Abstract
The β-diversity studies reveal diversity patterns at a spatial scale and strengthen the process of regional diversity conservation. The aim of the current study was to understand the pattern of local contribution to β-diversity (LCBD) and species contribution to β-diversity (SCBD) of odonates in the Ganga River. We selected 27 sites along the banks of the Ganga River for the study, with an average distance between sites of 75 km, and recorded 30 species of odonate (species richness between 5 and 24) at these sites. Using β-regression analysis, we examined the impact of species richness and habitat variables on the LCBD. The LCBD was found to be negatively correlated with species richness and influenced by creeping macrophytes, water temperature, dissolved oxygen and salinity. We found that species with high SCBD scores (above 0.05) had intermediate occupancy (between 10 and 16 sites), including 5 species of dragonfly and 5 species of dragonfly, and that the second-degree term the relationship between SCBD and the number of declared locations better stocked with species than in the first degree. Since the SCBD is responsible for identifying species that make the greatest contribution to β-diversity and the LCBD is responsible for identifying sites with particular combinations of species, the combined approach using both should be included for ecological assessments, river biodiversity restoration and maintenance plans.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ali ZSK, Johnson JA, Hussain SA et al (2019) Study area and sampling strategy. In: Johnson JA, Hussain SA, Badola R (eds) Biodiversity profle of the Ganga river. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, pp 24–61
Alves-Martins F, Brasil LS, Juen L, De Marco P Jr, Stropp J, Hortal J (2019) Metacommunity patterns of amazonian odonata: the role of environmental gradients and major rivers. PeerJ 7:e6472. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6472
Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x
Andrew RJ, Subramaniam KA, Tiple AD (2008) Common odonates of central India. Hislop College, Nagpur
Axmacher JC, Brehm G, Hemp A, Tünte H, Lyaruu HVM, Müller-Hohenstein K, Fiedler K (2009) Determinants of diversity in afrotropical herbivorous insects (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): plant diversity, vegetation structure or abiotic factors? J Biogeogr 36:337–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01997.x
Bartlett MS (1951) The effect of standardization on a Chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika 38:337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
Batista JD, Ferreira VRS, Cabette HSR, de Castro LA, De Marco P, Juen L (2021) Sampling efficiency of a protocol to measure Odonata diversity in tropical streams. PLoS ONE 16:e0248216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248216
Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214
Bouhala Z, Khemissa C, Márquez-Rodríguez J, Ferreras-Romero M, Samraoui F, Samraoui B (2019) Ecological correlates of odonate assemblages of a Mediterranean stream, Wadi Cherf, northeastern Algeria: implications for conservation. Int J Odonatol 22:181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2019.1688199
Bried JT, Ervin GN (2006) Abundance patterns of dragonflies along a wetland buffer. Wetlands 26:878–883. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006
Bried JT, Hager BJ, Hunt PD, Fox JN, Jensen HJ, Vowels KM (2011) Bias of reduced-effort community surveys for adult Odonata of lentic waters. Insect Conserv Divers 5:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00156.x
Briggs A, Pryke JS, Samways MJ, Conlong DE (2019) Macrophytes promote aquatic insect conservation in artificial ponds. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 29:1190–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3157
Brito MTdaS, Heino J, Pozzobom UM, Landeiro VL (2020) Ecological uniqueness and species richness of zooplankton in subtropical floodplain lakes. Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-0715-3
Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Rodrigues ASL (2004) Protected areas and species. Conserv Biol 18:616–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.01836.x
Buchsbaum R, Leahy CW, Allison T (2016) Distribution and abundance of odonata species across massachusetts: results of a long-term monitoring program. Northeastern Nat 23:501–524. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.023.0407
Buchwald R (1992) Vegetation and dragonfly fauna — characteristics and examples of biocenological field studies. Vegetatio 101:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033195
Butler RG, deMaynadier PG (2007) The significance of littoral and shoreline habitat integrity to the conservation of lacustrine damselflies (Odonata). J Insect Conserv 12:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9059-0
