Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The value of wetlands for water quality improvement: an example from the St. Johns River watershed, Florida

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands provide many valuable ecosystem functions such as sediment and nutrient retention, high biological productivity and biodiversity, flood control, and opportunities to recreate. Despite their importance, estimating the value of wetlands is difficult as the worth of these functions and services is not easily quantified. The overall objective of this study was to estimate the value of freshwater wetlands in the Saint Johns River (SJR) watershed, Florida based on their ability to remove nutrients, namely nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). We used a combination of literature review, geospatial analysis of land cover, and regression analysis to determine the total wetland area in the SJR watershed and the rates of nitrogen and phosphorus burial in the wetlands. We then estimated the economic value of these wetlands based on the replacement cost of nutrient removal by wastewater treatment plants. Nitrogen burial rates ranged from 27 g/m2/year to a background rate of 6.56 g/m2/year, and phosphorus burial rates range from 1.31 g/m2/year to a background of 0.11 g/m2/year. Using these rates, we calculate wetlands of the SJR catchment remove 79,873 MT of nitrogen annually just from burial in the soil, with a replacement cost of between $240 million to $150 billion per year. The amount of phosphorus buried yearly is more than 2400 MT with an annual replacement cost of $17 to $497 million. Though they are based on limited data and include a variety of watershed-scale research limitations, these findings highlight the significant potential value of conserving functional wetlands based solely on their nutrient retention functions. If we were to consider the benefits associated with other wetland functions such as flood control, biological productivity, and biodiversity in addition to their ability to retain nutrients, the value of the SJR wetlands would be even greater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Clayton MK (2004) Soil phosphorus variability: scale-dependence in an urbanizing agricultural landscape. Landsc Ecol 20:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostic EM, White JR (2007) Soil phosphorus and vegetation influence on wetland phosphorus release after simulated drought. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:238–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostic EM, White JR, Corstanje R, Reddy KR (2010) Redistribution of wetland soil phosphorus ten years after the conclusion of nutrient loading. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1808–1815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner M, Schelske CL, Keenan LW (2001) Historical rates of sediment and nutrient accumulation in marshes of the Upper St. Johns River Basin, Florida, USA. J Paleolimnol 26(3):241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCC (Cape Cod Commission) (2013) Regional wastewater management plan: understanding the cost factors of wastewater treatment and disposal. County of Barnstable, MA: CCC

  • Clough JS (2008) SLAMM 5.0.1. Technical documentation and executable program downloadable from http://www.warrenpinnacle.com/prof/SLAMM/index.html

  • Compton JE, Harrison JA, Dennis RL, Greaver TL, Hill BH, Jordan SJ, Walker H, Campbell HV (2011) Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: a new perspective for US decision making. Ecol Lett 14:804–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft CB (1997) Dynamics of nitrogen and phosphorus retention during wetland ecosystem succession. Wetl Ecol Manag 4:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft CB, Richardson CJ (1993) Peat accretion and phosphorus accumulation along a eutrophication gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 22(2):133–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craft CB, Richardson CJ (1998) Recent and long-term organic soil accretion and nutrient accumulation in the Everglades. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62(3):834–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craft C, Schubauer-Berigan J (2006) The role of freshwater wetlands in a water quality trading program. In: Wichelns D (ed) Proceedings: innovations in reducing nonpoint source pollution: methods, policies, programs, and measurements, Indianapolis, IN, 28–30 Nov 2006, pp 143–158

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierberg FE, DeBusk TA, Jackson SD, Chimney MJ, Pietro K (2002) Submerged aquatic vegetation-based treatment wetlands for removing phosphorus from agricultural runoff: Response to hydraulic and nutrient loading. Water Res 36(6):1409–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Natural Areas Inventory (2012) [Map of land cover in Florida in polygon and raster format]. Florida Cooperative Land Cover Map, Version 2.3. Tallahassee, Florida. http://www.fnai.org/LandCover.cfm. Accessed Sept 2014

  • Hartman P, Cleland J (2007) Wastewater treatment performance and cost data to support an affordability analysis for water quality standards. ICF International, Lexington, MA. http://www.kysq.org/docs/Wastewater_2007.pdf. Accessed April 2016

