Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Strategies for Agricultural Water Management of Large Irrigation and Drainage Networks with Fuzzy MCDM

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable water resources management aims at increasing the efficient use of water and achieving food security. This work proposes a generalized novel spatial fuzzy strategic planning (SFSP) in combination with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) and a conceptual agricultural water use model for determining sustainable agricultural water management strategies. The proposed framework is applied to an irrigation and drainage network in Iran, which constitutes a large-scale water resource system. A spatial strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) analysis of internal and external factors related to agricultural water management is applied in this work. Possible water management strategies were ranked with the MCDM approach that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Fuzzy technique for order-preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The AHP estimates the criteria weights and the TOPSIS model prioritizes the agricultural water management strategies. The results of SWOT analysis show that the final scores of the internal and external factors are equal to 2.9 and 2.73, respectively. Accordingly, the most attractive strategic type is a SO (aggressive) strategy, and a combination of structural and non-structural strategies (SO, ST, and WO strategies) are the top-ranked ones. Proposed strategies for water supply and demand management are the development and rehabilitation of the physical structure of water resources system of irrigation network, improvement of operation management and maintenance of water resources system, wastewater management, and inter-basin water transfer within the irrigation network. The results indicate that the total annual volume of agricultural water under normal conditions is about 1.8 billion cubic meters, of which about 1707 million cubic meters (95%) issue from surface water sources and 90 million cubic meters (5%) from groundwater sources. The proposed model and the calculated results provide viable and effective solutions for the implementation of sustainable management of water resources and consumption in large-scale water resources systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abdallah M, Hamdan S, Shabib A (2020) Amulti-objective optimizationmodel forstrategic wastemanagementmaster plans. J Clean Prod 124714

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharjee TK, Hellegers P, Ludwig F, Halsema G, Mojid M, Terwisscha C (2020) Prioritization of adaptation measures for improved agricultural water management in Northwest Bangladesh. J Climatic Change 163:431–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afsordegan A (2015) A contribution to multi-criteria decision making in sustainable energy management based on fuzzy and qualitative reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, Univ of Politécnica de Catalunya, Department of Project Engineering, SPAIN

  • Akbari-Alashti H, Bozorg-Haddad O, Fallah-Mehdipour E, Mariño MA (2014) Multi-reservoir real-time operation rules: a new genetic programming approach. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manag 167(10):561–576. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.13.00021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamanos A, Latinopoulos D, Loukas A, Mylopoulos N (2020) Comparing two hydro-economic approaches for multi-objective agricultural water resources planning. J Water Resour Manag 34:4511–4526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin SH, Razmi J, Zhang G (2011) Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming. J Expert Syst Appl 38:334–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaeian F, Delavar M, Morid S, Srinivasan R (2021) Robust climate change adaptation pathways in agricultural water management. J Agric Water Manag 252:106904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaesmailli M, Arbabshirani B, Golmah V (2012) Integrating analytical network process and fuzzy logic to prioritize the strategies – a case study for tile manufacturing firm. J Expert Syst 39:925–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccour S, Albiac J, Kahil T, Esteban E, Crespo D, Dinar A (2021) Hydroeconomic modeling for assessing water scarcity and agricultural pollution abatement policies in the Ebro River Basin, Spain. J Clean Prod 327:129459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskent E (2021) Assessment and improvement strategies of sustainable land management (SLM) planning initiative in Turkey. J Sci Total Environ 797:149183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner R, Rauter R (2016) Strategic perspective of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. J Clean Prod 141(1):81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozorg-Haddad O, Moradi-Jalal M, Mirmomeni M, Kholghi MKH, Mariño MA (2009) Optimal cultivation rules in multi-crop irrigation areas. Irrig Drain 58(1):38–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad C, Usman M, Schönbrodt-Stitt S (2020) Remote sensing-based assessments of land use, soil and vegetation status, crop production and water use in irrigation systems of the Aral Sea Basin. J Water Secur 11:100078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David FR (2011) Strategic management: concepts and cases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drisya J, Sathish Kumar D (2022) Evaluation of the drought management measures in a semi-arid agricultural watershed. J Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02079-4

  • Garcia LE (2008) Integrated water resources management: A small step for conceptualists, a giant step for practitioners. J Water Rerour Dev 24(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DA, Farinosi F (2020) Assessing development and climate variability impacts on water resources in the Zambezi River basin. Simulating future scenarios of climate and development. J Hydrol 32:100763

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Demirel NC, Demirel T (2007) Prioritization of e-Government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. J Inf Syst 16:284–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajanus M, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J (2012) Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis: lessons learnt in strategic natural resource management. J For Policy Econ 20:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamran M, Fazal MR, Mudassar M (2019) Towards empowerment of the renewable energy sector in Pakistan for sustainable energy evolution: SWOT analysis. J Renew Energy 146:543–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamian F, Mirakzadeh A, Azari A (2021) The water-energy-food nexus in farming: Managerial insights for a more efficient consumption of agricultural inputs. J Sustain Product Consump 27:1357–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Park S, JeongLee S, Shaimerdenova A, Kim J, Park E, Lee W, SunKim G, Kim N, HyungKim T, HeeLim C, Choi Y, KyunLee W (2021) J Disaster Risk Reduct 54:102056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang C, Huo Z (2020) Optimizing irrigation and drainage by considering agricultural hydrological process in arid farmland with shallow groundwater. J Hydrol 585:124785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (2000) Sustainable water resources management. Water Int. Taylor & Francis

