Abstract
The hydrologic restoration of the Everglades ecosystem is underway within the C-111 basin. Some early projects have been operating for over 10 years and can now be quantitatively assessed. Some recent research presented in Wetlands provides a good beginning. This research article complements those efforts with a broader project assessment by focusing on buffer lands east of Everglades National Park and in the adjacent water control canal system. This article reviews the restoration progress of the C-111 Project over 12 years against its original performance metrics established in 1999–2000 using a multi-criteria assessment methodology. The authors, including members of the original project design team, discuss the original design hypotheses and then organize the assessment into quantity, quality, timing, and distribution (e.g. QQTD) metrics consistent with the overall restoration objectives of the Everglades system. The assessment is unique given that the original designers were afforded a rare opportunity to see how well their restoration plan actually worked. The broad assessment that was completed includes a 28 year water budget of the L-31 N/C-111 Canal located on the boundary of the Everglades; an accounting of undesirable discharges to Barnes Sound/Manatee Bay; an assessment of hydrologic restoration of buffer land wetlands; an assessment of water quality in the study area; and, an assessment of flood impacts. The study results reveal a mixed record of success for the original restoration plan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armentano TV, Sah JP, Ross MS, Jones MS, Jones DT, Cooley HC, Smith CS (2006) Rapid responses of vegetation to hydrological changes in Taylor Slough Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Hydrobiol 569:293–309
CH2M Hill (2002) Central & Southern Florida Project Canal-111 South Dade County, Florida S-332D Detention Area, Pre-Operations and Start-up Monitoring Data Review Report, prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville, FL USA, 24 p. plus appendices
Desmond G (2007) High accuracy elevation data collection project. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-162-96
Gaiser EE, Price R, Scinto LJ, Trexler J (2010) Phosphorus retention and sub-surface movement through the S-332 detention basins on the eastern boundary of Everglades National Park, Comprehensive Final Report, prepared by Florida International University for Everglades National Park, 101 p
Gaiser EE, Sullivan P, Tobias FAC, Bramburger AJ, Trexler JC (2013) Boundary effects on benthic microbial phosphorus concentrations and diatom beta diversity in a hydrologically-modified, nutrient-limited wetland. Wetl., published online, doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0379-z
Genereux D, Guardiario J (1998) A canal drawdown experiment for determination of aquifer parameters. J of Hydr Eng 3:294–302. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) 1084-0699(1998)3:4(294)
German ER, (2000) Regional Evaluation of Evapotranspiration in the Everglades: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4217, 48 p
Godfrey MC, Catton T (2012) River of Interests: Water Management in South Florida and the Everglades, 1948–2010. U.S. Government Printing Office, 339 p
Grayson JE, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1999) The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landsk and Urb Plan 43(4):227–236
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9
Harmel RD, Cooper RJ, Slade RM, Haney RL, Arnold JG (2006) Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Trans of the ASABE 49(3):689–701
Hopfensperger KN, Engelhardt AM, Seagle SW (2006) The use of case studies in establishing feasibility for wetland restoration. Res Ecol 14(4):578–586. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00169.x
Kotun K, Renshaw A (2013) Taylor Slouth Hydrology – Fifty Years of Water Management 1961 – 2010. Wetl., published online. doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0441-x
Lal W (2006) Determination of multiple aquifer parameters using generated water level disturbances. Water Resc Res 42(W03429):1–13. doi:10.1029/2005WR004218
Motz LH, Brown CJ (2007) Analysis of Canal Pumping Test Adjacent to Everglades National Park Using a One-Dimensional Flow Model Considering Storage and Skin Effect in a Finite-Width Sink. Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress; Tampa, FL; USA; 15–19 May 2007, ASCE, 2007
National Park Service (2013) Everglades National Park website, http://www.nps.gov/ever/index.htm
National Research Council (2010) Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Third Biennial Review - 2010. The National Academies Press, p. 277, plus appendices
National Research Council (2012) Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fourth Biennial Review - 2012. The National Academies Press, p. 195, plus appendices
RECOVER (2011) CERP Adaptive Management Integration Guide. Prepared by Restoration Coordination and Verification, c/o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District, 82 p., plus appendices
Renken RA, Dixon J, Koehmstedt J, Ishman S, Leitz AC, Marella RL, Telis P, Rogers J, Memberg S (2005) Impact of Anthropogenic Development on Coastal Ground-Water Hydrology in Southeastern Florida, 1900–2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1275, 77 p
Sanon S, Hein T, Douven W, Winkler P (2012) Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna. Austria Env Man 111:159–172. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008
South Florida Water Management District – SFWMD, (1983) Report to the United States Army Corps of Engineers Requesting A Review of Central and Southern Florida Flood Control Project Facilities in the C-111 Basin, Dade County, Florida. Resource Planning Department, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, 49 p
SFWMD (2002; 2007; 2012) Water Quality Settlement Agreement Reports, prepared by South Florida Water Management District for the Technical Oversight Committee, West Palm Beach, Fl, 16 to 38 p.
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Shisler JK, Lannuzzi TJ, Ludwig DF, Bluestein PJ (2008) Ecological benchmarking in an urbanized estuarine river system. Ecol Rest 26(3):235–245
Simenstad C, Tanner C, Crandell C (2005) Challenges of habitat restoration in a heavily urbanized estuary: evaluating the investment. special issue no. J of Coastal Res 40(40):6–23
Smith CS, Serra L, Li Y (2011) Restoration of disturbed lands: the hole-in-the-donut restoration in the Everglades. Crit Rev in Environ Sci & Tech 41:723–739. doi:10.1080/10643389.2010.530913
Solecki WD, Long J, Harwell CC, Myers V, Zubrow E, Ankerson T, Deren C, Feanny C, Hamann R, Hornung L, Murphy C, Snyder G (1999) Human-environment Interactions in South Florida’s Everglades Region: systems of ecological degradation and restoration. Urban Ecosyst 3:305–343
Sullivan PL, Price RM, Schedbauer JL, Saha A, Gaiser EE (2013) The influence of hydrologic restoration on groundwater-surface water interactions in a karst wetland, The Everglades (FL, USA). Wetl., published online, doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0379-z
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1994) Central and Southern Florida Project for Flood Control and Other Purposes, Canal 111 (C-111) South Dade County. Draft Integrated General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement. Central and Southern Florida Project Report, Florida
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Central and Southern Florida Project for Flood Control and Other Purposes, Canal 111 (C- 111) South Dade County. Draft Integrated General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement, Supplement. Central and Southern Florida Project Report, Florida
United States Geological Survey (2000) Water Resources Data Florida Water Year 2000, Volume 2b. South Florida Ground Water, Water-Data Report FL-00-2B, Miami, Florida
USACE, SFWMD (1999) Central and Southern Florida project comprehensive review study, final feasibility report and programmatic environmental impact statement: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District Report
Zweig CL, Kitchens WM (2010) The Semiglades: The collision of restoration, social values, and the ecosystem concept. Res Ecol 18(2):138–142. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00613.x
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge editors and authors from the recent Special Issue of Wetlands devoted to the Everglades who started the overall assessment of the C-111 project and whom helped spawn ideas for this paper. The authors also acknowledge the review by 3 anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript. It should also be noted that the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors themselves and are not those of the USACE or SFWMD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, C.J., Vearil, J., Linton, P. et al. A multi-criteria assessment of the C-111 hydrologic restoration project – A case study. Water Resour Manage 28, 2453–2469 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0614-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0614-2