Skip to main content
Log in

Combining Radial Basis Function Neural Network Models and Inclusive Multiple Models for Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important issue in water engineering is predicting suspended sediment load (SSL). For the Telar River and its tributaries, this study employs an inclusive multiple model (IMM) to predict SSL. Telar River branches into two main branches: Telar and Kasilian. The modeling process consisted of two levels: 1) creating hybrid models and 2) creating ensemble models. At the first level, the Honeybadger optimization algorithm (HBOA), salp swarm algorithm (SSA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) were applied to set the parameters of the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) models. The IMM model was used to integrate the outputs of the RBFNN-HBOA, RBFNN-SSA, RBFNN-PSO, and RBFNN models into the RBFNN model at the second level. Inputs to the models included lagged rainfall, discharge, and SSL. Several new ideas have been introduced in the current paper, including hybrid RBFNN models, a gamma test for selecting optimal input combinations, an analysis of output uncertainty, and an advanced IMM for SSL prediction. Various performance evaluation criteria, including root mean square error (RMSE), Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and percentage bias (PBIAS), were used to evaluate the models. The comparative results indicated high accuracy of IMM with an MAE of 0.983, NSE of 0.254, PBIAS of 0.991 at Telar station. The training MAE of the IMM model was 4.4%, 4.8%, 6.7%, 52%, and 9.2% lower than that of the RBFNN-HBOA, RBFNN-SSA, RBFNN-PSO, and RBFNN models at Kasilian station. The study results revealed that the IMM and RBFNN-HBOA provided lower uncertainty than the other RBFNN models. Thus, the IMM model represents the most accurate estimation of SSL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from first author on reasonable request.

References

  • Afan HA, El-Shafie A, Yaseen ZM, Hameed MM, Wan Mohtar WHM, Hussain A (2015) ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0870-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlDahoul N, Essam Y, Kumar P, Ahmed AN, Sherif M, Sefelnasr A, Elshafie A (2021) Suspended sediment load prediction using long short-term memory neural network. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87415-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azamathulla HM, Cuan YC, Ghani AA, Chang CK (2013) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: GEP approach. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0608-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banadkooki FB, Ehteram M, Ahmed AN, Teo FY, Ebrahimi M, Fai CM, El-Shafie A (2020) Suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural network and ant lion optimization algorithm. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(30):38094–38116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darabi H, Mohamadi S, Karimidastenaei Z, Kisi O, Ehteram M, ELShafie A, Torabi Haghighi A (2021) Prediction of daily suspended sediment load (SSL) using new optimization algorithms and soft computing models. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05721-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehteram M, Ahmed AN, Latif SD, Huang YF, Alizamir M, Kisi O, El-Shafie A (2021) Design of a hybrid ANN multi-objective whale algorithm for suspended sediment load prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(2):1596–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emamgholizadeh S, Demneh RK (2019) A comparison of artificial intelligence models for the estimation of daily suspended sediment load: a case study on the Telar and Kasilian rivers in Iran. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essam Y, Huang YF, Birima AH, Ahmed AN, El-Shafie A (2022) Predicting suspended sediment load in Peninsular Malaysia using support vector machine and deep learning algorithms. Sci Rep 12(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhi A, Farzin S, Mousavi SF (2021) Meteorological drought analysis in response to climate change conditions, based on combined four-dimensional vine copulas and data mining (VC-DM). J Hydrol 603:127135

  • Ghose DK (2018) Prediction of suspended sediment load using radial basis neural network. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7566-7_60

  • Haji MS, Darzi SG, Najafpour G (2016) Lighvan Chay river suspended sediment load forecasting: application of wavelet and RBF-ANN. Linnaeus Eco-Tech 261–261

  • Hashim FA, Houssein EH, Hussain K, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W (2022) Honey Badger Algorithm: New metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Math Comput Simul. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil-Masir H, Fattahi R, Ghanbari-Adivi E, Asadi Aghbolaghi M, Ehteram M, Ahmed AN, El-Shafie A (2022) An inclusive multiple model for predicting total sediment transport rate in the presence of coastal vegetation cover based on optimized kernel extreme learning models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–34