  • Nyam YS, Kotir JH, Jordaan AJ, Ogundeji A (2021) Developing a conceptual model for sustainable water resource management and agricultural development: the Case of the Breede River Catchment Area. South Africa J Environ Manag 67:632–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Petousi I, Fountoulakis M, Papadaki A, Sabathianakis I, Daskalakis G, Nikolaidis N, Manios T (2017) Assessment of water management measures through SWOT analysis: the case of Crete Island, Greece. J Environ Sci 2:59–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Portoghese I, Giannoccaro G, Pagano A (2020) Modeling the impact of volumetric water pricing in irrigation districts with conjunctive use of water of surface and groundwater resources. J Agric Water Manag 244:106561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prato T (2009) Fuzzy adaptive management of social and ecological carrying capacities for protected areas. J Environ Manag 90(8):2551–2557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psomas A, Vryzidis I, Spyridakos A, Mimikou M (2021) MCDA approach for agricultural water management in the context of water–energy–land–food nexus. J Oper Res 21:689–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouillard J, Rinaudo J (2020) From State to user-based water allocations: An empirical analysis of institutions developed by agricultural user associations in France. J Agric Water Manag 239:106269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting. RWS Publication, USA, Resource Allocation

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadr SMK, Casal-Campos A, Butler D (2020) Strategic planning of the integrated urban wastewater system using adaptation pathways. J Water Res 182:116013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Verma R (2008) A new methodology for water resources multi–criteria decision making under uncertainty. J Phys Chem Earth 33(5):322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Deshmukh A (2018) Sustainable management of a river basin by integrating an improved fuzzy based hybridized SWOT model and geo-statistical weighted thematic overlay analysis. J Hydrol 563:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svekli M, Oztekin A, Uysal O, Torlak G, Turkyilmaz A, Delen D (2012) Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for airline industry in Turkey. J Expert Syst Appl 39:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler T, Nordbeck R, Seher W (2020) Cooperation in flood risk management: understanding the role of strategic planning in two Austrian policy instruments. J Environ Sci Policy 114:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J, Regan T, Hollings T, Amos N, Geary W, Parkes D, Hauser C, White M (2020) Spatial conservation action planning in heterogeneous landscapes. J Biol Conserv 250:108735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tziritis E, Panagopoulos A, Arampatzis G (2014) Development of an operational index of water quality (PoS) as a versatile tool to assist groundwater resources management and strategic planning. J Hydrol 517:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xu L, Solangi YA (2020) Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-fuzzy AHP approach. J Sustain Cities Soc 52:101861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe V, Takano S (2009) Application of combined SWOT and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for tourism revival strategic marketing planning: A Case of Sri Lanka tourism. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 8:954–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuebin L (2009) Study of multi–objective optimization and multi–attribute decision–making for economic and environmental power dispatch. J Electric Power Syst Res 79(5):789–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadeta D, Kebede A, Tessema N (2020) Climate change posed agricultural drought and potential of rainy season for effective agricultural water management, Kesem sub-basin, Awash Basin, Ethiopia. J Theor Appl Climatol 140:653–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Wang X, Kang J (2018) SWOT Analysis of the Development of Green Energy Industry in China: Taking Solar Energy Industry as an Example. Int Conf Green Energy Appl(ICGEA) 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Youzhi W, Alexander F, Ping G (2021) A model integrating the system dynamic model with the risk based two-stage stochastic robust programming model for agricultural-ecological water resources management. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 35:1953–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Iran’s National Science Foundation (INSF) for its support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ahmad Radmehr; Software, Formal analysis, Writing–Original Draft. Omid Bozorg-Haddad; Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration. Hugo A. Loáiciga; Validation, Writing–Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omid Bozorg-Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All authors accept all ethical approvals.

Consent to Participate

All authors consent to participate.

Consent for Publish

All authors consent to publish.

Competing Interests

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Agricultural water use in the irrigation management zones of the Sefidroud irrigation network (normal condition)
Table 6 Agricultural water use in the irrigation management zones of the Sefidroud irrigation network (dry condition)
Table 7 Internal SWOT factors and weighted ratings of factors (S = Strength; W = Weakness)
Table 8 External SWOT factors and weighted ratings of factors (O = Opportunity; T = Threat)
Table 9 Agricultural water management strategies by SWOT analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radmehr, A., Bozorg-Haddad, O. & Loáiciga, H.A. Developing Strategies for Agricultural Water Management of Large Irrigation and Drainage Networks with Fuzzy MCDM. Water Resour Manage 36, 4885–4912 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03192-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03192-3

Keywords

Navigation