitoring potential CO2 leakages on the surface. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(3), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leipold, F., Tassetto, D., & Bovelli, S. (2013). Wireless in-cabin communication for aircraft infrastructure. Telecommunication Systems, 52(2), 1211–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mini, S., Udgata, S. K., & Sabat, S. L. (2014). Sensor deployment and scheduling for target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(3), 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. More, A., & Raisinghani, V. (2014). Random backoff sleep protocol for energy efficient coverage in wireless sensor networks. Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics, 2, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han, G., Liu, L., Jiang, J., Shu, L., & Hancke, G. (2017). Analysis of energy-efficient connected target coverage algorithms for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(1), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jameii, S. M., Faez, K., & Dehghan, M. (2015). AMOF: Adaptive multi-objective optimization framework for coverage and topology control in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems, 61(3), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritamshirsa Choudhuri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhuri, R., Das, R.K. Efficient Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Optimal Scheduling. Wireless Pers Commun 107, 1187–1198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06331-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06331-z

Keywords

Navigation