Abstract
The study focuses on the uncertainty quantification and bias correction of hydrological projections using Bayesian applications. The climate change impact assessment on streamflow has been done using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model in Bharathapuzha river basin, India. The uncertainty quantification has been done by using Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) algorithm and the ensemble spread in the streamflow projections is quantified as the total uncertainty. A Hierarchical Bayesian Algorithm is adopted in the current study to remove the systematic bias in the projections of extreme streamflow. The approach established a probabilistic correction to the projected streamflow based on the biases in daily scale hindcast streamflow simulations with the corresponding observed historical streamflow data. The procedure is applied to the ensemble streamflow predictions for the Bharathapuzha catchment and over 10 times reduction in RMSE is observed in the bias corrected streamflow. The skill of the procedure in correcting the streamflow across different terciles is studied using the concept of reliability and significant improvement is observed in the reliability of high and medium flow ranges. The average width of the ensemble streamflow simulation band for the period 2021–2030 is seen to reduce from 5560 cumec to 2188 cumec after the correction procedure is applied.
Highlight
-
The parametric uncertainty in the streamflow projection is accounted by calibrating the hydrological model using the GLUE procedure.
-
A Hierarchical Bayesian approach has been adopted for bias correction of the streamflow projections.
-
A higher reliability is observed in the bias-corrected streamflow, especially in high and medium flow ranges.
-
The average width of the ensemble streamflow simulation band has reduced from 5560 cumec to 2188 cumec after the bias correction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aadhar S, Swain S, Rath DR (2019) Application and Performance Assessment of SWAT Hydrological Model over Kharun River Basin, Chhattisgarh, India. World Environmental and Water resources Congress 2019. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 272–280
Aawar T, Khare D (2020) Assessment of climate change impacts on streamflow through hydrological model using SWAT model: a case study of Afghanistan. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:1427–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00759-0
Abbaspour KC, Vejdani M, Haghighat S (2000) SWAT-CUP calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 43:1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.3000
Aloui S, Mazzoni A, Elomri A et al (2023) A review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) studies of Mediterranean catchments: applications, feasibility, and future directions. J Environ Manage 326:116799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116799
Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW et al (2012) SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55:1491–1508
Athira P, Nanda C, Sudheer KP (2018) A computationally efficient method for uncertainty analysis of SWAT model simulations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1538-9
Bastola S, Ishidaira H, Takeuchi K (2008) Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty: a case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe. J Hydrol 357:188–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.007
Bastola S, Murphy C, Sweeney J (2011) The role of hydrological modelling uncertainties in climate change impact assessments of Irish river catchments. Adv Water Resour 34:562–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.008
Bennett A, Stein A, Cheng Y et al (2022) A process-conditioned and spatially consistent method for reducing systematic biases in modeled streamflow. J Hydrometeorol 23:769–783. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0174.1
Bergstrom S (1991) Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling. Nord Hydrol 22:123–136. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1991.0009
Beven K (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology — the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol 105:157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7
Beven K (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320:18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305
Breach PA, Simonovic SP, Yang Z (2016) Global Climate Model Selection for Analysis of Uncertainty in Climate Change Impact assessments of Hydro-climatic extremes. Am J Clim Chang 05:502–525. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2016.54036
Bruno F, Cocchi D, Greco F, Scardovi E (2014) Spatial reconstruction of rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0812-0
Chen X, Hao Z, Devineni N, Lall U (2014) Climate information based streamflow and rainfall forecasts for Huai River basin using hierarchical bayesian modeling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1539-2014
Chen H, Cifelli ROB, Chandrasekar V, Ma Y (2019) A flexible bayesian approach to bias correction of radar-derived precipitation estimates over complex terrain: Model design and initial verification. J Hydrometeorol 20:2367–2382. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0136.1
Chen Y, Wang L, Shi X et al (2023) Impact of Climate Change on the hydrological regimes of the Midstream section of the Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin Based on SWAT Model. Water (Switzerland) 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040685
Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24:1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7568
Dams J, Nossent J, Senbeta TB et al (2015) Multi-model approach to assess the impact of climate change on runoff. J Hydrol 529:1601–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.023
Drissia TK (2019) Spatial and temporal variation of water stress in Bharathapuzha River Basin, Kerala, India. J Inst Eng Ser A 100:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0336-1
