Abstract
This paper describes the features of grassroots philanthropy as viewed by the participants. Using content analysis, we show that while the mainstream discourse focuses on efficiency, accountability, and professionalism, the grassroots discourse focuses on the individual aspects, viewing philanthropy as small good deeds, a personal spiritual journey, and something that brings happiness. To avoid making this personal journey impure or less happy, the grassroots philanthropists resist practices such as formalization and professionalization. They also distance themselves from corporates and bureaucracies which they view as corrupt and hypocritical. The grassroots’ discourse has its roots in the traditional Chinese culture, and is also shaped by the realities of the transitioning Chinese society, where citizens are searching for meaning, values, and support. Such a discourse has profound influence on the organizations that embrace the grassroots values and may also impact the development of the Chinese nonprofit sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Due to the special social and political context in China, many organizations can claim to be private nonprofit organizations. Some of these have very strong governmental background, such as the All-China Women’s Federation, China Disabled Persons’ Federation, and the All-China Federation of Youth. They all claim to be non-governmental and not for profit. It is true that they are providing crucial services to women, children, youth, and the disabled. However, they are either under direct leadership of the Party-sate or have current or retired government officials acting as president. Most of them also employ civil servants and do not have to go through nonprofit registration. They are really public institutions. Some other organizations, such as Soong Ching Ling Foundation, and China Red Cross, also have high level of government involvement. Even though they are not under the direct leadership of the government, they also employ civil servants. They are considered semi-public institutions. Besides, there are also organizations that were set up by government. For instance, the China Youth Development Foundation was created by the Communist Youth Leagues. The China Children and Youth Foundation were created by the All-China Women’s Federation. These are often considered government-organized non-governmental organizations (GONGOs). In addition, there are organizations created by corporations (e.g., corporate foundations), celebrities (e.g., One Foundation, established by Jet Li), prominent scholars, overseas nonprofits, international organizations (e.g., Oxfam, Save the Children), religious institutions, and so on. In a way, to define grassroots in China, one cannot define what they are, but needs to define what they are not. This approach was adopted by some previous scholars (see, for instance, Zhou 2015). In this study, as discussed in the main text, in addition to defining grassroots as the opposite of mainstream, we also adopt a strategy of self-identification.
We used “West” or the “Western countries” to refer to the economically advanced countries which adopt free market economy and a democratic political system (e.g., North America and Western Europe). We acknowledge that this is a Cold War term and that the East–West dichotomy overlooks regional hybridity. However, in many fields, such as management (Ichijo and Nonaka 2006), international relations, intercultural communication (Cheng 2003), and sociology, this term is still being used. To avoid getting into details regarding differences in each culture and society, we opt to use this simple East–West divide. More importantly, the term “West” has a special meaning for the Chinese citizens, as in the past, the term was used to describe those countries who were the enemies of the communist regime. Mao Zedong famously said: “This is a war between two worlds. The West Wind cannot prevail over the East Wind; the East Wind is bound to prevail over the West Wind.” (Mao 1986, p. 775).
References
Abel, E. K. (1986). The hospice movement: Institutionalizing innovation. International Journal of Health Services, 16(1), 71–85.
Adler, P. S. (2009). The Oxford handbook of sociology and organization studies: Classical foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 225–259.
Ashley, J. S., & He, P. (2008). Opening one eye and closing the other: The legal and regulatory environment for grassroots NGOs in China today. Boston University International Law Journal, 26(1), 29–96.
Bell, D. A. (2010a). China’s new Confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bell, D. A. (2010b). Reconciling socialism and Confucianism?: Reviving tradition in China. Dissent, 57(1), 91–99.
Boao Forum for Asia. (2012). Cishan tizhi gaige: Taomingdu, zhuanyehua, gongxinli [Reform of the charitable system: Transparency, professionalization, trustworthiness]. http://www.boaoforum.org/yjynhjb2012/5111.jhtml.
Brown, S. (2005). Travelling with a purpose: Understanding the motives and benefits of volunteer vacationers. Current Issues in Tourism, 8(6), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500508668232.
Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2006). Constructing an autistic identity: AS voices online. Mental Retardation, 44(5), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[315:CAAIAV]2.0.CO;2.
Chamberlin, J. (1990). The ex-patients’ movement: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11(3–4), 323–336.
Cheng, W. (2003). Intercultural conversation (Vol. 118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
China Charity Information Center. (2011). 2011 Niandu Zhongguo cishan toumingdu baogao [2011 China charity transparency report]. Beijing, China: Ministry of Civil Affaris.
China Daily. (2011). Better use of NGOs predicted. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2011-05/14/content_12509762.htm.
China Ministry of Civil Affairs. (2014). Development of social services 2013. Beijing, China: Author.
China Philanthropy Research Institute. (2014). Cishan zhuanyehua shi women xuyao shang de yitang “dake” [The professionalization of philanthropy is a “big lesson” that we have to learn]. http://www.bnu1.org/cpri/2014/0429/2503.html.
