Skip to main content
Log in

TOPMODEL for Streamflow Simulation of a Tropical Catchment Using Different Resolutions of ASTER DEM: Optimization Through Response Surface Methodology

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unavailability of proper hydrological data quality combined with the complexity of most physical based hydrologic models limits research on rainfall-runoff relationships, particularly in the tropics. In this paper, an attempt has been made to use different resolutions of DEM generated from freely available 30 m-based ASTER imagery as primary input to the topographically-based hydrological (TOPMODEL) model to simulate the runoff of a medium catchment located in the tropics. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the most sensitive parameters for streamflow simulation. DEM resolutions from 30 to 300 m have been used to assess their effects on the topographic index distribution (TI) and TOPMODEL simulation. It is found that changing DEM resolutions reduces the TOPMODEL simulation performance as the resolutions are varied from 30 to 300 m. The study concluded that the ASTER 30 m DEM can be used for reasonable streamflow simulation of a data scarce tropical catchment compared with the resampled DEMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balek J (1972) An application of the inadequate hydrological data of the African tropical regions in engineering design. In: Anon, Fort Colins, Colorado USA

  • Bekoe E.O (2005) Application of a hydrological model in a data-poor tropical West African catchment: a case study of the Densu Basin of Ghana. PhD thesis, Cranfield University

  • Beven KJ (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology the case of physically based models. J Hydrol 105:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1997) TOPMODEL: a critique. Hydrol Process 11:1069–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, Freer J (2000) A dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 15:1993–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, Lamb R, Quinn P, Romanowicz R, Freer J (1995) In: Singh VP (ed) “Topmodel,” chapter 18 in computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 627–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasington J, Richards K (1998) Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL. Comput Geosci 24:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau P, Gascuel-Odoux C, Robin P, Merot P, Beven K (1995) Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. Hydrol Process 9:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campling P, Gobin A, Beven K, Feyen J (2002) Rainfall-runoff modelling of a humid tropical catchment: the TOPMODEL approach. Hydrol Process 16:231–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candela A, Noto LV, Aronica G (2005) Influence of surface roughness in hydrological response of semiarid catchments. J Hydrol 313:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell NA, Franks SW, Larenus J (1998) Multi-scale permeability estimation for a tropical catchment. Hydrol Process 12:1507–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell NA, Vongtanaboon S, Jiang Y, Tangtham N (2006) Return-flow prediction and buffer designation in two rainforest headwaters. For Ecol Manag 224:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Cheng Q, Chen YD, Smettem K, Xu C (2010) Simulating the integrated effects of topography and soil properties on runoff generation in hilly forested catchments, south china. Hydrol Process 24:714–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkawatpanit C, Kazama S, Sawamoto M, Ranjan P (2009) Assessment of water conflict in mae chaem river basin, northern Thailand. Water Int 34:242–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N, Deems JS, Hamlet AF, Vano JA, Mickelsn KEB, Lee SY, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Implications of 21st Century Climate Change for the hydrology of Washington State. Clim Chang 102:225–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischbein K, Wilcke W, Valarezo C, Zech W, Knoblich K (2006) Water budgets of three small catchments under montane forest in Ecuador: experimental and modelling approach. Hydrol Process 20:2491–2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks SW, Beven KJ, Chappell NA, Gineste P (1999) The utility of multi-objective conditioning of a distributed hydrological model using uncertain estimates of saturated areas. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3:477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freer JE, McMillan H, McDonnell JJ, Beven KJ (2004) Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures. J Hydrol 291:254–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallart F, Llorens P, Latron J (1994) Studying the role of old agricultural terraces on runoff generation in a Mediterranean mountainous basin. J Hydrol 159:291–303

  • Güntner A, Uhlenbrook S, Seibert J, Leibundgut C (1999) Multi-criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment. Hydrol Process 13:1603–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Zhou J, Zou Q, Liu Y, Song L (2013) A novel multi-objective shuffled complex differential evolution algorithm with application to hydrological model parameter optimization. Water Resour Manag 27:2923–2946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PHM, Heuberger PSC (1995) Calibration of process-oriented models. Ecol Model 83:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Response surfaces: designs and analyses (vol.152). CRC Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinner DA, Stallard RF (2004) Identifying storm flow pathways in a rainforest catchment using hydrological and geochemical modeling. Hydrol Process 18:2851–2875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler P, Ditzer T, Ong RC, Huth A (2001) Comparison of measured and modelled growth on permanent plots in Sabahs rain forests. For Ecol Manag 144:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP (1996) Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: evaluation and modification. Glob Planet Chang 13:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin K, Zhang Q, Chen X (2010) An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty. J Hydrol 394:370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor GR, Nieuwolt S (1998) Tropical climatology. An introduction to the climates of the low latitudes, 2nd edn. Wiley, ISBN O-471-9661 X Paris 1–2

