Abstract
In the 1970s, the voluntary sector acted as a key space for advocacy and support for communities that were marginalised from statutory provision. This paper explores how East London voluntary sector organisations addressed the needs of new migrant communities in this period. Drawing on data from six case study organisations, this historical study explores the dual role these organisations played in advocating for these communities and providing needed services. The findings show that in the 1970s through the 1990s advocacy and service delivery functions were closely linked rather than service delivery crowding out advocacy as has been the trend in recent decades. The findings also emphasise the importance of the creation of trusted relationships between the organisations and the communities they served.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
After the dissolution of the GLC in the mid-1980s the London Boroughs Grant provided similar funding.
References
Almog-Bar, M., & Schmid, H. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organisations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Review, 43(1), 11–25.
Anheir, H., & Kendall, J. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: Examining three approaches. British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343–362.
Anwar, M. (1991). The context of leadership: Migration, settlement and racial discrimination. In P. Werber & M. Anwar (Eds.), Black and ethnic leaderships: The cultural dimensions of political action. London: Routledge.
Ashe, S., Virdee, S., & Brown, L. (2016). Striking back against racist violence in the East End of London, 1968–1970. Race & Class, 58(1), 34–54.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
Beveridge, W. H. (1948). Voluntary action: A report on methods of social advance. London: Routledge.
Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bradley, K. (2009). Poverty, philanthropy and the state: Charities and the working classes in London, 1918–1979. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckingham, H. (2009). Competition and contracts in the voluntary sector: Exploring the implications for homelessness service providers in Southampton. Policy and Politics, 37(2), 235–254.
Buckingham, H. (2010). Hybridity, diversity and the division of labour in the third sector: What can we learn from homelessness organisations in the UK? TSRC Working Paper 50. Birmingham, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham.
Butler, T., & Chris, H. (2011). Ethnicity, class and aspiration: Understanding London’s New East End. Bristol: Policy Press.
Cairns, B., Hutchinson, R., & Aiken, M. (2010). ‘It’s not what we do, it’s how we do it’: Managing the tension between service delivery and advocacy. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 193–207.
Cambridge, P., & Williams, L. (2004). Approaches to advocacy for refugees and asylum seekers: A development case study for a local support and advice service. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17(1), 97–113.
Carr, E. H. (1964). What is history?. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Deakin, N. (1996). Meeting the challenge of change: Voluntary action into the twenty-first century, the report of the commission on the future of voluntary sector. London: NCVO.
Dench, G. (2003). Minorities in the open society. London: Routledge.
Dench, G., Gavron, K., & Young, M. (2006). The new East End: Kinship, race and conflict. London: Young Foundation.
DeSantis, G. (2010). Voices from the margins: Policy advocacy and marginalized communities. ANSERJ: Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 1(1), 23–45.
Eade, J. (1994). Identity, nation and religion: Educated young Bangladeshi Muslims in London’s ‘East End’. International Sociology, 9(3), 377–394.
Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(2), 159–182.
Evers, A. (2020). Third sector hybrid organisations: Two different approaches. In D. Billis & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organisations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Penguin.
Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.
Glynn, S. (2010). Playing the ethnic card: Politics and segregation in London’s East End. Urban Studies, 47(5), 991–1013.
Glynn, S. (2014). Class, ethnicity and religion in the Bengali East End: A political history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Harris, M., Cairns, B., & Hutchinson, R. (2004). So many tiers, so many agendas, so many pots of money: The challenge of English regionalization for voluntary and community organizations. Social Policy and Administration, 38(5), 525–540.
Harris, M., & Young, P. (2010). Building bridges: The third sector responding locally to diversity. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 41–58.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Garrow, E. E. (2012). Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86(2), 295–322.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Gidron, B. (2005). Understanding multi-purpose hybrid voluntary organizations: The contributions of theories on civil society, social movements and non-profit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 97–112.
Henderson, R., & Pochin, M. (2001). A right result?: Advocacy, justice and empowerment. Bristol: Policy Press.
Hudson, A. (2002). Advocacy by UK-based development NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 402–418.
Institute for Voluntary Action Research. (2009). From settlement to community anchor: The enduring value of Cambridge House. London: IVAR.
Knight, B. (1993). Voluntary action. London: CENTRIS.
Macmillan, R. (2010). The third sector delivering public services: An evidence review. TSRC Working Paper 20, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
McCulloch, G. (2004). Documentary research in education, history and the social sciences. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Phillimore, J. (2011). Approaches to health provision in the age of super-diversity: Accessing the NHS in Britain’s most diverse city. Critical Social Policy, 31(1), 5–29.
Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211–2224.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). What makes democracy work? National Civic Review, 82(2), 101–107.
Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Taylor, M. (1996). Between public and private: Accountability in voluntary organisations. Policy & Politics, 24(1), 57–72.
Townsend, P. (1957). The family life of old people: An inquiry in East London. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ware, P. (2013). “Very small, very quiet, a whisper…”—Black and minority ethnic groups: Voice and influence. TSRC Working Paper 103, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank colleagues at the Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC) and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this article. The research on which this article is based was part of a major project directed by John Mohan at the TSRC, funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2017–102, Community-level perspectives on post-war change in the British voluntary sector).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The research is funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2017–102, Community-level perspectives on post-war change in the British voluntary sector). The author is not aware of any potential conflicts of interest in this research. This research involved three semi-structured interviews where verbal consent to participate and be quoted was taken at the start of the interviews. Interviewees were also sent introductory letters with information about the project as well as instructions on participation and their consent. No direct quotations were used in this submission. This research complied with the ethical review process at the University of Birmingham under which this research was conducted.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Directly Quoted Archival Sources (Tower Hamlets Archive)
Avenues Unlimited (AVU)
-
I/SPP/4/6/11/2—Fieldwork Report 1972/3
-
I/SPP/4/6/11/2—Annual Report 1974
London Black Women’s Health Action Project (LBWHAP)
-
LC1279—Annual Report 1986/7
-
LC1279—Annual Report 1994
-
LC1279—Annual Report 1994/5
Oxford House (OH)
-
LCP00235—Annual Report 1996
Praxis
-
LCP00240—Annual Report 1990
-
LCP00240—Annual Report 1996/7
St. Hilda’s House East (SHE)
-
LCP00251—Centenary Annual Report 1988/9
Organisation | Founding | Location | Purpose | Initial funding sources | Advocacy | Services |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avenues Unlimited (AVU) | 1965 | East Side | Youth; Community Development | Charitable and Statutory (YMCA and ILEA) | Formal: Campaigning; Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting | Advice: Legal |
Informal: Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy | ||||||
London Black Women’s Health Action Project (LBWHAP) | 1982 | West Side | Women’s Health/Education | Charitable and Statutory (GLC Women’s Unit) | Formal: Campaigning; Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting | Advice: Women’s Health |
Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy | Services: Health Sessions | |||||
Oxford House (OH) | 1860 | West Side | All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work | Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory | Formal: Anti-discrimination | Advice: Immigration; Youth |
Informal: Education; Community Development | Services: Interpretation | |||||
Praxis | 1983 | West Side | Social Justice/Migrant Rights | Endowment (Robert Kemble Trust) | Formal: Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting | Advice: Immigration; Health |
Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy | Services: Interpretation; Housing | |||||
St. Hilda’s East (SHE) | 1889 | East Side | All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work | Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory | Formal: Issue Signposting; Anti-discrimination | Advice: Legal; Pensioner |
Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy | Services: Interpretation; Elder Care | |||||
St. Margaret’s House (SMH) | 1889 | West Side | All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work | Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory | Formal: Anti-discrimination | Advice: Immigration; Legal; Women’s Health |
Informal: Community Development |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cookingham Bailey, E. Advocacy and Service Delivery in the Voluntary Sector: Exploring the History of Voluntary Sector Activities for New Minority and Migrant Groups in East London, 1970s–1990s. Voluntas 32, 1408–1418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00253-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00253-2