Cole, F. L. (1988). Content analysis: Process and application. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 2(1), 53–57.
Corbett, S., & Walker, A. (2012). The Big Society: Back to the future. The Political Quarterly, 83(3), 487–493.
Corti, I. N., Marola, P. N., & Castro, M. B. (2010). Social inclusion and local development through european voluntourism: A case study of the project realized in a neighborhood of morocco. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2(3), 221.
Davidson, J., & Henderson, V. L. (2010). ‘Coming out’ on the spectrum: autism, identity and disclosure. Social and Cultural Geography, 11(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903525240.
Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. (2012). Access contested: Toward the fourth phase of cyberspace controls. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinski, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Deng, G. (2010). The hidden rules governing China’s unregistered NGOs: management and consequences. China Review, 10(1), 183–206.
Du, L., Zhao, F., & Zhang, C. (2014). Impact of mobilization context on employees’ donation intentions in China. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 115–124.
Economy, E. C. (2011). The river runs black: The environmental challenge to China’s future. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Esarey, A., & Xiao, Q. (2008). Political expression in the Chinese blogosphere: Below the radar. Asian Survey, 48(5), 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2008.48.5.752.
Fairclough, N., & Chouliaraki, L. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fewsmith, J. (2004). Promoting the scientific development concept. China Leadership Monitor, 11(30), 1–10.
Foster, P. B. (2006). Ah Q Archaeology: Lu Xun, Ah Q, Ah Q Progeny and the National Character Discourse in Twentieth Century China. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1987). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. two). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Volume 1: An introduction. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. London: Penguin.
Fuma, S. (2005). Zhongguo Shanhui Shantang shi yanjiu [A Study of Benevolent Societies and Benevolent Halls in China] (Y. Wu, W, Yang & X. Zhang, Trans.). Beijing, China: Commercial Press. (Original work published in 1997).
Gee, J. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Routledge.
Guo, X. (2012). State and society in China’s democratic transition: Confucianism, Leninism, and economic development. London: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Garrow, E. E. (2012). Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review, 86(2), 295–322. https://doi.org/10.1086/666391.
Herold, D. K. (2008). Development of a civil society online? Internet vigilantism and state control in Chinese cyberspace. Asia Journal of Global Studies, 2(1), 26–37.
Ho, P. (2001). Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China. Development and Change, 32(5), 893–921.
Ho, P. (2007). Embedded activism and political change in a semiauthoritarian context. China Information, 21(2), 187–209.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Hsu, C. (2010). Beyond civil society: An organizational perspective on state–NGO relations in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.528949.
Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2006). Knowledge creation and management: New challenges for managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kang, X., & Heng, H. (2008). Graduated controls—The state-society relationship in contemporary China. Modern China, 34(1), 36–55.
Kwong, J. (1994). Ideological crisis among China’s Youths: Values and official ideology. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/591495.
Laliberté, A. (2003). ‘love Transcends Borders’ or’blood is Thicker than Water’? The Charity Work of the Compassion Relief Foundation in the People’s Republic of China. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 2(2), 243–261.
Lei, J., & Walker, A. (2013). The Big Society in China: A failed experiment. Social Policy and Society, 12(01), 17–30.
Levenson, J. R. (2013). Confucian China and its modern fate: Volume one: The problem of intellectual continuity (Vol. 14). London: Routledge.
Li, J. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. American Psychologist, 58(2), 146–147.
Lu, Y. (2007). Environmental civil society and governance in China. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 64(1), 59–69.
Lu, Y. (2009). Non-governmental organizations in China. New York: Routledge.
Luke, A. (1999). Critical discourse analysis. In J. Keeves & G. Lakomski (Eds.), Issues in educational research (pp. 161–173). New York: Pergamon.
Ma, Q. (2006). Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society?. New York: Routledge.
Mao, Z. (1986). The Writings of Mao Zedong, 1949–1976: January 1956–December 1957 (Vol. 2). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Paper presented at the Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
McCarthy, S. K. (2013). Serving society, repurposing the state: Religious charity and resistance in China. The China Journal, 70, 48–72.
Meng, B. (2011). From steamed bun to grass mud horse: E Gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese internet. Global Media and Communication, 7(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766510397938.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Milligan, C., & Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Preserving space for volunteers: Exploring the links between voluntary welfare organisations, volunteering and citizenship. Urban Studies, 42(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500034884.
Mitra, A. (2001). Marginal voices in cyberspace. New Media and Society, 3(1), 29–48.
Moulton, S., & Eckerd, A. (2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector: Resources, roles, and public values. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 656–685.
Nanfang People. (2014). Niandu cishanjia—Wei Xue: Gongyi cishan kao reqing meifa jianzhi [Philanthropist of the year—Wei Xue: Philanthropy and charity cannot be sustained by passion alone]. http://www.nfpeople.com/story_view.php?id=6192.
Panet-Raymong, J. (1987). Community groups in Guebec: The difficult balance between autonomy and partnership with the state. Canadian Social Work Review, 6, 126–135.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3, 230–246.