  • Molicova H, Grimalidi M, Bonell M, Hubert P (1997) Using TOPMODEL towards identifying and modelling the hydrological patterns within a headwater, humid tropical catchment. Hydrol Process 11:1169–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutu BM, Klik A (2007) Predicting daily streamflow in ungauged rural catchments the case of Masinga catchment Kenya. Hydrol Sci J 52:292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandakumar N, Mein RG (1997) Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrological effects of land-use change. J Hydrol 192:211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen B, Haddeland I, Lettenmaier DP (1997) Point evaluation of a surface hydrology model for BOREAS. J Geophys Res 102:29367–29378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyeko M (2014) Hydrologic modelling of data scarce basin with SWAT model: capabilities and limitations. Water Resour Manag 29:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Wainwright J, Abrahams AD, Simanton JR (1997) Distributed dynamic modelling of interrill overland flow. Hydrol Process 11:1833–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petheram C, Rustomji P, Chiew FHS, Vleeshouwer J (2012) Rainfall–runoff modelling in northern Australia: a guide to modelling strategies in the tropics. J Hydrol 462(463):28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan NR, Ogden FL, Tachikawa Y, Takara K (2008) Scaling of slope, upslope area, and soil water deficit: implications for transferability and regionalization in topographic index modeling. Water Resour Res 44:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin X, Ahn S, Speed TP, Rubin GM (2007) Global analyses of mRNA translational control during early Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol 8:R63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PF, Beven KJ, Chevallier P, Planchon O (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol Process 5:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PF, Beven KJ, Lamb R (1995) The Ln(a/TanB) index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the Topmodel framework. Hydrol Process 9:161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn P, Cummins M, Kase J, Martin E, Weissman S (1996) Development of categorical representations for above and below spatial relations in 3- to 7-month old infants. Dev Psychol 32:942–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowicz R (1997) A MATLAB implementation of TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 11:1115–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigdel A, Jha R, Bhatta D, Abou-Shanab R, Sapireddy VR, Jeon B (2011) Applicability of TOPMODEL in the catchments of Nepal: Bagmati River Basin. Geosyst Eng 14:180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suliman AHA (2010) Using HEC-RAS and QUAL2E to assess Johor river water quality. MSc Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

  • Suliman AHA, Gumindoga W, Katimon A, Darus IZM (2014) Semi-distributed rainfall-runoff model for streamflow simulation utilizing ASTER DEM in tropical areas. Sains Malays 43:1379–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Suliman AHA, Jajarmizadeh M, Harun S, Mat Darus IZ (2015) Comparison of semi-distributed, GIS-based hydrological models for the prediction of streamflow in a large catchment. Water Resour Manag 29:3095–3110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallaksen LM (1995) A review of baseflow recession analysis. J Hydrol 165:349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortajada C, Pobre K (2011) The Singapore–Malaysia water relationship: an analysis of the media perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 56:597–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Barros A, Brunsell N, Chappell NA, Coe M, Giambelluca T, Goldsmith S, Harmon R, Hendrickx JMH, Juvik J, McDonnell J, Ogden F (2012) The hydrology of the humid tropics. Nat Clim Chang 2:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, McCabe GJ (2000) Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100- and 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data. Hydrol Process 14:987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, Price CV (1994) Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography based watershed model. Water Resour Res 30:3041–3052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Ren L, Yuan F, Liu X (2012) The solution to DEM resolution effects and parameter inconsistency by using scale-invariant TOPMODEL. Hydrol Res 43:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahyapour S, Golshan A, Ghazali AHB (2013) Removal of total suspended solids and turbidity within experimental vegetated channel: optimization through response surface methodology. J Hydro Environ Res 8:260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaroual Z, Chaair H, Essadki A, El Ass K, Azzi M (2009) Optimizing the removal of trivalent chromium by electrocoagulation using experimental design. Chem Eng J 148:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Montgomery DR (1994) Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resour Res 30:1019–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Drake NA, Wainwright J, Mulligan M (1999) Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:763–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Dr. Hab. Renata J. Romanowicz for her support in applying MATLAB version of TOPMODEL. Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID) is greatly acknowledged, for providing required hydro-meteorological data. The ASTER GDEM used in this study is obtained from METI and NASA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali H. Ahmed Suliman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suliman, A.H.A., Katimon, A., Darus, I.Z.M. et al. TOPMODEL for Streamflow Simulation of a Tropical Catchment Using Different Resolutions of ASTER DEM: Optimization Through Response Surface Methodology. Water Resour Manage 30, 3159–3173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1338-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1338-2

Keywords

Navigation