Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connecting Two Sides: A Qualitative Study on Social Innovation Ventures and Poor Communities in an Emerging Economy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between social innovation venture and poor communities has received little attention from studies in the area of social innovation. In order to clarify this relationship, our study seeks to answer: What strategies would help to bring social innovation ventures closer to poor communities? We developed an empirical and qualitative research in a social innovation venture and two poor beneficiary communities in Brazil. The results indicate that the proximity between those agents was based on five main items: (a) reputation of the social venture; (b) appropriate prices according to the community’s reality; (c) close relations with the community; (d) structure proximity; and (e) winning the community leadership’s trust. Thus, our study contributes to the literature by exploring the beneficiary communities and their relationship with social innovation ventures. In addition, we suggest the use of the term “social innovation venture” to designate a wide range of types of organizations willing to generate social innovation in the practical field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., Kupp, M., & Vandermerwe, S. (2010). Good business makes poor customers good customers. Business Strategy Review, 21(4), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the “bottom of the pyramid”: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E. (2002). Apresentação. In R. M. Fischer (Ed.), O Desafio da colaboração (pp. 19–20). São Paulo: Editora Gente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation “came to be”: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, L. (1993). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France Le Psychologue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, P., & Altinay, L. (2013). How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? Management Decision, 51(9), 1772–1792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boateng, R., Hinson, R., Galadima, R., & Olumide, L. (2014). Preliminary insights into the influence of mobile phones in micro-trading activities of market women in Nigeria. Information Development, 30(1), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brest, P., & Born, K. (2013). When can impact investing create real impact. Standford Social Innovation Review, 21(4), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casini, A., Bensliman, R., Callorda Fossati, E., Degavre, F., & Mahieu, C. (2018). Is social innovation fostering satisfaction and well-being at work? Insights from employment in social enterprises providing long-term eldercare services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(29), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkin, J., & Cangioni, C. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, M., & Cleveland, S. (2018). Building engaged communities—A collaborative leadership approach. Smart Cities, 1(1), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D., & Maciuceanu, A. O. (2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3), 211–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delannon, N., Raufflet, E., & Baba, S. (2016). Corporate community engagement strategies and organizational arrangements: A multiple case study in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 714–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2006). A disciplina e a prática da pesquisa qualitativa. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa: teorias e abordagens. Artmend: Porto Alegre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenico, M. L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4), 681–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1987). Social innovation—Management’s new dimension. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossati, E. C., Degavre, F., & Nyssens, M. (2017). How to deal with an “essentially contested concept” on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (1983). Social innovation and the division of labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, G., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). Social impact investing in Germany: Current impediments from investors’ and social entrepreneurs’ perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1638–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot, A., & Dankbaar, B. (2014). Does social innovation require social entrepreneurship? Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (2005). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2013). Censo Demográfico 2010: Aglomerados Subnormais - informações territoriais. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/552/cd_2010_agsn_if.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.

  • Jäger, U. P., & Schröer, A. (2014). Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(5), 1281–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal, A. K. (2008). The fortune at the bottom or the middle of the pyramid? Innovations, 3(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1999). From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: The role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(2), 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, N. E. (2007). Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strategic Management Review, 1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautermann, C. (2013). The ambiguities of (social) value creation: Towards an extended understanding of entrepreneurial value creation for society. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 184–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. (2010). (Re)forming strategic cross-sector partnerships relational processes of social innovation. Business and Society, 49(1), 140–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettice, F., & Parekh, M. (2010). The social innovation process: Themes, challenges and implications for practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Han, S., & Ito, H. (2013). Capability building through innovation for unserved lower end mega markets. Technovation, 33(12), 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majee, W., Goodman, L., Reed Adams, J., & Keller, K. (2017). The We–Lead model for bridging the low-income community leadership skills-practice gap. Journal of Community Practice, 25(1), 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, P., Morgan, K., & Richardson, R. (2017). Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept (pp. 1–17). Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais-da-Silva, R. L., Takahashi, A. R. W., & Segatto, A. P. (2016). Scaling up social innovation: A meta-synthesis. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 134–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F. (2009). Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. V. Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 11–24). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Inovations, 1(2), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?—Proposal for a stronger focus. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (Eds.). (2012). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., Simon, J., & Gabriel, M. (2015). Introduction: Dimensions of social innovation. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon, & M. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. 1–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo, A., & Mellouli, S. (2018). Deploying governance networks for societal challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2015). Framing resource-constrained innovation at the bottom of the pyramid: Insights from an ethnographic case study in rural Bangladesh. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervez, T., Maritz, A., & Waal, A. De. (2013). Innovation and social entrepreneurship at the bottom of the pyramid—A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 16(5), 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group and Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation, 6(4), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S., & Kanta Ray, P. (2011). Product innovation for the people’s car in an emerging economy. Technovation, 31(5/6), 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoso, J., Kandampully, J., Fan, X., & Paulose, H. (2015). Learning from socially driven service innovation in emerging economies. Journal of Service Management, 26(1), 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. P., Jalal, K. F., & Boyod, J. A. (2008). An introduction to sustainable development. London: Earthscam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F., Pache, A.-C. C., Birkholts, C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86–105). California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2016). Poverty headcount ratio at $3.10 a day. http://beta.data.worldbank.org/?end=2014&indicators=SI.POV.2DAY&locations=BR&start=1960. Accessed 17 Dec 2018.

  • Turker, D., & Vural, C. A. (2017). Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, B., & Van den Broek, P. (2013). Social innovation : a territorial process. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hambouc (Eds.), The international handbook on social. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 131–141). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2017). Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (% of population). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY?view=chart. Accessed 12 July 2018.

  • Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 388–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Assessment of Postgraduate Education (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Postgraduate Program in Management (PPGADM) - UFPR Business School, Federal University of Paraná, 632, Prefeito Lothario Meissner Av., Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, Paraná, 80210-170, Brazil

    Rodrigo Luiz Morais-da-Silva, Andréa Paula Segatto & Indira Gandhi Bezerra-de-Sousa

Authors
  1. Rodrigo Luiz Morais-da-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andréa Paula Segatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Indira Gandhi Bezerra-de-Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Luiz Morais-da-Silva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morais-da-Silva, R.L., Segatto, A.P. & Bezerra-de-Sousa, I.G. Connecting Two Sides: A Qualitative Study on Social Innovation Ventures and Poor Communities in an Emerging Economy. Voluntas 31, 966–980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00156-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00156-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation