Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing the Combined Effect of Barrier Wall and Freshwater Injection Countermeasures on Controlling Saltwater Intrusion in Unconfined Coastal Aquifer Systems

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freshwater recharge wells and underground flow barriers are among several methods proposed for controlling saltwater intrusion (SWI) into coastal aquifers. In this study, experimental and numerical studies were performed to determine the effect of using a flow barrier wall, a recharge well and a combination of these, to control SWI in unconfined coastal aquifer systems. The SEAWAT model was used to predict the SWI wedge and the behaviour of the retreating residual saltwater after installing the remediation measures. The results show that increasing the barrier wall embedment ratio (db/d) from 0.44 to 0.67 led to an increase in the repulsion ratio (R) from 20.8 to 46.87%. Moreover, increasing the freshwater injection rate ratio (Qi/Q) from 0.22 to 0.56 increased the repulsion ratio (R) from 10.93 to 22.39%. Barrier wall embedment with ratios (db/d) of 0.44, 0.51 and 0.57, combined with a freshwater injection ratio (Qi/Q) with a value of 0.56, achieved (R) of 41.14, 45.41 and 50.0%, compared with 20.8, 27.1 and 34.40% for the barrier wall only and 22.39% for freshwater injection only. Freshwater injection ratios (Qi/Q) of 0.22, 0.33, 0.44 and 0.56 combined with a barrier wall embedment ratio (db/d) of 0.508 achieved repulsion ratios (R) of 33.9, 36.5, 39.0 and 45.42%, compared with 10.9, 15.6, 18.8 and 22.4% respectively for freshwater injection only and 27.1% for the barrier wall only. A combination of flow barrier and freshwater injection forced the saltwater to retreat and achieved values of R greater than either the barrier wall or freshwater injection separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdoulhalik A, Ahmed AA (2017) The effectiveness of cutoff walls to control saltwater intrusion in multi-layered coastal aquifers: experimental and numerical study. J Environ Manag 199:62e73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdoulhalik A, Ashraf A, Hamill G (2017) A new physical barrier system for seawater intrusion control. J Hydrol 549:416e427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar H (1983) The effect of a subsurface barrier on the conservation of freshwater in coastal aquifers. Water Res 17:1257e1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanayake P, Sholley M (2007) Evaluation of the hydraulic gradient at an island for low-level nuclear waste disposal. IAHS Publ 312:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw- Hill Book Co., Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruington AE, Seares FD (1965) Operating a seawater barrier project. J Irrig Drain Eng 91(1):117–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SW, Clement TP (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics in flux-controlled groundwater systems. Water Resour Res 48:W09527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami RR, Clement TP (2007) Laboratory-scale investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics. Water Resour Res 43:W04418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Langevin CD (2002) User’s guide to SEAWAT: a computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow. U.S. Geol. Surv., Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Basri M (2001) Two new methods for optimal design of subsurface barrier to control seawater intrusion. PhD Thesis. The Univ. of Manitoba

  • Hunt B (1985) Some analytical solutions for seawater intrusion control with recharge wells. J Hydrol 80(1–2):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Ipcc

  • Luo P, Zhou M, Deng H, Lyu J, Cao W, Takara K, Nover D, Schladow SG (2018a) Impact of forest maintenance on water shortages: hydrologic modeling and effects of climate change. Sci Total Environ 615:1355–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo P, APIP, He B, Duan W, Takara K, Nover D (2018b) Impact assessment of rainfall scenarios and land-use change on hydrologic response using synthetic area IDF curves. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11:S84–S97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luyun RA (2010) Effects of subsurface physical barrier and artificial recharge on seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. PhD thesis. Kagoshima University, Japan

  • Luyun R Jr, Momii K, Nakagawa K (2009) Laboratory-scale saltwater behavior due to subsurface cutoff wall. J Hydrol 377:227e236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luyun R Jr, Momii K, Nakagawa K (2011) Effects of recharge wells and flow barriers on seawater intrusion. Ground Water 49(2):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack ODL (1976) A single-potential solution for regional interface problems in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 12(6):1165–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2017) Report to congress: class V UIC study fact sheet - aquifer recharge Wells and aquifer storage and recovery Wells, EPA/ 816-R-99-014t. Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank Prof Jiro Takemura in helping to fabricate the sand box model in Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Irrigation and Hydraulics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Asaad M. Armanuos

  2. Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Egypt

    Mona G. Ibrahim & Wael Elham Mahmod

  3. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt

    Wael Elham Mahmod

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Oookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan

    Jiro Takemura

  5. Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Oookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-0033, Japan

    C. Yoshimura

Authors
  1. Asaad M. Armanuos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mona G. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wael Elham Mahmod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiro Takemura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Yoshimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asaad M. Armanuos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15503 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armanuos, A.M., Ibrahim, M.G., Mahmod, W.E. et al. Analysing the Combined Effect of Barrier Wall and Freshwater Injection Countermeasures on Controlling Saltwater Intrusion in Unconfined Coastal Aquifer Systems. Water Resour Manage 33, 1265–1280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-2184-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-2184-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation