Skip to main content
Log in

Canopy Resistance and Actual Evapotranspiration over an Olive Orchard

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Τhis study evaluates the hourly actual evapotranspiration (AΕT), predicted either by the two modified Penman-Monteith models (PM) which take into account the canopy resistance (rc) from the Katerji-Perrier (KP) or Todorovic (TD) models, or the simplified PM model with zero rc, as proposed by Priestley and Taylor (PT). The evaluation is based on comparisons with experimental measurements of AΕT applying the ‘Bowen ratio’ method. Hourly experimental data, of air temperature, humidity, wind speed and radiation balance measurements, taken at a 0.5 ha olive orchard in the rural area of Sparta (37° 04΄ N, 22°05΄ E), during the period from June 2010 up to July 2014, are used. The rc estimated by KP model is parameterized by a semi-empirical approach which requires a simple calibration procedure, while rc from TD model is parameterized using a theoretical approach. For estimating AET from minimum data (air temperature, humidity and radiation balance components) the PT model is also employed, since rc is not required and the aerodynamic term of PM is taken into account in the empirical parameter of the model. The results show that PT and KP models are the most appropriate [Refined Index of Agreement (RIA) equal to 0.89 or 0.88, respectively] followed by the TD model (RIA = 0.78). PT or KP models underestimate AET by 9.3% or 9.8%, respectively, while TD model overestimates AET by 15.0%, increased up to 25.8%, during warm period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amazirh A, Er-Raki S, Chehbouni A, Rivalland V, Diarra A, Khabba S, Ezzahar J, Merlin O (2017) Modified Penman-Monteith equation for monitoring evapotranspiration of wheat crop: Relationship between the surface resistance and remotely sensed stress index. Biosyst Eng 164:68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98(6):899–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves I, Pereira LS (2000) Modelling surface resistance from climatic variables. Agric Water Manag 42:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyoub A, Khabba S, Er-Raki S, Merlin O, Bahlaoui A (2017) Calibration and validation of the Penman-Monteith Model for estimating evapotranspiration of an orange orchard in semi-arid region. Acta Hortic 1150:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berni JAJ, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Sepulcre-Cantó G, Fereres E, Villalobos F (2009) Mapping canopy conductance and CWSI in olive orchards using high resolution thermal remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Environ 113:2380–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongi G, Loreto F (1989) Gas-exchange properties of salt stressed Olive (OleaeuropeaL.) leaves. Plant Physiol 90:1408–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burba GG, Verma SB, Kim J (1999) Energy fluxes of an open water area in a mid-latitude prairie wetland. Bound-Layer Meteorol 91:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen IS (1926) The ratio of heat losses by conduction and evaporation from any water surface. Phys Rev 27:779–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE (1996) Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiol 16:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delta-T Devices, L. (2013). User manual of the Moisture meter type HH2 Ver. 4.0.1.UK

  • El-Sharkawy MA, Cock JH (1984) Water use efficiency of cassava. I. Effects of air humidity and water stress on stomatal conductance and gas exchange. Crop Sci 24:297–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sharkawy MA (1990) Effect of humidity and wind on leaf conductance of field grown cassava. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 2(2):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Er-Raki S, Chehbouni A, Hoedjes J, Ezzahar J, Duchemin B, Jacob F (2008) Improvement of FAO-56 method for olive orchads through sequential assimilation of thermal infrared-based estimates of ET. Agric Water Manag 95:309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JE, Moreno F, Giron IF, Blasquez OM (1997) Stomatal control of water use in olive tree leaves. Plant Soil 190:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JE, Moreno F, Martin-Aranda J (1993) Water status of olive trees under dry-farming and drip irrigation. Acta Hortic 335:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JB, De Biase TA, Qi Y, Xu M, Goldstein AH (2005) Evapotranspiration models compared on a Sierra Nevada forest ecosystem. Environ Model Softw 20:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint AL, Childs SW (1991) Use of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation equation for soil water limited conditions in a small forest clearcut. Agric For Meteorol 56:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangi JP, Garrigues C, Haberstock H, Forest F (1996) Evapotranspiration and stress indicator through Bowen ratio method. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling Proceedings of the International Conference, November 3–6, San Antonio, TX, pp 800–805