Rosen, S. (2010). Is the Internet a positive force in the development of civil society, a public sphere, and democratization in China? International Journal of Communication, 4, 509–516.
Ru, J. (2004). Environmental NGOs in China: The interplay of state controls, agency interests and NGO strategies (Doctoral dissertation). www.stanford.edu.
Saich, T. (2008). Providing public goods in transitional China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). London: SAGE.
Shieh, S. (2009). Beyond corporatism and civil society: Three modes of state-NGO interaction in China. In J. Shwartz & S. Shieh (Eds.), State and society responses to social welfare needs in China (pp. 22–41). New York: Routledge.
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, J. H. (2009). The art of doing good: Charity in late Ming China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
So, A. Y., & Chu, Y.-W. (2012). The transition from neoliberalism to state neoliberalism in China at the turn of the twenty-first century. In K.-S. Chang, S.-K. Kim & F. Ben (Eds.), Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond (pp. 166–187). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Soteri-Proctor, A. (2011). Little big societies: Micro-mapping of organisations operating below the radar. Birmingham, UK: Third Sector Research Centre.
Soteri-Proctor, A., Smith, D. H., Pospíšilová, T., Roka, K., & Yu, P. (2016). Local or grassroots associations: Micro-associations. In The Palgrave (Ed.), Handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations (pp. 807–835). Berlin: Springer.
Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45.
Spires, A. J., Tao, L., & Chan, K.-M. (2014). Societal support for China’s grass-roots NGOs: Evidence from Yunnan, Guangdong and Beijing. The China Journal, 71, 65–90.
Steele, L. G., & Lynch, S. M. (2013). The pursuit of happiness in China: Individualism, collectivism, and subjective well-being during China’s economic and social transformation. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 441–451.
Sui, H. (2007). Development of philanthropy in China: A case of “one-day donation” [Cong “Yiri Juan” kan Zhongguo xiandai cishan shiye de fazhan]. Social Sciences Review, 2, 143–144.
Sullivan, J. (2012). A tale of two microblogs in China. Media, Culture and Society, 34(6), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712448951.
Szablewicz, M. (2014). The ‘losers’ of China’s Internet: Memes as ‘structures of feeling’ for disillusioned young netizens. China Information, 28(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x14531538.
Tai, Z. (2006). The internet in China: Cyberspace and civil society. New York: Routledge.
Tang, L., & Yang, P. (2011). Symbolic power and the internet: The power of a ‘horse’. Media, Culture and Society, 33(5), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711404462.
Tu, C. (2004). Constructing a socialist harmonious society. Theory Journal, 12, 005.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 84–106). New York: Routledge.
Varghese, P. J. (2015). Advocacy in mental health: Offering a voice to the voiceless. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 31(1), 4.
Vickers, E. (2009). Selling ‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristics’ ‘Thought and Politics’ and the legitimisation of China’s developmental strategy. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.04.012.
Wang, Z. (2014). The Chinese dream: Concept and context. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 19(1), 1–13.
Watson, A. (2008). Civil society in transitional state: The rise of associations in China. In J. Unger (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Wolch, J. (1999). Decentering America’s nonprofit sector: Reflections on Salamon’s crises analysis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10(1), 25–35.
Wu, H., & Chen, Q. (2014). “Diaosi” Culture: A challenge to journalistic ethics and building blocks of new communications ethics. Journal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, 5, 13–16.
Yan, Y. (2010). The Chinese path to individualization. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 489–512.
Yang, G. (2005). Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China. The China Quarterly, 181, 46–66.
Yang, G., & Jiang, M. (2015). The networked practice of online political satire in China: Between ritual and resistance. International Communication Gazette. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514568757.
Yang, P., Tang, L., & Wang, X. (2014). Diaosi as infrapolitics: Scatological tropes, identity-making and cultural intimacy on China’s Internet. Media, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714557980.
Yu, H. (2017). Philanthropy on the move: Mobile communication and neoliberal citizenship in China. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317693634.
Yu, J. (1998). Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle. Philosophy East and West, 48, 323–347.
Zhang, M. (1999). From Lei Feng to Zhang Haidi: Changing images of model youth in the post-Mao reform era. Civic discourse, civil society, and Chinese communities, 5, 111.
Zheng, Y., & Tok, S. K. (2007). Harmonious society and harmonious world: China’s policy discourse under Hu Jintao Briefing Series (Vol. 26). Nottingham, UK: China Policy Institute, University of Nottingham.
Zhou, H. (2015). Mapping the level of development of grassroots NPOs in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9612-0.
Zhou, Q., & Zeng, G. (2006). Zhongguo cishan jianshi [A concise history of charity in China]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
Funding
General Research Fund (GRF)—Early Career Schemes (457413); The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Direct Fund
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, H., Le Han, E. Striving to be Pure: Constructing the Idea of Grassroots Philanthropy in Chinese Cyberspace. Voluntas 30, 709–723 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9950-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9950-9