Gardini A, Trivisano C, Fabrizi E (2020) Bayesian inference for quantiles of the log-normal distribution. Biometrical J 62:1997–2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900386
George J, Athira P (2022) Process informed selection of climate models for climate change impact assessment in the Western Coast of India. Theor Appl Climatol 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04197-z
George J, Athira P (2023) A multi-stage Stochastic Approach for Statistical Downscaling of Rainfall. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03615-9
George J, Athira P (2024) A model output statistic-based probabilistic approach for statistical downscaling of temperature. Theor Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-04860-7
Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W (2009) Climate change impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int J Climatol 29:1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1828
Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
Hashino T, Bradley AA, Schwartz SS (2007) Evaluation of bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:939–950. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-939-2007
Hattermann FF, Vetter T, Breuer L et al (2018) Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment: a cross-scale study. Environ Res Lett 13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9938
Herrera PA, Marazuela MA, Hofmann T (2022) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis in hydrological modeling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 9:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1569
Hunt KMR, Fletcher JK (2019) The relationship between Indian monsoon rainfall and low-pressure systems. Clim Dyn 53:1859–1871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04744-x
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis WGI
John J, Chithra NR, Thampi SG (2019) Prediction of land use/cover change in the Bharathapuzha river basin, India using geospatial techniques. Environ Monit Assess 191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7482-4
Jones RN (2000) Managing uncertainty in climate change projections - issues for impact assessment: an editorial comment. Clim Change 45:403–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005551626280
Kim TJ, Kwon HH, Lima C (2018) A bayesian partial pooling approach to mean field bias correction of weather radar rainfall estimates: application to Osungsan weather radar in South Korea. J Hydrol 565:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.082
Kimani MW, Hoedjes JCB, Su Z (2018) Bayesian Bias correction of satellite rainfall estimates for climate studies. Remote Sens 10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071074
Li C, Fang H (2021) Assessment of climate change impacts on the streamflow for the Mun River in the Mekong Basin, Southeast Asia: using SWAT model. CATENA 201:105199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105199
Lima CHR, Lall U (2010) Spatial scaling in a changing climate: a hierarchical bayesian model for non-stationary multi-site annual maximum and monthly streamflow. J Hydrol 383:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.045
Loveland TR, Reed BC, Ohlen DO et al (2000) Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens 21:1303–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210191
Lozano JS, Bustamante GR, Hales RC et al (2021) A streamflow bias correction and performance evaluation web application for geoglows ecmwf streamflow services. Hydrology 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/HYDROLOGY8020071
Ma Y, Chandrasekar V (2021) A hierarchical bayesian Approach for Bias correction of NEXRAD Dual-Polarization Rainfall estimates: Case Study on Hurricane Irma in Florida. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 18:568–572. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.2983041
Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. J Am Stat Assoc 46:68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2280095
Mehrishi P, Kundu A, Thakur IS (2022) An Appraisal of Kerala Flood-2019. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 50:1563–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-022-01544-5
Mishra V, Shah HL (2018) Hydroclimatological Perspective of the Kerala Flood of 2018. J Geol Soc India 92:645–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-1079-3
Mohsen Hassan Abdalla E, Alfredsen K, Merete Muthanna T (2022) Towards improving the calibration practice of conceptual hydrological models of extensive green roofs. J Hydrol 607:127548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127548
Nachtergaele F, Velthuizen H, Van, Verelst L (2023) Harmonized World Soil Database version 2.0. FAO; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA);
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR et al (2002) Soil and Water Assessment Tool user’s Manual. TWRI Rep TR-192 412
Pai DS, Sridhar L, Rajeevan M et al (2014) Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25° × 0.25°) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam 65:1–18
Pokhrel P, Robertson DE, Wang QJ (2013) A bayesian joint probability post-processor for reducing errors and quantifying uncertainty in monthly streamflow predictions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:795–804. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-795-2013
Pratt JW, Gibbons JD (1981) Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two-Sample Tests. pp 318–344
Ravindranath A, Devineni N, Lall U et al (2019) Streamflow Reconstruction in the Upper Missouri River Basin Using a novel bayesian network model. Water Resour Res 55:7694–7716. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024901
Reggiani P, Renner M, Weerts AH, Van Gelder PAHJM (2009) Uncertainty assessment via bayesian revision of ensemble streamflow predictions in the operational river Rhine forecasting system. Water Resour Res 45:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006758
