Abstract
An effective urban drainage system (UDS) is crucial for solving urban flooding problems, motivating plenty of studies to design, build and rehabilitate UDSs. However, the existing design and analysis methods usually assume a uniformly spatial distribution of rainfall intensity throughout an urban catchment, while there is an observably spatial variation of rainfall intensity (SVRI) in most practical systems, especially for short-duration storms and/or large-scale catchments. The assumption ignoring SVRI might fully or partially underestimate the runoffs locally and thus increase the partial flooding risks for the UDS designed under uniformly spatial rainfall distribution. To address this issue, this paper proposes an improved framework with two spatially variable rainfall models (SVRMs) to evaluate the impacts of SVRI on urban flooding. In this proposed framework, four aspects of improvements have been implemented: (i) both SVRMs are derived from the spatially uniform hyetographs to ensure the same total precipitation volume; (ii) both SVRMs utilize the density function of truncated two-dimensional Gaussian distribution to approximate the pattern of SVRI; (iii) different characteristics of SVRI are quantified in these two SVRMs respectively, and (iv) the Monte Carlo method is adopted to implement the uncertainty of rainfall intensity in SVRMs. Besides, two real-world UDSs of different configurations and scales are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed framework. The application results show that the SVRI could significantly aggravate urban flooding risk including flooding duration and volume, and the impact patterns may vary with the characteristics of UDSs. The results and findings of this study also indicate the importance of taking SVRI into consideration in UDS design and flooding assessment practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg P, Moseley C, Haerter JO (2013) Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nat Geosci 6:181. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1731
Bruni G, Reinoso R, Van De Giesen NC, Clemens F, Ten Veldhuis JAE (2015) On the sensitivity of urban hydrodynamic modelling to rainfall spatial and temporal resolution. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(2):691–709. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015
Burkardt J (2014) The truncated normal distribution. Department of Scientific Computing Website, Florida State University 1:35
Butler D, Digman C, Makropoulos C, Davies JW (2018) Urban drainage. Crc Press
Cristiano E, ten Veldhuis M-C, Van De Giesen N (2017) Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and their effects on hydrological response in urban areas–a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(7):3859–3878
Duan H-F, Li F, Tao T (2016) Multi-objective optimal design of detention tanks in the urban stormwater drainage system: uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Water Resour Manag 30(7):2213–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1282-1
Fiori A, Volpi E (2020) On the effectiveness of LID infrastructures for the attenuation of urban flooding at the catchment scale. Water Resour Res 56(5):e2020WR027121. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr027121
Gires A et al (2012) Quantifying the impact of small scale unmeasured rainfall variability on urban runoff through multifractal downscaling: A case study. J Hydrol 442:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.005
Gironás J, Roesner LA, Rossman LA, Davis J (2010) A new applications manual for the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Environ Model Softw 25(6):813–814
Gulbaz S, Kazezyilmaz-Alhan CM (2017) Experimental Investigation on Hydrologic Performance of LID with Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention System. J Hydrol Eng 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001450
Li Y et al (2017) Seeking urbanization security and sustainability: Multi-objective optimization of rainwater harvesting systems in China. J Hydrol 550:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.042
Lin RZ, Zheng FF, Savic D, Zhang QZ, Fang XG (2020) Improving the effectiveness of multiobjective optimization design of urban drainage systems. Water Resources Research 56(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026656
Martinez C, Sanchez A, Toloh B, Vojinovic Z (2018) Multi-objective evaluation of urban drainage networks using a 1D/2D flood inundation model. Water Resour Manag 32(13):4329–4343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2054-x
Mugume SN, Butler D (2017) Evaluation of functional resilience in urban drainage and flood management systems using a global analysis approach. Urban Water J 14(7):727–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2016.1253754
Muller CL et al (2015) Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential. Int J Climatol 35(11):3185–3203. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4210
Nedergaard Pedersen A et al (2021) The Bellinge data set: open data and models for community-wide urban drainage systems research. Earth Syst Sci Data 13(10):4779–4798. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4779-2021
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
Ochoa-Rodriguez S et al (2015) Impact of spatial and temporal resolution of rainfall inputs on urban hydrodynamic modelling outputs: A multi-catchment investigation. J Hydrol 531:389–407
QGIS Development Team (2022) QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association
Rossman L (2015) Storm water management model user’s manual version 5.1—manual. US EPA Office of Research Development, EPA: Washington, DC, USA
Saharia M et al (2021) On the impact of rainfall spatial variability, geomorphology, and climatology on flash floods. Water Resour Res 57(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029124
Schilling W (1991) Rainfall data for urban hydrology: what do we need? Atmos Res 27(1–3):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(91)90003-f
Smith BK, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Villarini G, Wright DB (2013) Spectrum of storm event hydrologic response in urban watersheds. Water Resour Res 49(5):2649–2663. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20223
Vojinovic Z et al (2014) Multi-objective rehabilitation of urban drainage systems under uncertainties. J Hydroinf 16(5):1044–1061. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.223
Wang Q, Zhou Q, Lei X, Savic DA (2018) Comparison of multiobjective optimization methods applied to urban drainage adaptation problems. J Water Res Plan Manag 144(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000996
Westra S, Sisson SA (2011) Detection of non-stationarity in precipitation extremes using a max-stable process model. J Hydrol 406(1–2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.014
Willems P, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Olsson J, Nguyen VTV (2012) Climate change impact assessment on urban rainfall extremes and urban drainage: Methods and shortcomings. Atmos Res 103:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.04.003
Wright DB, Smith JA, Villarini G, Baeck ML (2014) Long-term high-resolution radar rainfall fields for urban hydrology. J Am Water Resour Assoc 50(3):713–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12139
Yang L, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Zhang Y (2016) Flash flooding in small urban watersheds: Storm event hydrologic response. Water Resour Res 52(6):4571–4589. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr018326
Yavari F, Neyshabouri SAS, Yazdi J, Molajou A, Brysiewicz A (2022) A novel framework for urban flood damage assessment. Water Resour Manag 36(6):1991–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03122-3
Yen BC (1992) Dimensionally homogeneous manning’s formula. J Hydraul Eng 118(9):1326–1332. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1326)
Zhang Y, Smith JA (2003) Space-time variability of rainfall and extreme flood response in the Menomonee River Basin, Wisconsin. J Hydrometeorol 4(3):506–517. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004_0506:Svorae_2.0.Co;2
Zheng F, Westra S, Leonard M (2015) Opposing local precipitation extremes. Nat Clim Change 5:389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2579
Zhu Z, Wright DB, Yu G (2018) The impact of rainfall space-time structure in flood frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 54(11):8983–8998. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023550
Zoccatelli D, Borga M, Zanon F, Antonescu B, Stancalie G (2010) Which rainfall spatial information for flash flood response modelling? A numerical investigation based on data from the Carpathian range, Romania. J Hydrol 394(1–2):148–161
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922096, 52179080), and Excellent Youth Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LR19E080003).
Funding
This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922096, 52179080), the Excellent Youth Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LR19E080003), and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (1-ZVR5 and 4-ZZNF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ruozhou Lin and Feifei Zheng. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ruozhou Lin and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, R., Zheng, F., Ma, Y. et al. Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment. Water Resour Manage 36, 5655–5673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8