  • Gavin H, Agnew CA (2004) Modelling actual, reference and equilibrium evaporation from a temperate wet grassland. Hydrol Process 18(2):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández ADP, Cock JH, El-Sharkawy MA (1989) The responses of leaf gas exchange and stomatal conductance to air humidity in shade-grown coffee, tea and cacao plants as compared with sunflower. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 1(2):155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Perrier A (1983) A modélisation de l’évapotranspiration réelle d’uneparcelle de luzerne: rôle d’un coefficient cultural. Agronomie 3(6):513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Rana G (2006) Modelling evapotranspiration of six irrigated crops under Mediterranean climate conditions. Agric For Meteorol 138:142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Rana G, Fahed S (2011) Parameterizing canopy resistance using mechanistic and semi-empirical estimates of hourly evapotranspiration: critical evaluation for irrigated crops in the Mediterranean. Hydrol Process 25:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai T, Saitoh TM, Sato Y, Takahashi H, Manfroi OJ, Morooka T, Kuraji K, Suzuki M, Yasunari T, Komatsu H (2005) Annual water balance and seasonality of evapotranspiration in a Bornean tropical rain forest. Agric For Meteorol 128:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascano RJ, van Bavel CHM and Evett SR (2010) A field test of recursive calculation of crop evapotranspiration. TASABE 53:1117–1126

  • Lecina S, Martinez-Cob A, Perez FG, Villalobos FG, Baselga JJ (2003) Fixed versus bulk canopy resistance for reference evapotranspiration estimation using the Penman–Monteith equation under semiarid conditions. Agric Water Manag 60:181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li XW, Li ZY et al (2009) Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research. J Geophys Res 114:22103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhang L, Kang S, Tong L, Du T, Hao X, Zhao P (2015) Comparison of several surface resistance models for estimating crop evapotranspiration over the entire growing season in arid regions. Agric Water Manag 208:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XY, Lin ED (2005) Performance of the Priestley–Taylor equation in the semiarid climate of North China. Agric Water Manag 71:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield TA, Davies WJ (1981) Stomata and stomatal mechanisms. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Australia, pp 315–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Margonis A, Papaioannou G, Kerkides P, Bourazanis G (2017) Parameterization of “canopy resistance” and estimation of hourly latent heat flux over a crop. European Water 59:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Cob A, Faci JM (2010) Evapotranspiration of an hedge-pruned olive orchard in a semiarid area of NE Spain. Agric Water Manag 97(3):410–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelakis NIC, Vouyoucalou E, Clapaki G (1996) Water use and the soil moisture depletion by olive trees under different irrigation conditions. Agric Water Manag 29:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. In: Gogg GE (ed) The state and movement of water in living organism. Symp Soc Exp Biol 19:205–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmura A (1982) Objective criteria for rejecting data for Bowen ratio flux calculations. J Appl Meteorol 21(4):595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels VRN, Samson R (2006) Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland. Agric Water Manag 82:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Math Phys Eng Sci 193:120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez PJ, Castellvi F, Ibanez M, Rosell JI (1999) Assessment of reliability of Bowen ratio method for partitioning fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 97:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrier A (1975) Étude physique de l’ évapotranspiration dans les conditions naturelles: I. Évaporation et bilan d’ énergie des surfaces naturelles. Ann Agron 26:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterschmitt JM, Perrier A (1991) Evapotranspiration and canopy temperature of rice and groundnut in south-east Coastal India.Crop coefficient approach and relationship between evapotranspiration and canopy temperature. Agric For Meteorol 56:273–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, El Moujabber M (1994) Evapotranspiration and canopy resistance of grass in a Mediterranean region. Theor Appl Climatol 50(1–2):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, El Moujabber M (1997a) A model for predicting actual evapotranspiration under water stress conditions in a Mediterranean region. Theor Appl Climatol 56(1–2):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, El Moujabber M, Brisson N (1997b) Validation of a model of actual evapotranspiration for water stressed soybeans. Agric For Meteorol 86:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Perniola M (2001) Evapotranspiration of sweet sorghum: a general model and multilocal validity in semiarid environmental conditions. Water Resour Res 37(12):3237–3246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, de Lorenzi F (2005) Measurement and modeling of evapotranspiration of irrigated citrus orchard under Mediterranean conditions. Agric For Meteorol 128:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Lazzara P, Ferrara RM (2012) Operational determination of daily actual evapotranspiration of irrigated tomato crops under Mediterranean conditions by one-step and two-step models: Multiannual and local evaluations. Agric Water Manag 15:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N (2008) Direct and indirect methods to simulate the actual evapotranspiration of irrigated overhead table grape vineyard under Mediterranean conditions. Hydrol Process 22:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Lange OL, Buschbom U, Kappen L, Evenari M (1972) Stomatal responses to changes in humidity in plants growing in the desert. Planta 108:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Hall AE (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Zeigler H (eds) Encyclopedia Plant Physiol. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 181–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ (1993) Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi TT, Guan DX, Wang AZ, Wu JB, Jin CJ, Han SJ (2008) Comparison of three models to estimate evapotranspiration for a temperate mixed forest. Hydrol Process 22:3431–3443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Todorovic M, Caliandro A, Rubino P (2003) Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by the Penman–Monteith equation in southern Italy. Constant vs variable canopy resistance. Theor Appl Climatol 74:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart RB, Rouse WR (1977) Substantiation of the Priestley and Taylor parameter alpha D 1D26 for potential evaporation in high latitudes. J Appl Meteorol 16:649–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner DM, Jacobs JM (2005) Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 308:81–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner BD, Greene JP, Bingham GE (1987) A Bowen-ratio design for long term measurements. ASAE Paper No 87–2503. Am Soc Agric Eng. St. Joseph, MI, pp. 1–6