Campos F, Velasco T, Sanz G, Casanueva P, Albuquerque MTD, Antunes IMHR (2014) Ischnura Graellsii(Insecta: Odonata) A water pollution biovulnerability indicator-probability mapping using spatial uncertainty. River Res Applic 32:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2839
Chesters D, Beckschäfer P, Orr MC, Adamowicz SJ, Chun K, Zhu C (2019) Climatic and vegetational drivers of insect beta diversity at the continental scale. Ecol Evol 9:13764–13775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5795
Corbet PS (2004) Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata, 2nd edn. Brill Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta Regression in R. J Stat Soft. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02
da Silva PG, Hernández MIM, Heino J (2018) Disentangling the correlates of species and site contributions to beta diversity in dung beetle assemblages. Divers Distrib 24:1674–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12785
Datry T, Moya N, Zubieta J, Oberdorff T (2016) Determinants of local and regional communities in intermittent and perennial headwaters of the bolivian Amazon. Freshw Biol 61:1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12706
De K, Siliwal M, Uniyal VP, Hussain SA (2021) Spiders as bio-indicators of habitat disturbance in the riparian zone of the Ganga river: a preliminary study. Trop Ecol 63:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00192-z
De K, Singh AP, Sarkar A, Singh K, Siliwal M, Uniyal VP, Hussain SA (2023a) Local and species contribution to the beta diversity and rarity of riparian spider community of the Ganga River, India. Community Ecol 24:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-023-00141-x
De K, Singh AP, Sarkar A, Singh K, Siliwal M, Uniyal VP, Hussain SA (2023b) Relationship between species richness, taxonomic distinctness, functional diversity, and local contribution to β diversity and effects of habitat disturbance in the riparian spider community of the Ganga River, India. Ecol Process. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-023-00421-4
De Marco Júnior P, Batista JD, Cabette HSR (2015) Community assembly of adult odonates in tropical streams: an ecophysiological hypothesis. PLoS ONE 10:e0123023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123023
Dray S, Bauman D, Blanchet G, Borcard D, Clappe S, Guénard G, Jombart T, Larocque G, Legendre P, Madi M, Wagner HH (2019) adespatial: Multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. R package version 0.3–3. https://cran.r-project.org/package=adespatial
ERőS T (2007) Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: the roles of habitat types and non-native species. Freshw Biol 52:1400–1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01777.x
Gaston KJ, Borges PAV, He F, Gaspar C (2006) Abundance, spatial variance and occupancy: arthropod species distribution in the Azores. J Anim Ecology 75:646–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01085.x
Godó L, Borza S, Valkó O, Rádai Z, Deák B (2023) Owl-mediated diploendozoochorous seed dispersal increases dispersal distance and supports seedling establishment. Global Ecol Conserv 45:e02519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02519
Heino J, Grönroos M (2016) Exploring species and site contributions to beta diversity in stream insect assemblages. Oecologia 183:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3754-7
Heiser M, Dapporto L, Schmitt T (2013) Coupling impoverishment analysis and partitioning of beta diversity allows a comprehensive description of Odonata biogeography in the Western Mediterranean. Org Divers Evol 14:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-013-0161-3
Hofmann TA, Mason CF (2005) Habitat characteristics and the distribution of Odonata in a lowland river catchment in eastern England. Hydrobiologia 539:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-3916-1
Johansson F, Bini LM, Coiffard P, Svanbäck R, Wester J, Heino J (2019) Environmental variables drive differences in the beta diversity of dragonfly assemblages among urban stormwater ponds. Ecol Ind 106:105529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105529
Jooste ML, Samways MJ, Deacon C (2020) Fluctuating pond water levels and aquatic insect persistence in a drought-prone Mediterranean-type climate. Hydrobiologia 847:1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04186-1
Kaiser HF (1970) A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35:401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Kaiser HF, Rice J (1974) Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educ Psychol Meas 34:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
Kareiva P, Marvier M (2003) Conserving Biodiversity Coldspots. Amer Sci 91:344. https://doi.org/10.1511/2003.4.344
Khan S, Sinha R, Whitehead P, Sarkar S, Jin L, Futter MN (2018) Flows and sediment dynamics in the Ganga River under present and future climate scenarios. Hydrol Sci J 63:763–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1447113
Kong H, Chevalier M, Laffaille P, Lek S (2017) Spatio-temporal variation of fish taxonomic composition in a South-East Asian flood-pulse system. PLoS ONE 12:e0174582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174582
Legendre P, De Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16:951–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12141
Lopes PM, Caliman A, Carneiro LS, Bini LM, Esteves FA, Farjalla V, Bozelli RL (2011) Concordance among assemblages of upland amazonian lakes and the structuring role of spatial and environmental factors. Ecol Ind 11:1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.017
May M (2019) Odonata: who they are and what they have done for us lately: classification and ecosystem services of Dragonflies. Insects 10:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10030062
Mendes TP, Cabette HSR, Juen L (2015) Setting boundaries: Environmental and spatial effects on Odonata larvae distribution (Insecta). An Acad Bras Ciênc 87:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520130477
Mimouni E-A, Pinel-Alloul B, Beisner BE (2015) Assessing aquatic biodiversity of zooplankton communities in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 18:1353–1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0457-5
Miyazono S, Taylor CM (2013) Effects of habitat size and isolation on species immigration-extinction dynamics and community nestedness in a desert river system. Freshw Biol 58:1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12127
Nair MV (2011) Dragonflies and damselflies of Orissa and Eastern India. Wildlife Organisation, Forest and Environment Department, Government of Orissa
Ng VKY, Cribbie RA (2016) Using the Gamma Generalized Linear model for modeling continuous, skewed and heteroscedastic outcomes in psychology. Curr Psychol 36:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9404-0
Olden JD, Kennard MJ, Leprieur F, Tedesco PA, Winemiller KO, García-Berthou E (2010) Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges. Divers Distrib 16:496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x
Oliveira-Junior J (2019) Structuring of dragonfly communities (Insecta: Odonata) in Eastern Amazon: Effects of Environmental and spatial factors in preserved and altered Streams. Insects 10:322. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10100322
Oliveira-Junior JMB, Dias-Silva K, Teodósio MA, Juen L (2019) The response of Neotropical Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) to local and Regional Abiotic factors in small Streams of the Amazon. Insects 10:446. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120446
Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: a New Map of Life on Earth. Bioscience 51:933. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
Pires MM, Stenert C, Maltchik L (2018) Drivers of beta diversity of Odonata along a forest–grassland transition in southern brazilian coastal ponds. Freshw Sci 37:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/697925
Pozzobom UM, Heino J, Brito MT, Landeiro S (2020) VL Untangling the determinants of macrophyte beta diversity in tropical floodplain lakes: insights from ecological uniqueness and species contributions. Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00730-2
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Raebel EM, Merckx T, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9281-7
Rai AK, Beg Z, Singh A, Gaurav K (2021) Estimating discharge of the Ganga River from satellite altimeter data. J Hydrol 603:126860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126860
Rodrigues ASL, Brooks TM (2007) Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:713–737. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095737
Sakai M, Suda S, Okeda T, Washitani I (2017) Identifying priority habitats and monitoring species for conservation and restoration of lentic Odonata habitats: assemblage nestedness on Amami-Oshima Island, Japan. Ecol Res 32:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1490-z
Sareein N, Phalaraksh C, Rahong P, Techakijvej C, Seok S, Bae YJ (2019) Relationships between predatory aquatic insects and mosquito larvae in residential areas in northern Thailand. J Vector Ecol 44:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12353
Schindler M, Fesl C, Chovanec A (2003) Dragonfly associations (Insecta: Odonata) in relation to habitat variables: a multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 497:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025476220081
Silva LFR, Castro DMP, Juen L, Callisto M, Hughes RM, Hermes MG (2021) A matter of suborder: are Zygoptera and Anisoptera larvae influenced by riparian vegetation in Neotropical. Savanna Streams? Hydrobiologia 848:4433–4443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04642-6
Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 31:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005
Steiner M, Grieder S (2020) EFAtools: an R package with fast and flexible implementations of exploratory factor analysis tools. JOSS 5:2521. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02521
