Skip to main content
Log in

Advocacy and Service Delivery in the Voluntary Sector: Exploring the History of Voluntary Sector Activities for New Minority and Migrant Groups in East London, 1970s–1990s

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1970s, the voluntary sector acted as a key space for advocacy and support for communities that were marginalised from statutory provision. This paper explores how East London voluntary sector organisations addressed the needs of new migrant communities in this period. Drawing on data from six case study organisations, this historical study explores the dual role these organisations played in advocating for these communities and providing needed services. The findings show that in the 1970s through the 1990s advocacy and service delivery functions were closely linked rather than service delivery crowding out advocacy as has been the trend in recent decades. The findings also emphasise the importance of the creation of trusted relationships between the organisations and the communities they served.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. After the dissolution of the GLC in the mid-1980s the London Boroughs Grant provided similar funding.

References

  • Almog-Bar, M., & Schmid, H. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organisations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Review, 43(1), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheir, H., & Kendall, J. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: Examining three approaches. British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M. (1991). The context of leadership: Migration, settlement and racial discrimination. In P. Werber & M. Anwar (Eds.), Black and ethnic leaderships: The cultural dimensions of political action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashe, S., Virdee, S., & Brown, L. (2016). Striking back against racist violence in the East End of London, 1968–1970. Race & Class, 58(1), 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. H. (1948). Voluntary action: A report on methods of social advance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K. (2009). Poverty, philanthropy and the state: Charities and the working classes in London, 1918–1979. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, H. (2009). Competition and contracts in the voluntary sector: Exploring the implications for homelessness service providers in Southampton. Policy and Politics, 37(2), 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, H. (2010). Hybridity, diversity and the division of labour in the third sector: What can we learn from homelessness organisations in the UK? TSRC Working Paper 50. Birmingham, Birmingham, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham.

  • Butler, T., & Chris, H. (2011). Ethnicity, class and aspiration: Understanding London’s New East End. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, B., Hutchinson, R., & Aiken, M. (2010). ‘It’s not what we do, it’s how we do it’: Managing the tension between service delivery and advocacy. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, P., & Williams, L. (2004). Approaches to advocacy for refugees and asylum seekers: A development case study for a local support and advice service. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17(1), 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1964). What is history?. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, N. (1996). Meeting the challenge of change: Voluntary action into the twenty-first century, the report of the commission on the future of voluntary sector. London: NCVO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dench, G. (2003). Minorities in the open society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dench, G., Gavron, K., & Young, M. (2006). The new East End: Kinship, race and conflict. London: Young Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, G. (2010). Voices from the margins: Policy advocacy and marginalized communities. ANSERJ: Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 1(1), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade, J. (1994). Identity, nation and religion: Educated young Bangladeshi Muslims in London’s ‘East End’. International Sociology, 9(3), 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(2), 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2020). Third sector hybrid organisations: Two different approaches. In D. Billis & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organisations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. (2010). Playing the ethnic card: Politics and segregation in London’s East End. Urban Studies, 47(5), 991–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. (2014). Class, ethnicity and religion in the Bengali East End: A political history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Cairns, B., & Hutchinson, R. (2004). So many tiers, so many agendas, so many pots of money: The challenge of English regionalization for voluntary and community organizations. Social Policy and Administration, 38(5), 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Young, P. (2010). Building bridges: The third sector responding locally to diversity. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y., & Garrow, E. E. (2012). Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86(2), 295–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y., & Gidron, B. (2005). Understanding multi-purpose hybrid voluntary organizations: The contributions of theories on civil society, social movements and non-profit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., & Pochin, M. (2001). A right result?: Advocacy, justice and empowerment. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, A. (2002). Advocacy by UK-based development NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 402–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Voluntary Action Research. (2009). From settlement to community anchor: The enduring value of Cambridge House. London: IVAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B. (1993). Voluntary action. London: CENTRIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, R. (2010). The third sector delivering public services: An evidence review. TSRC Working Paper 20, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

  • McCulloch, G. (2004). Documentary research in education, history and the social sciences. London: Routledge/Falmer.

  • Phillimore, J. (2011). Approaches to health provision in the age of super-diversity: Accessing the NHS in Britain’s most diverse city. Critical Social Policy, 31(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211–2224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). What makes democracy work? National Civic Review, 82(2), 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1996). Between public and private: Accountability in voluntary organisations. Policy & Politics, 24(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1957). The family life of old people: An inquiry in East London. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, P. (2013). “Very small, very quiet, a whisper…”—Black and minority ethnic groups: Voice and influence. TSRC Working Paper 103, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

  • Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank colleagues at the Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC) and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this article. The research on which this article is based was part of a major project directed by John Mohan at the TSRC, funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2017–102, Community-level perspectives on post-war change in the British voluntary sector).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Cookingham Bailey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The research is funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2017–102, Community-level perspectives on post-war change in the British voluntary sector). The author is not aware of any potential conflicts of interest in this research. This research involved three semi-structured interviews where verbal consent to participate and be quoted was taken at the start of the interviews. Interviewees were also sent introductory letters with information about the project as well as instructions on participation and their consent. No direct quotations were used in this submission. This research complied with the ethical review process at the University of Birmingham under which this research was conducted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Directly Quoted Archival Sources (Tower Hamlets Archive)

Avenues Unlimited (AVU)

  • I/SPP/4/6/11/2—Fieldwork Report 1972/3

  • I/SPP/4/6/11/2—Annual Report 1974

London Black Women’s Health Action Project (LBWHAP)

  • LC1279—Annual Report 1986/7

  • LC1279—Annual Report 1994

  • LC1279—Annual Report 1994/5

Oxford House (OH)

  • LCP00235—Annual Report 1996

Praxis

  • LCP00240—Annual Report 1990

  • LCP00240—Annual Report 1996/7

St. Hilda’s House East (SHE)

  • LCP00251—Centenary Annual Report 1988/9

Organisation

Founding

Location

Purpose

Initial funding sources

Advocacy

Services

Avenues Unlimited (AVU)

1965

East Side

Youth; Community Development

Charitable and Statutory (YMCA and ILEA)

Formal: Campaigning; Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting

Advice: Legal

Informal: Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy

London Black Women’s Health Action Project (LBWHAP)

1982

West Side

Women’s Health/Education

Charitable and Statutory (GLC Women’s Unit)

Formal: Campaigning; Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting

Advice: Women’s Health

Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy

Services: Health Sessions

Oxford House (OH)

1860

West Side

All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work

Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory

Formal: Anti-discrimination

Advice: Immigration; Youth

Informal: Education; Community Development

Services: Interpretation

Praxis

1983

West Side

Social Justice/Migrant Rights

Endowment (Robert Kemble Trust)

Formal: Anti-discrimination; Issue Signposting

Advice: Immigration; Health

Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy

Services: Interpretation; Housing

St. Hilda’s East (SHE)

1889

East Side

All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work

Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory

Formal: Issue Signposting; Anti-discrimination

Advice: Legal; Pensioner

Informal: Education; Community Development; Facilitating Citizen Advocacy

Services: Interpretation; Elder Care

St. Margaret’s House (SMH)

1889

West Side

All Ages Leisure/Education/Social Work

Property Ownership; Donors; Charitable and Statutory

Formal: Anti-discrimination

Advice: Immigration; Legal; Women’s Health

Informal: Community Development

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cookingham Bailey, E. Advocacy and Service Delivery in the Voluntary Sector: Exploring the History of Voluntary Sector Activities for New Minority and Migrant Groups in East London, 1970s–1990s. Voluntas 32, 1408–1418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00253-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00253-2

Keywords

Navigation