Rehana S, Mujumdar PP (2014) Basin Scale Water resources systems modeling under cascading uncertainties. Water Resour Manag 28:3127–3142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0659-2
Reuter HI, Nelson A, Jarvis A (2007) An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21:983–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169899
Samavati A, Babamiri O, Rezai Y, Heidarimozaffar M (2023) Investigating the effects of climate change on future hydrological drought in mountainous basins using SWAT model based on CMIP5 model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37:849–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02319-7
Schepen A, Zhao T, Wang QJ, Robertson DE (2018) A bayesian modelling method for post-processing daily sub-seasonal to seasonal rainfall forecasts from global climate models and evaluation for 12 Australian catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1615-2018
Schneider SH, Kuntz-Duriseti K (2002) Uncertainty and climate change policy. Clim Chang Policy Surv 53–87
Schoups G, Van De Giesen NC, Savenije HHG (2008) Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction. Water Resour Res 44:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006836
Setegn SG, Srinivasan R, Melesse AM, Dargahi B (2009) SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7457. Hydrol Process 2274:n/a-n/a
Shen M, Chen J, Zhuan M et al (2018) Estimating uncertainty and its temporal variation related to global climate models in quantifying climate change impacts on hydrology. J Hydrol 556:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.004
Smith MD (2011) The ecological role of climate extremes: current understanding and future prospects. J Ecol 99:651–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01833.x
Sreelatha K, AnandRaj P (2022) Regional evaluation of global climate models for precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature over southern-part of India. ISH J Hydraul Eng 28:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1779137
Srivastava AK, Rajeevan M, Kshirsagar SR (2009) Development of a high resolution daily gridded temperature data set (1969–2005) for the Indian region. Atmos Sci Lett 248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.232. :n/a-n/a
Tang X, Zhang J, Wang G et al (2021) Uncertainty analysis of swat modeling in the lancang river basin using four different algorithms. Water (Switzerland) 13:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030341
Taye MT, Ntegeka V, Ogiramoi NP, Willems P (2011) Assessment of climate change impact on hydrological extremes in two source regions of the Nile River Basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:209–222. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-209-2011
Thirel G, Andréassian V, Perrin C (2015) On the need to test hydrological models under changing conditions. Hydrol Sci J 60:1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1050027
Towler E, Rajagopalan B, Summers RS, Yates D (2010) An approach for probabilistic forecasting of seasonal turbidity threshold exceedance. Water Resour Res 46:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007834
Varughese A, Hajilal G (2017) Analysis of historical Climate Change trends in Bharathapuzha River Basin, Kerala, India. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 16:237–242
Viola MR, de Mello CR, Chou SC et al (2015) Assessing climate change impacts on Upper Grande River Basin hydrology, Southeast Brazil. Int J Climatol 35:1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4038
Wang QJ, Robertson DE, Chiew FHS (2009) A bayesian joint probability modeling approach for seasonal forecasting of streamflows at multiple sites. Water Resour Res 45:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007355
Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004065
Wu L, Liu X, Chen J et al (2022) Overcoming equifinality: time-varying analysis of sensitivity and identifiability of SWAT runoff and sediment parameters in an arid and semiarid watershed. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:31631–31645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18573-9
Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC et al (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J Hydrol 358:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012
Yoshida T, Hanasaki N, Nishina K et al (2022) Inference of parameters for a global hydrological model: identifiability and predictive uncertainties of climate-based parameters. Water Resour Res 58. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030660
Zhao F, Wu Y, Qiu L et al (2018) Parameter uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model in a mountain-loess transitional watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Water (Switzerland) 10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060690
Zhong R, Zhao T, He Y, Chen X (2019) Hydropower change of the water tower of Asia in 21st century: a case of the Lancang River hydropower base, upper Mekong. Energy 179:685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.059
Funding
The current study is funded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India under the INSPIRE Faculty scheme [DST/INSPIRE/04/2015/000382].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both the authors contributed to the study conception and design. The development and implementation of the methodology, analysis of the results and draft of the manuscript was prepared by Jose George. The supervision of the study and finalization of the manuscript was done by Athira.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
George, J., Athira, P. Bayesian Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Bias Correction of Projected Streamflow in Climate Change Impact Assessment. Water Resour Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03876-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03876-y