  • Khatibi R, Ghorbani MA, Pourhosseini FA (2017) Stream flow predictions using nature-inspired Firefly Algorithms and a Multiple Model strategy–Directions of innovation towards next generation practices. Adv Eng Inform 34:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Pandey A, Sharma N, Flügel WA (2016) Daily suspended sediment simulation using machine learning approach. Catena. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang G, Panahi F, Ahmed AN, Ehteram M, Band SS, Elshafie A (2021) Predicting municipal solid waste using a coupled artificial neural network with Archimedes optimisation algorithm and socioeconomic components. J Clean Prod 315:128039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Huang G, Šimůnek J, Xu X, Xiong Y, Huang Q (2021) Comparison of ensemble data assimilation methods for the estimation of time-varying soil hydraulic parameters. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Ahmad S, McClain ME, Wang X, Lim YH (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: an artificial neural network approach. Agric Water Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshram SG, Singh VP, Kisi O, Karimi V, Meshram C (2020) Application of artificial neural networks, support vector machine and multiple model-ANN to sediment yield prediction. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02672-8

  • Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp Swarm Algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeeni H, Bonakdari H (2018) Impact of normalization and input on ARMAX-ANN model performance in suspended sediment load prediction. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1842-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nhu VH, Khosravi K, Cooper JR, Karimi M, Kisi O, Pham BT, Lyu Z (2020) Monthly suspended sediment load prediction using artificial intelligence: testing of a new random subspace method. Hydrol Sci J. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1754419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Molajou A, Tajbakhsh AD, Najafi H (2019) A Wavelet based data mining technique for suspended sediment load modeling. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02216-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panahi F, Ehteram M, Emami M (2021) Suspended sediment load prediction based on soft computing models and Black Widow Optimization Algorithm using an enhanced gamma test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(35):48253–48273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Jaafari A, Nguyen-Thoi T, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Satyam N, Masroor M, Rehman S, Sajjad H, Sahana M, Van Le H, Prakash I (2021) Ensemble machine learning models based on Reduced Error Pruning Tree for prediction of rainfall-induced landslides. Int J Digital Earth. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1860145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saggi MK, Jain S, Bhatia AS, Sharda R (2022) Proposition of new ensemble data-intelligence model for evapotranspiration process simulation. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 1–17

  • Seifi A, Riahi H (2020) Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using hybrid gamma test-least square support vector machine, gamma test-ANN, and gamma test-ANFIS models in an arid area of Iran. J Water Clim Change 11(1):217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastav RK, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2007) A simplified approach to quantifying predictive and parametric uncertainty in artificial neural network hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 43(10):W10407. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005352

  • Stefansson A, Koncar N, Jones AJ (1997) A note on the gamma test. Neural Comput Appl 5(3):131–133

  • Tao H, Keshtegar B, Yaseen ZM (2019) The feasibility of integrative radial basis M5Tree predictive model for river suspended sediment load simulation. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02378-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toriman E, Jaafar O, Maru R, Arfan A, Ahmar AS (2018) Daily suspended sediment discharge prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (vol. 954, no. 1). IOP Publishing, p 012030

  • Wu Y, Xie P, Dahlak A (2021) Utilization of radial basis function neural network model for water production forecasting in seawater greenhouse units. Energy Rep 7:6658–6676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Medellín-Azuara J, Escriva-Bou A, Liu Z (2021) Bayesian machine learning ensemble approach to quantify model uncertainty in predicting groundwater storage change. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahiri J, Mollaee Z, Ansari MR (2020) Estimation of suspended sediment concentration by M5 model tree based on hydrological and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02577-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanking the reviewers for their thorough work and helpful comments, the author is also grateful to the https://data.gov.uk/ website’s admin for free providing the part of data for this research

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Shahrekord, Iran. The financial support of this organization is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualisation: Mohammad Ehteram; Methodology: Mohammad Ehteram, Alireza Farrokhi, ZohrehSheikh Khozani, Formal analysis and investigation: Mohammad Ehteram, Elham Ghanbari-Adivi, Writing original draft preparation: Mohammad Ehteram, Elham Ghanbari-Adivi.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Ghanbari-Adivi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

All authors have given consent to their contribution.

Consent for Publish

All authors have agreed with the content and all have given explicit consent to publish.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghanbari-Adivi, E., Ehteram, M., Farrokhi, A. et al. Combining Radial Basis Function Neural Network Models and Inclusive Multiple Models for Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads. Water Resour Manage 36, 4313–4342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03256-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03256-4

Keywords

Navigation