  • Thom AS (1972) Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 98:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom AS (1975) Momentum, mass and heat exchange of the plant communities. In: Vegetation and Atmosphere (eds) Monteith Academic Press, London: 57–109

  • Todd RW, Evett SR, Howell TA (2000) The Bowen ratio-energy balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated alfalfa evaluated in a semi-arid, advective environment. Agric For Meteorol 103:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic M (1999) Single- layer evapotranspiration model with variable canopy resistance. J Irrig Drain Eng 125:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utset A, Farre I, MartInez-Cob M, Cavero J (2004) Comparing Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor approaches as reference evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manag 66:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos FJ, Orgaz F, Testi L, Fereres E (2000) Measurement and modeling of evapotranspiration of olive (OleaeuropaeaL.) orchards. Eur J Agron 13:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu GF, Su YH, Li X et al (2014) Modelling evapotranspiration in an alpine grassland ecosystem on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Hydrol Process 28(3):610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Robeson SM, Matsuura K (2012) A refined index of model performance. Int J Climatol 32(13):2088–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Kang S, Li F, Zhang L (2008) Comparison of three evapotranspiration models to Bowen ratio-energy balance method for a vineyard in an arid desert region of northwest China. Agric For Meteorol 148:1629–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, the Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food and the former Prefecture of Laconia for funding the project are duly acknowledged. A previous shorter version of the paper has been presented in the 10th World Congress of EWRA “Panta Rei” Athens, Greece, 5-9 July 2017 and has been published in the European Water Journal (Margonis et al. 2017)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia Papaioannou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margonis, A., Papaioannou, G., Kerkides, P. et al. Canopy Resistance and Actual Evapotranspiration over an Olive Orchard. Water Resour Manage 32, 5007–5026 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2119-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2119-x

Keywords

Navigation