Stewart TW, Downing JA (2008) Macroinvertebrate communities and environmental conditions in recently constructed wetlands. Wetlands 28:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1672/06-130.1
Suárez-Tovar CM, Ulises Castillo-Pérez E, Antonio Sandoval-García I, Schondube JE, Cano-Santana Z, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2022) Resilient dragons: exploring Odonata communities in an urbanization gradient. Ecol Ind 141:109134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109134
Szabó B, Lengyel E, Padisák J, Stenger-Kovács C (2018) Benthic diatom metacommunity across small freshwater lakes: driving mechanisms, β-diversity and ecological uniqueness. Hydrobiologia 828:183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3811-9
Thomaz SM, da Cunha ER (2010) The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages’ composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnol Bras 22:218–236. https://doi.org/10.4322/actalb.02202011
Tippler C, Wright IA, Davies PJ, Evans CR (2018) Are Odonata nymph adversely affected by impaired water quality in urban streams. Austral Ecol 43:890–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12630
Tojo K, Sekiné K, Takenaka M, Isaka Y, Komaki S, Suzuki T, Schoville SD (2017) Species diversity of insects in Japan: their origins and diversification processes. Entomol Sci 20:357–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12261
Villalobos-Jimenez G, Dunn AM, Hassall C (2016) Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in urban ecosystems: a review. Eur J Entomol 113:217–232. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2016.027
Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Heino J (2017) Ecological uniqueness of stream and lake diatom communities shows different macroecological patterns. Divers Distrib 23:1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12594
von Königslöw V, Fornoff F, Klein A-M (2021) Pollinator enhancement in agriculture: comparing sown flower strips, hedges and sown hedge herb layers in apple orchards. Biodivers Conserv 31:433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02338-w
Wetzel RG, Hutchinson GE (1976) 1975. A treatise on limnology, v. 3. Limnological botany. John Wiley and Sons, New York, London, Sydney, and Toronto, xii + 660 p. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21:929–930. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1976.21.6.0929
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943563
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218190
Wiersma YF, Urban DL (2005) Beta diversity and nature reserve system design in the Yukon, Canada. Conserv Biol 19:1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00099.x
Xie L, Chen H, Wei L, Chen S, Wang L, Xu B, Yi X, Wang X, Ding H, Fang Y (2023) Scale-dependent effects of species diversity on aboveground biomass and productivity in a subtropical broadleaved forest on Mt. Huangshan Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9786
Zimprich D (2010) Modeling change in skewed variables using mixed Beta regression models. Res Hum Dev 7:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600903578136
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out under the projects “Biodiversity conservation and Ganga rejuvenation” and “Planning and Management for Aquatic Species Conservation and Maintenance of Ecosystem Services in the Ganga River Basin” funded by the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. We express our gratitude to Shri G. Asok Kumar, Director General (DG), NMCG, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra and Mr. Upendra Prasad Singh, Former DGs, and their team for extending funding support. We would like to thank the Chief Wildlife Warden of the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and West Bengal for providing and facilitating timely research permits to conduct the study. We acknowledge the help and support provided by the Director and Dean at the Wildlife Institute of India in carrying out this study.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India (Grant No. B-02/2015-16/1259/NMCG-WII PROPOSAL and B-03/2015-16/1077/NMCG-NEW PROPOSAL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft; DD: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation; MS: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation; VPU: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing; BSA: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing; JAJ: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing; SAH: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De, K., Dey, D., Shruti, M. et al. β-diversity of odonate community of the Ganga River: partitioning and insights from local and species contribution. Wetlands Ecol Manage 31, 899–912 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09959-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09959-8