  • Howarth RW, Marino R, Cole JJ (1988) Nitrogen fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and marine ecosystems 2: biogeochemical controls. Limnol Oceanogr 33:688–701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ipsilantis I, Sylvia DM (2007) Abundance of fungi and bacteria in a nutrient-impacted Florida wetland. Appl Soil Ecol 35:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang F, Beck MB, Rowles K, Cummings RG (2004) Pollutant trading: estimating the cost of phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment facilities. In: Hatcher KJ (ed) Proceedings of the 2004 Georgia Water Resources Conference, Athens, Georgia

  • Jiang F, Beck MB, Cummings RG, Rowles K, Russell D (2005) Estimation of costs of phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment facilities: adaptation of existing facilities. Water Policy Working Paper #2005-011

  • Lee C, Fletcher TD, Sun G (2009) Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng Life Sci 9(1):11–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metrohm Applikon (2017) Waste water treatment plants: nitrogen removal simultaneously analysis of ammonia, nitrate and nitrite (Process application note AN-PAN-1009). http://applikon.su/Downloads/AN-PAN-1009_WWTT_Removal_of_nitrogen_compounds.pdf

  • Nichols DS (1983) Capacity of natural wetlands to remove nutrients from wastewater. Water Pollut Control Fed 55(5):495–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obreza TA, Rouse R, Hanlon EA (2006) Advancements with controlled-release fertilizers for Florida citrus production: 1996–2006. University of Florida Department of Soil and Water Science, EDIS. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ss463

  • Olila OG, Reddy KR (1995) Labile and non-labile pools of phosphorus in surface waters and soils of the Upper St Johns River basin. Final report submitted to the St Johns River Water Management District. Contract No. 94D179. St Johns River Water Management District. Palatka, Florida

  • Petrone KC (2010) Catchment export of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus across an agro-urban land use gradient, Swan-Canning River system, southwestern Australia. J Geophys Res 115:G01016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenger JP, Reddy KR (2000) Microbial enzyme activities in a freshwater wetland after cessation of nutrient loading. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1796–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy K, Debusk W, Delaune R, Koch M (1993) Long-term nutrient accumulation rates in the Everglades. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1147–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Corstanje R, Chua T, D’Angelo EM (1999) Selected biogeochemical properties of impacted and unimpacted marsh sites in the Upper St. Johns River basin. Final report submitted to the St Johns River Water Management District. Contract No. 98B368. St Johns River Water Management District. Palatka, Florida

  • Ribaudo M, Hansen L, Hellerstein D, Greene C (2008) The use of markets to increase private investment in environmental stewardship. Economic Research Report No. ERR-64. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, DC

  • Richardson CJ, Qian SS (1999) Long-term phosphorus assimilative capacity in freshwater wetlands: a new paradigm for sustaining ecosystem structure and function. Environ Sci Technol 33(10):1545–1551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder E (2007) A range of cost-effective strategies for reducing nitrogen contributions from onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems. Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs, Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Health

  • Russell M, Greening H (2015) Estimating benefits in a recovering estuary: Tampa Bay, Florida. Estuaries Coasts 38(Suppl 1):S9–S18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed T, Sun G (2012) A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J Environ Manag 11:429–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartain JB (1988) Fertility considerations for sod production. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ss164

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Primer for municipal wastewater treatment systems (EPA 832-R-04-001). Office of Water, Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/primer.pdf

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008) Municipal nutrient removal technologies reference document (Vol. 1, EPA 832-R-08-006). http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/upload/mnrt-volume1.pdf

  • Woltermade CJ (2000) Ability of restored wetlands to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in agricultural drainage water. J Soil Water Conserv 55(3):303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright D, Marois J, Rich J, Sprenkel R (2004) Field corn production guide. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag202

  • Wright DL, Blunt AR, Barnett RD, Mackowiak CL, Dufault N, Marois J (2007) Management considerations for wheat production in Florida. University of Florida Department of Agronomy, EDIS. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag293

  • Yang YY, Toor GS (2017) Sources and mechanisms of nitrate and orthophosphate transport in urban stormwater runoff from residential catchments. Water Res 112:176–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by funding from the Saint Johns River Water Management District (contract #27,884), facilitated by the University of North Florida. We would like to thank Kim Ponzio of the SJR Water Management District and Mark Middlebrook and Andrea Conover of the Saint Johns River Alliance for helping us in our fieldwork. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions significantly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Saint Johns River Water Management District (contract #27884), facilitated by the University of North Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Widney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Widney, S., Kanabrocki Klein, A., Ehman, J. et al. The value of wetlands for water quality improvement: an example from the St. Johns River watershed, Florida. Wetlands Ecol Manage 26, 265–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9569-4

Keywords

Navigation