Abstract
This article explores the experiences of third sector development actors and the actions that they took during the Dominican Republic’s National Regularization Plan for Foreigners until its expiration in the summer of 2015. The study employs an interpretivist approach that assumes that third sector development actors construct their roles through an interactive process based on their co-created interpretations and negotiated meanings ascribed to factors, conditions, and situations related to the regularization plan. Data were gathered from December 2015 to July 2016 from 19 semi-structured interviews with third sector development actors, who work with members of the Haitian immigrant community. Using constructivist grounded theory methods, the analysis identifies four key roles of third sector actors in the documentation process that incorporate guidance, support, collaboration, and accompaniment. This research elevates the importance of third sector organizations in responding to immigrant documentation issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, A. (2015). Haitian workers facing deportation by Dominican neighbors. New York Times (June 16). https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/world/americas/migrantworkers-in-dominican-republic-most-of-them-haitian-face-deportation.html.
Ambrosini, M. (2015). NGOs and health services for irregular immigrants in Italy: When the protection of human rights challenges the laws. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies,13(2), 116–134.
Americas Watch, National Coalition for Haitian Refugees and Caribbean Rights. (1989). Haitian sugar-cane cutters in the Dominican Republic. Barbados: Caribbean Rights.
Amnesty International. (2007). Dominican Republic: A life in transit-the plight of Haitian migrants and Dominicans of Haitian descent. London: Amnesty International Publications. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR270012007ENGLISH.PDF.
Amnesty International. (2015). ‘Without papers, I am no one’: Stateless people in the Dominican Republic. London: Amnesty International Publications. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/amr27/2755/2015/en/.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interaction: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology,64(6), 931–961.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Chetkovich, C., & Kunreuther, F. (2006). From the ground up: Grassroots organizations making social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Choup, A. M. (2006). Catalysts for cooperation: Non-governmental organizations in Santo Domingo. Journal of Civil Society,2(3), 217–231.
Constitutional Court of the Dominican Republic. (2013). Sentencia TC/0168/13. http://www.refworld.org/docid/526900c14.html%20and%20http://tribunalconstitucional.gob.do/sites/default/files/documentos/Sentencia%20TC%2001%2068-13%20-%20C.pdf.
Cooley, C. H. (1956). Social organization. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Douglas, W. A., Ferguson, J., & Klett, E. (2004). An effective confluence of forces in support of workers’ rights: ILO standards, US trade laws, unions, and NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly,26(2), 273–299.
Drake, D. H., Simmons, K., & Smith, K. (2014). Building communities collaboratively: The Milton Keynes community mobiliser service. Community Development Journal,49(2), 311–326.
Fals Borda, O. (1988). Knowledge and people’s power: Lessons with peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico and Colombia. New York, NY: New Horizons Press.
Farmer, P. (2011). Accompaniment as policy. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (25 May). https://www.lessonsfromhaiti.org/press-and-media/transcripts/accompaniment-as-policy/.
Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Garkisch, M., Heidingsfelder, J., & Beckmann, M. (2017). Third sector organizations and migration: A systematic literature review on the contribution of third sector organizations in view of flight, migration and refugee crises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,28(5), 1839–1880.
Gergen, K. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Hall, P. M. (1987). Interactionism and the study of social organization. The Sociological Quarterly,28(1), 1–22.
Hannam, M. A. (2014). Soy Dominicano—The status of Haitian descendants born in the Dominican Republic and measures to protect their right to a nationality. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,47(4), 1123–1166.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (2013). IACHR expresses deep concern over ruling by the Constitutional Court of the Dominican Republic. Organization of American States (October 8). http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/media_center/preleases/2013/073.asp.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (2015). Report on the situation of human rights in the Dominican Republic. Organization of American States (December 31). www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/dominicanrepublic-2015.pdf.
Kallman, M., & Clark, T. (2016). The third sector: Community organizations, NGOs, and nonprofits. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Keys, H. M., Kaiser, B. N., Foster, J. W., Burgos Minaya, R. Y., & Kohrt, B. A. (2015). Perceived discrimination, humiliation, and mental health: A mixed-methods study among Haitian migrants in the Dominican Republic. Ethnicity & Health,20(3), 219–240.
Kim, D. (2011). Catalysers in the promotion of migrants’ rights: Church-based NGOs in South Korea. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,37(10), 1649–1667.
Mejia, N. C. (2015). Dominican apartheid: Inside the flawed migration system of the Dominican Republic. Harvard Latino Law Review,18, 201–229.
Morgan-Trimmer, S. (2014). ‘It’s Who You Know’: Community empowerment through network brokers. Community Development Journal,49(3), 458–472.
Muñoz Marquez, L. M. (2016). The relevance of organizational structure to NGOs’ approaches to the policy process. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(1), 465–486.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Petrozziello, A. J. (2012). Haitian construction workers in the Dominican Republic: An exploratory study on indicators of forced labor. Observatorio Migrantes del Caribe. http://www.obmica.org/index.php/publicaciones/informes/24-haitian-construction-workers-in-the-dominican-republic-an-exploratory-study-on-indicators-of-forced-labor?tmpl=print.
Prendergast, P. W. (2012). Modernity, empowerment and grassroots communication in the English-speaking Caribbean. Caribbean Quarterly,58(2), 3–15.
Riaño, P. (Ed.). (1994). Women in grassroots communication: Furthering social change (Vol. 16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sagás, E. (2000). Race and politics in the Dominican Republic. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Stark, W. (1963). Fundamental forms of social thought. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Suiter, S. V. (2017). Community health needs assessment and action planning in seven Dominican bateyes. Evaluation and Program Planning,60, 103–111.
Van der Leun, J., & Bouter, H. (2015). Gimme shelter: Inclusion and exclusion of irregular immigrants in Dutch civil society. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies,13(2), 135–155.
Viterna, J., Clough, E., & Clarke, K. (2015). Reclaiming the ‘third sector’ from ‘civil society’. Sociology of Development,1(1), 173–207.
Wilson, C. E. (2012). Collaboration of nonprofit organizations with local government for immigrant language acquisition. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,42(5), 963–984.
Wooding, B. (2008). Contesting Dominican discrimination and statelessness. Peace Review,20(3), 366–375.
Wooding, B. (2009). Contesting discrimination and statelessness in the Dominican Republic. Forced Migration Review,1(32), 23–25.
Wooding, B. & Moseley-Williams, R. (2004). Needed but unwanted: Haitian immigrants and their descendants in the Dominican Republic. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations. http://www.obmica.org/index.php/publicaciones/libros/55-needed-but-unwanted-haitian-immigrants-and-their-descendants-in-the-dominican-republic.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants for their time and insights.
Funding
This study was funded by The University of Toledo’s College of Languages, Literature and Social Sciences, Summer Research Awards and Fellowship Program through the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, and Center for International Studies and Program’s Kohler International Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peralta, K.J., Vaitkus, E. Constructing Action: An Analysis of the Roles of Third Sector Actors During the Implementation of the Dominican Republic’s Regularization Plan. Voluntas 30, 1319–1331 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0003-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0003-1