Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gray Water Footprint: Taking Quality, Quantity, and Time Effect into Consideration

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water footprint is a research hotspot in the field of water resource. Gray water footprint is important in the assessment of environmental effects on water resource. In this short communication, a new gray water footprint assessment method was proposed as: WFgray(α, β, ϒ). Here α is an index for water quality effect assessment; β is an index for water quantity effect assessment; ϒ is an index for time effect assessment. This model takes water quality, quantity, and time effect into consideration. We firmly believe that this method will contribute to the development of water footprint assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Brillas E (2013) A review on the degradation of organic pollutants in waters by UV Photoelectro-Fenton and Solar Photoelectro-Fenton. J Braz Chem Soc. doi:10.5935/0103-5053.20130257

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii S, Tanaka S, Hong Lien NP, Qiu Y, Polprasert C (2007) New POPs in the water environment: distribution, bioaccumulation and treatment of perfluorinated compounds—a review paper. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 56(5):313. doi:10.2166/aqua.2007.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes D, Brodie J, Waterhouse J, Bainbridge Z, Bass D, Hart B (2007) Assessment of the water quality and ecosystem health of the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): conceptual models. Environ Manag 40(6):993–1003. doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9009-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2002) Virtual water trade: proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. Value of water research report. IHE, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual. Earthscan, Earthscan LLC,1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA

  • Liu C, Li K, Yu LQ, Xu YP, Huang BB, Wu JD, Wang ZJ (2013) POPs and their ecological risk in sewage sludge of waste water treatment plants in Beijing, China. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(7):1575–1584. doi:10.1007/s00477-013-0693-2

  • Parr LB, Mason CF (2003) Long-term trends in water quality and their impact on macroinvertebrate assemblages in eutrophic lowland rivers. Water Research 37 (12):2969–2979. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00115-5

  • Pfister S, Ridoutt BG (2014) Water footprint: pitfalls on common ground. Environ Sci Technol 48(1):4. doi:10.1021/es405340a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) Reducing humanity’s water footprint. Environ Sci Technol 44(16):6019–6021. doi:10.1021/es101907z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the Africa—China Cooperation Program on Environment which is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST) and coordinated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (No. 2010DFA92820 and No. 2010DFA92800). It was supported in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.0400219184) and the scientific research ability training project of undergraduates in Tongji University. We would like to express our gratitude to the help from members of water footprint research group: Jin Xu, Dazhi Yuan, Ke Yang, Bei Zhang, Wen Tang, Shiyuan Zhao, Yi Lan, Lingping Xu and Haiyan Tian. We also thank Mr. Yang Aihui from World Wide Fund For Nature for his help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongtao Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, H. et al. Gray Water Footprint: Taking Quality, Quantity, and Time Effect into Consideration. Water Resour Manage 28, 3871–3874 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0695-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0695-y

Keywords

Navigation